Assessment co-creation: an exploratory analysis of opportunities and challenges based on student and instructor perspectives

References

• Arthur, N. 2006. “Using Student-Generated Assessment Items to Enhance Teamwork, Feedback and the Learning Porcess.” Synergy: Supporting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at the University of Sydney 24: 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R. 2003. “Assessing Learning Outcomes: A Comparison of Multiple-Choice and Short-Answer Questions in a Marketing Context.” Journal of Marketing Education 25 (1): 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bible, Lynn, Mark G. Simkin, and William L. Kuechler. 2008. “Using Multiple-Choice Tests to Evaluate Students’ Understanding of Accounting.” Accounting Education 17 (sup1): S55–S68. doi:10.1080/09639280802009249.
   Google Scholar
• Bottomley, S., and P. Denny. 2011. “A Participatory Learning Approach to Biochemistry Using Student Authored and Evaluated Multiple-Choice Questions.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 39 (5): 352–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., A. Cook-Sather, and P. Felten. 2011. “Students as Co-Creators of Teaching Approaches, Course Design, and Curricula: Implications for Academic Developers.” International Journal for Academic Development 16 (2): 133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., A. Cook-Sather, P. Felten, L. Millard, and N. Moore-Cherry. 2016. “Addressing Potential Challenges in Co-Creating Learning and Teaching: Overcoming Resistance, Navigating Institutional Norms and Ensuring Inclusivity in Student–Staff Partnerships.” Higher Education 71 (2): 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, M. M., S. P. Bates, K. W. Galloway, R. K. Galloway, J. A. Hardy, A. E. Kay, P. Kirsop, and H. A. McQueen. 2014. “Scaffolding Student Engagement via Online Peer Learning.” European Journal of Physics 35 (4): 045002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C., and D. E. Brown. 2002. “Student-Generated Questions: A Meaningful Aspect of Learning in Science.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (5): 521–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S., K. Lindsay, C. McKenna, and S. New. 2004. “INQUIRE: A Case Study in Evaluating the Potential of Online MCQ Tests in a Discursive Subject.” ALT-J 12 (3): 249–260.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., C. Bovill, and P. Felten. 2014. Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Deeley, S. J. 2014. “Summative Co-Assessment: A Deep Learning Approach to Enhancing Employability Skills and Attributes.” Active Learning in Higher Education 15 (1): 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeley, S. J., and C. Bovill. 2017. “Staff Student Partnership in Assessment: Enhancing Assessment Literacy Through Democratic Practices.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (3): 463–477. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., J. Wilson, and S. Ennis. 2012. “Multiple-Choice Question Tests: A Convenient, Flexible and Effective Learning Tool? A Case Study.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49 (2): 111–121. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.677596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper, S. W. 2009. “Catalytic Assessment: Understanding How MCQs and EVS can Foster Deep Learning.” British Journal of Educational Technology 40 (2): 285–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elton, L., and B. Johnston. 2002. “Setting the Scene”, Assessment in Universities: A Critical Review of Research. London: Generic Centre Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN).
   Google Scholar
• Fellenz, M. R. 2004. “Using Assessment to Support Higher Level Learning: The Multiple Choice Item Development Assignment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (6): 703–719.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, K. W., and S. Burns. 2015. “Doing it for Themselves: Students Creating a High Quality Peer-Learning Environment.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 16: 82–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbank, Paul. 2003. “Collaboration in the Assessment Process: An Initial Evaluation of Collaboration on an Undergraduate Business and Management Course.” Teaching in Higher Education 8 (3): 317–331. doi:10.1080/13562510309395.
   Google Scholar
• Gurney, B. 1989. “Constructivism and Professional Development: A Stereoscopic View.” http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED305259.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, J. A., S. P. Bates, M. M. Casey, K. W. Galloway, R. K. Galloway, A. E. Kay, P. Kirsop, and H. A. McQueen. 2014. “Student-Generated Content: Enhancing Learning Through Sharing Multiple-Choice Questions.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (13): 2180–2194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, D., and J. Wells. 2013. “An Inquiry into the Effectiveness of Student Generated MCQs as a Method of Assessment to Improve Teaching and Learning.” Creative Education 4 (7A2): 117–125.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, David H. 1994. “Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist Design Model.” Educational Technology 34 (4): 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2007. “E-Assessment by Design: Using Multiple-Choice Tests to Good Effect.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 31 (1): 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B. 2004. “Qualitative Data Analysis: Exposing a Process for Transforming a ‘Messy’ but ‘Attractive’ Nuisance.” In A Real Life Guide to Accounting Research: A Behind the Scenes View of Using Qualitative Research Methods, edited by C. Humphrey, and B. Lee, 389–405. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, E., and P. Devitt. 2006. “Constructing Multiple Choice Questions as a Method for Learning.” Annal-Academy of Medicine Singapore 35 (9): 604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purchase, H., J. Hamer, P. Denny, and A. Luxton-Reilly. 2010. “The Quality of a PeerWise MCQ Repository.” Paper presented at the twelfth australasian conference on computing education.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., C. Meister, and S. Chapman. 1996. “Teaching Students to Generate Questions: A Review of the Intervention Studies.” Review of Educational Research 66 (2): 181–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefani, L. A. J. 1998. “Assessment in Partnership with Learners.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 23 (4): 339–350.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, F. Y., and Y. H. Liu. 2008. “The Comparative Effects of Student Question-Posing and Question-Answering Strategies on Promoting Students’ Academic Achievement, Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies Use.” Journal of Education and Psychology 31 (3): 25–52.
   Google Scholar