6,260
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Introductions

Introducing ‘Brexit Geographies’: five provocations

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 97-110 | Received 05 Nov 2018, Accepted 23 Nov 2018, Published online: 07 Dec 2018

References

  • Anderson, B., & Wilson, H. F. (2018). Everyday Brexits. Area, 50(2), 291–295. doi: 10.1111/area.12385
  • Anthony, G. (2017). Brexit and the Irish border: Legal and political questions. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy/British Academy Briefing.
  • Bachmann, V., & Sidaway, J. D. (2016). Brexit geopolitics. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 77, 47–50.
  • Becker, S. O., Fetzer, T., & Novy, D. (2017). Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis. Economic Policy, 32(92), 601–650. doi: 10.1093/epolic/eix012
  • Benson, M., Collins, K., & O’Reilly, K. (2018). What does Brexit mean for UK citizens living in the EU27? Talking about the citizens’ rights agreements with UK citizens across the EU27. London: Goldsmith.
  • Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., & Kohl, T. (2018). Consequences of Brexit and options for a ‘global Britain’. Papers in Regional Science, 97(1), 55–72. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12343
  • Bromley-Davenport, H., MacLeavy, J., & Manley, D. (2018). Brexit in Sunderland: The production of difference and division in the UK referendum on European Union membership. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space. doi: 10.1177/0263774X18804225
  • Burnett, J. (2017). Racial violence and the Brexit state. Race & Class, 58(4), 85–97. doi: 10.1177/0306396816686283
  • Calhoun, C. (2016). Brexit is a mutiny against the cosmopolitan elite. New Perspectives Quarterly, 33(3), 50–58.
  • Chen, W., Los, B., McCann, P., Ortega-Argilés, R., Thissen, M., & van Oort, F. (2018). The continental divide? Economic exposure to Brexit in regions and countries on both sides of The Channel. Papers in Regional Science, 97(1), 25–54. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12334
  • Colantone, I., & Stanig, P. (2018). Global competition and Brexit. American Political Science Review, 112(2), 201–218. doi: 10.1017/S0003055417000685
  • Coppock, J. T. (1974). Geography and public policy: Challenges, opportunities and implications. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 63, 1–16. doi: 10.2307/621525
  • Dhingra, S., Machin, S., & Overman, H. (2017a). Local economic effects of Brexit. National Institute Economic Review, 242(1), R24–R36. doi: 10.1177/002795011724200112
  • Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., Rappoport, V., Sampson, T., & Thomas, C. (2018). UK trade and FDI: A post-Brexit perspective. Papers in Regional Science, 97(1), 9–24. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12345
  • Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., & Sampson, T. (2017b). A hitch-hiker’s guide to post-Brexit trade negotiations: Options and principles. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33, S22–S30. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grx005
  • Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G. I., Sampson, T., & Reenen, J. V. (2016). The consequences of Brexit for UK trade and living standards. LSE Occasional Papers, LSE.
  • Di Cataldo, M. (2017). The impact of EU objective 1 funds on regional development: Evidence from the UK and the prospect of Brexit. Journal of Regional Science, 57(5), 814–839. doi: 10.1111/jors.12337
  • Di Cataldo, M., & Monastiriotis, V. (2018). An assessment of EU Cohesion policy in the UK regions: Direct effects and the dividend of targeting (LEQS Paper No. 135/2018). Brussels: LEQS.
  • Doherty, M. (2016). Through the looking glass: Brexit, free movement and the future. King’s Law Journal, 27(3), 375–386. doi: 10.1080/09615768.2016.1250463
  • Dorling, D. (2016). Brexit: The decision of a divided country. BMJ, 354.
  • Dorling, D., & Tomlinson, S. (2018). Rule Britannia: BREXIT and the End of empire. London: Biteback.
  • Dörry, S. (2017). The geo-politics of Brexit, the euro and the City of London. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 85, 1–4.
  • Dougan, M. (Ed.). (2017). The UK after Brexit: Legal and policy challenges. Cambridge: Intersentia.
  • Dougan, M. (2018). The institutional consequences of a bespoke agreement with the UK based on a ‘close co-operation’ model. Brussels: European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizen’s Rights and Constitutional Affairs.
  • Elden, S. (2013). The Birth of territory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ford, R., & Goodwin, M. (2017). Britain after Brexit: A nation divided. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 17–30. doi: 10.1353/jod.2017.0002
  • Gilmartin, M., Wood, P., & O’Callaghan, C. (2018). Borders, mobility and belonging in the era of Brexit and Trump. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Goodhart, D. (2017). The road to Somewhere: The populist revolt and the future of politics. London: Hurst and Co.
  • Goodwin, M., & Milazzo, C. (2017). Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(3), 450–464. doi: 10.1177/1369148117710799
  • Goodwin, M. J., & Heath, O. (2016). The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: An aggregate-level analysis of the result. The Political Quarterly, 87(3), 323–332. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12285
  • Gordon, I. R. (2018). In what sense left behind by globalisation? Looking for a less reductionist geography of the populist surge in Europe. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 95–113. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsx028
  • Greater London Authority. (2018). Preparing for Brexit. London: Author.
  • Hall, S., & Wójcik, D. (2018). ‘Ground Zero’of Brexit: London as an international financial centre. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.002
  • Harvey, D. (1974). What kind of geography for what kind of policy? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 63, 18–24. doi: 10.2307/621527
  • Harvey, D. (1984). On the history and present condition of geography: An historical materialist manifesto. The Professional Geographer, 36, 1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1984.00001.x
  • Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hayward, K., & Murphy, M. C. (2018). The EU’s influence on the peace process and agreement in Northern Ireland in light of Brexit. Ethnopolitics, 17, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/17449057.2018.1472426
  • Hazeldine, T. (2017). The revolt of the rustbelt. New Left Review, 105, 51–79.
  • Higgins, K. W. (2018). National belonging post-referendum: Britons living in other EU member states respond to “Brexit”. Area. doi: 10.1111/area.12472
  • Hinshaw, R. E. (2006). Living with nature’s extremes: The life of Gilbert Fowler White. New York: Johnson Books.
  • Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259–1277. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785
  • Jensen, M. D., & Snaith, H. (2016). When politics prevails: The political economy of a Brexit. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1302–1310. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1174531
  • Jessop, B. (2017). The organic crisis of the British state: Putting Brexit in its place. Globalizations, 14(1), 133–141. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2016.1228783
  • Jessop, B. (2018). Neoliberalization, uneven development, and Brexit: Further reflections on the organic crisis of the British state and society. European Planning Studies, 26(9), 1728–1746. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1501469
  • Lai, K. P., & Pan, F. (2018). Brexit and shifting geographies of financial centres in Asia. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.004
  • Lavery, S., McDaniel, S., & Schmid, D. (2018). New geographies of European financial competition? Frankfurt, Paris and the political economy of Brexit. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.03.021
  • Lee, N., Morris, K., & Kemeny, T. (2018). Immobility and the Brexit vote. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 143–163. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsx027
  • Leslie, P. A., & Arı, B. (2018). Could rainfall have swung the result of the Brexit referendum? Political Geography, 65, 134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.05.009
  • Livingstone, D. N. (1992). The geographical tradition: Episodes in the history of a contested enterprise. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Los, B., McCann, P., Springford, J., & Thissen, M. (2017). The mismatch between local voting and the local economic consequences of Brexit. Regional Studies, 51(5), 786–799. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1287350
  • Lulle, A., Moroşanu, L., & King, R. (2018). And then came Brexit: Experiences and future plans of young EU migrants in the London region. Population, Space and Place, 24(1), e2122. doi: 10.1002/psp.2122
  • Manley, D., Jones, K., & Johnston, R. (2017). The geography of Brexit–what geography? Modelling and predicting the outcome across 380 local authorities. Local Economy, 32(3), 183–203. doi: 10.1177/0269094217705248
  • McCann, P. (2018). The trade, geography and regional implications of Brexit. Papers in Regional Science, 97(1), 3–8. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12352
  • Miller, R. G. (2018). (Un)settling home during the Brexit process. Population, Space and Place, e2203. doi: 10.1002/psp.2203
  • North, P. (2017). Local economies of Brexit. Local Economy, 32(3), 204–218. doi: 10.1177/0269094217705818
  • Owen, J., Rutter, J., & Lloyd, L. (2018). Preparing Brexit: How ready is Whitehall. Institute for Government, Retrieved from www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/preparing-brexit-how-ready-whitehall
  • Paddison, R., & Rae, N. (2017). Brexit and Scotland: Towards a political geography perspective. Social Space, 13, 1–18.
  • Pelling, M. (2011). Adaptation to climate Change. London: Routledge.
  • Picketty, T. (2013). Capital in the twenty first century. Boston: Harvard University Press.
  • Picker, G., Murji, K., & Boatcă, M. (2019). Racial urbanities: Towards a global cartography. Social Identities, 25, 1–10. doi: 10.1080/13504630.2017.1418606
  • Pollard, J. S. (2018). Brexit and the wider UK economy. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.005
  • Zhang, A. (2018). New findings on key factors influencing the UK’s referendum on leaving the EU. World Development, 102, 304–314. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.017

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.