References
- (The 31 studies analyzed in this review are marked with *.)
- Akai, N., & Goto, T. (2018). Strategic intertemporal budget allocation of local governments in the model with spillovers and mergers. OSIPP Discussion Paper 1-26.
- Alesina, A., & Spolaore, E. (2003). The size of Nations. MIT Press.
- Allers, M. A., & Geertsema, J. B. (2016). The effects of local government amalgamation on public spending and service levels. Evidence from 15 years of municipal boundary reform. Journal of Regional Science, 56(4), 659–682. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12268. *.
- Andrews, R. (2015). Vertical consolidation and financial sustainability: Evidence from English local government. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(6), 1518–1545. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15614179. *.
- Andrews, R., & Boyne, G. A. (2009). Size, structure and administrative overheads: An empirical analysis of English local authorities. Urban Studies, 46(4), 739–759. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009102127
- Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: And empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
- Askim, J., Klausen, J. E., Vabo, S. I., & Bjurstrøm, K. (2017). Territorial upscaling of local governments: A variable-oriented approach to explaining variance among western European countries. Local Government Studies, 43(4), 555–576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1310102
- Baldersheim, H., & Rose, L. (2010). Territorial choice: The politics of boundaries and borders. Palgrave-Macmillan.
- Bel, G., & Sebő, M. (2019). Does inter-municipal cooperation really reduce delivery costs? An empirical evaluation of the role of scale economies, transaction costs, and governance arrangements. Urban Affairs Review, 55(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419839492
- Bikker, J., & Van der Linde, D. (2016). Scale economies in local public administration. Local Government Studies, 42(3), 441–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2016.1146139
- Blesse, S., & Baskaran, T. (2016). Do municipal mergers reduce costs? Evidence form German federal state. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 59, 54–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.04.003. *.
- Blom-Hansen, J. (2010). Municipal amalgamations and common pool problems: The Danish local government reform in 2007. Scandinavian Political Studies, 33(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2009.00239.x
- Blom-Hansen, J., Houlberg, K., & Serritzlew, S. (2014). Size, democracy and economic costs of running the political system. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 790–803. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12096. *.
- Blom-Hansen, J., Houlberg, K., Serritzlew, S., & Treisman, D. (2016). Jurisdiction size and local government policy expenditure: Assessing the effect of municipal amalgamation. American Political Science Review, 110(4), 812–831. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000320. *.
- Bours, A. (1993). Management, tiers, size and amalgamations of local government. In R. J. Benett (Ed.), Local government in the New Europe (pp. 109–129). Belhaven Press.
- Boyne, G. (1995). Population size and economies of scale in local government. Policy & Politics, 23(3), 213–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/030557395782453446
- Brink, A. (2004). The break-up of municipalities: Voting behavior in local referenda. Economics of Governance, 5(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-003-0068-0
- Caulfield, J., & Larsen, H. O. (2002). Introduction. In J. Caufield, & O. L. Helge (Eds.), Local government at the Millenium (pp. 9–27). Leske and Budrich.
- Chatry, I., & Hulbert, C. (2017). Multi-level governance reforms: Overview of OECD country experiences. OECD Publishing.
- Cobban, T. W. (2019). Bigger is better: Reducing the cost of local administration by increasing jurisdiction size in Ontario, Canada, 1995-2010. Urban Affairs Review, 55(2), 462–500. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417719324. *.
- Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Shadish, W. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
- Dollery, B., Kortt, M., & Grant, B. (2011). A normative model for local government de-amalgamation in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 601–615. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2011.623670
- Dollery, B., & Ting, S. K. (2017). Counting the cost: An analysis of the post-merger performance of the Clarence Valley council in New South Wales. Economic Analysis and Policy, 56, 72–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2017.08.008
- Dowding, K., John, P., & Biggs, S. (1994). Tiebout: A survey of the empirical literature. Urban Studies, 31(4/5), 767–797. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989420080671
- Egger, P. H., Koethenbuerger, M., & Loumeau, G. (2017). Local border reforms and economic activity. CESifo Working Paper No. 6738 Category 1: Public Finance.*.
- Erlingsson, G. O. (2005). Modelling secessions from municipalities. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0080-6757.2005.00125.x
- Feld, L. P., & Fritz, B. (2015). The political economy of municipal amalgamation: Evidence of common pool effects and local public debt. Freiburger Diskussionspapiere zur Ordnungsökonomik No. 15/10. *.
- Foged, S. K. (2016). The relationship between population size and contracting out public services: Evidence from a quasi-experiment in Danish municipalities. Urban Affairs Review, 52(3), 348–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087415591288. *.
- Goto, T., & Yamamoto, G. (2018). Creative Accounting and Municipal Mergers–A Theoretical and Empirical Approach. OSIPP Discusion Paper No 18E012. Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University. *.
- Hall, J. C., Matti, J., & Zhou, J. (2017). The economic impact of city-county consolidations: A Synthetic Control Approach. Working Papers No.17-08. Department of Economics, West Virginia University. *.
- Hanes, N. (2015). Amalgamation impacts on local public expenditures in Sweden. Local Government Studies, 41(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.869496
- Hansen, S. W. (2014). Common pool size and the project size: An empirical test on expenditures using Danish municipal mergers. Public Choice, 159(1-2), 3–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-012-0009-y. *.
- Hansen, S. W., Houlberg, K., & Pedersen, L. H. (2014). Do municipal mergers improve fiscal outcomes? Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(2), 196–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12020. *.
- Harjunen, O., Saarimaa, T., & Tukiainen, J. (2017). Political representation and effects of municipal mergers. VATT Working Papers No. 98. Helsinki: VATT Institute for Economic Research.*.
- Hinnerich, B. T. (2009). Do merging local governments free ride on their counterparts when facing boundary reform? Journal of Public Economics, 93(5-6), 721–728. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.01.003. *.
- Hirota, H., & Yunoue, H. (2014). Municipal mergers and special provisions of local council members in Japan. The Japanese Political Economy, 40(3-4), 96–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2329194X.2014.1006453. *.
- Hirsch, W. Z. (1968). The supply of urban public services. Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Jordahl, H., & Liang, Ch-Y. (2010). Merged municipalities, higher debt: On free-riding and the common pool problem in politics. Public Choice, 143(1-2), 151–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9495-y. *.
- Kauder, B. (2016). Incorporation of municipalities and population growth – A Propensity Score matching approach. Papers in Regional Science, 95(3), 539–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12148. *.
- Keating, M. (1995). Size, efficiency and democracy: Consolidation, fragmentation and public choice. In D. Judge, G. Stoker, & H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of Urban Politics (pp. 117–134). Sage.
- King, D. S. (1984). Fiscal tiers: The economics of Multi-level government. Allen & Unwin.
- Kortt, M. A., Dollery, B., & Drew, J. (2015). Municipal mergers in New Zealand: An empirical analysis of the proposed amalgamation of Hawke’s Bay Councils. Local Government Studies, 42(2), 228–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2015.1007133
- Krøtel, S. M. L., Villadsen, A. R., & Hansen, M. B. (2017). What to do here? What to do there? The effect of change in organization size on public management. International Public Management Journal, 20(4), 675–700. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1276035. *.
- Lacroix, G., & Santarossa, G. (2003). L’impact des regroupements municipaux sur le fardeau fiscal et la valeur des propriétés résidentielles au Québec, 1992-1999. Cahier de recherche/Working Paper3(31). *.
- Leland, S., & Thurmaier, K. (2005). When efficiency is unbelievable: Normative lessons from 30 years of city–county consolidations. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 475–489. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00473.x
- Lima, R. C. A., & Neto, R. M. S. (2018). Secession of municipalities and economies of scale: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Regional Science, 58(1), 159–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12348. *.
- Lin, J. (2012). Geography, history, economies of density and the location of cities. Business Review, 3, 18–24.
- Luchinger, S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Skalenertrage in der offentlichen Kernverwaltung Eine empirische Analyse anhand von Gemeindefusionen. Swiss Political Science Review, 8(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2002.tb00333.x. *.
- McQuestin, D., Drew, J., & Dollery, B. (2018). Do municipal mergers improve technical efficiency? An empirical analysis of the 2008 Queensland municipal merger Program. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 77(3), 442–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12286. *.
- Meligrana, J., & Razin, E. (2004). Conclusion: Changing local government boundaries in different political-ideological environments. In J. Meligrana (Ed.), Redrawing local government boundaries: An international study of politics, procedures, and decisions (pp. 227–239). UBC Press.
- Meyer, B. D. (1995). Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1995.10524589
- Miyazaki, T. (2017). Examining the relationship between municipal consolidation and cost reduction: An instrumental variable approach. Applied Economics, 50(10), 1108–1121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1352077. *.
- Moisio, A., & Uusitalo, R. (2013). The impact of municipal mergers on local public expenditures in Finland. Public Finance and Management, 13, 148–166. *.
- Nakazawa, K. (2018). Free-rider behaviour under voluntary amalgamation: The case of setting the long-term care insurance premium in Japan. Papers in Regional Science, 1409–1423. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12312. *.
- Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. Brace and Jovanovich.
- O’Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (1999). Modeling the impact of public management: Implications of Structural context. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(4), 505–526. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024421
- Paddison, R. (2004). Redrawing local boundaries: Deriving the principles for politically just procedures. In J. Meligrana (Ed.), Redrawing local boundaries: An international study of politics, procedures, and decisions (pp. 19–37). UBC Press.
- Pano-Puey, E., Magre Ferran, J., & Puiggros Mussons, C. (2018). Beyond size: Overcoming fragmentation by inter-municipal associations in Spain? The case of Catalonia. International Review of Administrative Science, 84(4), 639–658. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317727339
- Primo, D., & Snyder, J. (2008). Distributive politics and the law of ‘/n. Journal of Politics, 70(2), 477–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080444
- Reingewertz, Y. (2012). Do municipal amalgamation work? Evidence from municipalities in Israel. Journal of Urban Economics, 72(2-3), 240–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2012.06.001. *.
- Reingewertz, Y., & Serritzlew, S. (2019). Special issue on municipal amalgamations: Guest editors’ introduction. Local Government Studies, 45(5), 603–610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1615465
- Roesel, F. (2017). Do mergers of large local governments reduce expenditures? – evidence from Germany using the synthetic control method. European Journal of Political Economy, 50, 22–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.10.002. *.
- Saarimaa, T., & Tukiainen, J. (2015). Common pool problems in voluntary mergers. European Journal of Political Economy, 38, 140–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.02.006. *.
- Sancton, A. (2000). Merger mania: The assault on local government. McGill’Queen’s University Press.
- Sedmihradska, L. (2011). Voluntary municipal associations in the Czech Republic: Unfulfilled expectations? In P. Swianiewicz (Ed.), Working together: Inter-municipal cooperation in five central European countries (pp. 165–210). LGI-Open Society Institute.
- Sharpe, L. J. (1995). Local government: size, efficiency and citizen participation. In: The Size of Municipalities, Efficiency and Citizen Participation. Local and Regional Authorities in Europe No. 56. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
- Steiner, R., Kaiser, C., & Eythorsson, G. (2016). A comparative analysis of amalgamation reforms in selected European countrie. In S. Kuhlmann, & G. Bouckaert (Eds.), Local public sector reforms in times of crisis (pp. 23–42). Palgrave-Macmillan.
- Strebel, M. A. (2019). Why voluntary municipal merger projects fail: Evidence from popular votes in Switzerland. Local Government Studies, 45(5), 654–675. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1584557
- Swianiewicz, P. (2002). Consolidation of fragmentation? The size of local government in central and Eastern Europe. LGI – Open Society Institute.
- Swianiewicz, P. (2010). If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution? East European perspective. Local Government Studies, 36(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930903560547
- Swianiewicz, P. (2018). If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution? – Ten years later. Local Government Studies, 44(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1403903
- Swianiewicz, P., Gendźwiłł, A., & Zardi, A. (2017). Territorial reforms in Europe: Does size matters. Territorial amalgamation Toolkit. Strasbourg: Centre of Expertise for Local Government Reform. Council of Europe.
- Swianiewicz, P., & Łukomska, J. (2019). Is small beautiful? The quasi-experimental analysis of the impact of territorial fragmentation on costs in Polish local governments. Urban Affairs Review, 55(3), 832–855. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417744676. *.
- Tang, W., & Hewings, G. J. (2017). Do city–county mergers in China promote local economic development? Economics of Transition, 25(3), 439–469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12118. *.
- Tavares, A. F. (2018). Municipal amalgamations and their effects: A literature review. Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, 22(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2018-0005
- Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/257839
- Treisman, D. (2007). The architecture of government: Rethinking political decentralization. Cambridge University Press.
- Walker, R. M., & Andrews, R. (2013). Local government management and performance: A review of evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 101–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut038
- Weingast, B., Shepsle, K., & Johnsen, C. (1981). The political economy of benefits and costs: A neoclassical approach to distributive politics. Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 642–664. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/260997