References
- Bennett, I., & Danczak, A. (1994). Terminal care: Improving teamwork in primary care using Significant Event Analysis. European Journal of Cancer Care, 3, 54–57.
- Cunningham, W. (2001). Clinical governance in action. Clinical governance–theory into practice for the West Northumberland Primary Care Group. Journal of Clinical Governance, 9(2), 79–84.
- Department of Health (1990). NHS and Community Care Act. London: HMSO. Department of Health (1992). The Health of the Nation. London: HMSO.
- Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.
- Hudson, B. (2001). Interprofessionality and partnership: An obstacle to integrated care? An exploratory study of professional preferences. Nuffield Portfolio Programme Report No 15. Leeds: Nuffield Institute for Health.
- Leathard, A. (1994). Interprofessional developments in Britain: An overview. In Leathard, A. (1994) Going interprofessional. Working together for health and welfare. London: Routledge.
- Ovretveit, J. (1999). A team quality improvement sequence for complex problems. Quality in Health Care, 8, 239–246.
- Peck, E., & Norman, I. J. (1999). Working together in adult community mental health services: Exploring interprofessional role relations. Journal of Mental Health, 8(3), 231–242.
- Pringle, M., Bradley, C. P., Carmichael, C. M., Wallis, H., & Moore, A. (1995). Significant Event Auditing: A study of the feasibility and potential of case-based auditing in primary medical care. London: The Royal College of General Practitioners.
- Rees, G., Huby, G., & McClean, J. (2003). Promoting research-based development of Primary Care services: Negotiating the boundaries between research and development. In R. Rushmere, H. T. O. Davies & M. Tavakoli (Eds) Meeting the challenges: Reform in Primary Care. Chichester: Aeneas.
- Robinson, L., & Drinkwater, C. (2000). A significant case audit of a community based elderly resource team–an opportunity for multidisciplinary teams to introduce clinical governance? Journal of Clinical Governance, 8, 89–96.
- Robinson, L. A., Stacy, R., Spencer, J. A., & Bhopal, R. S. (1995). How to do it: Use facilitated case discussions for significant event auditing. British Medical Journal, 311, 315–318.
- Scottish Executive (2000). Report of the Joint Future Group.
- Stark, S., Stronach, I., & Warne, T. (2002). Teamwork in mental health: Rhetoric and reality. Journal of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing. 9(4), 411–418.
- Stead, J., Sweeney, G., & Wescott, R. (2003). A key tool for clinical governance. Clinical Governance Bulletin. Available at http://latis.ex.ac.uk/sigevent/articles/clingov.htm.
- Stevenson, K., Baker, R., Farooqi, A., & Sorrie, R. (2001). Features of Primary Health Care Teams associated with successful quality improvement of diabetes care: A qualitative study. Family Practice, 18(1), 21–26.
- Sweeney, G., Westcott, R., & Stead, J. (2000). The benefits of significant event audit in primary care: A case study. Journal of Clinical Governance, 8(3), 128–134.
- Twomey, P. (2002). Significant event review within the primary care trust clinical governance programme. Journal of Clinical Governance, 10(3), 151–153.
- Westcott, R., Sweeney, G., & Stead, J. (2000). Significant event audit in practice: A preliminary study. Family Practice, 17(2), 173–179.
- Wilkes, D., & Mills, K. (2001). Using the significant event audit model and patient interviews in assessing the quality of care. Journal of Clinical Governance, 9, 13–19.