2,538
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Towards Post-neoliberal Resource Politics? The International Political Economy (IPE) of Oil and Copper in Brazil and Chile

References

  • Abidin, M.Z. (2001), ‘Competitive Industrialisation with Natural Resource Abundance: Malaysia’, in R. Auty (ed.), Resource Abundance and Economic Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 147–64.
  • Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis (ANP) (2011), ANP Annual Report 2010 (Rio de Janeiro: ANP Publications).
  • Aguiar de Medeiros, C. (2009), ‘Asset-Stripping the State: The Political Economy of Privatization in Latin America’, New Left Review, 55, (January-February), 109–32
  • Aharoni, Y. and Ascher, W. (1998), ‘Restructuring the Arrangements between Government and State Enterprises in the Oil and Mining Sectors’, Natural Resources Forum, 22 (3), pp. 201–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.1998.tb00729.x
  • Alexander, W.L. (ed.) (2009), Lost in the Long Transition: Struggles for Social Justice in Neoliberal Chile (Plymouth: Lexington Books).
  • Arbix, G. and Scott, M. (2010), ‘Beyond Developmentalism and Market Fundamentalism in Brazil: Inclusionary State Activism without Statism’, paper presented at the workshop ‘States, Development and Global Governance’, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 12–13 March
  • Aroca, P. (2001), ‘Impacts and Development in Local Economies based on Mining: The Case of Chilean II Region’, Resources Policy, 27 (2), pp. 119–34. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4207(01)00013-7
  • Artestis, P. and Saad Filho, A. (eds) (2007), Political Economy of Brazil: Recent Economic Performance (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Auty, R.M. (1993), Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies: The Resource Curse Thesis (London: Routledge).
  • Auty, R.M. (ed.) (2001), Resource Abundance and Economic Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Barbier, E. (2003), ‘The Role of Natural Resources in Economic Development’, Australian Economic Papers, 42 (2), pp. 253–72.
  • Barbier, E. (2005), Natural Resources and Economic Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Barbier, E. (2011), Scarcity and Frontiers: How Economies Have Developed through Natural Resource Exploitation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Barton, J. (2002), ‘State Continuismo and Pinochetismo: The Keys to the Chilean Transition’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 21 (3), pp. 358–74. doi: 10.1111/1470-9856.00048
  • Barton, J. and Warwick, M. (2002), ‘The End of Transition? Chile 1990–2000’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 21 (3), pp. 329–38. doi: 10.1111/1470-9856.00046
  • BBC (2012), ‘Argentina Senate Backs YPF Oil Nationalisation’, Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-17850544 [accessed 24 January 2013]
  • Bebbington, A. (ed.) (2012), Social Conflict, Economic Development, and the Extractive Industry: Evidence from South America (London: Routledge).
  • Bebbington, A.et al. (2008), ‘Contention and Ambiguity: Mining and the Possibilities of Development’, Development and Change, 39 (6), pp. 887–914. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00517.x
  • Bergquist, C. (1986), Labour in Latin America. Comparative Essays on Chile, Argentina, Venezuela, and Colombia (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
  • Berrios, R., Marak, A. and Morgensten, S. (2011), ‘Explaining Hydrocarbon Nationalization in Latin America: Economics and Political Ideology’, Review of International Political Economy, 18 (5), pp. 673–97. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2010.493733
  • Blyth, M. (2002), Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Borzutzky, S. and Weeks, G. (eds) (2010), The Bachelet Government: Conflict and Consensus in Post-Pinochet Chile (Florida: University Press of Florida).
  • Brainard, L. and Martínez-Diaz, L. (eds) (2009), Brazil as an Emerging Economic Superpower? (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution).
  • Brautigam, D. (2009), The Dragon's Gift: The Real Story of China in Africa (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Bronstein, H. (2012), ‘Argentina Nationalises Oil Company YPF’, Reuters, Available from: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/04/us-argentina-ypf-idUSBRE8421GV20120504 [accessed 24 January 2013]
  • Brooks, S. (2009), Social Protection and the Market in Latin America. The Transformation of Social Security Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Bunker, S.G. (1985), Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Unequal Exchange and the Failure of the Modern State (Urbana: University of Illinois Press).
  • Bunker, S.G. and Ciccantell, P.S. (2005), Globalization and the Race for Resources (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
  • Burges, S. (2009), ‘Brazil: Toward a (Neo)Liberal Democracy?’, in J. Grugel and P. Riggirozzi (eds), Governance after Neoliberalism in Latin America (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) pp. 195–216.
  • Cameron, M. and Hershberg, E. (eds) (2011), Latin America's Left Turns: Politics, Policies, and Trajectories of Change (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers).
  • Campbell, B. (ed.) (2009), Mining in Africa: Regulation and Development (London: Pluto Press).
  • Campbell, J.L. (2001), ‘Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy’, in J.L. Campbell, O.K. Pedersen (eds), The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis (Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press) pp. 159–90.
  • Cardoso, F.H. (1973), ‘Associated-Dependent Development: Theoretical and Practical Implications’, in A. Stepan (ed.), Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies, Future (New Haven and London: Yale University Press). pp. 142–78.
  • Cardoso, F.H. and Faletto, E. (1979), Dependency and Development in Latin America (Berkeley: University of California Press).
  • Castañeda, J. and Morales, M. (2008), Leftovers: Tales of the Two Latin American Lefts (London: Routledge).
  • Castillo-Ospina, O.L. (forthcoming), ‘Sustainable versus Development? Mining and Natural Resources Governance in Colombia’, in J. Nem Singh and F. Bourgouin (eds), Resource Governance and Developmental States in the Global South: Critical International Political Economy Perspectives (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Chang, H.J. (2007), State-owned Enterprise Reform. UNDESA National Development Strategies Policy Notes (New York: UN Publications).
  • CODELCO (2010), CODELCO Annual Report (2010) (Santiago de Chile: CODELCO).
  • CODELCO (2012), Plan de Inversiones CODELCO Citation2012, March. Available from: http://www.codelco.cl/prontus_codelco/site/artic/20120306/asocfile/20120306130444/plan_de_inversiones_codelco_2012_0503(2012),pdf [accessed 3 April 2012]
  • Collier, R.B. and Collier, D. (2002), Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labour Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
  • Comisión Chilena del Cobre (COCHILCO) (2009), COCHILCO Annuario (Santiago de Chile: COCHILCO Publications).
  • Comisión Chilena del Cobre (COCHILCO) (2010), COCHILCO Annuario (Santiago de Chile: COCHILCO Publications).
  • Di John, J. (2009), From Windfall to Curse? Oil and Industrialisation in Venezuela, 1920–Present (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press).
  • Easterly, W. and Levine, R. (2003), ‘Tropics, Germs and Crops: How Endowments Influence Economic Development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, pp. 3–39.
  • Edwards, S. (2010), Left Behind: Latin America and the False Promise of Populism (Chicago: Chicago University Press).
  • Evans, P. (1979), Dependent Development: Alliance of the Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
  • Evans, P. (1995), Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
  • Farrell, H. and Newman, A. (2010), ‘Making Global Markets: Historical Institutionalism in International Political Economy’, Review of International Political Economy, 17 (4), pp. 609–38. doi: 10.1080/09692291003723672
  • Fleury, A. and Leme Fleury, M.T. (2011), Brazilian Multinationals: Competences for Internationalisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Gallagher, K. and Porzecanski, R. (2010), The Dragon in the Room: China and the Future of Latin American Industrialisation (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
  • Garnaut, R. (2012), ‘The Contemporary China Resources Boom’, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 56, pp. 222–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00581.x
  • Gellert, P.K. (2010a), ‘Rival Transnational Networks, Domestic Politics, and Indonesian Timber’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 40 (4), pp. 539–67. doi: 10.1080/00472336.2010.507041
  • Gellert, P.K. (2010b), ‘Extractive Regimes: Toward a Better Understanding of Indonesian Development’, Rural Sociology, 75 (1), pp. 28–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00001.x
  • Gofas, A. and Hay, C. (2010), The Role of Ideas in Political Analysis: A Portrait of Contemporary Debates, in A. Gofas and C. Hay (eds), (London: Routledge).
  • Goldstein, A. (1999), ‘Brazilian Privatization in International Perspective: The Rocky Path from State Capitalism to Regulatory Capitalism’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 8 (4), pp. 673–711. doi: 10.1093/icc/8.4.673
  • Goldstein, A. (2006), ‘State-owned Enterprises, Privatization and Industrial Policy’, in P. Bianchi and S. Labory (eds), International Handbook on Industrial Policy (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar) pp. 198–214.
  • Goldstein, A. (2007), Multinational Companies from Emerging Economies. Composition, Conceptualisation, and Direction in the Global Economy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • González, F. (2008), Dual Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Institutionalised Regimes in Chile and Mexico, 1970–2000 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
  • Grugel, J. and Riggirozzi, P. (2007), ‘The Return of the State in Argentina’, International Affairs, 83 (1), pp. 87–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2007.00604.x
  • Grugel, J. and Riggirozzi, P. (eds) (2009), Governance after Neoliberalism in Latin America (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Grugel, J. and Riggirozzi, P. (2012), ‘Post Neoliberalism: Rebuilding and Reclaiming the State in Latin America’, Development and Change, 43 (1), pp. 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01746.x
  • Haarstad, H. (ed.) (2012), New Political Spaces in Latin American Natural Resource Governance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Haggard, S. (1990), Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
  • Hall, P.A. (1989), The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
  • Hall, P.A. (1993), ‘Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics, 25 (3), pp. 275–96. doi: 10.2307/422246
  • Hay, C. (2004), ‘The Normalizing Role of Rationalist Assumptions in the Institutional Embedding of Neoliberalism’, Economy and Society, 33 (4), pp. 500–27. doi: 10.1080/0308514042000285260
  • Hay, C. (2011), ‘Ideas and the Construction of Interests’, in D. Béland, R.H. Cox (eds), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Hay, C. and Wincott, D. (1998), ‘Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism’, Political Studies, 46, pp. 951–7. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00177
  • Hertog, S. (2010a), ‘Defying the Resource Curse. Explaining Successful State-Owned Enterprises in Rentier States’, World Politics, 62 (2), pp. 261–301. doi: 10.1017/S0043887110000055
  • Hertog, S. (2010b), Princes, Brokers, and Bureaucrats. Oil and the State in Saudi Arabia (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
  • Hogenboom, B. (2012), ‘The Return of the State and New Extractivism: What about Civil Society?’, in B. Cannon and P. Kirby (eds), Civil Society and the State in Left-led Latin America. Challenges and Limits to Democratization (London: Zed Publications).
  • Hujo, K. (2012), Mining Rents and the Financing of Social Policy: Opportunities and Challenges, in K. Hujo (eds), (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Hujo, K. and McClanahan, S. (2009), Financing Social Policy: Mobilising Resources for Social Development, in K. Hujo and S. McClanahan (eds), (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Humphreys, M., Sachs, J. and Stiglitz, J.E. (2007), Escaping the Resource Curse (New York and Chichester: Columbia University Press).
  • Hunter, W. (2007), ‘The Normalization of an Anomaly: The Workers’ Party in Brazil’, World Politics, 59 (3), pp. 440–75. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100020888
  • Hunter, W. (2010), The Transformation of the Workers' Party, 1989–2009 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Hunter, W. (2011), ‘Brazil: The PT in Power’, in S. Levitsky and K. Roberts (eds), The Resurgence of the Latin American Left (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press). pp. 306–24.
  • Hunter, W. and Borges Sugiyama, N. (2009), ‘Democracy and Social Policy in Brazil: Advancing Basic Needs, Preserving Privileged Interests’, Latin American Politics and Society, 51 (2), pp. 29–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2009.00047.x
  • Hunter, W. and Power, T. (2007), ‘Rewarding Lula: Executive Power, Social Policy and the Brazilian Elections of 2006’, Latin American Politics and Society, 49 (1), pp. 1– 30. doi: 10.1353/lap.2007.0005
  • Jenkins, R. (2012), ‘Latin America and China: A New Dependency?’, Third World Quarterly, 33 (7), pp. 1337–58. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2012.691834
  • Karl, T.L. (1997), The Paradox of the Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States (Berkeley: University of California Press).
  • Kaup, B. (2010), ‘A Neoliberal Nationalization: The Constraints on Natural Gas-Led Development in Bolivia’, Latin American Perspectives, 37 (3), pp. 123–38. doi: 10.1177/0094582X10366534
  • Kingstone, P. (1999), Crafting Coalitions for Reform: Business Preferences, Political Institutions and Neoliberalism in Brazil (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press).
  • Kohli, A. (2004), State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Kurtz, M.J. (2009), ‘The Social Foundations of Institutional Order: Reconsidering War and the “Resource Curse” in Third World State-Building’, Politics and Society, 37 (4), pp. 479–520. doi: 10.1177/0032329209349223
  • Levitsky, S. and Roberts, K. (2011), The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, in S. Levitsky and K. Roberts (eds), (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
  • Lievesley, G. and Ludlam, S. (2009), Reclaiming Latin America: Experiments in Radical Social Democracy, in G. Lievesley and S. Ludlam (eds), (London: Zed Publications).
  • Lima, P.C.R. (2010), ‘Descrição e Análise de Contrato de Cessão Onerosa entre a União e a Petrobrás’, Nota Téchnica (Brasilia, DF: Câmara dos Deputados, Consultoria Legislativa).
  • Love, J. and Baer, W. (2009), Brazil under Lula: Economy, Politics and Society under the Worker-President, in J. Love and W. Baer (eds), (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Mahoney, J. (2000), ‘Path Dependence in Historical Sociology’, Theory and Society, 29 (4), pp. 507–48. doi: 10.1023/A:1007113830879
  • Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (2010), Explaining Institutional Change. Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, in J. Mahoney and K. Thelen (eds), (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Maia, J., Mondi, L. and Roberts, S. (2005), ‘Industrial Development and Industrial Finance in Brazil and South Africa’, Annual Forum 2005. Trade and Uneven Development: Opportunities and Challenges, University of Capetown and UNU-Wider. Available from http://www.tips.org.za/files/789.pdf
  • Melo, M.A. (2008), ‘Unexpected Successes, Unanticipated Failures: Social Policy from Cardoso to Lula’, in P.R. Kingstone and T. Power (eds), Democratic Brazil Revisited (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press), pp. 161–84.
  • Montero, A. (1998), ‘State Interests and New Industrial Policy in Brazil: The Case of the Privatization of Steel, 1990–1994’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 40 (3), pp. 27–62. doi: 10.2307/166199
  • Naím, M. (1994), ‘Latin America: The Second Stage of Reform’, Journal of Democracy, 5 (4), pp. 32–48. doi: 10.1353/jod.1994.0057
  • Nem Singh, J.T. (2010), ‘Reconstituting the Neostructuralist State: Political Economy of Continuity and Change in Chilean Mining Policy’, Third World Quarterly, 31 (8), pp. 1413–33. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2010.538240
  • Nem Singh, J.T. (2012), States, Markets and Labour Unions: The Political Economy of Oil and Copper in Brazil and Chile, PhD dissertation, University of Sheffield
  • Nem Singh, J.T. and Bourgouin, F. (forthcoming), ‘Introduction’, in J.T. Nem Singh and F. Bourgouin (eds), Resource Governance and Developmental States: Critical International Political Economy Perspectives (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • OECD (2011), Corporate Governance: Corporate Governance in Chile (Paris: OECD Publishing).
  • Panizza, F. (2009), Contemporary Latin America: Development and Democracy beyond the Washington Consensus (London: Zed Publications).
  • Pardelli, G. (2010), ‘Appendix 1: The Growth Acceleration Programme (PAC)’, Morgan Stanley Research ‘Brazil Infrastructure: Paving the Way’. Available from: http://www.morganstanley.com/views/perspectives/pavingtheway.pdf [accessed 15 July 2012]
  • Pedersen, J.D. (2008), Globalisation, Development and the State. The Performance of Brazil and India since 1990 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Petras, J. and Veltmeyer, H. (2009), What's Left in Latin America? Regime Change in New Times (Surrey: Ashgate Publishing).
  • PETROBRAS (2011), PETROBRAS Annual Report (Rio de Janeiro: PETROBRAS).
  • Philip, G. (1982), Oil and Politics in Latin America: Nationalist Movements and State Companies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Pierson, P. (2000), ‘Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics’, American Political Science Review, 94 (2), pp. 251–67. doi: 10.2307/2586011
  • Pierson, P. (2004), Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press).
  • Pinheiro, A.C., Bonelli, R. and Schneider, B.R. (2004), Pragmatic Policy in Brazil: The Political Economy of Incomplete Market Reform, Texto para Discussão No. 1035 (Rio de Janeiro: IPEA).
  • Pollack, B. and Grugel, J. (1984), ‘Chile Before and After Monetarism’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 3 (2), pp. 131–43.
  • Power, T. (2010), ‘Optimism, Pessimism, and Coalitional Presidentialism: Debating the Institutional Design of Brazilian Democracy’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 29 (1), pp. 18–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2009.00304.x
  • Prebisch, R. (1950), ‘The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems’, Economic Bulletin for Latin America, report E/CN.12/89/Rev (New York: United Nations)
  • Randall, L. (1992), ‘The Role of Oil in Brazil's Economic Options’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Los Angeles, 24–27 September
  • Randall, L. (1993), The Political Economy of Brazilian Oil (Westport: Praeger Publishers).
  • Raw, S. (1987), ‘The Making of a State-Owned Conglomerate: A Brazilian Case Study’, Working Paper No. 97, Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, August. Available from: http://kellogg.nd.edu/publications/workingpapers/WPS/097.pdf [accessed 15 July 2011]
  • Resende, P. (2009), ‘Chapter 2.1. Infrastructure: Will PAC Really Accelerate Growth?’, in I. Miaet al. (eds), Brazil Competitiveness Report 2009 (Geneva: World Economic Forum). pp. 31–9.
  • Ross, M. (1999), ‘The Political Economy of the Resource Curse’, World Politics, 51 (2), pp. 297–322. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100008200
  • Ross, M. (2001), Extractive Sector and the Poor. An Oxfam Report (Washington, DC: Oxfam America).
  • Ross, M. (2012), The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Wealth Shapes the Development of Nations (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
  • Rosser, A. (2006), The Political Economy of the Resource Curse: A Literature Survey, IDS Working Paper 268 (Sussex: Institute of Development Studies).
  • Rosser, A. (2007), ‘Escaping the Resource Curse? The Case of Indonesia’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 37 (1), pp. 38–58. doi: 10.1080/00472330601104557
  • Sachs, J. and Warner, A. (1995), ‘Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth’, Working Paper No. 5398, National Bureau of Economic Research
  • Sachs, J. and Warner, A. (1997), Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth, Center for International Development and Harvard Institute for International Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University)
  • Sader, E. (2011), The New Mole: Paths of the Latin American Left (London: Verso).
  • Schamis, H. (1999), ‘Distributional Coalitions and the Politics of Economic Reform in Latin America’, World Politics, 51 (2), pp. 236–68. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100008182
  • Schneider, B.R. (2004), ‘Organizing Interests and Coalitions in the Politics of Market Reform in Latin America’, World Politics, 56 (3), pp. 456–79. doi: 10.1353/wp.2004.0019
  • Schneider, B.R. (2009), ‘Big Business in Brazil: Leveraging Natural Endowments and State Support for International Expansion’, in L. Brainard and L. Martínez-Diaz (eds), Brazil as an Emerging Economic Superpower? (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution). pp. 159–86.
  • SECOM (2010), ‘Brazil Announces Phase 2 of the Growth Acceleration Programme’, 30 March. Available from: http://blogs.worldbank.org/growth/brazil-announces-phase-two-growth-acceleration-program#secom [accessed 15 July 2012]
  • Shirley, M.M. (1999), ‘Bureaucrats in Business: The Role of Privatization versus Corporatization in State-Owned Enterprise Reform’, World Development, 27 (1), pp. 115–36. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00130-2
  • Sikor, T. and Lund, C. (eds) (2009), The Politics of Possession: Property, Authority and Access to Natural Resources (London: Wiley-Blackwell).
  • Silva, E. (2009), Challenging Neoliberalism in Latin America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Silva, P. (2004), ‘Doing Politics in a Depoliticized Society: Social Change and Political Deactivation in Chile’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 23 (1), pp. 63–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2004.00096.x
  • Silva, P. (2009), In the Name of Reason: Technocrats and Politics in Chile (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press).
  • Singh, J.T. and Massi, E. (forthcoming), ‘Rethinking Neoliberalism in Brazil: The Political Economy of Reforms in Mining and Oil’, Politics and Society, special issue on ‘Post-neoliberalism in the Southern Cone’, under review.
  • Smith, P.S. (1976), Oil and Politics in Modern Brazil (Toronto: Macmillan).
  • Solimano, A. (2012), Chile and the Neoliberal Trap. The Post-Pinochet Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Staab, S. (2010), ‘Social Investment Policies in Chile and Latin America: Towards Equal Opportunities for Women and Children?’, Journal of Social Policy, 39 (4), pp. 607–26. doi: 10.1017/S0047279410000243
  • Staab, S. (2012), ‘Maternalism, Male-Breadwinner Bias, and Market Reform: Historical Legacies and Current Reforms in Chilean Social Policy’, Social Politics, 19 (3), pp. 299–332. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxs010
  • Taylor, M. (2006), From Pinochet to the ‘Third Way’: Neoliberalism and Social Transformation in Chile (London and Ann Arbour: Pluto Press).
  • The Economist (2011), ‘Latin America's Economies: The Balancing Act’, The Economist, The Americas Section, 13 August.
  • Thelen, K. (1999), ‘Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2, pp. 369–404. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
  • Thelen, K. (2003), ‘How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis’, in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 305–36.
  • Thorpe, R.et al. (2012), The Developmental Challenges of Mining and Oil. Lessons from Africa and Latin America (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Trebat, T.J. (1983), Brazil's State-Owned Enterprises: A Case Study of the State as Entrepreneur (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Ubiraci Sennes, R. and Narciso, T. (2009), ‘Brazil as an International Energy Player’, in L. Brainard and L. Martínez-Diaz (eds), Brazil as an Emerging Economic Superpower? (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution). pp. 17–54.
  • Vergara, A. (2008), Copper Workers, International Business and Domestic Politics in Cold War Chile (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press).
  • Victor, D.G., Hults, D. and Thurber, M. (eds) (2011), Oil and Governance: State-Owned Enterprises and the World Energy Supply (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Villarzú, J.R. (2005), ‘CODELCO y el Modelo de Alianza Estratégica’, PowerPoint presentation, 21 October
  • Waterbury, J. (1993), Exposed to Innumerable Delusions: Public Enterprise and State Power in Egypt, India, Mexico, and Turkey (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Weyland, K. (2008), ‘Toward a New Theory of Institutional Change’, World Politics, 60 (2), pp. 281–314. doi: 10.1353/wp.0.0013
  • Weyland, K., Madrid, R. and Hunter, W. (eds) (2010), Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Wirth, J. (1970), The Politics of Brazilian Development, 1930–1954 (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
  • Wise, C. and Roett, R. (eds) (2000), Exchange Rate Politics in Latin America (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution).
  • World Bank (1995), Restructuring the Public Mining Institutions of the Latin America and Caribbean Region (Washington, DC: World Bank).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.