How digital citizenship regimes are rescaling European nation-states

References

• Agnew, J. (2017). The tragedy of the nation-state. Territory, Politics, Governance, 5(4), 347–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1357257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J. (2020). Power’s quiet reach and why it should exercise US. Space and Polity, 24(3), 408–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2020.1759412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. (2021). The deep border. Political Geography, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102547
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. (2022). Machine learning political orders. Review of International Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210522000031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aradau, C., & Blanke, T. (2021). Algorithmic reason: The new government of self and other. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arrighi, J.-T., & Stjepanović, D. (2019). Introduction: The rescaling of territory and citizenship in Europe. Ethnopolitics, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2019.1585087
   Google Scholar
• Atzori, M. (2017). Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: Is the state still necessary? Journal of Governance and Regulation, 6(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgr_v6_i1_p5
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2009). Open questions on state rescaling. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. (2015). Benchmarking future city-regions beyond nation-states. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1046908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. (2018a). ‘Algorithmic nations’: Seeing like a city-regional and techno-political conceptual assemblage. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 5(1), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2018.1507754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. (2018b). (Smart) citizens from data providers to decision-makers? The case study of Barcelona. Sustainability, 10(9), 3252. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. (2018c). Metropolitanising small European stateless city-regionalised nations. Space and Polity, 22(3), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2018.1555958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. (2019). Catalonia rescaling Spain: Is it feasible to accommodate its “stateless citizenship”? Regional Science Policy & Practice, 11(5), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. (2020a). Emerging citizenship regimes and rescaling (European) nation-states: Algorithmic, liquid, metropolitan and stateless citizenship ideal types. In S. Moisio, N. Koch, A. E. G. Jonas, C. Lizotte, & J. Luukkonen (Eds.), Handbook on the changing geographies of the state: New spaces of geopolitics (pp. 368–384). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978057.00048.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. (2020b). Platform and data co-operatives amidst European pandemic citizenship. Sustainability, 12(20), 8309. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. (2021a). Emerging digital citizenship regimes: Pandemic, algorithmic, liquid, metropolitan, and stateless citizenships. Citizenship Studies, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2021.2012312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. (2021b). The right to have digital rights in smart cities. Sustainability, 13(20), 11438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011438. Special issue ‘social innovation in sustainable urban development.’
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. (2021c). Data co-operatives through data sovereignty. Smart Cities, 4(3), 1158–1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4030062 Special issue ‘feature papers for smart cities.’
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. (2021d). Smart city citizenship. Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. (2022). Emerging digital citizenship regimes: Postpandemic technopolitical democracies. Bingley: Emerald Points.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, I., & Ahedo, I. (2021). Postpandemic technopolitical democracies. Frontiers in Political Science – Politics of Technology. Online: https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/28882/postpandemic-technopolitical-democracies
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, I., & Bustard, J. (2022). The dilemmas around digital citizenship in a post-Brexit and post-pandemic Northern Ireland: Towards an Algorithmic Nation? 25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2022.2026565.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, I., Pérez-Batlle, M., & Batlle-Montserrat, J. (2021). People-centered smart cities: An exploratory action research on the cities’ coalition for digital rights. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1994861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celeste, E. (2019). Digital constitutionalism: A new systematic theorisation. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 33(1), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2019.1562604
   Google Scholar
• Cheney-Lippold, J. (2017). We are data: Algorithms and the making of our digital selves. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L., & Georgiou, M. (2022). The digital border: Migration, technology, power. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., Stephansen, H., Fotopoulou, A., MacDonald, R., Clark, W., & Dickens, L. (2014). Digital citizenship? Narrative exchange and the changing terms of civic culture. Citizenship Studies, 18(6-7), 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2013.865903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gregorio, G. (2022). Digital constitutionalism in Europe: Reframing rights and powers in the algorithmic society. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dumbrava, C. (2017). Citizenship and technology. In A. Shachar, R. Bauböck, I. Bloemraad, & M. Vink (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of citizenship (pp. 767–788). OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the college de France, 1975-76. Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S. W. (2022). Citizenship in hard times: How ordinary people respond to democratic threat. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harari, Y. N. (2018). 21 lessons for the century. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2017). Digital citizenship and surveillance society. International Journal of Communications, 11, 731–739. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel, P., Braun, M., Tretter, M., & Dabrock, P. (2021). Data sovereignty: A review. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720982012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isin, E., & Ruppert, E. (2015). Being digital citizens. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E., & Ruppert, E. (2020). The birth of sensory power: How a pandemic made it visible? Big Data & Society, 7(2), 205395172096920–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720969208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isin, E., & Turner, B. S. (2007). Investigating citizenship: An agenda for citizenship studies. Citizenship Studies, 11(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020601099773
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (2013). Rescaling the European state: The making of territory and the rise of the meso Oxford. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCosker, A., Vivienne, S., & Johns, A. (2016). Negotiating digital citizenship: Control, contest and culture. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. (1991). The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics. American Political Science Review, 85(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400271451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moisio, S., Jonas, A. E. G., Koch, N., Lizotte, C., & Luukkonen, J. (2020). Handbook on the changing geographies of the state: New spaces of geopolitics. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Moraes, J., & Andrade, E. (2015). Who are the citizens of the digital citizenship? The International Review of Information Ethics, 23(11), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.29173/irie227
   Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2007). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ohmae, K. (1995). The end of the nation-state: The rise of regional economies. Simon and Schuster Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Orgad, L., & Baübock, R. (2018). Cloud communities: The drawn of global citizenship? EUI.
   Google Scholar
• Suzor, N. (2018). Digital constitutionalism: Using the rule of law to evaluate the legitimacy of governance by platforms. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 205630511878781–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118787812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammppu, P., Masso, A., Ibrahimi, M., & Abaku, T. (2022). Estonian e-Residency and conceptions of platform-based state-individual relationship. Trames, 26(76/71), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2022.1.01
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J. (1994). The state as container: Territoriality in the modern world-system. Progress in Human Geography, 18(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259401800202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. S. (2017). Contemporary citizenship: Four types. Journal of Citizenship and Globalisation Studies, 1(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/jcgs-2017-0002
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile.
   Google Scholar