Colliding intervention in the spatial management of street-based injecting and drug-related litter within settings of public convenience (UK)

References

• ACMD. (1988). AIDS and drug misuse. Part 1 (Report by Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs). HMSO: London.
   Google Scholar
• Berridge, V. (2012). The rise, fall, and revival of recovery in drug policy. Lancet, 379(9810), 22–23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60011-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blenkharn, J. I. (2008). Clinical wastes in the community: Local authority management of discarded drug litter. Public Health, 122, 725–728. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office, HMSO. (1998). Tackling drugs to build a better Britain. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2012, October 10). Conservative Party conference keynote speech. Conservative Party annual conference, Birmingham. Retrieved April 5, 2014, from http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/oct/10/david-cameron-conservative-party-conference-speech
   Google Scholar
• Chheng, K., Leang, S., Thomson, N., Moore, T., & Crofts, N. (2012). Harm reduction in Cambodia: A disconnect between policy and practice. Harm Reduction Journal, 9, 30. Retrieved from http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/9/1/30 doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-9-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colon, I., & Marston, B. (1999). Resistance to a residential AIDS home. Journal of Homosexuality, 37, 135–145. doi: 10.1300/J082v37n03_08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree, A., Mercer, G., Horan, R., Grant, S., Tan, T., & Buxton, J. A. (2013). A qualitative study of the perceived effects of blue lights in washrooms on people who use injection drugs. Harm Reduction Journal, 10, 22. Retrieved from http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/10/1/22 doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-10-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBeck, K., Small, W., Wood, E., Li, K., Montaner, J. S. G., & Kerr, T. (2009). Public injecting among a cohort of injecting drug users in Vancouver, Canada. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 63, 81–86. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.069013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. (2005). Tackling drug-related litter: Guidance and good practice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (1995). Tackling drugs together. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K., Fitzgerald, J., & Choi, Y. (2001). Safety becomes danger: Dilemmas of drug-use in public space. Health and Place, 7, 319–331. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8292(01)00024-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, E. (2006). Insite: Canada's landmark safe injecting program at risk. Harm Reduction Journal, 3. Retrieved from http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/3/1/24 doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-3-24
   Google Scholar
• Drug Policy Alliance. (2012). Supervised injection facilities: Resource sheet. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, C. (2009). The drifting city: The role of affect and repair in the development of ‘enabling environments’. International Journal of Drug Policy, 20, 202–208. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. (2015). Drugs policy and the city in Europe. Lisbon: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. L. (2005). Policing as public health menace in the policy struggles over public injecting. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16, 203–206. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., Dovey, K., Dietze, P., & Rumbold, G. (2004). Health outcomes and quasi-supervised settings for street injecting drug use. International Journal on Drug Policy, 15, 247–257. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2004.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Forte, J. A. (2015). Not in my social world: A cultural analysis of media representations, contested spaces, and sympathy for the homeless. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 29(4), Article 9. Retrieved from: http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol29/iss4/9
   Google Scholar
• Fry, C. L. (2002). Injecting drug user attitudes towards rules for supervised injecting rooms: Implications for uptake. International Journal of Drug Policy, 13, 471–476. doi: 10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00076-2
   Google Scholar
• Galvani, S. (2012). Supporting people with alcohol and drug problems. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, T., Hankins, C., Palmer, D., Boivin, J.-F., & Platt, R. (2003, July). Ascertaining the need for a Safer Injecting Facility (SIF): The burden of public injecting in Montreal, Canada. Journal of Drug Issues, 33(3), 713–731. doi: 10.1177/002204260303300310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, W., & Kimber, J. (2005, March 18). Being realistic about benefits of supervised injecting facilities. The Lancet.
   Google Scholar
• Health Protection Agency. (2012). Shooting up: Infections among people who inject drugs in the United Kingdom 2011. Health Protection Agency, Health Protection Scotland, Public Health Wales, and Public Health Agency Northern Ireland, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrich, D. (2004). European report on drug consumption rooms. Luxemburg: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction.
   Google Scholar
• Heed, K. (2006). Response: If enforcement is not working, what are the alternatives? International Journal of Drug Policy, 17(2), 104–106. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2008). Drugs: Protecting families and communities: The 2008 drug strategy. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2010). Drug strategy 2010: Reducing demand, restricting supply, building recovery: Supporting people to live a drug free life. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, N., Lloyd, C., Kimber, J., & Tompkins, C. (2007). Public injecting and willingness to use a drug consumption room among needle exchange programme attendees in the UK. International Journal of Drug Policy, 18, 62–65. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.11.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber, J., Dolan, K., & Wodak, A. (2005). Survey of drug consumption rooms: Service delivery and perceived public health and amenity impact. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24, 21–24. doi: 10.1080/09595230500125047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korner, H., & Treloar, C. (2003). Needle and syringe programmes in the local media: ‘Needle anger’ versus ‘effective education in the community’. International Journal of Drug Policy, 15, 46–55. doi: 10.1016/S0955-3959(03)00089-6
   Google Scholar
• MacPherson, D., Mulla, Z., & Richardson, L. (2006). The evolution of drug policy in Vancouver, Canada: Strategies for preventing harm from psychoactive substance use. International Journal of Drug Policy, 17(2), 85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, B. D., Kerr, T., Qi, J., Montaner, J. S. G., & Wood, E. (2010). Public injecting and HIV risk behaviour among street-involved youth. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 110, 254–258. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.01.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, I., Maas, B., Wood, E., Tyndall, M. W., Small, W., Lai, C., … Kerr, T. (2007). Factors associated with public injecting among users of Vancouver's Supervised Injecting Facility. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 33, 319–326. doi: 10.1080/00952990601175102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, M. (2012). The recent evolution of UK drug strategies: From maintenance to behaviour change. People, Place and Policy Online, 6, 29–40. doi: 10.3351/ppp.0006.0001.0004
   Google Scholar
• de Montigney, L., Moudon, A. V., Leigh, B., & Young, K. (2010). Assessing a drop box programme: A spatial analysis of discarded needles. International Journal of Drug Policy, 21, 208–214. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D., & Dietze, P. (2005). Enabling environments and the reduction of drug-related harm: Reframing Australian policy and practice. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24, 275–284. doi: 10.1080/09595230500170258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, C., & Leonard, L. (2004). Prevalence and factors related to public injecting in Ottawa, Canada: Implications for the development of a trial safer injecting facility. International Journal of Drug Policy, 15, 275–284. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2004.03.003
   Google Scholar
• NICE. (2014). Needle and syringe programmes: NICE public health guidance 52.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, S. (2008, June 17–18). From one space to another. The displacement of risk behaviour (injecting drug use) in an urban environment. Ways of living: Inequalities, risks and choices, 1st annual ENQUIRE conference, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, S. (2009). The effect of place on health risk: A qualitative study of micro-injecting environments (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Plymouth.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, S. (2011a, October 3–5). Colliding interventions: The problematising of public injecting drug use. Contemporary drug problems conference: Beyond the buzzword: Problematising ‘drugs’, Prato, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, S. (2011b). Identifying and predicting drug-related harm with applied qualitative research. In J. Katz, S. Peace, & S. Spurr (Eds.), Adult lives: A life course perspective (pp. 439–448). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, S. (2013). Habitus and drug using environments: Health, place and lived experience. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, S. (2014). An applied visual sociology: Picturing harm reduction. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, S., & Coomber, R. (2007). A rapid appraisal of public injecting sites and drug related litter in Plymouth (Unpublished Report for Plymouth Drug and Alcohol Action Team). University of Plymouth.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, S., & Coomber, R. (2008). A comparative study of drug related litter collected in Plymouth during 2006–2007 and 2007–2008 (Unpublished Report for Plymouth Drug and Alcohol Team). University of Plymouth.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, S., & Coomber, R. (2009a). ‘Informal sorter houses’: A qualitative insight of the ‘shooting gallery’ phenomenon in a UK setting. Health and Place, 15, 981–989. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, S., & Coomber, R. (2009b). Public injecting and symbolic violence. Addiction Research and Theory, 17(4), 390–405. doi: 10.1080/16066350802518247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, S., & Coomber, R. (2009c). An informal evaluation of drug-related litter bins in Plymouth City Centre (Unpublished Report for Plymouth Drug and Alcohol Action Team). University of Plymouth.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, S., & Coomber, R. (2010). Fluorescent blue lights, injecting drug use and related health risk in public conveniences: Findings from a qualitative study of micro-injecting environments. Health and Place, 16, 629–637. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, S., & Coomber, R. (2011a). Public injecting drug use and the social production of harmful practice in high-rise tower blocks (London, UK): A Lefebvrian analysis. Health and Place, 17, 717–726. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, S., & Coomber, R. (2011b). Injecting drug user views (and experiences) of drug-related litter bins in public places: A comparative study of qualitative research findings obtained from UK settings. Health & Place, 17, 1218–1227. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., Parkin, S., & Coomber, R. (2011). Generalizing applied qualitative research on harm reduction: The example of a public injecting typology. Contemporary Drug Problems, 38, 61–91. doi: 10.1177/009145091103800104
   Google Scholar
• Philipp, R. (1993). Community needlestick accident data and trends in environmental quality. Public Health, 107, 363–369. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3506(05)80129-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Health England. (2013a). Hepatitis C in the UK. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health England. (2013b). Shooting up: Infections among people who inject drugs in the UK (2012). London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, T. (2002). The ‘risk environment’: A framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm. International Journal of Drug Policy, 13, 85–94. doi: 10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00007-5
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, T. (2009). Risk environments and drug harms: A social science for harm reduction approach. International Journal of Drug Policy, 20, 193–201. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, T., Kimber, J., Small, W., Fitzgerald, J., Kerr, T., Hickman, M., & Holloway, G. (2006). Public injecting and the need for ‘safer environment interventions’ in the reduction of drug-related harm. Addiction, 101, 1384–1393. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01556.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, T., Watts, L., Davies, S., Martin, A., Smith, J., Clark, D., … Lyons, M. (2007). Risk, shame and the public injector: A qualitative study of drug injecting in South Wales. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 572–585. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, E., Beilenson, P., Vlahov, D., Smith, L., Koenig, M., Jones, T. S., & Doherty, M. (1998). Operation Red Box: A pilot project of needle and syringe drop boxes for injection drug users in East Baltimore. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Human Retrovirology, 18, S120–S125. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199802001-00020
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, R. (1990). The Edinburgh epidemic: A case study. In J. Strang & G. V. Stimson (Eds.), AIDS and drug misuse: The challenge for policy and practice in the 1990s (pp. 95–107). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Room, R. (2006). Response. Drug policy and the city. International Journal of Drug Policy, 17(2), 136. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2008). The road to recovery: A new approach to tackling Scotland's drug problem. Edinburgh: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Small, W., Rhodes, T., Wood, E., & Kerr, T. (2007). Public injection settings in Vancouver: Physical environment, social context and risk. International Journal of Drug Policy, 18, 27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.11.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. B. R. (2010). Socio-spatial stigmatization and the contested space of addiction treatment: Remapping strategies of opposition to the disorder of drugs. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 859–866. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimson, G. V. (2000). Blair declares war: The unhealthy state of British drug policy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 11, 259–264. doi: 10.1016/S0955-3959(00)00060-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stimson, G. V., Alldritt, L., Dolan, K., & Donoghoe, M. (1988). Syringe exchange schemes for drug users in England and Scotland. British Medical Journal, 296, 1717–1719. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6638.1717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoever, H. (2002). Crack cocaine in Germany: Current state of affairs. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 413–421. doi: 10.1177/002204260203200205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang, J., & Gossop, M. (2005). The ‘British system’ of drug policy: Extraordinary individual freedom, but to what end? In J. Strang & M. Gossop (Eds.), Heroin addiction and the British system: Volume 2: Treatment and policy responses (pp. 206–219). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strathdee, S. A., & Pollini, R. A. (2007). A 21st-century Lazarus: The role of safer injection sites in harm reduction and recovery. Addiction, 102, 848–849. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01859.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strike, C. J., Myers, T., & Millson, M. (2004). Finding a place for needle exchange programs. Critical Public Health, 14, 261–275. doi: 10.1080/09581590400004386
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, L. M. (1997). The socio-spatial stigmatization of homelessness and HIV/AIDS: Toward an explanation of the NIMBY syndrome. Social Science and Medicine, 45, 903–914. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00432-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., Cusick, L., Kimber, J., Rutherford, J., Hickman, M., & Rhodes, T. (2006). The social impact of public injecting (Independent Working Group on Drug Consumption Rooms). Joseph Rowntree Foundation, p. Paper D.
   Google Scholar
• Ti, L., & Kerr, T. (2014). The impact of harm reduction on HIV and illicit drug use. Harm Reduction Journal, 11, 7. Retrieved from http://www.harmreductionjournal doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-11-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treloar, C., & Fraser, S. (2007). Public opinion on needle and syringe programmes: Avoiding assumptions for policy and practice. Drug and Alcohol Review, 26, 355–361. doi: 10.1080/09595230701373867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, N. M. J., & Tompkins, C. N. E. (2004). Supervised injecting centres. British Medical Journal, 328, 100–102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7431.100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar