Our international SoTL journey: brokering across academic hierarchies and boundaries

References

• Barnett, R. 2011. “The Coming of the Ecological University” Oxford Review of Education 37 (4): 439–455. http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/03054985.2011.595550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T. 1989. “Historians on History.” Studies in Higher Education 14 (3): 263–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, D., L. Roberts, S. Ananthram, and M. Broughton. 2018. “What is Required to Develop Career Pathways for Teaching Academics?” Higher Education 75 (2): 271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, D., and G. Poole. 2020. Origin of the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. ISSOTL. https://issotl.com/2020/06/19/origin-of-the-international-society-for-the-scholarship-of-teaching-and-learning/.
   Google Scholar
• Billot, J., S. Rowland, B. Carnell, C. Amundsen, and T. Evans. 2017. “How Experienced SoTL Researchers Develop the Credibility of Their Work.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal 5 (1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, S., and L. C. Woollacott. 2018. “On the Constitution of SoTL: Its Domains and Contexts.” Higher Education 75: 537–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Lawrenceville, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A. 2008. “Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Affiliations of Experienced Researchers.” Higher Education 56 (4): 423–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. 2013. “Scholarly Personal Narratives as a New Direction for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Teaching Theology & Religion 16 (2): 127–128.
   Google Scholar
• Chng, H. H., B. Liebowitz, and K. Mårtensson. 2020. “Leading Change from Different Shores: The Challenges of Contextualizing the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 8 (1): 24–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, M. A. 2012. “SoTL as Generative Heuristic Methodology for Building Learning Communities.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6 (2): 4.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, S., J. P. L. Tan, and E. McWilliam. 2011. “Measuring Creative Potential: Using Social Network Analysis to Monitor a Learners’ Creative Capacity.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 27: 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanghanel, J., and P. Trowler. 2008. “Exploring Academic Identities and Practices in a Competitive Enhancement Context: A UK-Based Case Study.” European Journal of Education 43 (3): 301–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felten, P. 2013. “Principles of Good Practice in SoTL.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal 1 (1): 121–125.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane. 2006. “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1): 80–92.
   Google Scholar
• Geertsema, J. 2016. “Academic Development, SoTL, and Educational Research.” International Journal for Academic Development 21 (2): 122–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassick, C. E., M. T. Huber, and G. I. Maeroff. 1997. Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. Special Report. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Inc., Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gurung, R. A. 2014. “Getting Foxy: Invoking Different Magesteria in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal 2 (2): 109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, S. T., and P. B. Lester. 2009. “A Multilevel Approach to Building and Leading Learning Organizations.” The Leadership Quarterly 20 (1): 34–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubball, H., and A. Clarke. 2010. “Diverse Methodological Approaches and Considerations for SoTL in Higher Education.” The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 1: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hubball, H. T., M. Pearson, and A. Clarke. 2013. “SoTL Inquiry in Broader Curricula and Institutional Contexts: Theoretical Underpinnings and Emerging Trends.” International Journal for Inquiry in Teaching and Learning 1 (1): 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M. T., and S. P. Morreale. 2002. Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Exploring Common Ground, 1–24. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education and The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, P., M. T. Huber, and A. Ciccone. 2011. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Reconsidered: Institutional Integration and Impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, N., S. Nesbit, and C. Oliver. 2012. “A Difficult Journey: Transitioning from STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) to SoTL.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning 6: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Kensington-Miller, B., J. Renc-Roe, and S. Morón-García. 2015. “The Chameleon on a Tartan Rug: Adaptations of Three Academic Developers’ Professional Identities.” International Journal for Academic Development 20 (3): 279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kensington-Miller, B., A. S. Webb, A. Gansemer-Topf, H. Lewis, J. Luu, G. Maheux-Pelletier, and A. Hofmann. 2021. “Brokering Boundary Crossings Through the SoTL Landscape of Practice.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 9 (1): 365–379. doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. 2003. “The Scholarship of Teaching: A Comparison of Conceptions Held by Experts and Regular Academic Staff.” Higher Education 46 (1): 93–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubiak, C., M. Fenton-O’Creevy, K. Appleby, M. Kempster, M. Reed, C. Solvason, and M. Thorpe. 2015. “Brokering Boundary Encounters.” In Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, Identity, and Knowledgeability in Practice-Based Learning, edited by E. Wenger-Trayner, M. Fenton-O’Creevy, S. Hutchinson, C. Kubiak, and B. Wenger-Trayner, 81–96. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leibowitz, B., and V. Bozalek. 2018. “Towards a Slow Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South.” Teaching in Higher Education 23 (8): 981–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Major, C. H., and B. Palmer. 2006. “Reshaping Teaching and Learning: The Transformation of Faculty Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Higher Education 51 (4): 619–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mårtensson, K. 2014. Influencing Teaching and Learning Microcultures. Academic Development in a Research-Intensive University. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Mårtensson, K., T. Roxå, and T. Olsson. 2011. “Developing a Quality Culture Through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Higher Education Research & Development 30 (1): 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieson, S. 2019. “Integrating Research, Teaching and Practice in the Context of new Institutional Policies: A Social Practice Approach.” Higher Education 78 (5): 799–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney, K. 2013. “Introduction to SoTL in and Across Disciplines.” In The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in and Across the Disciplines, edited by K. McKinney, 1–11. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller-Young, J. E., M. Yeo, and K. Manarin. 2018. “Challenges to Disciplinary Knowing and Identity: Experiences of Scholars in a SoTL Development Program.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 12 (1): Article 3.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, R. J. 2015. “Chapter Four: Scholarly Personal Narrative as a way to Connect the Academy to the World.” Counterpoints 463: 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, L., and M. Carney. 2017. “Scholarly Personal Narrative in the SoTL Tent.” Teaching and Learning Inquiry 5 (1): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C., S. Nesbit, and N. Kelly. 2013. “Dissolving Dualisms: How two Positivists Engaged with non-Positivist Qualitative Methodology.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 12 (1): 180–194.
   Google Scholar
• Roxå, T., and K. Mårtensson. 2009. “Significant Conversations and Significant Networks – Exploring the Backstage of the Teaching Arena.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (5): 547–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, N. 2016. “Synthesizing SoTL Institutional Initiatives Toward National Impact.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 146: 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, N., E. Abrahamson, J. Deshler, B. Kensington-Miller, K. Manarin, S. Morón-García, C. Oliver, and J. Renc-Roe. 2013. “Conflicts and Configurations in a Liminal Space: SoTL Scholars’ Identity Development.” Teaching and Learning Inquiry 1 (2): 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Svinicki, M. 2012. “Who is Entitled to do SoTL?” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6 (2): Article 2.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, J. A., and D. E. Ellis. 2016. “Reconceptualizing the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at the University of Waterloo: An Account of Influences and Impact.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 146: 71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, S. 2010. “Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10): 837–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautwein, C. 2018. “Academics’ Identity Development as Teachers.” Teaching in Higher Education 23 (8): 995–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. 1997. Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. London, ON: Althouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verwoord, R., and G. Poole. 2016. “The Role of Small Significant Networks and Leadership in the Institutional Embedding of SoTL.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 146: 79–86.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, A. S. 2020. “Riding the Fourth Wave: An Introduction to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” In Evidence-Based Faculty Development Through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), edited by R. C. Plews, and M. L. Amos, 1–19. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger-Trayner, E., and B. Wenger-Trayner. 2015. “Learning in Landscapes of Practice.” In Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, Identity, and Knowledgeability in Practice-Based Learning, edited by E. Wenger-Trayner, M. Fenton-O’Creevy, S. Hutchinson, C. Kubiak, and B. Wenger-Trayner, 13–30. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. “Communities of Practice: Learning as a Social System.” Systems Thinker 9 (5): 2–3.
   Google Scholar