Elite city-deals for economic growth? Problematizing the complexities of devolution, city-region building, and the (re)positioning of civil society

References

• Ayres, S., Sandford, M., & Coombes, T. (2017). Policy-making ‘front’ and ‘back’ stage: Assessing the implications for effectiveness and democracy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19, 861–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., & Budd, L. (2016). Devolution and the UK economy. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, C., & Fothergill, S. (2016). The uneven impact of welfare reform. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.
   Google Scholar
• Beel, D., Jones, M., & Jones, I. R. (2016). Regulation, governance and agglomeration: Making links in city-region research. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1376(December).
   Google Scholar
• Beel, D., Jones, M., Jones, I. R., & Escadale, W. (2017). Connected growth: Developing a framework to drive inclusive growth across a city-region. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 32, 565–575.
   Google Scholar
• Breathnach, P. (2014). Creating city-region governance structures in a dysfunctional polity: The case of Ireland’s national spatial strategy. Urban Studies, 51(11), 2267–2284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, P. (2014). Depoliticisation: Economic crisis and political management. Policy and Politics, 42, 189–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser, M. (2013). Democratic accountability and metropolitan governance: The case of South Hampshire, UK. Urban Studies, 51(11), 2336–2353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. (2015). Benchmarking future city-regions beyond nation-states. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2, 351–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney, P. (2016). How does single party dominance influence civil society organisations engagement strategies? Exploratory analysis of participative mainstreaming in a ‘regional’ European polity. Public Policy and Administration, 31, 122–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, N., & Cochrane, A. (2013). Geographies and politics of localism: The localism of the United Kingdom’s coalition government. Political Geography, 34, 10–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, G., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2016). Divergent cities? Unequal urban growth and development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 9, 259–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, K. (1997). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, ore looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, R. (1999). ‘A process, not an event': Devolution in Wales, 1998–2018. Retrieved from https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8318
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S., & Blanco, I. (2017). Austerity urbanism: Patterns of neo-liberalisation and resistance in six cities of Spain and the UK. Environment and Planning A, 49, 1517–1536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deas, I. (2014). The search for territorial fixes in subnational governance: City-regions and the disputed emergence of post-political consensus in Manchester, England. Urban Studies, 51(11), 2285–2314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Business Innovation and Skills. (2010). Understanding local growth ( 7, pp. 1–58). Retrieved from Bis.Gov.Uk
   Google Scholar
• Dicks, B. (2014). Participatory community regeneration: A discussion of risks, accountability and crisis in devolved wales. Urban Studies, 51(5), 959–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, S., & Goodwin, M. (1988). The local state and uneven development. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, D., & Jones, M. (2009). City-regions: New geographies of uneven development and inequality. Regional Studies, 43, 247–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etherington, D., & Jones, M. (2016a). Devolution and disadvantage in the Sheffield City Region: An assessment of employment, skills, and welfare policies. Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, D., & Jones, M. (2016b). The city-region chimera: The political economy of metagovernance failure in Britain. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 9, 371–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etherington, D., & Jones, M. (2018). Re-stating the post-political: Depoliticization, social inequalities, and city-region growth. Environment and Planning A, 50(1), 51–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, E. A., Kerr, P., & Byrne, C. (2014). Rolling back to roll forward: Depoliticisation and the extension of government. Policy and Politics, 42, 225–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. (2012). Triumph of the city. London: Pan.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, A. (2007). Taking city regions seriously? Response to debate on ? City-regions: New geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31, 443–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2006). Re-reading the new regionalism: A sympathetic critique. Space and Polity, 10, 21–46.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2007). From competitive regions to competitive city-regions: A new orthodoxy, but some old mistakes. Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 311–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2012). Life after regions? The evolution of city-regionalism in England. Regional Studies, 46, 1243–1259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., & Allmendinger, P. (2015). Fluid spatial imaginaries: Evolving estuarial city-regional spaces. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39, 857–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D., & Vigar, G. (2010). The new spatial planning: Territorial management with soft spaces and fuzzy boundaries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., & Oosterlynck, S. (2013). Spaces of neoliberal experimentation: Soft spaces, postpolitics, and neoliberal governmentality. Environment and Planning A, 45, 217–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Deas, I., & Hincks, S. (2014). Making an impact: When agglomeration boosterism meets antiplanning rhetoric. Environment and Planning A, 46, 265–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heley, J. (2013). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries and spatial governance in post-devolution Wales. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, 1325–1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hincks, S., Deas, I., & Haughton, G. (2017). Real geographies, real economies and soft spatial imaginaries: Creating a ‘more than Manchester’ region. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41, 642–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2015). Cities and local government devolution bill. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2016). Cardiff Capital Region City Deal. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, J., & Phillips, S. D. (1996). Regime shift: New citizenship practices in Canada. International Journal of Canadian Studies, 14, 111–136.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place. Pensylvania: Penn State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2014). Repoliticising depoliticisation: Theoretical preliminaries on some responses to the American fiscal and eurozone debt crises. Policy and Politics, 42, 207–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2016). The state: Past, present, future. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, A. E. G. (2012). City-regionalism. Progress in Human Geography, 36, 822–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (1999). New institutional spaces: Training and enterprise councils and the remaking of economic governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., Orford, S., & McFarlane, V. (Eds.). (2015). People, places, policies: Knowing contemporary Wales through new localities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, B., & Bradley, J. (2014). The metropolitan revolution: How cities and metros are fixing our broken politics and fragile economy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M., Loughlin, J. P., & Deschouwer, K. (2003, April 1). Culture, institutions and economic development: A study of eight European regions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, A. (2009). Mind the gap. The theory and practice of state rescaling: Institutional morphology and the ‘new’ city-regionalism. Space and Polity, 13, 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinnon, D. (2016). Regional inequality, regional policy and progressive regionalism. Soundings, 65, 141–159.
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: On the state, politics, scale, and explanation. Political Geography, 18, 697–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod, G., & Jones, M. (2007). Territorial, scalar, networked, connected: In what sense a ‘regional world’? Regional Studies, 41, 1177–1191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2015). Rebalancing the spatial economy: The challenge for regional theory. Territory, Politics, Governance, 3, 235–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan, G., & Mohan, J. (2002). Placing social capital. Progress in Human Geography, 26, 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muldoon-Smith, K., & Greenhalgh, P. (2015). Passing the buck without the bucks: Some reflections on fiscal decentralisation and the business rate retention scheme in England. Local Economy, 30, 609–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, M., & Overman, H. (2013). Agglomeration, clusters, and industrial policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 29, 383–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J., & Clarke, J. (2009). Publics, politics and power: Remaking the public in public services. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, P., & Pike, A. (2015a). City deals, decentralisation and the governance of local infrastructure funding and financing in the UK. National Institute Economic Review, 233, R14–R26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, P., & Pike, A. (2015b). The governance of local infrastructure funding and financing. Infrastructure Complexity, 2(3), 1–9. doi:10.1186/s40551-015-0007-6
   Google Scholar
• Omstedt, M. 2016. Reinforcing unevenness: Post-crisis geography and the spatial selectivity of the state. Regional studies, Regional Science, 3, 99–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, J. (2005). Governmentality and regional economic strategies. In J. Hillier & E. Rooksby (Eds.), Habitus: A sense of place (pp. 131–157). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (1995). Moving and shaking: Business élites, state localism and urban privatism. Progress in Human Geography, 19, 16–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2012). Austerity urbanism. City, 16, 626–655.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 41, 169–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015). Fast policy: Experimental statecraft at the thresholds of neoliberalism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, S. (2016). Statecraft, scalecraft and local government reorganisation in Wales. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(7), 1306–1323.
   Google Scholar
• Penny, J. (2016). Between coercion and consent: The politics of ‘cooperative governance’ at a time of ‘austerity localism’ in London. Urban Geography, 38, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugalis, L., & Townsend, A. R. (2012). Rebalancing England: Sub-national development (once again) at the crossroads. Urban Research & Practice, 5, 157–174.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. (2004). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: Uinversity of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, T. D. (2006). Local representations in crisis: Governance, citizenship regimes, and UK TECs and Ontario local boards. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 409–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2003). Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies, 37, 579–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, K., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2017). ‘Disorganised devolution': Reshaping metropolitan governance in England in a period of austerity. Raumforschung und Raumordnung/Spatial Research and Planning, 75(3), 211–224.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M. (2013). Keys to the city: How economics, institutions, social interaction, and politics shape development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33, 601–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaney, J. (2016). Limits of devolution: Localism, economics and post-democracy. The Political Quarterly, 87, 546–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waite, D. (2015). City profile: Cardiff and the shift to city-regionalism. Cities (London, England), 48, 21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WalesOnline.co.uk. (2016). New era for South Wales as £1.2bn City Deal is signed today. Retrieved from April 12, 2018, https://www.walesonline.co.uk/business/business-news/new-era-south-wales-12bn-1104036
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K., Newman, J., John, P., Theodore, N., Macleavy, J., & Cochrane, A. (2015). Whatever happened to local government? A review symposium. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2, 435–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh Government. (2008). People, places, futures: The Wales spatial plan. Cardiff: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Government. (2012, July). City regions final report. Cardiff: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Government. (2015a). Well-being of future generations (Wales) Act 2015. Cardiff: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Government. (2015b, April). White paper reforming local government: power to local people. Cardiff: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Government. (2017). White paper: Reforming local government: Resilient and renewed. Cardiff: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, J. (2016). Emerging geographies of English localism: The case of neighbourhood planning. Political Geography, 53, 43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar