Public spheres on the move: the embodied deliberation of cycling in Los Angeles

References

• Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011). International practices. International Theory, 3(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1017/S175297191000031X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blickstein, S. (2010). Automobility and the politics of bicycling in New York City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 886–905. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2015). Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2010). Mobilities I: Catching Up. Progress in Human Geography, 5, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T., & Merriman, P. (Eds.). (2016). Geographies of mobilities: Practices, spaces, subjects. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davi, O. (2016, February 12). Updating Santa Barbara’s bicycle master plan. From plan … to implementation. CASA Magazine – A Community Weekly, 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• FAQ – cicLAvia. cicLAvia. Retrieved from http://www.ciclavia.org/faq
   Google Scholar
• Fierke, K. (2014). Political self-sacrifice. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2003). Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freund, P., & Martin, G. (2007). Hyperautomobility, the social organization of space, and health. Mobilities, 2(1), 37–49. doi: 10.1080/17450100601106237
   Google Scholar
• Fujii, L. A. (2011). Killing neighbors: Webs of violence in Rwanda. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furness, Z. (2010). One less car: Bicycling and the politics of automobility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1993). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of Bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (2004). Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman: Between discourse in the abstract and face-to-face interaction. Economy and Society, 33(3), 277–302. doi: 10.1080/0308514042000225671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/17450100500489189
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkesworth, M. (2012). Political worlds of women: Activism, advocacy, and governance in the 21st century. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E. F. (2008). Theorizing acts of citizenship. In E. F. Isin & G. M. Nielsen (Eds.), Acts of citizenship (pp. 15–43). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E. F., & Nyers, P. (2014a). Introduction: Globalizing citizenship studies. In E. F. Isin & P. Nyers (Eds.), Routledge handbook of global citizenship studies (pp. 1–11). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E. F., & Nyers, P. (2014b). Routledge handbook of global citizenship studies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. (2013). Controlling mobility, performing borderwork: Cycle mobility in Copenhagen and the multiplication of boundaries. Journal of Transport Geography, 30, 220–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. (2009). Flows of meaning, cultures of movements – urban mobility as meaningful everyday life practice. Mobilities, 4(1), 139–158. doi: 10.1080/17450100802658002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, M. (2004). Brave New neighborhoods: The privatization of public space. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, M. (2008). Homo spectator: Public space in the age of the spectacle. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 34(5), 467–486. doi: 10.1177/0191453708089194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, M. (2013). What is wrong with gentrification? Urban Research and Practice, 6(3), 297–310. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2013.846006
   Google Scholar
• LA Critical Mass Bike Ride. (2012, August 31). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/events/430037597039911/
   Google Scholar
• Lugo, A. E. (2013). CicLAvia and human infrastructure in Los Angeles: Ethnographic experiments in equitable bike planning. Journal of Transport Geography, 30, 202–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugo, A. E. (2015, September 30). Unsolicited advice for vision zero. Retrieved from http://www.urbanadonia.com
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, C. (1999). Beyond appeasement. Interpreting interwar Peace movements in world politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, C. (2014). Interpreting international politics. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manderscheid, K. (2014). Criticising the solitary mobile subject: Researching relational mobilities and reflecting on mobile methods. Mobilities, 9(2), 188–219. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2013.830406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McThomas, M. (2016). Performing citizenship. Undocumented migrants in the United States. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pachirat, T. (2013). Every twelve seconds: Industrialized slaughter and the politics of sight. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, J. (2008). Mobility without Mayhem: Safety, cars, and citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paddison, R., & Sharp, J. (2007). Questioning the end of public space: Reclaiming control of local banal spaces. Scottish Geographical Journal, 123(2), 87–106. doi: 10.1080/14702540701615236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan, S. C., & Hargrove, E. C. (2007). Automobility, liberalism and the ethics of driving. Environmental Ethics, 29, 77–90. doi: 10.5840/enviroethics200729130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2012). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226. doi: 10.1068/a37268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. (2015). Close encounters? Mobile methods, (post)phenomenology and affect. Cultural Geographies, 22(2), 231–246. doi: 10.1177/1474474014558988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. (2016). Fixing mobility in the neoliberal city: Cycling policy and practice in London (UK) as a mode of political-economic and bio-political governance. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 106(2), 450–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J., Aldred, R., & Brown, K. (2015). Geographies of citizenship and everyday (im)mobility. Geoforum, 64, 325–332. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staeheli, L., Marshall, D. J., & Maynard, N. (2016). Circulations and the entanglements of citizenship formation. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(2), 377–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staeheli, L., & Mitchell, D. (2016). The people’s property?: Power, politics, and the public. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Staeheli, L., Mitchell, D., & Nagel, C. R. (2009). Making publics: Immigrants, regimes of publicity and entry to “the public”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27, 633–648. doi: 10.1068/d6208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehlin, J. (2014). Regulating inclusion: Spatial form, social process, and the normalization of cycling practice in the USA. Mobilities, 9(2), 21–41. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2013.784527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wedeen, L. (2007). Peripheral visions: Publics, power and performance in Yemen. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weldon, L. S. (2006). Inclusion, solidarity, and social movements: The global movement against gender violence. Perspectives on Politics, 4(1), 55–74. doi: 10.1017/S1537592706060063
   Google Scholar
• Whatmore, S., & Landström, C. (2011). Flood apprentices: An exercise in making things public. Economy and Society, 40(4), 582–610. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2011.602540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (2002). Constructing “race” and “ethnicity” in America: Category-making in public policy and administration. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (Eds.). (2014). Interpretation and method: Empirical methods and the interpretive turn. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar