Rethinking cross-border Euregionalism as self-organising system

References

• Amin, A. (2004). Regions unbound: Towards a new politics of place. Geografiska Annaler, 86(1), 33–44. doi: 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00152.x
   Google Scholar
• Antonsich, M. (2009). On territory, the nation-state and the crisis of the hyphen. Progress in Human Geography, 33(6), 789–806. doi: 10.1177/0309132508104996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (2002). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Cresskill: Hampton Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., & Jørgensen, K. E. (2000). Transnational governance “above” and “below” the state: The changing nature of borders in the new Europe. Regional & Federal Studies, 10(2), 62–77. doi: 10.1080/13597560008421120
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Colomb, C., & Nadin, V. (2010). European spatial planning and territorial cooperation. New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2010). Land, terrain, territory. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 799–817. doi: 10.1177/0309132510362603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, S. (2001). Against essentialism: A theory of culture and society. Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gualini, E. (2003). Cross-border governance: Inventing regions in a trans-national multi-level polity, disP 39(152), 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M., & Whatmore, S. (Eds.). (2009). Dictionary of human geography. London: Wile-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., & Kooij, H. J. (2013). Fading EUphoria at the Dutch-German border? The case of AVANTIS. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 104(3), 379–387. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., & Van Assche, K. (in press). Understanding empirical boundaries: A systems-theoretical avenue in border studies. Geopolitics (accepted).
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2003). The political economy of scale and the construction of cross-border micro-regions. In F. Söderbaum & T. Shaw (Eds.), Theories of new regionalism (pp. 179–196). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillian.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. M. (2008). Euro-politics of scale: Competing visions of the region in eastern Germany. GeoJournal, 72(1), 75–89. doi: 10.1007/s10708-008-9166-4
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. M. (2009). Cross-border regions and territorial restructuring in central Europe: Room for more transboundary space. European Urban and Regional Studies, 16(2), 177–191. doi: 10.1177/0969776409102190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (2003). The invention of regions: Political restructuring and territorial government in Western Europe. In N. Brenner, B. Jessop, M. Jones, & G. MacLeod (Eds.), state/space: A reader (pp. 256–277). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• King, M., & Thornhill, C. (2003). Niklas Luhmann's theory of politics and law. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave MacMillian.
   Google Scholar
• Knippenberg, H. (2004). The Maas-Rhine Euroregion: A laboratory for European integration? Geopolitics, 9(3), 608–626. doi: 10.1080/14650040490478675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooij, H. J., Van Assche, K., & Lagendijk, A. (2012). Open concepts as crystallization points and enablers of discursive configurations: The case of the innovation campus in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.731039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramsch, O. T. (2002). Reimagining the scalar topologies of cross-border governance: Eu(ro)regions in the post-colonial present. Space and Polity, 6(2), 169–196. doi: 10.1080/1356257022000003617
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, O. T. (2003). Re-imagining the 'Scalar Fix' of transborder governance: The case of the Maas-Rhein Euregio. In E. Berg & H. van Houtum (Eds.), Routing borders between territories, discourses and practices (pp. 211–235). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, O. T. (2007). Querying cosmopolis at the borders of Europe. Environment and Planning A, 39, 1582–1600. doi: 10.1068/a38212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramsch, O. T. (2008). T.H. Marshall at the limit: Hiding out in the Maas-Rhein Euregio. Space and Polity, 12(1), 31–46. doi: 10.1080/13562570801969416
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, O. T. (2010). The Rabelaisian border. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 1000–1014. doi: 10.1068/d14508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwil, F. (1986). Of systems, boundaries, and territoriality: An inquiry into the formation of the state system. World Politics, 39(1), 27–52. doi: 10.2307/2010297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lissandrello, E. (2006). The Utopia of cross-border regions: territorial transformation and cross-border governance on Espace Mont-Blanc. Nijmegen: Radboud University.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1982). Territorial borders as system boundaries. In R. Strassoldo, & G. Delli Zotti (Eds.), Cooperation and conflict in border areas (pp. 235–244). Milano: Franco Angeli Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1990). Political theory in the welfare state. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1992). What is communication? Communication Theory, 2(3), 251–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00042.x
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2000). Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2012a). Theory of society: Volume 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2012b). Introduction to systems theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. B. (2004). Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler, 86(1), 5–18. doi: 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00150.x
   Google Scholar
• Noe, E., Alrøe, H. F., & Sørensen Langvad, A. M. (2005). A semiotic polyocular framework for multidisciplinary research in relation to multifunctional farming and rural development. Paper presented at the XXI ESRS-Congress, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Noe, E., & Alrøe, H. F. (2006). Combining Luhmann and actor-network theory to see farm enterprises as self-organizing systems. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 13(1), 34–48.
   Google Scholar
• Noe, E., & Alrøe, H. F. (2012). Observing farming systems: Insights from social systems theory. In I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon, & B. Dedieu (Eds.), Farming systems research in the 21st century: The new dynamic (pp. 387–403). Dordrecht: Spring Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, J. (2008). Cartographic anxiety and the search for regionality. Environment and Planning A, 40(2), 342–361. doi: 10.1068/a38255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, J. (2010). Rethinking territory. Antipode, 42(5), 1090–1118. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00795.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1994). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (1999). Building governance institutions across European borders. Regional Studies, 33(7), 657–667. doi: 10.1080/00343409950078693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2007a). Construction of new territorial scales: A framework and case study of the EUREGIO cross-border region. Regional Studies, 41(2), 253–266. doi: 10.1080/00343400600990517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2007b). Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: A comparative study of European cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(6), 861–879. doi: 10.1068/c60m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikner, T. (2008). Reorganizing cross-border governance capacity: The case of the Helsinki-Tallinn Euregion. European Urban and Regional Studies, 15(3), 211–227. doi: 10.1177/0969776408090414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, G. (2008). The conflicting logics of cross-border reterritorialization: Geopolitics of Euroregions in Eastern Europe. Political Geography, 27(4), 418–438. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redepenning, M. (2006). Wozu Raum? Systemtheorie, critical geopolitics und raumbezogene Semantiken. Leipzig: Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. (2000). Euroregions, governance, and transborder cooperation within the EU. In M. van der Velde & H. van Houtum (Eds.), Borders, regions, and people (pp. 104–115). London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Seidl, D. (2005). Organisational identity and self-transformation: An autopoietic perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Strüver, A. (2005). Stories of the “Boring Border': The Dutch-German borderscape in people's minds. Münster: Lit Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2012). Performing success and failure in governance: Dutch planning experiences. Public Administration, 90(3), 567–581. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01972.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Teampău, P., Devlieger, P., & Suciu, C. (2008). Liquid boundaries in marginal marshes: Reconstructions of identity in the Romanian Danube Delta. Studia Sociologia 53(1), 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• van Zoest, A. (1978). Semiotiek: Over tekens, hoe ze werken en wat we ermee doen. Baarn: Ambo.
   Google Scholar