References
- Bernstein, Basil. 2003. Class, Codes and Control: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. (Vol. 4). London: Psychology Press.
- Brooke, Mark. 2013. “Which Research Paradigm for TESOL?” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3 (3): 430–437. doi: https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.3.430-436
- Brooke, Mark. 2017. “Using ‘Semantic Waves’ to Guide Students Through the Research Process: From Adopting a Stance to Sound Cohesive Academic Writing.” Asian Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 7 (1): 37–66.
- Cenoz, Jasone, Fred Genesee, and Durk Gorter. 2014. “Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” Applied Linguistics 35 (3): 243–262. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011
- Clarence, Sherran. 2016. “Exploring the Nature of Disciplinary Teaching and Learning Using Legitimation Code Theory Semantics.” Teaching in Higher Education 21 (2): 123–137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1115972
- Coyle, Do. 2008. “CLIL: A Pedagogical Approach from the European Perspective.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, edited by N. H. Hornberger, 2nd ed., Vol. 4, 97–112. Berlin: Springer.
- Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
- Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2008. “Outcomes and Processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Current Research From Europe.” In Future Perspectives for English Language Teaching, edited by W. Delanoy and L. Volkmann, 139–157. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
- Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2011. “Content-and-language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles?” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 182–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092
- Fortune, Tara Williams, and Diane J. Tedick. 2008. “One-way, Two-way and Indigenous Immersion: A Call for Cross-fertilization.” Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 66: 3–21.
- Genesee, Fred, and Kathryn Lindholm-Leary. 2013. “Two Case Studies of Content-based Language Education.” Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language Education 1 (1): 3–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.1.02gen
- Howard, Sarah, Karl A. Maton. 2011. “Theorising Knowledge Practices: A Missing Piece of the Educational Technology Puzzle.” Research in Learning Technology 19 (3): 191–206. doi: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19i3.17109
- Hüttner, Julia, Christiane Dalton-Puffer, and Ute Smit. 2013. “The Power of Beliefs: Lay Theories and Their Influence on the Implementation of CLIL Programmes.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16 (3): 267–284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777385
- Lasagabaster, David, and Juan Manuel Sierra. 2009. “Immersion and CLIL in English: More Differences than Similarities.” ELT Journal 64 (4): 367–375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp082
- Lincoln, Yvonna S., Susan A. Lynham, and Egon G. Guba. 2011. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences, Revisited.” The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research 4: 97–128.
- Llinares, Ana, Tom Morton, and Rachel Whittaker. 2012. The Roles of Language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Loewenberg Ball, Deborah, Mark Hoover Thames, and Geoffrey Phelps. 2008. “Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes it Special?” Journal of Teacher Education 59 (5): 389–407. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
- Lyster, Roy. 1987. “Speaking Immersion.” Canadian Modern Language Review 43 (4): 697–713. doi: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.43.4.697
- Martin, J. R. 2017. “Revisiting Field: Specialized Knowledge in Secondary School Science and Humanities Discourse.” Onomázein 111–148. http://onomazein.letras.uc.cl/04_NumeroDescarga/NSFL/DescargaSFL_5.html doi: https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.sfl.05
- Maton, K. 2011. “Theories and Things: The Semantics of Disciplinarity.” In Disciplinarity: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives, edited by F. Christie and K. Maton, 62–84. London: Continuum.
- Maton, Karl. 2014. “Building Powerful Knowledge: The Significance of Semantic Waves.” In Knowledge and the Future of the Curriculum, 181–197. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Maton, Karl, and Y. J. Doran. 2017. “Semantic Density: A Translation Device for Revealing Complexity of Knowledge Practices in Discourse, Part 1 – Wording.” Onomázein 46–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.sfl.03.
- Morton, Tom. 2018. “Reconceptualizing and Describing Teachers’ Knowledge of Language for Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21 (3): 275–286. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352
- Rose, D., and J. R. Martin. 2005. “Designing Literacy Pedagogy: Scaffolding Democracy in the Classroom.” In Continuing Discourse On Language: A Functional Perspective, edited by R. Hasan, R. C. Matthlessen, and J. Webster, Vol. 1, 251–280. London: Equinox.
- Saldaña, Johnny. 2015. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.
- Shulman, Lee. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
- Swain, Merrill. 1993. “The Output Hypothesis: Just Speaking and Writing aren’t Enough.” Canadian Modern Language Review 50 (1): 158–164. doi: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.50.1.158
- Walliman, Nicholas. 2011. Your Research Project: Designing and Planning Your Work. London: Sage.