Transgressing the boundaries of ‘students as partners’ and ‘feedback’ discourse communities to advance democratic education

References

• Ahmadi, R., and M. Hasani. 2018. “Capturing Student Voice on TEFL Syllabus Design: Agenticity of Pedagogical Dialogue Negotiation.” Cogent Education 5 (1): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajjawi, R., and D. Boud. 2017. “Researching Feedback Dialogue: An Interactional Analysis Approach.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2): 252–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajjawi, R., and D. Boud. 2018. “Examining the Nature and Effects of Feedback Dialogue.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (7): 1106–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahou, L. 2011. “Rethinking the Challenges and Possibilities of Student Voice and Agency.” Educate 1 (1): 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, J. 2010. “Integrating Student Voice: Assessment for Empowerment.” Practitioner Research in Higher Education 4 (1): 14–29.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. 2007. A Will to Learn: Being a Student in an age of Uncertainty. Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baroutsis, A., G. McGregor, and M. Mills. 2016. “Pedagogic Voice: Student Voice in Teaching and Engagement Pedagogies.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 24 (1): 123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 1971. “On the Classification and Framing of Educational Knowledge.” In Knowledge and Control: New Directions for the Sociology of Education, edited by M. F. D. Young, 47–69. London: Collier-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and L. Campbell. 2010. “Generating Dialogue in Assessment Feedback: Exploring the use of Interactive Cover Sheets.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and N. Falchikov. 2006. “Aligning Assessment with Long-Term Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31: 399–413.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C. 2019. “A co-Creation of Learning and Teaching Typology: What Kind of co-Creation are you Planning or Doing?” International Journal for Students as Partners 3 (2): 91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C. 2020. Co-creating Learning and Teaching: Towards Relational Pedagogy in Higher Education. London: Critical Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., A. Cook-Sather, and P. Felten. 2011. “Students as co-Creators of Teaching Approaches, Course Design, and Curricula: Implications for Academic Developers.” International Journal for Academic Development 16 (2): 133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., A. Cook-Sather, P. Felten, L. Millard, and N. Moore-Cherry. 2016. “Addressing Potential Challenges in Co-creating Learning and Teaching: Overcoming Resistance, Navigating Institutional Norms and Ensuring Inclusivity in Student-Staff Partnerships.” Higher Education 71 (2): 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., and C. Woolmer. 2018. “How Conceptualisations of Curriculum in Higher Education Influence Student-Staff co-Creation in and of the Curriculum.” Higher Education 78 (3): 407–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burbules, N. C. 2000. “The Limits of Dialogue as a Critical Pedagogy.” In Revolutionary Pedagogies: Cultural Politics, Instituting Education, and the Discourse of Theory, edited by Peter Pericles Trifonas, 251–273. https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=yRPo7_4PeqgC&oi=fnd&pg=PA251&dq=Burbules,+N.+C.+(2000).+The+limits+of+dialogue+as+a+critical+pedagogy.+Revolutionary+pedagogies:+Cultural+politics,+education,+and+the+discourse+of+theory,+251-273.&ots=J1CRFEnEXC&sig=-TZCQX-2YF8XbeKtJIM133jZc0U#v=onepage&q&f=fals
   Google Scholar
• Byrom, T., P. Thomson, and P. Gates. 2007. “‘My School has Been Quite Pushy About the Oxbridge Thing’: Voice and Choice of Higher Education.” Improving Schools 10 (1): 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2013. “Trust and its Role in Facilitating Dialogic Feedback.” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education, edited by D. Boud, and E. Molloy, 90–103. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2020. “Longitudinal Perspectives on Students’ Experiences of Feedback: A Need for Teacher–Student Partnerships.” Higher Education Research and Development 39 (3): 425–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., and D. Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. 2006. “Sound, Presence, and Power: “Student Voice” in Educational Research and Reform.” Curriculum Inquiry 36 (4): 359–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. 2010. “Students as Learners and Teachers: Taking Responsibility, Transforming Education, and Redefining Accountability.” Curriculum Inquiry 40 (4): 555–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., C. Bovill, and P. Felten. 2014. Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., and A. Luz. 2015. “Greater Engagement in and Responsibility for Learning: What Happens When Students Cross the Threshold of Student–Faculty Partnership.” Higher Education Research & Development 34 (6): 1097–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., K. E. Matthews, A. Ntem, and S. Leathwick. 2018. “What We Talk About When we Talk About Students as Partners.” International Journal for Students as Partners 2 (2): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Curzon-Hobson, A. 2002. “A Pedagogy of Trust in Higher Learning.” Teaching in Higher Education 7 (3): 265–276.
   Google Scholar
• Daenekindt, S., and J. Huisman. 2020. “Mapping the Scattered Field of Research on Higher Education. A Correlated Topic Model of 17,000 Articles, 1991–2018.” Higher Education 80: 571–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeley, S. J., and C. Bovill. 2017. “Staff Student Partnership in Assessment: Enhancing Assessment Literacy Through Democratic Practices.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (3): 463–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., A. E. A. Chapman-Chin, D. LaPointe-McEwan, and D. A. Klinger. 2018. “Student Perspectives on Assessment for Learning.” The Curriculum Journal 29 (1): 77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, E., and R. Zandstra. 2011. Students as Change Agents – New Ways of Engaging with Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Bristol: A joint University of Exeter/ESCalate/Higher Education Academy Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, A. 2018. “Toward the Formation of Genuine Partnership Spaces.” International Journal for Students as Partners 2 (1): 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. A., and P. Goodyear. 2019. The Education Ecology of Universities: Integrating Learning, Strategy and the Academy. Sydney: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esterhazy, R., and C. Damşa. 2019. “Unpacking the Feedback Process: An Analysis of Undergraduate Students’ Interactional Meaning-Making of Feedback Comments.” Studies in Higher Education 44 (2): 260–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1972. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. 2011. On Critical Pedagogy. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gravett, K., I. Kinchin, N. Winstone, K. Balloo, M. Heron, A. Hosein, S. Lygo-Baker, and E. Medland. 2019. “The Development of Academics’ Feedback Literacy: Experiences of Learning from Critical Feedback via Scholarly Peer Review.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (5): 651–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, M., A. Flint, and K. Harrington. 2014. Engagement Through Partnership: Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. York: HEA.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, and E. Molloy. 2019. “Identifying Feedback That has Impact.” In The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education: Improving Assessment Outcomes for Learners, edited by M. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, and E. Molloy, 15–34. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. 1994. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Khatib, M., and M. Miri. 2016. “Cultivating Multivocality in Language Classrooms: Contribution of Critical Pedagogy-Informed Teacher Education.” Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 13 (2): 98–131.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, N. F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. 2012. “The Higher Education Research Archipelago.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (1): 129–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, E. 2018. “Embracing and/or Avoiding the Risks of Partnership: A Faculty Perspective.” Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education 1 (24): 9.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E. 2017. “Five Propositions for Genuine Students as Partners Practice.” International Journal for Students as Partners 1 (2): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E., A. Cook-Sather, A. Acai, S. L. Dvorakova, P. Felten, E. Marquis, and L. Mercer-Mapstone. 2019. “Toward Theories of Partnership Praxis: an Analysis of Interpretive Framing in Literature on Students as Partners in Teaching and Learning.” Higher Education Research & Development 38 (2): 280–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E., A. Cook-Sather, and M. Healey. 2018. “Connecting Learning, Teaching, and Research Through Student–Staff Partnerships: Toward Universities as Egalitarian Learning Communities.” In Shaping Higher Education with Students: Ways to Connect Research and Teaching, edited by Vincent C. H. Tong, Alex Standen, and Mina Sotiriou, 23–29. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E., A. Dwyer, L. Hine, and J. Turner. 2018. “Conceptions of Students as Partners.” Higher Education 76 (6): 957–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., S. L. Dvorakova, K. E. Matthews, S. Abbot, B. Cheng, P. Felten, K. Knorr, E. Marquis, R. Shammas, and K. Swaim. 2017. “A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education.” International Journal for Students as Partners 1 (1): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, E., and M. Bearman. 2019. “Embracing the Tension Between Vulnerability and Credibility: ‘Intellectual Candour’ in Health Professions Education.” Medical Education 53 (1): 32–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsen, S., S. Cook, and L. Hannant. 2017. “Students as Partners in Negotiated Assessment in a Teacher Education Course.” Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education 1 (21): 2.
   Google Scholar
• Neill, A. S. 1970. Summerhill: for & Against. New York: Hart Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. 2015. “Opening up to Student Voice: Supporting Teacher Learning Through Collaborative Action Research.” Learning Landscapes 8 (2): 285–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2020. “The Power of Internal Feedback: Exploiting Natural Comparison Processes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–23. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., D. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J. J. 1817. Emile (Vol. 2). A. Belin.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2010. “Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 535–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shady, S., and M. Larson. 2010. “Tolerance, Empathy or Inclusion? Insights from Martin Buber.” Educational Theory 60 (1): 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Sheth, J. N., and W. H. Stellner. 1979. “Psychology of Innovation Resistance: The Less Developed Concept (LDC) in Diffusion Research.” Faculty working papers, College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Steen-Utheim, A., and A. Wittek. 2017. “Dialogic Feedback and the Potentialities for Student Learning.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 15: 18–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telio, S., R. Ajjawi, and G. Regehr. 2015. “The ‘Educational Alliance’ as a Framework for Reconceptualizing Feedback in Medical Education.” Academic Medicine 90 (5): 609–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tight, M. 2014. “Working in Separate Silos? What Citation Patterns Reveal About Higher Education Research Internationally.” Higher Education 68 (3): 379–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 2018. “Student Partnership, Trust and Authority in Universities.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (2): 163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., and D. Boud. 2020. “The Need to Disentangle Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education, 1–12. doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., and D. Carless. 2019. Designing Effective Feedback Processes in Higher Education: A Learning-Focused Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., E. Pitt, and R. Nash. 2020. “Educators' Perceptions of Responsibility-Sharing in Feedback Processes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., E. Pitt, and R. Nash. 2021. “Educators’ Perceptions of Responsibility-Sharing in Feedback Processes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (1): 118–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., and D. Carless. 2013. “The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (3): 285–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar