1,633
Views
42
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

On resistance in the post-political city: conduct and counter-conduct in Vancouver

Pages 70-84 | Received 01 Jun 2012, Accepted 01 Oct 2013, Published online: 21 Feb 2014

References

  • Barnett, C. (2005). The consolations of ‘neoliberalism'. Geoforum, 36, 7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.08.006
  • Barnett, C., Clarke, N., Cloke, P., & Malpass, A. (2008). The elusive subject of neo-liberalism – beyond the analytics of governmentality. Cultural Studies, 22(5), 624–653. doi: 10.1080/09502380802245902
  • Blakeley, G. (2010). Governing ourselves: Citizen participation and governance in Barcelona and Manchester. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(1), 130–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00953.x
  • Blomley, N., & Sommers, J. (1999). Mapping urban space: Governmentality and cartographic struggles in inner city Vancouver. In R. Smandych (Ed.), Governable places: Readings on governmentality and crime control (pp. 261–286). Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.
  • Cadman, L. (2010). How (not) to be governed: Foucault, critique, and the political. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(3), 539–556. doi: 10.1068/d4509
  • Cho, E. (2007). Do political parties matter at the local level? The role of local political parties on rezoning decisions in Vancouver (1999–2005). Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Simon Fraser University.
  • City of Vancouver. (1995) CityPlan – Directions for Vancouver. Vancouver: CityPlan Office, Planning Department.
  • City of Vancouver. (2002) CityPlan community visions terms of reference. Retrieved September 25, 2012, from: http://former.vancouver.ca/COMMSVCS/PLANNING/CITYPLAN/termsre.htm
  • City of Vancouver. (2007) Special Council Meeting Minutes. 13, 15 and 27 November, 2007.
  • Cooper, D. (2006) Active citizenship and the governmentality of local lesbian and gay politics. Political Geography, 25, 921–943. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.08.009
  • Crampton, J., & Elden, S. (Eds.). (2007). Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography. Ashgate: Aldershot.
  • Curtis, B. (1995). Taking the state back out: Rose and Miller on political power. The British Journal of Sociology, 46(4), 575–589. doi: 10.2307/591572
  • Davidson, A. I. (2011). In praise of counter-conduct. History of the Human Sciences, 24(4), 25–41. doi: 10.1177/0952695111411625
  • Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality. London: Sage.
  • Death, C. (2010). Counter-conducts: A Foucauldian analytics of protest, social movement studies. Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest, 9(3), 235–251.
  • Dikeç, M. (2007). Space, governmentality, and the geographies of French urban policy. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(4), 277–289. doi: 10.1177/0969776407081162
  • Flint, J. (2003). Housing and ethopolitics: Constructing identities of active consumption and responsible community. Economy & Society, 32(4), 611–629. doi: 10.1080/0308514032000107628
  • Flyvbjerg, B., & Richardson, T. (2002). Planning and Foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures. New directions for planning theory (pp. 44–62). London: Routledge.
  • Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus, & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault. Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Foucault, M. (1984). The care of the self. The history of sexuality, volume 3. London: Penguin Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1976/1998). The will to knowledge: The history of sexuality, Volume 1. London: Penguin.
  • Foucault, M. (1978/2007). What is critique? In S. Lotringer & L. Hochroch (Eds.), The politics of truth: Michel Foucault (pp. 41–81, 2nd ed). Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Foucault, M. (1978/2007). Security, territory, population. Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Foucault, M. (1979/2008). The birth of biopolitics. Lectures at the College de France 197879. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Füller, H., & Marquardt, N. (2009). Gouvernementalität in der humangeographischen Diskursforschung. In G. Glasze & A. Mattissek (Eds.), Handbuch Diskurs und Raum (pp. 83–106). Bielefeld: Transcript.
  • Füller, H., & Marquardt, N. (2010). Die Sicherstellung von Urbanität. Innerstädtische Restrukturierung und soziale Kontrolle in Downtown Los Angeles. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
  • Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality (pp. 1–51). Harvester Wheatsheaf: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hahn, B. (2000). Power centres: A new retail format in the United States of America. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 7(4), 223–231. doi: 10.1016/S0969-6989(00)00015-1
  • Hernandez, T., & Simmons, J. I. M. (2006). Evolving retail landscapes: Power retail in Canada. Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien, 50(4), 465–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2006.00158.x
  • Hobson, K. (2009). On a governmentality analytics of the ‘Deliberative Turn': Material conditions, rationalities and the deliberating subject. Space and Polity, 13(3), 175–191. doi: 10.1080/13562570903454283
  • Huxley, M. (2000). The limits to communicative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(4), 369–377. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0001900406
  • Huxley, M. (2002). Governmentality, gender, planning. A Foucauldian perspective. In P. Allmendinger, & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures. New directions for planning theory (pp. 136–153). London: Routledge.
  • Huxley, M. (2008). Space and government: Governmentality and geography. Geography Compass, 2(5), 1635–1658. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00133.x
  • Huxley, M., & Yiftachel, O. (2000). New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(4), 333–342. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0001900402
  • Imrie, R. & Raco, M. (Eds.), (2003). Urban renaissance? New labour, community and urban policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Larner, W. (2000). Neo-liberalism: Policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in Political Economy, 63(Autumn), 5–25.
  • Leitner, H., Peck, J., & Sheppard, E. (Eds.), (2007) Contesting neoliberalism. Urban frontiers. New York: Guildford Press.
  • Lemke, T. (1997). Eine Kritik der politischen Vernunft – Foucaults Analyse der modernen Gouvernementalität. Hamburg: Argument Verlag.
  • Lemke, T. (2000). Neoliberalismus, Staat und Selbsttechnologien. Ein kritischer Überblick über die governmentality studies. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 41(1), 31–47. doi: 10.1007/s11615-000-0003-8
  • Lemke, T. (2002). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Rethinking Marxism, 14(3), 49–64. doi: 10.1080/089356902101242288
  • Lemke, T. (2005). Nachwort. Geschichte und Erfahrung. Michel Foucault und die Spuren der Macht. In D. Defert & F. Ewald (Eds.), Michel Foucault. Analytik der Macht (pp. 317–347). Frankfurt / M.: Suhrkamp.
  • MacKinnon, D. (2000). Managerialism, governmentality and the state: A neo-Foucauldian approach to local economic governance. Political Geography, 19(3), 293–314. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00086-4
  • MacLeod, G. (2011). Urban politics reconsidered: Growth machine to post-democratic city? Urban Studies, 48(12), 2629–2660. doi: 10.1177/0042098011415715
  • Mayer, M. (2007). Contesting the neoliberalization of urban governance. In H. Leitner, J. Peck, & E. S. Sheppard (Eds.), Contesting neoliberalism. Urban Frontiers (pp. 90–115). New York: Guilford.
  • Mayer, M., & Boudreau, J.-A. (2012). Social movements in urban politics: Trends in research and practice. In K. Mossberger, S. Clarke & P. John (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on urban politics (pp. 208–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mayer, M., & Künkel, J. (2012). Introduction: Neoliberal urbanism and its contestations – Crossing theoretical boundaries. In J. Künkel & M. Mayer (Eds.), Neoliberal urbanism and its contestations – Crossing theoretical boundaries (pp. 3–26). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • McKee, K. (2008). Transforming Scotland's public-sector housing through community ownership: The reterritorialisation of housing governance? Space and Polity, 12(2), 183–196. doi: 10.1080/13562570802173265
  • McKee, K. (2009). Post-Foucauldian governmentality: What does it offer critical social policy analysis? Critical Social Policy, 29(3), 465–486. doi: 10.1177/0261018309105180
  • Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1080/03085149000000001
  • Murdoch, J. (2000). Space against time: Competing rationalities in planning for housing. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25(4), 503–519. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2000.00503.x
  • Nicholls, W., & Beaumont, J. (2004). Guest editorial: The urbanisation of justice movements? Space and Polity, 8(2), 107–117. doi: 10.1080/1356257042000273913
  • Nuissl, H., & Heinrichs, D. (2011). Fresh wind or hot air – Does the governance discourse have something to offer to spatial planning? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(1), 47–59. doi: 10.1177/0739456X10392354
  • O'Malley, P. (1996). Indigenous governance. Economy and Society, 25(3), 310–326. doi: 10.1080/03085149600000017
  • O'Malley, P., Weir, L., & Shearing, C. (1997). Governmentality, criticism, politics. Economy and Society, 26(4), 501–517. doi: 10.1080/03085149700000026
  • Paddison, R. (2009). Some reflections on the limitations to public participation in the post-political city. L'Espace Politique (OnlineJournal of Political Geography and Geopolitics), 8 (2009-2). Retrieved December 2, 2012, from http://espacepolitique.revues.org/index1393.html
  • Pløger, J. (2001). Public participation and the art of governance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(2), 219–241. doi: 10.1068/b2669
  • Purcell, M. (2009). Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? Planning Theory, 8(2), 140–165. doi: 10.1177/1473095209102232
  • Raco, M., & Imrie, R. (2000). Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy. Environment and Planning A, 32(12), 2187–2204. doi: 10.1068/a3365
  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205. doi: 10.2307/591464
  • Rose, N., O'Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104. doi: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900
  • Rose-Redwood, R. (2006). Governmentality, geography, and the geo-coded World. Progress in Human Geography, 30(4), 469–486. doi: 10.1191/0309132506ph619oa
  • Ruppert, E. (2006). Rights to public space: Regulatory reconfigurations of liberty. Urban Geography, 27(3), 271–292. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.27.3.271
  • Rutherford, T. D. (2006). Local representations in crisis: Governance, citizenship regimes, and UK TECs and Ontario local boards. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(3), 409–426. doi: 10.1068/d383
  • Rutland, T., & Aylett, A. (2008). The work of policy: actor networks, governmentality, and local action on climate change in Portland, Oregon. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(4), 627–646. doi: 10.1068/d6907
  • Schipper, S. (2013). Genealogie und Gegenwart der ,unternehmerischen Stadt”. Neoliberales Regieren in Frankfurt am Main zwischen 1960 und 2010. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
  • Senellart, M. (2007). Course context, michel foucault: Security, territory, population. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 369–401.
  • Stenson, K. (2005). Sovereignty, biopolitics and the local government of crime in Britain. Theoretical Criminology, 9(3), 265–287. doi: 10.1177/1362480605054811
  • Sussmann, C. (2006). Vancouver's 2002 municipal election: Growth coalition defeated. Studies in Political Economy, (77), 157–174.
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006. doi: 10.1080/00420980500279869
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The Antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 601–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00859.x
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Interrogating post-democratization: Reclaiming egalitarian political spaces. Political Geography, 30(7), 370–380. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.08.001
  • Tooke, J. (2003). Spaces for community involvement: Process of disciplining and appropriation. Space and Polity, 7(3), 233–246. doi: 10.1080/1356257032000169703
  • Uitermark, J. (2005). The genesis and evolution of urban policy: A confrontation of regulationist and governmentality approaches. Political Geography, 24, 137–163. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.07.009
  • Willse, C. (2010). Neo-liberal biopolitics and the invention of chronic homelessness. Economy & Society, 39(2), 155–184. doi: 10.1080/03085141003620139

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.