Reflexivity, participatory art, and the failures of monist representation

References

• Abramovic, M. (2011). An artist’s life manifesto [Installation]. Los Angeles, CA: Museum of Contemporary Art.
   Google Scholar
• Amoureux, J. (2015). A practice of ethics for global politics. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, C., Lee, L., & Borcardt-Hume, A. (2015). Theaster gates. New York, NY: Phaidon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bemis Center for Contemporary Arts. (2016). Theaster gates: Town hall + Carver Bank. Retrieved from http://www.bemiscenter.org/art/exhibitions/theaster-gates-town-hall.html
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bordes, P. (1980). Jacques-Louis David’s ‘Serment du Jeu de Paume’: Propaganda without a cause? Oxford Art Journal, 3(2), 19–25. doi: 10.1093/oxartj/3.2.19
   Google Scholar
• Boros, D. (2012). Creative rebellion for the twenty-first century: The importance of public and interactive art to political life in America. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2009). Rhetoric and the public sphere: Has deliberative democracy abandoned mass democracy? Political Theory, 37(3), 323–350. doi: 10.1177/0090591709332336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chicago, J. (1974–1979). The dinner party [Ceramic, porcelain, textile]. New York, NY: Brooklyn Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Condorcet, M. D. (1793). Plan of the French constitution and declaration of rights: As presented to The National convention of France on the 16th of February, 1793 (2nd ed.). London, No. 166, Fleet-Street: J.S. Jordan.
   Google Scholar
• David, J. (1784). Oath of the Horatii [Oil on canvas]. Paris, France: Louvre.
   Google Scholar
• David, J. (1791). Tennis court oath [Graphite, pen and ink wash on paper]. Versailles, France: Musée National du Château.
   Google Scholar
• De Duve, T. (1996). Kant after duchamp. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Disch, L. (2011). Toward a mobilization conception of democratic representation. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 100–114. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. (1985). A matter of principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, J. (2015). The living image of the people. Theory & Event, 18(1). Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/article/566086
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 80–56.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, T. (2010-ongoing). Town hall [installation]. North Omaha, NE: Bemis Center for Contemporary Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, T. (2013-ongoing). Carver bank [Building, installation]. North Omaha, NE. Bemis Center for Contemporary Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, T. (2015-ongoing). Stony Island arts bank [Building, installation]. Chicago, IL: Rebuild Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (2003 [1787–1788]). The federalist papers. New York, NY: Bantam Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, G., & Moyer, C. (2013). Artists reclaim the commons: New works/new territories/new publics. Hamilton, NJ: International Sculpture Center Press.
   Google Scholar
• LaClau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards as radical democratic politics. New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, S. (Ed.). (1994). Mapping the terrain: New genre public art. San Francisco, CA: Bay Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefort, C. (1988). Democracy and political theory. (D. Macey, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 515–528. doi: 10.1017/S0003055403000856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2009). The democratic paradox. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. (2011). The emancipated spectator. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Rebuild Foundation. (2016). Stony Island arts bank. Retrieved from https://rebuild-foundation.org/site/stony-island-arts-bank/
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. (2011). Democratic legitimacy: Impartiality, reflexivity, proximity. (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosler, M. (1987). The birth and death of the viewer: On the public function of art. In Hal Foster (Eds.), Discussions in contemporary culture (Vol. 1, pp. 9–15). New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartzberg, M. (2013). Counting the many: The origins and limits of supermajority rule. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. (2006). Representative democracy: Principles and genealogy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar