China and India's insertion in the intellectual property rights regime: sustaining or disrupting the rules?

References

• Adler, E. and Haas, P.M. (1992), ‘Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program’, International Organization, 46 (1), pp. 367–90. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, James E. (1979), ‘A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation’, American Economic Review, 69 (1), pp. 106–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, D. and Newman, A.L. (2007), ‘The European Regulatory State and Global Public Policy: Micro-Institutions, Macro-Influence’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14 (6), pp. 827–46. doi: 10.1080/13501760701497659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basheer, S. (2005), ‘Policy Style’ Reasoning at the Indian Patent Office’, Intellectual Property Quarterly, 3, pp. 309–23.
   Google Scholar
• Baxi, U. (2004), ‘Rule of Law in India’, in R. Peerenboom (ed.), Asian Discourses of Rule of Law: Theories and Implementation of Rule of Law in Twelve Asian Countries, France and the U.S. (London: Routledge Curzon), pp. 318–339.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagwati, J. and Hugh, P., Eds. (1990), Aggressive Unilateralism: America's 301 Trade Policy and the World Trading System (Michigan: The University of Michigan Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bird, Robert C. (2006), ‘Defending Intellectual Property Rights in the BRIC Economies’, American Business Law Journal, 43 (2), pp. 317–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.2006.00019.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, R. and Cahoy, D. (2007), ‘The Emerging BRIC Economies: Lessons from Intellectual Property Negotiation and Enforcement’, Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 5 (3), pp. 400–21.
   Google Scholar
• Büthe, T. and Mattli, W. (2011), The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bobdi, V.A. (2003), ‘The Rise of Judicial Power’, in S.J. Sorabjee (ed.), Law and Justice: An Anthology (Delhi: Universal Law Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Daniel. (2001), The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L.H. (2010), China Engages Global Health Governance: Responsible Stakeholder or System-Transformer? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. (2009), Intellectual Property Rights in China: Politics of Piracy, Trade and Protection (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Chin, G. (2010), ‘China's Rising Institutional Influence’, in A. Alexandroff and A. Cooper (eds), Rising States, Rising Institutions (Washington: Brookings Institution Press), pp. 83–104.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, C.M. (2000), Intellectual Property Rights the WTO and Developing Countries (New York: Zed Books).
   Google Scholar
• Dam, S. (2005), ‘Lawmaking Beyond Lawmakers: Understanding the Little Right and the Great Wrong (Analysing the Legitimacy of the Nature of Judicial Lawmaking in India's Constitutional Dynamic)’, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 13, pp. 109–40.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, Alan V. (1998), ‘Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?’, in Jeffrey A. Frankel (ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Devonshire, C., Scott, A. and Woollard, S. (2011), Intellectual Property Rights in China (China Briefing) (Heidelberg: Springer Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• De Bièvre, D. and Thomann, L. (2010), ‘Forum Shopping in the Intellectual Property Rights Regime’ Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung, Working Paper No.132.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, M. (2009), Piracy and the State: the Politics of Intellectual Property Rights in China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P. (1998), ‘The Universality of Intellectual Property Rights: Origins and Development’, Conference Organised by the WIPO in collaboration with the UNHCR, Geneva, 9th November 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P. (2010), The Global Governance of Knowledge: Patent Offices and their Clients (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfuss, R.C. (2009), ‘Introduction: Designing Intellectual Property Institutions for the Twenty-First Century’, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 12, pp. 341–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00386.x
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. (2005), ‘Globalization, Harmonization, and Competition: The Different Pathways to Policy Convergence’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12 (5), pp. 841–59. doi: 10.1080/13501760500161472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubash, N. and Morgan, B. (2013), The Rise of the Regulatory State of the South: Infrastructure and Development in Emerging Economies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Elsmore, M. and Hurvitz, A. (2012), ‘China Customs: A Wall to Keep Counterfeits In?’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 7 (8), pp. 604–12. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jps085
   Google Scholar
• Fewsmith, J. (ed.) (2010), China Today, China Tomorrow: Domestic Politics, Economy and Society (Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield).
   Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F. (2002), ‘Policy Credibility and Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Comparative Empirical Analysis’, Journal of European Public Policy, 9 (6), pp. 873–93. doi: 10.1080/1350176022000046409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros, D. and Steinherr, A. (2004), Economic Transition in Central and Eastern Europe: Planting the Seeds (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, L. (2000), Ruling the World (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gungwu, W. and Yongnian, Z. (2008), China and the New International Order (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. and Taylor, R. (1996), ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Studies, XLIV, pp. 936–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haunss, S. and Shadlen, K.C. (eds.) (2009), Politics of Intellectual Property: Contestation Over the Ownership, Use, and Control of Knowledge and Information (Gloucestershire: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Helfer, L. (2004), ‘Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property’, The Yale Journal of International Law, 29 (1), pp. 1–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hsueh, R. (2011), China's Regulatory State: A New Strategy for Globalization (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, J. and Wright, T. (2008), Rising Powers and Global Institutions (New York: The Century Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, A.I. (2003), ‘Is China a Status-Quo Power’, International Security, 27 (4), pp. 5–56. doi: 10.1162/016228803321951081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, D.C. (2007), China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia (New York: Columbia University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, Peter. (1977), ‘Introduction: Domestic and International Forces and Strategies of Foreign Economic Policy’, International Organization, 31, pp. 587–606. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300018622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S. (2008), ‘Chinese Economic Nationalism: The Effects of Interests and Institutions’, Paper prepared for the conference “China, the United States and the Emerging Global Agenda”. Available from: http://www.ncuscr.org/files/Kennedy%20Background%20Paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Leftwich, A. (1995), ‘Bringing Politics Back In: Towards a Model of the Developmental State’, The Journal of Development Studies, 31 (3), pp. 400–427. doi: 10.1080/00220389508422370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, P. (2008), ‘The Impact of TRIPS on Innovation and Exports: A Case Study of the Pharmaceutical Industry in India’, Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 2, pp. 61–65.
   Google Scholar
• Maskus, Keith E. (2002), ‘Regulatory Standards in the WTO: Comparing Intellectual Property Rights with Competition Policy, Environmental Protection, and Core Labor Standards’, World Trade Review, 1 (2), pp. 135–52. doi: 10.1017/S147474560200112X
   Google Scholar
• Maskus, K. and Reichman, J.H. (2004), ‘The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods’, Journal of International Economic Law, 7 (2), pp. 279–320. doi: 10.1093/jiel/7.2.279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattli, W. and Büthe, T. (2003), ‘Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power?’, World Politics, 56 (1), pp. 1–42. doi: 10.1353/wp.2004.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, C. (2007), World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): Resurgence and the Development Agenda (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M.C. (2013), Wronged by Empire: Post-Imperial Ideology and Foreign Policy in India and China (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1997), ‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’, International Organization, 51 (4), pp. 513–53. doi: 10.1162/002081897550447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2009), ‘Liberal Intergovermentalism’, in A. Wiener and T. Diez (eds), European Integration Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 67–87.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, J.V. (2014), ‘Paradigm Shift in the Global IP Regime: The Agency of Academics’, Review of International Political Economy, 21 (2), pp. 275–309. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2013.819812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzaka, V. (2012), ‘Intellectual Property Protection and European ‘Competitiveness’, Review of International Political Economy, 20 (4), pp. 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Narlikar, A. (2010), New Powers: How to Become One and How to Manage Them (London: Hurst).
   Google Scholar
• Nakai, Y. and Tanaka, Y. (2010), ‘Chinese Company's IPR Strategy: How Huawei Technologies Succeeded in Dominating Overseas Market by Sideward-Crawl Crab Strategy’, Technology Management for Global Economic Growth (PICMET) 2010 Proceedings, 18–22 July, Phuket, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Netanel, N.W. (2009), The Development Agenda: Global Intellectual Property and Developing Countries (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J.S. (2011), The Future of Power (New York: Public Affairs).
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2003), Report on the Chinese Economy (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Okediji, R. (2004), ‘Rules of Power in an Age of Law: Process Opportunism and TRIPS Dispute Settlement’, in C. Kwan and J. Hardigan (eds), Handbook of International Trade (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 42–72.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. and Jayadev, A. (2011), ‘Access to Medicines in India: A Review of Recent Concerns’, in R. Subramanian and L. Shaver (eds), Access to Knowledge in India: New Research on Intellectual Property, Innovation and Development (London: Bloomsbury), pp. 78–108.
   Google Scholar
• Peerenboom, R. (2002), China's Long March toward Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Peerenboom, R. (2004), Asian Discourses of Rule of Law: Theories and Implementation of Rule of Law in Twelve Asian Countries, France and the U.S. (London: Routledge Curzon).
   Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K. and Victor, D.G. (2004), ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources’, International Organisation, 58, pp. 277–309. doi: 10.1017/S0020818304582036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, B. and Sell, S. (2012), ‘China's Role in Global Governance – Foreign Exchange and Intellectual Property: A Comparison’, RCCPB Working Paper, no. 31, November 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J.N. and Wang, H. (2009), ‘China and Global Governance’, Asian Perspective, 33 (3), pp. 5–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, S. and Ray, A. (2009), ‘Shifting Coordinates of India's Stance at the WTO: Understanding the Domestics and International Economic Drivers’, in A. Narlikar and B. Vickers (eds), Leadership and Change in the Multilateral Trading System (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff), pp. 97–120.
   Google Scholar
• Sell, S. (1995), ‘Intellectual Property Protection and Antitrust in the Developing World: Crisis, Coercion, and Choice’, International Organization, 49 (2), pp. 315–49. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300028411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadlen, K.C. (2005), ‘Policy Space for Development in the WTO and Beyond: The Case of Intellectual Property Rights’, Working paper, no. 05-06. Global Development and Environment Institute (Massachusetts: Tufts University).
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. (1985), ‘Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research’, in P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol (eds.), Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 3–43.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. and Pierson, P. (2002), ‘Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science’, in I. Katznelson and H.V. Milner (eds), Political Science: State of the Discipline (New York: W.W. Norton), pp. 693–721.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, R. (2002), ‘In the Shadow of law or Power? Consensus – Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO’, International Organization, 56 (2), pp. 339–374. doi: 10.1162/002081802320005504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teets, J. (2013), ‘Let Many Civil Societies Bloom: Regional Ideational Variation in China’, China Quarterly, February 2013, 213, pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2012), ‘Indian Drug Patents: Taking Pains’, Sep 8th 2012.
   Google Scholar
• United States International Trade Commission. (2011), China: Effects of Intellectual Property Infringement and Indigenous Innovation Policies on the US Economy, Investigation No. 332–519.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R.H. (2003), ‘What Strategies are Viable for Developing Countries Today? The World Trade Organization and the Shrinking of “Development Space”’, Review of International Political Economy, 10 (4), pp. 621–44. doi: 10.1080/09692290310001601902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. (2010), ‘India in the World’, in S. Acharya and R. Mohan (eds), India's Economy: Performance and Challenges (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 369–98.
   Google Scholar
• Woo-Cumings, M. (1999), The Developmental State (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Yu, P. (2004), ‘Currents and Crosscurrents in the International Intellectual Property Regime’, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 323, reprinted in Michigan State University College of Law, Occasional Papers in Intellectual Property and Communications Law No. 5, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, P. (2006), ‘From Pirates to Partners (Episode Two): Protecting Intellectual Property in Post-WTO China’, Michigan State University Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 03-15.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, P. (2008), ‘Access to Medicines, BRICS Alliances, and Collective Action’, American Journal of Law & Medicine, 34 (2), pp. 345–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. (2011), ‘From Words to Deeds: Explaining China's (Non) Compliance with the Global Intellectual Property Rights Regime since the Country's WTO Entry’, PhD Dissertation submitted to the University of Minnesota, August 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Zweig, D. (2002), Internationalizing China: Domestic Interests and Global Linkages (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar