The post-political meaning of the concept of commons: the regulation of the urban commons in Bologna

References

• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2012). Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(1), 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angiolini, C. (2016). Possibilità e limiti dei recenti regolamenti comunali in materia dei beni comuni. In A. Quarta & M. Spanò (Eds.), Beni comuni 2.0. Contro-egemonia e nuove istituzioni (pp. 147–157). Milano: Mimesis.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, F., & Perrotta, D. (2017). Emancipation, integration, or marginality: The Romanian Roma in Bologna and the Scalo Internazionale Migranti. In P. Mudu & S. Chattopadhyay (Eds.), Migration, squatting and radical autonomy (pp. 143–161). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arena, G. (2012). Il welfare di comunità. In G. Arena & C. Iaione (Eds.), L’italia dei beni comuni (pp. 89–107). Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Arena, G. (2013). Le città come beni comuni. Retrieved from http://www.labsus.org/2013/10/le-citta-come-beni-comuni/
   Google Scholar
• Arena, G., & Iaione, C. (2012). Introduzione. In G. Arena & I. Christian (Eds.), L’italia dei Beni Comuni (pp. 9–12). Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, S., & Mattei, U. (2013). Social movements as constituent power: The Italian struggle for the commons. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20(2), 965–1013.
   Google Scholar
• Bignami, S. (2014, February 12). Bologna bene comune e Napolitano benedice. La Repubblica.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, I. (2015). Between democratic network governance and neoliberalism: A regime-theoretical analysis of collaboration in Barcelona. Cities (london, England), 44, 123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boarelli, M. (2010). Un mondo a parte: il declino del ceto politico. In M. Boarelli, L. Lambertini, & M. Perrotta (Eds.), Bologna al bivio. Una città come le altre? (pp. 21–36). Roma: Edizioni dell’asino.
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. (2015). Bologna, a laboratory for urban commoning, David Bollier. News and perspectives on the commons. Retrieved from http://www.bollier.org/blog/bologna-laboratory-urban-commoning
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2000). The urban question as a scale question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 361–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley, D. W., & Cernea, M. M. (1989). The management of common property natural resources some conceptual and operational fallacies. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Buzar, S., Hall, R., & Ogden, P. E. (2007). Beyond gentrification: The demographic reurbanisation of Bologna. Environment and Planning A, 39, 64–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caffentzis, G. (2010). The future of “the commons”: neoliberalism’s “Plan B” or the original disaccumulation of capital? New Formations, 69, 23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ciccarelli, R. (2017, September 10). L’altra Bologna si riprende la città. Il Manifesto.
   Google Scholar
• Cini, L. (2017). Italian students as political actors: The policy impact of the recent student mobilizations in the field of higher education. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10(1), 2035–6609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comune di Bologna. (2015). Regolamento sulla collaborazione tra cittadini e amministrazione per la cura e la rigenerazione dei beni comuni urbani. Bologna.
   Google Scholar
• Comune di Bologna. (2016). 2014—2016 Due anni di patti di collaborazione. Bologna. Retrieved from http://www.comune.bologna.it/media/files/due_anni_di_patti_di_collaborazione.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Comune di Bologna. (2017). Promozione della Cittadinanza Attiva. Report attività – ottobre 2017. Bologna. Retrieved from http://www.labsus.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/report_2017_-_dati_a_ottobre_2017_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cossentino, F. (2010). Il welfare e l’erosione del modello emiliano. In M. Boarelli, L. Lamberitini, & M. Perrotta (Eds.), Bologna al bivio? Una città come le altre? (pp. 77–94). Roma: Edizioni dell’asino.
   Google Scholar
• Cumbers, A. (2015). Constructing a global commons in, against and beyond the state. Space and Polity, 19(1), 62–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuppini, N. (2016). Emerging social mobilisation within the transformations of the contemporary city: The case of Bologna. Contested cities international conference: From contested cities to global urban justice, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Cuppini, N. (2017). Dissolving Bologna: Tensions between citizenship and the logistics city. Citizenship Studies, 21(4), 495–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2015). Común. Ensayo sobre la revolución del siglo XXI. Barcelona: Gedisa.
   Google Scholar
• Darling, J. (2014). Asylum and the post-political: Domopolitics, depoliticisation and acts of citizenship. Antipode, 46(1), 72–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. (2012a). ‘Active citizenship: Navigating the conservative heartlands of the New Labour project. Policy and Politics, 40(1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. (2012b). ‘Network governance theory: A Gramscian critique. Environment and Planning A, 44(11), 2687–2704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Angelis, M. (2003). Reflections on alternatives, commons and communities or building a new world from the bottom up. The Commoner, 6 (pp. 1–14). Retrieved from http://www.thecommoner.org
   Google Scholar
• De Angelis, M. (2012). Crises, movements and commons. Borderlands, 11(2), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• De Angelis, M. (2013). Does capital need a commons fix? Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organizations, 13(3), 603–615.
   Google Scholar
• Deas, I. (2014). The search for territorial fixes in subnational governance: City-regions and the disputed emergence of post-political consensus in Manchester, England. Urban Studies, 51(11), 2285–2314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S. (2011). Feminism and the politics of the commons. The Commoner.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S., & Caffentzis, G. (2013). Commons against and beyond capitalism. Upping the Anti: a Journal of Theory and Action, 15, 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S. R., & Iaione, C. (2016). The city as a commons. Yale Law & Policy Review, 34(2), 281–349.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2004). L’ordine del discorso : e altri interventi. Torino: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, P. (1977). Un altro modo di possedere. Milano: A. Giuffrè.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2010). The enigma of capital and the crisis of capitalism. London: Profile Books .
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iaione, C. (2012). Città e Beni Comuni. In G. Arena & C. Iaione (Eds.), L’italia dei Beni Comuni (pp. 109–150). Carocci: Roma.
   Google Scholar
• Iaione, C. (2015). Governing the urban commons. Italian Journal of Public Law, 7(1), 170–221.
   Google Scholar
• Iaione, C. (2016). The CO-city: Sharing, collaborating, cooperating, and commoning in the city. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 75(2), 415–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäggi, M., Müller, R., & Schmid, S. (1977). Red Bologna. London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhne, J. (2015). Notable urban commons around the world. In D. Bollier & S. Helfrich (Eds.), Patterns of commoning (pp. 92–99). Amherst, MA: The Conmmons Strategies Group.
   Google Scholar
• Labgov. (no date). About LabGov. Retrieved from http://www.labgov.it/about-labgov/
   Google Scholar
• Labsus. (2004). La carta della sussidiarietà - Labsus. Retrieved from http://www.labsus.org/la-carta-della-sussidiarieta/
   Google Scholar
• Labsus. (2013). Presentato a Bologna il progetto “Le città come beni comuni”. Retrieved from http://www.labsus.org/2013/10/presentato-bologna-progetto-citta-come-beni-comuni/
   Google Scholar
• Labsus. (2016). Rapporto Labsus 2015: Amministrazione Condivisa dei Beni Comuni. Retrieved from http://www.labsus.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Rapporto_Labsus_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Labsus. (no date). Progetto. Retrieved from http://www.labsus.org/progetto/
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Le Altre Case di Bologna. (2017). Le Altre Case di Bologna. Retrieved from http://www.lealtrecasebo.it/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Linebaugh, P. (2008). The Magna Carta Manifesto. Liberties and commons for all. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marinetto, M. (2003). Who wants to be an active citizen? Sociology, 37(1), 103–120.
   Google Scholar
• Mattei, U. (2011). Beni comuni. Un manifesto. Bari: Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Mattei, U. (2013). I beni comuni fra economia, diritto e filosofia. Spazio filosofico, 07.
   Google Scholar
• Mattei, U. (2015). Il benicomunismo e i suoi nemici. Torino: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Mattei, U. (2017, August 10). L’occupazione dei beni comuni è vera politica. Il Fatto Quotidiano.
   Google Scholar
• Mattei, U., & Quarta, A. (2015). Right to the city or urban commoning? Thoughts on the generative transformation of property law. The Italian Law Journal, 01(02), 303–325.
   Google Scholar
• Midnight Notes Collective. (2001). The new enclosures. The Commoner, 2 (pp. 1–15). Retrieved from http://www.thecommoner.org
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mudu, P. (2004). Resisting and challenging neoliberalism: The development of Italian social centers. Antipode, 36, 917–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudu, P. (2012). At the intersection of anarchists and autonomists: Autogestioni and centri sociali. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 11(3), 413–438.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, R. (1977). Education: A school that has still to be invented. In M. Jäggi, R. Müller, & S. Schmid (Eds.), The red Bologna (pp. 111–133). London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2012). Austerity urbanism: American cities under extreme economy. ity: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 16(6), 626–655.
   Google Scholar
• Quarta, A., & Spanò, M. (2016). Introduzione. Il Comune che c’è. In A. Quarta & M. Spanò (Eds.), Beni Comuni 2.0. Contro Egemonia e Nuove Istituzioni (pp. 216). Milano: Mimesis.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. R. (1998). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, U., & Enright, T. (2017). Ambivalence of the urban commons. In A. Jonas, K. Ward, B. Miller, & D. Wilson (Eds.), Handbook on spaces of urban politics (pp. 77–88). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruming, K. (2017). Post-political planning and community opposition: Asserting and challenging consensus in planning urban regeneration in Newcastle, NSW. Geographical Research, 56(2), 181–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, S. (1977). The precondition. In The Red Bologna (pp. 29–42). London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrides, S. (2016). Common space : the city as commons. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stinco, G. (2017, February 17). Università di Bologna, la protesta non si ferma. Il Manifesto.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 601–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Post-democratic cities for whom and for what? Regional studies association annual conference, Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2014). Where is the political? Insurgent mobilisations and the incipient “return of the political”. Space and Polity, 18(2), 122–136.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. (1987). The management of common property resources: Finding a cooperative solution. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (1981). Accelerated development in Sub-Saharan Africa. An agenda for action. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (1992). World Development Report 1992: Development and the Environment. Oxford University Press, p. 324. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/995041468323374213/pdf/105170REPLACEMENT0WDR01992.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wu Ming. (2017a). Difendere XM24 per tornare a respirare, Wu Ming. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/0By3pel23h55TVkdTTjBqSlN4aUk/view
   Google Scholar
• Wu Ming. (2017b). La svolta della Bolognina 2.0 | Il PD realizza il programma di Salvini. - Giap, Wu Ming Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.wumingfoundation.com/giap/2017/02/la-svolta-della-bolognina-2-0-il-pd-realizza-il-programma-di-salvini/
   Google Scholar