Can higher-proficiency L2 learners benefit from working with lower-proficiency partners in peer feedback?

References

• Allen, D., and A. Mills. (2016). “The Impact of Second Language Proficiency in Dyadic Peer Feedback.” Language Teaching Research 20: 498–513. doi: 10.1177/1362168814561902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcelos, A. M. F. 2000. “Understanding Teachers’ and Students’ Language Learning Beliefs in Experience: A Deweyan Approach.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of Education, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
   Google Scholar
• Barcelos, A. M. F. 2003. “Teachers’ and Students’ Beliefs within a Deweyan Framework: Conflict and Influence.” In Beliefs about SLA: New Research Approaches, edited by P. Kalaja and A. M. F. Barcelos, 171–199. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., D. Kember, and D. Leung. 2001. “The Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 133–149. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielen, S., E. Peeters, F. Dochy, P. Onghena, and K. Struyven. 2010. “Improving the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback for Learning.” Learning and Instructions 20: 304–315. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M. C. M. de, and O. S. Villamil. 2000. “Activating the ZPD: Mutual Scaffolding in L2 Peer Revision.” The Modern Language Journal 84: 51–68. doi: 10.1111/0026-7902.00052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G. W. 2005. “English Language Teaching in China: Policies, Progress, and Problems.” Language Policy 4: 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G. W., and S. T. E. Lam. 2010. “Issues of Cultural Appropriateness and Pedagogical Efficacy: Exploring Peer Review in a Second Language Writing Class.” Instructional Science 38: 371–394.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., and F. Hyland. (Eds.). 2006. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, L., and M. Cortazzi. 2006. “Changing Practices in Chinese Cultures of Learning.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 19: 5–20. doi: 10.1080/07908310608668751
   Google Scholar
• Kowal, M., and M. Swain. 1994. “Using Collaborative Language Production Tasks to Promote Students’ Language Awareness.” Language Awareness 3: 73–93. doi: 10.1080/09658416.1994.9959845
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P. 2005. “Sociocultural and Second Language Learning Research: An Exegesis.” In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, edited by E. Hinkel, 335–353. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., and S. L. Thorne. 2006. Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leeser, M. J. 2004. “Learner Proficiency and Focus on Form During Collaborative Dialogue.” Language Teaching Research 8: 55–81. doi: 10.1191/1362168804lr134oa
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., and J. Hansen. 2002. Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K., and W. Baker. 2009. “To Give is Better Than to Receive: The Benefits of Peer Review to the Reviewer’s Own Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 18: 30–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonça, C. O., and K. E. Johnson. 1994. “Peer Review Negotiations: Revision Activities in ESL Writing Instruction.” TESOL Quarterly 28: 745–769. doi: 10.2307/3587558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam. 1988. Case Study in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Min, H. T. 2005. “Training Students to Become Successful Peer Reviewers.” System 33: 293–308. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Min, H. T. 2006. “The Effects of Training Peer Review on EFL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15: 118–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, H. T. 2008. “Reviewer Stances and Writer Perceptions in EFL Peer Review Training.” English for Specific Purposes 27: 285–305. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2008.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, G. L., and J. G. Carson. 1998. “ESL Students’ Perceptions of Effectiveness in Peer Response Groups.” Journal of Second Language Writing 7: 113–131. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90010-8
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, G. L., and J. M. Murphy. 1992a. “An L2 Writing Group: Task and Social Dimensions.” Journal of Second Language Writing 1: 171–193. doi: 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90002-7
   Google Scholar
• Ohta, A. S. 2000. “Rethinking Interaction in SLA: Developmentally Appropriate Assistance in the Zone of Proximal Development and the Acquisition of L2 Grammar.” In Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, edited by J. P. Lantolf, 51–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, E. (1999). “ A qualitative study of peer and teacher response in an ESL writing classroom in Puerto Rico.” Doctoral diss.. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Rollinson, P. 2005. “Using Peer Feedback in the ESL Writing Class.” ELT Journal 59: 23–30. doi: 10.1093/elt/cci003
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. 2011. “Collaborative Writing in L2 Contexts: Processes, Outcomes, and Future Directions.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, M. 2008. “Japanese Learners’ Self-Revisions and Peer Revisions of Their Written Compositions in English.” TESOL Quarterly 42: 209–233. doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00116.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M., and S. Lapkin. 1998. “Interaction and Second Language Learning: Two Adolescent French Immersion Students Working Together.” The Modern Language Journal 82: 320–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B. M., and M. Ng. 2000. “Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit From Peer Comments?” Journal of Second Language Writing 9: 147–170. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9
   Google Scholar
• Villamil, O. S., and M. C. M. de Guerrero. 1996. “Peer Revision in the L2 Classroom: Social-Cognitive Activities, Mediating Strategies, and Aspects of Social Behavior.” Journal of Second Language Writing 5: 51–75. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90015-6
   Google Scholar
• Villamil, O. S., and M. C. M. de Guerrero. 1998. “Assessing the Impact of Peer Revision on L2 Writing.” Applied Linguistics 19: 491–514. doi: 10.1093/applin/19.4.491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villamil, O. S., and M. C. M. de Guerrero. 2006. “Sociocultural Theory: A Framework for Understanding Socio-Cognitive Dimensions of Peer Feedback.” In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, edited by K. Hyland, and F. Hyland, 23–41. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S. 2015. “What Factors Shape the Collaborative Pattern of Group Interaction During Peer Feedback in the L2 Writing Classroom?” Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 28: 618–640.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S., and I. Lee. 2014. “An Analysis of EFL Students’ use of First Language in Peer Feedback of L2 Writing.” System 47: 28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S., and I. Lee. 2015. “Understanding EFL Students’ Participation in Group Peer Feedback of L2 Writing: A Case Study from an Activity Theory Perspective.” Language Teaching Research 19: 572–593.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S., and I. Lee. 2016. “Understanding the Role of Learners with Low English Language Proficiency in Peer Feedback of Second Language Writing.” TESOL Quarterly 50: 483–494.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, H. 2010. “Investigating Learners’ Use and Understanding of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Writing: A Comparative Study in a Chinese English Writing Classroom.” Assessing Writing 15: 3–17. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, H. 2014. “Investigating Teacher-Supported Peer Assessment for EFL Writing.” ELT Journal 68: 155–168. doi: 10.1093/elt/cct068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, W., and D. Mitchell. 2012. “Participation in Peer Response as Activity: An Examination of Peer Response Stances From an Activity Theory Perspective.” TESOL Quarterly 46: 362–386. doi: 10.1002/tesq.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar