Taming the City? Ideas, Structural Power and the Evolution of British Banking Policy Amidst the Great Financial Meltdown

References

• Andrews, D. (1994), ‘Capital Mobility and State Autonomy: Toward a Structural Theory of International Monetary Relations’, International Studies Quarterly, 38 (2), pp. 193–218. doi: 10.2307/2600975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, S.M. (1995), Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Balls, E. (2006), ‘Speech to the British Bankers Association’, 11 October, London.
   Google Scholar
• Bank of England (1995), Report of the Board of Banking Supervision Inquiry into the Circumstances of the Collapse of Barings Bank (London: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Bank of England (2007), Financial Stability Report, April.
   Google Scholar
• Barclays. (2011), Response to Independent Commission on Banking Issues Paper. Available from: http://bankingcommission.independent.gov.uk/responses/ [accessed February 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Barry, B. (2002), ‘Capitalists Rule OK? Some Puzzles about Power’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 1 (2), pp. 155–84. doi: 10.1177/1470594X02001002001
   Google Scholar
• BBC Analysis (2011), ‘Goodbye the Golden Eggs of Banking?’, 12 June.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (1993), Australian Manufacturing and the State: The Politics of Industry Policy in the Post-war Era (New York: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (2012), ‘The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business’, International Studies Quarterly, 56 (4), pp. 661–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00743.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. and Hindmoor, A. (2014a), ‘The Ideational Shaping of State Power and Capacity: Winning Battles but Losing the War over Bank Reform in the US and UK’, Government and Opposition, 49 (3), pp. 342–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. and Hindmoor, A. (2014b), Masters of the University but Slaves of the Market: The Great Financial Meltdown and How Some Bankers Avoided the Carnage (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff, W. and Darling, A. (2009), UK International Financial Services – the Future: A Report from UK Based Financial Services Leaders to the Government (London: HM Treasury).
   Google Scholar
• Block, F. (1977), ‘The Ruling Class Does Not Rule’, Socialist Revolution, 33, pp. 6–28.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2003), ‘Structures Do Not Come with an Instruction Sheet: Interests, Ideas and Progress in Political Science’, Perspectives on Politics, 1 (4), pp. 695–706. doi: 10.1017/S1537592703000471
   Google Scholar
• British Bankers Association (2010), ‘Regulation Must Not Stifle Lending’, Banking Business Review. Available from: http://www.banking-business-review.com/news/regulation_must_not_stifle_lending_bba_100302 [accessed February 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (2007), ‘Speech by the Chancellor of the Excheque’, Mansion House, 20 June.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (2010), Beyond the Crash: Overcoming the First Crisis of Globalization (London: Free Press).
   Google Scholar
• Capling, A.M. and Galligan, B. (1992), Beyond the Protective State: The Political Economy of Australia's Manufacturing Industry Policy (London: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• CityUK (2008), Economic Contribution of UK Financial Services 2008 (London: CityUK).
   Google Scholar
• Cohan, W. (2011), Money and Power: How Goldman Sachs Came to Rule the World (New York: Doubleday).
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party (2010), Change for the Better in Financial Services (London: Conservative Party).
   Google Scholar
• CRESC (2011), An Alternative Report on Banking UK Banking Reform: A Public Interest Report from CRESC (Manchester: Center for Research on Socio-Cultural Change).
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (1979), State and Economy in Contemporary Capitalism (London: Croom Helm).
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. (2011), Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. and Reinke, E. (forthcoming), ‘Structural Power and Bank Bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States’, Politics & Society.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, P. (2011), ‘Bankers Say Put Reforms on Hold until Markets and Economy Recover’, The Guardian, 29 August.
   Google Scholar
• Darling, A. (2011), Back from the Brink (London: Atlantic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. (1991), Rational Choice and Political Power (Aldershot: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. (1996), Power (Buckingham: Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• FPC [Financial Policy Committee] (2013) Record of the Interim Financial Policy Committee Meeting, 19 March (London: Bank of England).
   Google Scholar
• Goff, S. (2011), ‘The Price of Protection’, Financial Times, 11 September.
   Google Scholar
• Gowan, P. (2009), ‘Crisis in the Heartland’, New Left Review, 55, pp. 5–29.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, K. (2011), ‘Ringfence Will Cost Britain's Banks Dear, Wall Street Says’, The Times, 1 September.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, S.J. and Pierson, P. (2002), ‘Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State’, Politics & Society, 30 (2), pp. 277–325.
   Google Scholar
• Haldane, A., Brennan, S. and Madouros, V. (2012), What Is Contribution of the Financial Sector? Mirage or Miracle?, The Future of Finance, LSE Report, pp. 87–120.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (1986), Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France (New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hardie, I. and Maxfield, S. (2013), ‘Market-Based Banking as the Worst of all Worlds: Illustrations from the United States and the United Kingdom’, in I. Hardie and D. Howarth (eds), Market-Based Banking and the International Financial Crisis (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 56–78.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (1999), The Political Economy of New Labour: Labouring under False Pretences (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. and Rosamond, B. (2002), ‘Globalization, European Integration and the Discursive Construction of Economic Imperatives’, Journal of European Public Policy, 9 (2), pp. 147–67. doi: 10.1080/13501760110120192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmoor, A. (2004), New Labour at the Center: Constructing Political Space (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• HM Government (2010), The Coalition: Our Programme for Government. HM Government. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/78977/coalition_programme_for_government.pdf [accessed 29 August 2014].
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury (2009), Reforming Financial Markets, Cm. 7667 (London: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury (2011), The Government Response to the Independent Commission on Banking, Cm. 8252 (London: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, W. (2011), ‘Banking Reform: Ringfencing Is the Only Solution’, The Guardian, 31 August.
   Google Scholar
• ICB [Independent Commission on Banking] (2011), Final Report: Recommendations (London: Independent Commission on Banking).
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, P., Goff, S. and Parker, G. (2011), ‘Banks Hope Their Lobbying Pays Off’, Financial Times, 10 April.
   Google Scholar
• Johal, S., Moran, M. and William, K. (2012), ‘Post-crisis Financial Regulation in Britain’, in R. Mayntz (ed.), Crisis and Control: Institutional Change in Financial Market Regulation (Cologne: Max Plank Institute), pp. 67–95.
   Google Scholar
• Johal, S., Moran, M. and William, K. (2014), ‘Power, Politics and the City of London after the Great Financial Crisis’, Government and Opposition, 49 (3), pp. 400–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. and Kwak, J. (2010), 13 Bankers: Wall Street and the Next Financial Meltdown (New York: Pantheon Books).
   Google Scholar
• King, M. (2009), ‘Monetary Policy Developments’. Speech to Scottish business organisations, Edinburgh, 20 October.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C.E. (1977), Politics and Markets (New York: Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C.E. (1982), ‘The Market as Prison’, The Journal of Politics, 44 (2), pp. 324–36. doi: 10.2307/2130588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyds Banking Group (2011), Response to the Independent Commission on Banking: Issues Paper. Available from: http://bankingcommission.independent.gov.uk/responses/ [accessed February 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Masters, B. (2011), ‘Financial Services: Banks and Regulators at Odds’, Financial Times, 2 November.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, B., Parker, G. and Barber, T. (2010), ‘City Fears on Labour Turmoil’, Financial Times, 11 June.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, M. (2003), The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mulholland, H. and Quinn, B. (2011), ‘Cable Claims Coalition Unity over Banking Reforms’, The Guardian, 31 August.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office (2012), HM Treasury Resource Accounts, 2012–13, HC 34, London: National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• Orfeo, F. (2010), ‘Capitalist Diversity and the International Regulation of Hedge Funds’, Review of International Political Economy, 17 (3), pp. 696–723.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, G. (2010), ‘Speech by the Chancellor of the Exchequer’, Mansion House, 16 June.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G. and Jenkins, P. (2013), ‘Osborne Threatens to Break Up Banks’, Financial Times, 4 February.
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Commission on Banking (2012), First Report of Session 2012–13, HL Paper 98, HC Paper 848 (London: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. and Wallerstein, M. (1988), ‘Structural Dependence of the State on Capital’, American Political Science Review, 82 (1), pp. 11–29. doi: 10.2307/1958056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quin, J. (2013), ‘Chancellor Files Legal Challenge to EU Cap on Bank Bonsues’, Daily Telegraph, 25 September.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, D. and Shapiro, R. (1991), ‘Business Political Power: The Case of Taxation’, American Political Science Review, 85 (3), pp. 851–74. doi: 10.2307/1963853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A.M. (1999), ‘Public Opinion, Elections and Representation Within a Market Economy: Does the Structural Power of Business Undermine Popular Sovereignty’, American Journal of Political Science, 43 (3), pp. 842–63. doi: 10.2307/2991837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. (2000), ‘The Discipline of International Relations: Still An American Social Science?’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2 (3), pp. 374–402. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00042
   Google Scholar
• Sorkin, R.A. (2009), Too Big to Fail (New York: Penguin Books).
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (2009), ‘The Anatomy of a Murder: Who Killed America's Economy?’, Critical Review, 21 (2–3), pp. 329–39. doi: 10.1080/08913810902934133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1998), States and Markets (London: Pinter).
   Google Scholar
• Swank, D. (1992), ‘Politics and the Structural Dependence of the State in Democratic Capitalist Nations’, American Political Science Review, 86 (1), pp. 38–54. doi: 10.2307/1964014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist (2011a), ‘Bank Reform: To Rip Asunder’, The Economist, 17 September.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist (2011b), ‘Commission Accomplished’, The Economist, 16 April. Available from: http://www.economist.com/node/21529047 [accessed 9 September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Treasury Select Committee (2008), The Run on the Rock (London: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Treasury Select Committee (2011), Independent Commission on Banking: Final Report: Oral and Written Evidence, HC680 [incorporating HC 1534, Session 2010–12 (London: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. (2009), The Turner Review: A Regulatory Response to the Global Banking Crisis (London: FSA).
   Google Scholar
• UKFI (2009), An Introduction: Who We Are What We Do and the Framework Document Which Governs the Relationship Between UKFI and HM Treasury (London: UK Financial Investments).
   Google Scholar
• Veronesi, P. and Zingales, L. (2010), ‘Paulson's Gift’, Journal of Financial Economics, 97 (3), pp. 339–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D.R. (1983), ‘Capitalism and Incarceration’, Monthly Review, 34 (10), pp. 6–28. doi: 10.14452/MR-034-10-1983-03_4
   Google Scholar
• Wachman, R. and Curtis, P. (2011), ‘City Hits Back at Vince Cable over Banking Reform Comments’, The Guardian, 31 August.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M. and Hay, C. (2003), ‘The Discourse of Globalisation and the Logic of No Alternative: Rendering the Contingent Necessary in the Political Economy of New Labour’, Policy and Politics, 31 (3), pp. 289–305. doi: 10.1332/030557303322034956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigley, B. (2008), London: Winning in a Changing World (London: Merrill Lynch Europe).
   Google Scholar
• Woll, C. (2007), ‘Leading the Dance: Power and Political Resources of Business Lobbyists’, Journal of Public Policy, 27 (1), pp. 57–78. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X07000633
   Google Scholar
• Zysman, J. (1983), Governments, Markets and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar