The Role of Southern Intellectuals in Contemporary Trade Governance

References

• Adler, E. and Bernstein, S. (2005), ‘Knowledge in Power: The Epistemic Construction of Global Governance’, in M. Barnett and R. Duvall (eds), Power in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 294–318.
   Google Scholar
• Africa Group (2008), Press Statement by Hon. Uhuru Kenyatta, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade (Kenya), On behalf of the African Group at the WTO Mini-Ministerial Meeting, Geneva: 25th July 2008. Available from: www.trade.go.ke/downloads/Press%20Releases/ [accessed 10 July 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. and Duvall, R. (eds) (2005), Power in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bergsten, C.F. (2008), ‘A Partnership of Equals’, Foreign Affairs, 87 (4), pp. 57–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, D. (2005), ‘Least Developed Countries in Trade Negotiations: Planning Process and Information Needs’, Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Review, 1 (1), pp. 69–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, D. (2009), Ongoing WTO Doha Round Negotiations Concerns and Interests of Bangladesh and other LDCs. Available from: www.cpd.org.bd/pub_attach/DR99.pdf [accessed 10 July 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Bhattia, U.S. (2010), ‘A Few Developing Countries Cannot Be the Bankers of the Round’, South Bulletin, 46 (3), p. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattia, U.S. (2011), Sources of the WTO's Impasse. Available from: http://www.voxeu.org/article/sources-wto-s-impasse [accessed 3 July 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Blustein, P. (2008), The Nine-Day Misadventure of the Most Favored Nations: How the WTO's Doha Round Negotiations Went Awry in July 2008, Brookings Institute Paper. Available from www.brookings.edu/research/articles/2008/12/05-trade-blustein [accessed 4 June 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M.M. (1997), ‘Any More Bright Ideas? The Ideational Turn in Comparative Politics’, Comparative Politics, 29 (2), pp. 229–50. doi: 10.2307/422082
   Google Scholar
• Bresser Pereira, L.C. (2010), Globalization and Competition: Why Some Emergent Countries Succeed While Others Fall Behind (New York: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Carrión Fonseca, G.M. (2010), A Nicaraguan in the World Trade Organization, Envio, number 349. Available from: www.envio.org.ni/articulo/4227 [accessed 12 June 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Chayes, A. and Chayes, A.H. (1995), The New Sovereignty (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Chin, G. and Thakur, R. (2010), ‘Will China Change the Rules of Global Order?’ The Washington Quarterly, 33 (4), pp. 119–38. doi: 10.1080/0163660X.2010.516145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R.W. (1996), Approaches to World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Cross, M.K.D. (2012), ‘Rethinking Epistemic Communities Twenty Years Later’, Review of International Studies, 39 (1), pp. 137–60. doi: 10.1017/S0260210512000034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, M. (2013), Symbolic Power in the World Trade Organisation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Efstathopoulos, C. (2012), ‘Leadership in the WTO: Brazil, India and the Doha Development Agenda’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25 (2), pp. 269–93. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2012.678294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger, J.M. and Nogués, J.J. (2002), ‘The Unbalanced Uruguay Round Outcome: The New Areas in Future WTO Negotiations’, The World Economy, 25 (3), pp. 321–40. doi: 10.1111/1467-9701.00435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, S. (1993), ‘Epistemology, Ontology and the “Italian School”’, in S. Gill (ed.), Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 21–48.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R.O. (eds) (1993), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks (London: Lawrence and Wishart Ltd).
   Google Scholar
• Guardian, The (2008), ‘WTO: China Throws Up Barrier to Doha Agreement’, The Guardian, 28 July, p. 21.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. (1992), ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, 46 (1), pp. 1–35. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P.A. (1989), The Power of Economic Ideas (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R. (1996), ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Studies, 44 (5), pp. 936–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, E.N. (2011), ‘NGOs and the European Union: Examining the Power of Epistemes in the EC's TRIPS and Access to Medicines Negotiations’, Journal of Civil Society, 7 (2), pp. 179–206. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2011.573669
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, E.N. (2014), ‘The Quest for Accountable Governance: Embedded NGOs and Demand Driven Advocacy in the International Trade Regime’, Journal of World Trade, 48 (3), pp. 457–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindu, The (2013), ‘We Would Rather be Called Re-Emerging Powers, Says NSA’, The Hindu, 3 February.
   Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. (2013), ‘New Protagonists in Global Economic Governance: Brazilian Agribusiness at the WTO’, New Political Economy, 18 (4), pp. 603–23. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2013.736957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, F. (2009), Reforming the World Trade Organization: Developing Countries in the Doha Round (Jaipur: CUTS International and Friedrich Ebert Stiftung).
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, F. (2010), ‘How to Break the Impasse of Doha Round’, South Bulletin, 46 (3), p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, F. (2012a), ‘Is the Doha Round Dead? What Is the Way Forward?’ World Economics, 13 (3), pp. 143–169.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, F. (2012b), ‘Narratives and Myths in the WTO Doha Round’, Economic and Political Weekly, 47 (31), pp. 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Jawara, F. and Kwa, A. (2003), Behind the Scenes at the WTO: The Real World of International Trade Negotiations (London: Zed Books).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. (1995), Japan, Who Governs? The Rise of the Developmental State (New York: WW Norton).
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, I. (2005), ‘The Power of Interpretive Communities’, in M. Barnett and R. Duvall (eds), Power in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 185–204.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R.O. (1986), ‘Reciprocity in International Relations’, International Organization, 40 (1), pp. 1–27. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300004458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khor, M. (2010), ‘Long Stalemate Ahead for WTO Talks’, South Bulletin, 46 (3), pp. 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Khor, M. (2011a), ‘Crunch Time at the WTO’, Gulf Daily News, 4 May.
   Google Scholar
• Khor, M. (2011b), ‘Behind the Impasse in WTO's Doha Talks’, South Bulletin, 54, pp. 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Khor, M. (2012), ‘The Twists and Turns of the Doha Talks and the WTO’, South Bulletin, 68. Available from: www.southcentre.int/south-centre-archive/publications-archive/south-bulletin-archive/ [accessed 22 August 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Khor, M. (2013), ‘WTO: Stingy with the Poor, Generous with the Rich’, Inter Press Service, 1 October.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, R. (2009), Remarks of United States Trade Representative Ron Kirk at the Opening Plenary of the 7th Session of the WTO Ministerial Conference November 30, 2009 – Geneva, Switzerland. Available from: www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min09_e/min09_statements_e.htm [accessed 3 May 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Klapper, B. S. (2008), ‘US Slams China, India on Trade Talks’, Associated Press, 28 July.
   Google Scholar
• Lamy, P. (2013), ‘Putting Geopolitics Back at the Trade Table’, Speech to the IISS-Oberoi Discussion Forum in Delhi on 29 January 2013. Available from: www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl264_e.htm [accessed 9 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Lindvall, J. (2009), ‘The Real but Limited Influence of Expert Ideas’, World Politics, 61 (4), pp. 703–30. doi: 10.1017/S0043887109990104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marier, P. (2008), ‘Empowering Epistemic Communities: Specialised Politicians, Policy Experts and Policy Reform’, West European Politics, 31 (3), pp. 513–533. doi: 10.1080/01402380801939800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, P.S. (2007), Comments to the Warwick Commission, Video. Available from: www.youtube.com/WarwickCommission [accessed 4 July 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, P.S., Chatterjee, B. and George, J. (2013), ‘The Doha Development Agenda: Prospective Outcomes and African Perspectives’, in R. Wilkinson and J. Scott (eds), Trade, Poverty, Development: Getting Beyond the WTO’s Doha Deadlock (Abingdon: Routledge), pp. 187–202.
   Google Scholar
• Melendez-Ortiz, R. (2006), ‘The Trade Round of Unbelievers’. D+C, Issue 8–9. Available from: www3.giz.de/E+Z/content/archive-eng/index.html [accessed 3 July 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Melendez-Ortiz, R. (2007), Comments in the Discussion on ‘Policy Space and Trade Negotiations’. Available from: http://ictsd.org/connect/bridges-tv/ [accessed 4 July 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C.A. (2007), ‘Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions, and Global Governance’, Governance, 20 (2), pp. 325–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00359.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostry, S. (2002), ‘The Uruguay Round North-South Grand Bargain: Implications for Future Negotiations’, in D.M. Kennedy and J.D. Southwick (eds), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honour of Robert E. Hudec (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 285–300.
   Google Scholar
• Ostry, S. (2003), Cancun: Can can't? Can do? Available from: www.ceim.uqam.ca/pdf/construire_ostry.pdf [accessed 23 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, B. (2009), ‘Transformismo at the WTO’, in M. McNally and J. Schwarzmatel (eds), Gramsci and Global Politics: Hegemony and Resistance (Abingdon: Routledge), pp. 42–57.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, A. (2005), The Global Politics of Unequal Development (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Ponte, S. and Cheyns, E. (2013), ‘Voluntary Standards, Expert Knowledge and the Governance of Sustainability Networks’, Global Networks, 13 (4), pp. 459–77. doi: 10.1111/glob.12011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rethel, L. (2010), ‘The New Financial Development Paradigm and Asian Bond Markets’, New Political Economy, 15 (4), pp. 493–517. doi: 10.1080/13563460903302667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J.G. (1975), ‘International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends’, International Organization, 29 (3), pp. 557–83. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300031696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J.G. (1982), ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’, International Organization, 36 (2), pp. 379–415. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300018993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J. and Schipper, F. (2011), ‘Experts and European Transport Integration, 1945–1958’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18 (2), pp. 274–93. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.544509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, S.C. (2011), ‘After Doha: Why the Negotiations Are Doomed and What We Should Do About It’, Foreign Affairs, 90 (3), pp. 104–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2008), ‘The Use and Mis-Use of Trade Negotiation Simulations’, Journal of World Trade, 42 (1), pp. 87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. and Wilkinson, R. (2013), ‘China in the WTO’, Journal of World Trade, 47 (4), pp. 761–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siles-Brügge, G. (2014), Constructing European Union Trade Policy: A Global Idea of Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Tortora, M. (2000), The Role of the Diplomat in Times of Globalization, Finance, Investment and Growth, No. 59. Available from: www.sela.org [accessed 22 August 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Trommer, S. (2013), ‘Legal Opportunity in Trade Negotiations: International Law, Opportunity Structures and the Political Economy of Trade Agreements’, New Political Economy, online first, doi:10.1080/13563467.2012.753520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trommer, S. (2014), Transformations in Trade Politics: Participatory Trade Politics in West Africa (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. (2003), Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R.H. (2013), ‘Protecting Power: Western States in Global Organizations’, in D. Held and C. Rogers (eds), Global Governance at Risk (Cambridge: Polity), pp. 77–110.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2006), Multilateralism and the World Trade Organisation: The Architecture and Extension of International Trade Regulation (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2014), What’s Wrong with the WTO and How to Fix It (Cambridge: Polity).
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Hannah, E. and Scott, J. (Forthcoming), ‘The WTO in Bali: What MC9 Means for the Doha Development Agenda and Why It Matters’, Third World Quarterly.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo-Cumings, M. (ed.) (1999), The Developmental State (New York: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• WTO (2008), Statement of African, ACP and LDC Groups on the WTO Mini-Ministerial Meeting Geneva, 25 July 2008, TN/C/12, 28 July.
   Google Scholar
• WTO (2011), Remarks by U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk at the Opening Plenary Session at the World Trade Organization Ministerial Conference. Available from: www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min11_e/min11_statements_e.htm [accessed 23 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Zhenyu, S. (2013), ‘The Doha Round and the Future of the WTO’, in R. Wilkinson and J. Scott (eds), Trade, Poverty, Development: Getting Beyond the WTO’s Doha Deadlock (Abingdon: Routledge), pp. 141–54.
   Google Scholar
• Zoellick, R. (2003), ‘America Will Not Wait for the Won't-Do Countries,’ Financial Times, 22 September, p. 15.
   Google Scholar
• Zoellick, R. (2005), Whither China: From Membership to Responsibility? Remarks to National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, 21 September. Available from: http://2001--2009.state.gov/s/d/former/zoellick/rem/53682.htm [accessed 23 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Zoellick, R. (2010), ‘Democratizing Development Economics’. Speech made at Georgetown University, 29 September 2010. Available from: http://go.worldbank.org/N58SCW9BW0 [accessed 1 September 2011].
   Google Scholar