Written feedback in intercultural doctoral supervision: a case study

References

• Adcroft, Andy. 2011. “The Mythology of Feedback.” Higher Education Research & Development 30 (4): 405–419. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010.526096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljaafreh, Ali, and James P. Lantolf. 1994. “Negative Feedback as Regulation and Second Language Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development.” Modern Language Journal 78 (4): 465–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basturkmen, Helen, Martin East, and John Bitchener. 2014. “Supervisors’ on-Script Feedback Comments on Drafts of Dissertations: Socialising Students into the Academic Discourse Community.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (4): 432–445. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2012.752728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, John B. 2001. “Teaching Across Cultures.” In Student Motivation: The Culture and Context of Learning, edited by Farideh Salili, Chi Yue Chiu, and Ying Yi Hong, 293–308. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, John, Helen Basturkmen, and Martin East. 2010. “The Focus of Supervisor Written Feedback to Thesis/Dissertation Students.” International Journal of English Studies 10 (2): 79–97.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, David, and Elizabeth Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, David. 2006. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 219–233. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, David, Diane Salter, Min Yang, and Joy Lam. 2011. “Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (4): 395–407. doi: 10.1080/03075071003642449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanock, Kate. 2000. “Comments on Essays: Do Students Understand What Tutors Write?” Teaching in Higher Education 5 (1): 95–105. doi: 10.1080/135625100114984
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, Juliet M., and Anselm L. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• East, Martin, John Bitchener, and Helen Basturkmen. 2012. “What Constitutes Effective Feedback to Postgraduate Research Students? The Students’ Perspective.” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 9 (2): 7.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, Dana R. 1997. “The Influence of Teacher Commentary on Student Revision.” Tesol Quarterly 31 (2): 315–339. doi: 10.2307/3588049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, Dana R., Susan Pezone, Cathy R. Tade, and Sharee Tinti. 1997. “Teacher Commentary on Student Writing: Descriptions & Implications.” Journal of Second Language Writing 6 (2): 155–182. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90032-1
   Google Scholar
• Grant, Barbara. 2003. “Mapping the Pleasures and Risks of Supervision.” Discourse 24 (2): 175–190.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, John. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, John, and Helen Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, Richard, Peter Hartley, and Alan Skelton. 2001. “Getting the Message Across: The Problem of Communicating Assessment Feedback.” Teaching in Higher Education 6 (2): 269–274. doi: 10.1080/13562510120045230
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Funding Council for England. 2011. “The National Student Survey: Findings and Trends 2006–2010.” Accessed 3 March 2015. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2011/201111/.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, Janet. 2013. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. 4th ed. New York: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hounsell, Dai. 2007. “Towards More Sustainable Feedback to Students.” In Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term, edited by David Boud, and Nancy Falchikov, 101–113. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, Fiona, and Ken Hyland. 2001. “Sugaring the Pill: Praise and Criticism in Written Feedback.” Journal of Second Language Writing 10 (3): 185–212. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, Ken, and Fiona Hyland. 2006. “Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing.” Language Teaching 39 (2): 83–101. doi: 10.1017/S0261444806003399
   Google Scholar
• James, Richard, Kerri-Lee Krause, and Claire Jennings. 2010. The First Year Experience in Australian Universities: Findings from 1994 to 2009. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Accessed 20 February 2015. http://cshe.unimelb.edu.au/research/experience/docs/FYE_Report_1994_to_2009.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, Vijay, and Elke Stracke. 2007. “An Analysis of Written Feedback on a PhD Thesis.” Teaching in Higher Education 12 (4): 461–470. doi: 10.1080/13562510701415433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutch, Alistair. 2003. “Exploring the Practice of Feedback to Students.” Active Learning in Higher Education 4 (1): 24–38. doi: 10.1177/1469787403004001003
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, David. 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517. doi: 10.1080/02602931003786559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, David, and Debra Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, Margaret, Karen Handley, and Jill Millar. 2011. “Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (8): 879–896. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaprasad, Arkalgud. 1983. “On the Definition of Feedback.” Behavioral Science 28 (1): 4–13. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830280103
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Michael, and Hui Meng. 2013. “Democratising Western Research Using Non-Western Theories: Rancière and Mute Chinese Theoretical Tools.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (6): 907–920. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.607493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Craig, and Karen Burke da Silva. 2014. “An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Feedback to Students on Assessed Work.” Higher Education Research & Development 33 (4): 794–806. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2013.863840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Mirabelle. 2009. “An Investigation into Written Comments on Assignments: Do Students Find Them Usable?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (1): 67–78. doi: 10.1080/02602930801895752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, Gordon. 1999. “Using L1 to Master L2: A Response to Antón and DiCamilla’s ‘Socio-Cognitive Functions of L1 Collaborative Interaction in the L2 Classroom’.” The Modern Language Journal 83 (2): 248–254. doi: 10.1111/0026-7902.00019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X. 2006. “‘天地君亲师’源流考 [Headstream of the ‘Heaven—earth—sovereign—parent—teacher’].” Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Science) 2: 99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. 1999. “The New Scholarship in Teacher Education.” Educational Researcher 28 (9): 4–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X028009004
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, Barry J. 2001. “Theories of Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis.” In Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives, edited by Barry J. Zimmerman and Dale H. Schunk. 2nd ed., 1–37. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar