Interdisciplinary curriculum reform in the changing university

References

• Abbott, A. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., and P. Trowler. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. 2nd ed. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J. 2002. “The Sacred and the Profane in Recent Struggles to Promote Official Pedagogic Identitities.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 23 (4): 617–626. doi: 10.1080/0142569022000038468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 1971. Class, Codes and Control, Vol. 1. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 1975. “Class and Pedagogies: Visible and Invisible.” Educational Studies 1 (1): 23–41. doi: 10.1080/0305569750010105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. 1973. “The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas.” Journal of applied Psychology 57 (3): 195–203. doi: 10.1037/h0034701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, J. 2011. “Knowledge Matters: Interrogating the Curriculum Debate using the Sociology of Knowledge.” Journal of Education 51: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. R. 1986. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-national Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. E., P. A. Kirschner, and J. Sweller. 2012. “Putting Students on the Path to Learning: The Case for Fully Guided Instruction.” American Educator 36 (1): 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, M. C., and W. B. Dabars. 2014. “Towards Interdisciplinarity by Design in the American Research University.” In University Experiments in Inter-disciplinarity. Obstacles and Opportunities, edited by Peter Weingart, and Britta Padberg, 13–36. Blelefeld: Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M., M. Devlin, and M. Tight. eds. 2010. Interdisciplinary Higher Education: Perspectives and Practicalities. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, D., P. Dale, R. Hindmarsh, C. Fellows, M. Buckridge, and P. Cybinski. 2007. “Interdisciplinary Foundations: Reflecting on Interdisciplinarity and Three Decades of Teaching and Research at Griffith University, Australia.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (2): 167–185. doi: 10.1080/03075070701267228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frodeman, R. 2014. “The end of Disciplinarity.” In University Experiments in Inter-disciplinarity. Obstacles and Opportunities, edited by Peter Weingart, and Britta Padberg, 175–198. Blelefeld: Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., and V. Boix-Mansilla. 1994. “Teaching for Understanding-within and Across the Disciplines.” Educational Leadership 51: 14–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith University. 2011. “Griffith Graduate Attributes Interdisciplinary Perspective Toolkit.” Retrieved October 2, 2015, from https://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/290773/Interdisciplinary-perspective.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Holmwood, J. 2010. “Sociology's Misfortune: Disciplines, Interdisciplinarity and the Impact of Audit Culture.” The British Journal of Sociology 61 (4): 639–658. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01332.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Julie. 1990. Interdisciplinarity. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T., and W. G. Doty. 1994. Interdisciplinary Studies Today. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R., L. J. Voigt, and K. Q. Fath. 2004. “Does Interdisciplinarity Promote Learning? Theoretical Support and Researchable Questions.” The Review of Higher Education 28 (1): 23–48. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2004.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, V. 2016. “Comparing Discipline Based and Interdisciplinary Knowledge in University Education.” In Pedagogic Rights and Democratic Education: Bernsteinian Explorations of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment, edited by Philippe Vitale, and Beryl Exley, 146–160. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. 2000. “The (Re)Organisation of Knowledge and Assessment for a Learning Society: the constraints on interdisciplinarity.” Studies in Continuing Education 22(2): 183–199.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. 2011. “Making the Break: Disciplines and Interdisciplinarity.” In The Anthropology of Writing: Understanding Textually Mediated Worlds, edited by F. Christie, and K. Maton, 87–105. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J. 2016. “The Body of Knowledge.” In Pedagogic Rights and Democratic Education, edited by P. Vitale, and B. Exley, 75–86. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J., B. Davies, and A. Morais. eds. 2004. Reading Bernstein, Researching Bernstein. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, B., and S. Edwards. 2011. Good Practice Report: Curriculum Renewal. Canberra: ALTC.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, W. H. 1994. “Designing Interdisciplinary Courses.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 58: 35–51. doi: 10.1002/tl.37219945804
   Google Scholar
• Newell, W. 2010. “Undergraduate General Education.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity , edited by Robert Frodeman, Julie Thompson Klein, and Carl Mitcham, 360-371. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., and B. Lingard. 2010. Globalizing Education Policy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. 1978. “Principles of Categorization.” In Cognition and Categorization, edited by E. Rosch, and B. B. Lloyd, 27–48. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sa, C. M. 2008. “‘Interdisciplinary Strategies’ in US Research Universities.” Higher Education 55 (5): 537–552. doi: 10.1007/s10734-007-9073-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Melbourne. 2014. Learn more about Breadth. Retrieved September 28, 2015, from http://breadth.unimelb.edu.au.
   Google Scholar
• University of Tasmania. 2013. Breadth Units. Retrieved September 28, 2015, from http://www.utas.edu.au/students/breadth-units.
   Google Scholar
• University of Tasmania. 2015. Curriculum Principles for the University of Tasmania. Retrieved September 28, 2015, from http://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/567744/7825_A3_Curriculum-Principles1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P., and B. Padberg. eds. 2014. University Experiments in Inter-disciplinarity. Obstacles and Opportunities. Blelefeld: Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P., and N. Stehr. eds. 2000. Practising Interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, C. 2013. “Curriculum Design and Epistemic Ascent.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (1): 128–146. doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woelert, P., and V. Millar. 2013. “The Paradox of Interdisciplinarity in Australian Research Governance.” Higher Education 66 (6): 755–767. doi: 10.1007/s10734-013-9634-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. 2008. Bringing Knowledge Back in: From Social Constructivism to Social Realism in the Sociology of Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., and J. Muller. 2013. “On the Powers of Powerful Knowledge.” Review of Education 1 (3): 229–250. doi: 10.1002/rev3.3017
   Google Scholar