Freedom, faith, and humanitarian governance: the spatial politics of church asylum in Europe

References

• Ager, A. (2011). Faith and the discourse of secular humanitarianism. Journal of Refugee Studies, 24(3), 456–472. doi: 10.1093/jrs/fer030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ataç, I. (2016). ‘Refugee protest camp Vienna’: Making citizens through locations of the protest movement. Citizenship Studies, 20(5), 629–646. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2016.1182676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, C., Clarke, N., Cloke, P., & Malpass, A. (2008). The elusive subjects of neo-liberalism. Cultural Studies, 22(5), 624–653. doi: 10.1080/09502380802245902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., & Stein, J. (2012). Sacred aid: Faith and humanitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A., Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (1996). Introduction. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 1–18). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, M. (2014). Ethnographies of neoliberal governmentalities: From the neoliberal apparatus to neoliberalism and governmental assemblages. Foucault Studies, 18, 11–33. doi: 10.22439/fs.v0i18.4649
   Google Scholar
• Brady, M. (2016). Neoliberalism, governmental assemblages, and the ethnographic imaginary. In M. Brady & R. Lippert (Eds.), Governing practices: Neoliberalism, governmentality, and the ethnographic imaginary (pp. 3–31). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, M., & Lippert, R. (2016). Governing practices: Neoliberalism, governmentality, and the ethnographic imaginary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B. (2007). Biopolitics and the molecularization of life. Cultural Geographies, 14(1), 6–28. doi: 10.1177/1474474007072817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J., & Jones, A. (2008). The spatialities of europeanisation: Territory, government and power in ‘Europe’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33, 300–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, G., & Jennings, A. (2008). Development, civil society and faith-based organizations: Bridging the sacred and the secular. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cloke, P., & Beaumont, J. (2013). Geographies of postsecular rapprochement in the city. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 27–51. doi: 10.1177/0309132512440208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, S. (2009). Topologies of power: Foucault’s analysis of political government beyond ‘governmentality’. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 78–108. doi: 10.1177/0263276409347694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S., Williams, G., Srivastava, M., & Véron, R. (2005). Seeing the state: Governance and governmentality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, H. (1995). God and Caesar at the Rio Grande: Sanctuary and the politics of religion. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2007). Governmentality, calculation, territory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 562–580. doi: 10.1068/d428t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2016). Foucault’s last decade. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J., & Gupta, A. (2002). Spatializing states: Toward an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality. American Ethnologist, 29, 981–1002. doi: 10.1525/ae.2002.29.4.981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (2011). Introduction: Faith-based humanitarianism in contexts of forced displacement. Journal of Refugee Studies, 24(3), 429–439. doi: 10.1093/jrs/fer033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In C. Burchell, C. Gordon, & B. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality with two lectures by and interview with Michel Foucault (pp. 87–104). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978 [Lectures at the College of France]. (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2010). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979 [Lectures at the College of France]. Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J.-K. (1996). The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J.-K. (2005). Surplus possibilities: Postdevelopment and community economies. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 26(1), 4–26. doi: 10.1111/j.0129-7619.2005.00198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goździak, E. M., & Shandy, D. J. (2002). Special issue: Religion and spirituality in forced migration. Journal of Refugee Studies, 15(2), 429–633.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, M. (2000). Governmentality and the mastery of territory in nineteenth-century America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, S. (2017). Sacred squatting. Seeking sanctuary in religious spaces. In P. Mudu & S. Chattopadhyay (Eds.), Migration, squatting and radical autonomy (pp. 183–188). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• IOM. (2006). Faith-based organizations join the fight against human trafficking. Retrieved from https://www.iom.int/news/faith-based-organizations-join-fight-against-human-trafficking
   Google Scholar
• Just, W. D. (2013). The rise and features of church asylum in Germany: ‘I will take refuge in the shadow of they wings until the storms are past’. In R. Lippert & S. Rehaag (Eds.), Sanctuary practices in international perspectives: Migration, citizenship and social movements (pp. 135–147). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larner, W. (2003). Neoliberalism? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21, 509–512. doi: 10.1068/d2105ed
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larner, W., & Craig, D. (2005). After neoliberalism? Community activism and local partnerships in Aotearoa New Zealand. Antipode, 37(3), 402–424. doi: 10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00504.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larner, W., & Le Heron, R. (2002). From economic globalisation to globalising economic processes: Towards post-structural political economies. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 33(4), 415–419. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00044-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larner, W., & Walters, W. (Eds.). (2004). Global governmentality: Governing international spaces. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Legg, S. (2007). Spaces of colonialism: Delhi’s urban governmentalities. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., & Strunk, C. (2014). Spaces of immigrant advocacy and liberal democratic citizenship. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(2), 348–356. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2013.875806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2001). The birth of biopolitics: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the Collège de France on neoliberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207. doi: 10.1080/03085140120042271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley, D., & Tse, J. (2013). Homo religiosus? Religion and immigrant subjectivities. In P. Hopkins, L. Kong, & E. Olson (Eds.), Religion and place: Landscape, politics, and piety (pp. 149–165). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert, R. (2005). Sanctuary, sovereignty, sacrifice: Canadian sanctuary incidents, power, and law. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert, R., & Brady, M. (2016). Governmentalities, the ethnographic imaginary, and beyond. In M. Brady & R. Lippert (Eds.), Governing practices: Neoliberalism, governmentality, and the ethnographic imaginary (pp. 269–274). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert, R., & Rehaag, S. (Eds.). (2013). Sanctuary practices in international perspectives: Migration, citizenship and social movements. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marfleet, P. (2011). Understanding ‘sanctuary’: Faith and traditions of asylum. Journal of Refugee Studies, 24(3), 440–455. doi: 10.1093/jrs/fer040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, K. (2009). Post-Foucauldian governmentality: What does it offer critical social policy analysis? Critical Social Policy, 29(3), 465–486. doi: 10.1177/0261018309105180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. (2015). Faith based organizations and international responses to forced migration. In S. D. Brunn (Ed.), The changing world religion map (pp. 3115–3133). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K., & Lizotte, C. (2016). Governing through failure: Neoliberalism, philanthropy, and education reform in Seattle. In M. Brady & R. Lippert (Eds.), Governing practices: Neoliberalism, governmentality, and the ethnographic imaginary (pp. 221–244). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K., & Sparke, M. (2016). The new Washington consensus: Millennial philanthropy and the making of global market subjects. Antipode, 48(3), 724–749. doi: 10.1111/anti.12203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. (2002). Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S., & Luukkonen, J. (2015). European spatial planning as governmentality: An inquiry into rationalities, techniques, and manifestations. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(4), 828–845. doi: 10.1068/c13158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morison, J. (2000). Government-voluntary sector compacts: Governance, governmentality, and civil society. Journal of Law and Society, 27(1), 98–132. doi: 10.1111/1467-6478.00148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyn, S. (2014). Human rights and the uses of history. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Moyn, S. (2015). Christian human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudu, P., & Chattopadhyay, S. (Eds.). (2017). Migration, squatting and radical autonomy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neufert, B. (2014). Church asylum. Forced Migration Review, 48, 36–38.
   Google Scholar
• Nyers, P., & Rygiel, K. (Eds.). (2015). Citizenship, migrant activism and the politics of movement. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, P., Weir, L., & Shearing, C. (1997). Governmentality, criticism, politics. Economy and Society, 26(4), 501–517. doi: 10.1080/03085149700000026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Raleigh, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabben, L. (2016). Sanctuary and asylum: A social and political history. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raiser, K. (2010, October 7–10). Why do we do what we do? The theological dimension of sanctuary work. New Sanctuary Movement in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Read, J. (2009). A genealogy of homo-economicus: Neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity. Foucault Studies, 6, 25–36. doi: 10.22439/fs.v0i0.2465
   Google Scholar
• Riera, J., & Poirier, C. (2014). Welcoming the stranger’ and UNHCR’s cooperation with faith-based organisations. Forced Migration Review, 48, 64–67.
   Google Scholar
• Rodin, L. (2017). Studies on governmentality: Six epistemological pitfalls. Russian Sociological Review, 16(2), 9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., & Novas, C. (2004). Biological citizenship. In A. Ong, & S. J. Collier, (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 439–463). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, S. (2007). Green governmentality: Insights and opportunities in the study of nature’s rule. Progress in Human Geography, 31(3), 291–307. doi: 10.1177/0309132507077080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, R. (2016). Governing emergent technologies: Nanopower and nanopolitics. An ethnographic approach. In M. Brady & R. Lippert (Eds.), Governing practices: Neoliberalism, governmentality, and the ethnographic imaginary (pp. 105–130). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, K. (2011). Sanctuary and crime in the middle ages, 400–1500. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, S. (2012). Asylum-seeking, migration and church. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sparke, M. (2017). Austerity and the embodiment of neoliberalism as ill-health: Towards a theory of biological sub-citizenship. Social Science and Medicine. forthcoming. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(5), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. (2013, May 31). Overview of the survey on good practice examples: Faith-based organizations and local faith communities contributing to protection outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.unhcr.org/51b6debe9.html
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. (2014). On faith-based organizations, Local faith communities and faith leaders. Retrieved from www.unhcr.org/539ef28b9.html
   Google Scholar
• Walters, W. (2012). Governmentality: Critical encounters. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. (2015). Postsecular geographies: Theo-ethics, rapprochement and neoliberal governance in a faith-based drug programme. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40(2), 192–208. doi: 10.1111/tran.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A., Cloke, P., & Thomas, S. (2012). Co-constituting neoliberalism: Faith-based organisations, co-option, and resistance in the UK. Environment and Planning A, 44(6), 1479–1501. doi: 10.1068/a44507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A., Goodwin, M., & Cloke, P. (2014). Neoliberalism, big society, and progressive localism. Environment and Planning A, 46(12), 2798–2815. doi: 10.1068/a130119p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar