Therapists' experiences and perceptions of teamwork in neurological rehabilitation: Critical happenings in effective and ineffective teamwork

References

• Armitage P. Joint working in primary health care. Nursing Times 1983; 79: 75–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barr H. New NHS, new collaboration, new agenda for education. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2000; 14: 81–86
   Google Scholar
• Barr O. Interdisciplinary teamwork: Consideration of the challenges. British Journal of Nursing 1997; 6: 1005–1010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boaden N., Leaviss J. Putting teamwork in context. Medical Education 2000; 34: 921–927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Bryman, Burgess, R. G., 1994. Analyzing qualitative data. London, Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Crouch S. Critical incident analysis. Nursing 27 June – 10 July, 1991; 4: 30–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis A., Davis S., Moss N., Marks J., Mcgrath J., Hovard L., Axon J., Wade D. First steps towards an interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 1992; 6: 237–244
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health Long-term Conditions NSF Team. The National service framework for long-term conditions. Department of Health, London 2005
   Google Scholar
• Diller L. Congress Presidential Address: Fostering the interdisciplinary team, fostering research in a society in transition. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation 1990; 71: 275–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiger S. M., Schmitt M. H. Collegiality in interdisciplinary health teams: Its measurement and its effects. Social Science and Medicine 1979; 13A: 217–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan J. C. The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin 1954; 51: 327–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeth D. Sustaining interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2001; 15: 37–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman M., Miller C., Ross N. The impact of individual philosophies of teamwork on multi-professional practice and the implications for education. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2000; 14: 237–247
   Google Scholar
• Gibbon B., Watkins C., Barer D., Waters K., Davies S., Lightbody L., Leathley M. Can staff attitudes to team working in stroke care be improved?. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2002; 40: 105–111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbon B. An investigation of inter-professional collaboration in stroke rehabilitation team conferences. Journal of Clinical Nursing 1999; 8: 246–252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzo R. Group decision making and effectiveness in organizations. Designing effective work groups, P. Goodman, Associates. Josey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 1986
   Google Scholar
• Indredavik B., Bakke F., Slørdahl S. A., Rokseth R., Håheim L. I. Treatment in a combined acute and rehabilitation Stroke Unit. Which aspects are most important?. Stroke May, 1999; 917–923
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guidelines for stroke2nd edn. Royal College of Physicians, London 2004
   Google Scholar
• McGrath J. R., Marks J. A., Davis A. M. Towards interdisciplinary rehabilitation: Further developments at Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre. Clinical Rehabilitation 1995; 9: 320–326
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux J. Interprofessional team-working: What makes teams work well?. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2001; 15: 29–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Multiple sclerosis. Management of multiple sclerosis in primary and secondary care. Clinical guideline 8. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Norman I. J., Redfern S. J., Tomalin D. A., Oliver S. Developing Flanagan's critical incident technique to elicit indicators of high and low quality nursing care from patients and their nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1992; 17: 590–600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opie A. Thinking teams thinking clients: Issues of discourse and representation in the work of health care teams. Sociology of Health and Illness 1997; 19: 259–280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry L. Critical incidents, crucial issues: Insights into the working lives of registered nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing 1997; 6: 131–132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pethybridge J. How team working influences discharge planning form hospital: A study of four multi-disciplinary teams in an acute hospital in England. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2004; 18: 29–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Playford E. D., Dawson L., Limbert V., Smith M., Ward C. D., Wells R. Goal setting in rehabilitation: Report of a workshop to explore professionals perceptions of goal setting. Clinical Rehabilitation 2000; 14: 491–496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P., Ebrahim S. Rhetoric and reality in stroke patient care. Social Science and Medicine 2000; 51: 1437–1446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P., Ebrahim S. Redefining doing something: Health professionals views on their role in the care of stroke patients. Physiotherapy Research International 1997; 2: 12–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rich A. Reflection and critical incident analysis: Ethical and moral implications of their use within nursing and midwifery education. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1995; 22: 1050–1057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimon D. Nurses perceptions of their psychological role in treating rehabilitation patients: A study employing the critical incident technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1979; 4: 403–413
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmitt M. H. Collaboration improves the quality of care: Methodological challenges and evidence from US health care research. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2001; 15: 47–66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schut H. A., Stam H. J. Goals in rehabilitation teamwork. Disability and Rehabilitation 1994; 16: 223–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead A., Leonard M. C. Changing to a client-focused quality service through more effective teamwork. Health Manpower Management 1995; 21: 23–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strasser D. C., Falconer J. A., Martino-Saltzmann D. The rehabilitation team: Staff perceptions of the hospital environment, the interdisciplinary team environment, and interprofessional relations. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation 1994; 75: 177–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Unit Triallists Collaboration. Collaborative systemic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (Stroke Unit) care after stroke. British Medical Journal 1997; 314: 1151–1159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suddick K. M., DeSouza L. H. Therapists' experiences and perceptions of team work in neurological rehabilitation. Reasoning behind the team approach, structure and composition of the team and team working processes. Physiotherapy Research International 2006; 11: 72–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wade D. T. Editorial. Evidence relating to goal planning in rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 1998; 12: 273–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Dauphinee S., Shapiro S., Bass E., Fletcher C., Georges P., Hensby V., Mendelsohn B. A randomised trial of team care following stroke. Stroke 1984; 15: 864–872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar