The political economy of post-crisis international standards for resolving financial institutions

References

• Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Resolution (ACPR). (2013), Communication on the Resolution Strategy of ACPR Resolution Board (Paris: Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Resolution (ACPR)).
   Google Scholar
• Bach, D. and Newman, A.L. (2007), ‘The European Regulatory State and Global Public Policy: Micro-Institutions, Macro-Influence’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14 (6), pp. 827–846. doi: 10.1080/13501760701497659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. (2009), The UK Bank Resolution Regime: Speech at the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, 26 November (London: Bank of England).
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. (2010), The Financial Crisis Reform Agenda, 13 July (London: Bank of England).
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. (2010), ‘Restraining Regulatory Capture? Anglo-America, Crisis Politics and Trajectories of Change in Global Financial Governance’, International Affairs, 86 (3), pp. 647–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00903.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, A. (2013), ‘The New Political Economy of the Macroprudential Ideational Shift’, New Political Economy, 18 (1), pp. 112–139. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2012.662952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bank of England. (2010), Financial Stability Report, December (London: Bank of England).
   Google Scholar
• Bank of England and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (2012), Resolving Globally Active, Systemically Important, Financial Institutions, December (London: Bank of England and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation).
   Google Scholar
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2010), Report and Recommendations of the Cross-Border Bank Resolution Group: Final Paper, March, Basel.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. (2009), Can banking regulation go global?, 18 March.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. and Hindmoor, A. (2015), ‘Taming the City? Ideas, Structural Power and the Evolution of British Banking Policy Amidst the Great Financial Meltdown’, New Political Economy, 20 (3), pp. 454–474. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2014.951426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calello, P. and Ervin, W. (2010), ‘From Bail-out to Bail-in’, The Economist, 28 January.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M.B. (2013a), ‘Projecting from a Fiction: The Case of Denmark and the Financial Crisis’, New Political Economy, 18 (4), pp. 555–578. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2013.742881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M.B. (2013b), ‘Global in Life, Still National in Death? Special Bank Resolution Regimes After the Crisis’, in M. Moschella and E. Tsingou (eds), Great Expectations, Slow Transformation (Colchester: ECPR press), pp. 77–94.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. (2009), Public Consultation Regarding an EU Framework for Cross-Border Crisis Management in the Banking Sector (Brussels : Commission of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. (2011), Consultation on Technical Details of a Possible European Crisis Management framework (Brussels : Commission of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS). (2008), Overview of Resolution Regimes in the EU (London : Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS)).
   Google Scholar
• De Larosière, J., et al. (2009), The High-Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU Report (the de Larosiere Report), February, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Dombret, A. (2011), Reform of the Global Financial System: Opening Lecture at the Generation Forum Eltville, 17 June (Frankfurt: Bundesbank).
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, D.W. (2007), All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the Office for the Comptroller of the Currency. (2010), US Banking Agencies Express Support for Basel Agreement – Press Release, 12 September (Washington, DC: Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the Office for the Comptroller of the Currency).
   Google Scholar
• Financial Services Authority (FSA). (2009), The Turner Review: A Regulatory Response to The Global Banking Crisis (London: Financial Services Authority).
   Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Board (FSB). (2011), Key Attributes Of Effective Resolution Regimes For Financial Institutions, November (Basel: Financial Stability Board (FSB)).
   Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Board (FSB). (2012), Update of List of Global Systemically Important Banks, November, November (Basel: Financial Stability Board (FSB)).
   Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Board (FSB). (2015), Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) Standard for Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs), November (Basel: Financial Stability Board (FSB)).
   Google Scholar
• Fioretos, O. (2010) ‘Capitalist Diversity and the International Regulation of Hedge Funds’, Review of International Political Economy, 17 (4), pp. 696–723. doi: 10.1080/09692291003723789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, R. and Walter, A. (2011), China, the United States, and Global Order (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Germain, R. (2016), ‘Locating Authority: Resolution Regimes, SIFIs and the Enduring Significance of Financial Great powers’, Journal of Banking Regulation, 17 (1–2), pp. 34–45. doi: 10.1057/jbr.2015.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German Finance Ministry and Ministry of Justice. (2011), German Response to the European Commission’s Working Document on Technical Details for an EU Framework for Crisis Management in the Banking Sector (Berlin: German Finance Ministry and Ministry of Justice).
   Google Scholar
• Gibson M.S. (2013), Testimony on Cross-Border Resolution Before the Subcommittee on National Security and International Trade and Finance, Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affair, 15 May (Washington, DC: US Senate).
   Google Scholar
• Goldbach, R. and Zimmermann, H. (2015), ‘Germany in the Context of the Multilevel Reform Process’, in R. Mayntz (ed.), Negotiated Reform: The Multilevel Governance of Financial Regulation (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag), pp. 139–162.
   Google Scholar
• Gracie, A. (2012), A Practical Process for Implementing a Bail-in Resolution Power, 17 September (London: Bank of England).
   Google Scholar
• Gracie, A. (2014), Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity – the Thinking Behind the FSB, 4 December (London: Bank of England).
   Google Scholar
• Gruenberg M.J. (2013), Remarks to the Exchequer Club, 15 May (Washington, DC: FDIC).
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. and Quaglia, L. (2016), The Political Economy of Banking Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Independent Commission on Banking. (2011), Final Report Recommendations, September (London: Independent Commission on Banking).
   Google Scholar
• Institute of International Finance. (2010), A Global Approach to Resolving Failing Financial Firms’, May (Washington, DC: Institute of International Finance).
   Google Scholar
• Institute of International Finance. (2011), Response to the FSB’s Consultation, September (Washington, DC: Institute of International Finance).
   Google Scholar
• Institute of International Finance. (2012), Making Resolution Robust – Completing the Legal and Institutional Framework for Effective Cross Border Resolution, June (Washington, DC: Institute of International Finance).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2010), Resolution of Cross-Border Banks – A Proposed Framework for Enhanced Coordination, June (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2011), People’s Republic of China: Financial System Stability Assessment, IMF Country Report No. 11/321, January (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2012), Japan: Financial System Stability Assessment, IMF Country Report No. 12/210, August (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).
   Google Scholar
• James, S. (2016), 'The Domestic Politics of Financial Regulation: Informal Ratification Games and the EU Capital Requirement Negotiations’, New Political Economy, 21 (2), pp. 187–203. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2015.1079171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodachi, K. (2013), ‘Japan’s Orderly Resolution Regime for Financial Firms’, Nomura Journal of Capital Markets, 45 (2), pp. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kudnra, Z. (2012), ‘Cross-Border Resolution of Failed Banks in the European Union After the Crisis: Business as Usual’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 50 (2), pp. 283–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02204.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lall, R. (2012), ‘From Failure to Failure: The Politics of International Banking Regulation’, Review of International Political Economy, 19 (4), pp. 609–638. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2011.603669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linde, L. (2013), Speech at the 6th Santander International Banking Conference, 5 November (Madrid: Banco de Espana).
   Google Scholar
• Moloney, N. (2011), ‘I. Reform or Revolution? The Financial Crisis, EU Financial Markets Law, and the European Securities and Markets Authority’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 60 (2), pp. 521–533. doi: 10.1017/S0020589311000145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mügge, D. (ed.) (2014), Europe and the Governance of Global Finance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Newman, A. and Posner, E. (2016), ‘Transnational Feedback, Soft Law, and Preferences in Global Financial Regulation’, Review of International Political Economy, 23 (1), pp. 123–152. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2015.1104375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatley, T., et al. (2013), ‘The Political Economy of Global Finance: A Network Model’, Perspectives on Politics, 11 (1), pp. 133–153. doi: 10.1017/S1537592712003593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauly, L. (2008), ‘Financial Crisis Management in Europe and Beyond’, Contribution to Political Economy, 27 (1), pp. 73–89. doi: 10.1093/cpe/bzn006
   Google Scholar
• People’s Bank of China. (2015), Financial Stability Report (Beijing).
   Google Scholar
• Posner, E. (2009), ‘Making Rules for Global Finance: Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation at the Turn of the Millennium’, International Organization, 63 (4), pp. 665–699. doi: 10.1017/S0020818309990130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, E. (2010), ‘Sequence as Explanation: the International Politics of Accounting Standards’, Review of International Political Economy, 17 (4), pp. 639–664. doi: 10.1080/09692291003723748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaglia, L. (2014a), The European Union and Global Financial Regulation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Quaglia, L. (2014b) ‘The European Union, the USA and International Standard Setting by Regulatory Fora in Finance’, New Political Economy, 19 (3), pp. 427–444. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2013.796449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rixen, T. (2013), ‘Why Reregulation After the Crisis is Feeble: Shadow Banking, Offshore Financial Centers, and Jurisdictional Competition’, Regulation & Governance, 7 (4), pp. 435–459. doi: 10.1111/rego.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, P.J. and Ziegler, N.J. (2015), ‘Patchwork Pace-Setter: The United States in the Multilevel Process of Financial Market Regulation’, in R. Maynz (ed.), Multilevel Governance of Financial Market Reform (Cologne: Campus Verlag), pp. 65–96.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenmaker, D. (2013) Governance of International Banking: The Financial Trilemma (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2015), ‘The UK in the Multilevel Process of Financial Market Regulation: Global Pace-Setter or National Outlier?’, in R. Maynz (ed.), Multilevel Governance of Financial Market Reform (Cologne: Campus Verlag), pp. 121–137.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A. (2001), ‘The International Politics of Harmonization: The Case of Capital Market Regulation’, International Organization, 55 (3), pp. 589–620. doi: 10.1162/00208180152507560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, D. A. (2007), Regulating Capital: Setting Standards for the International Financial System (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• St. Charles, K. (2010), ‘Regulatory Imperialism: The Worldwide Export of European Regulatory Principles on Credit Rating Agencies’, Minnesota Journal of International Law, 19 (2), pp. 399–451.
   Google Scholar
• Tarullo, D.K. (2012), Speech at the Council on Foreign Relations, 2 May (Washington, DC: Federal Reserve).
   Google Scholar
• Tarullo, D.K. (2013), Toward Building a More Effective Resolution Regime: Progress and Challenges, 18 October (Washington, DC: Federal Reserve).
   Google Scholar
• Transform in Banking Act (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Transform in Bank Restructuring Act (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Transform in Single Resolution Mechanism (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Treanor, J. (2013), ‘Lehman Collapse: the Liquidator's Story’, The Guardian, 13 September, p. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Tsingou, E. (2008), ‘Transnational Private Governance and the Basel Process: Banking Regulation and Supervision, Private Interests and Basel II’, in J.-C. Graz. and A. Noelke (eds), Transnational Private Governance and its Limits (London: Routledge), pp. 58–68.
   Google Scholar
• Tsingou, E. (2015), ‘Club Governance and the Making of Global Financial Rule’, Review of International Political Economy, 22 (2), pp. 225–256. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2014.890952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, P. (2010), Developing an EU Cross-Border Crisis Management Framework, 30 September (London: Bank of England).
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, P. (2013a), Resolution and Future of Finance, 20 May (London: Bank of England).
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, P. (2013b), Speech: The Reform of International Banking: Some Remaining Challenge’, 1 October (London: Bank of England). Available from: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/speeches/2013/speech682.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, P. (2014), 'The Resolution of Financial Institutions Without Taxpayer Solvency Support', European Summer Symposium in Economic Theory, Gerzensee, Switzerland, 3 July. Available from: http://www.cepr.org/sites/default/files/events/papers/6708_TUCKER%20Essay.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Underhill, G.R.D. and Zhang, X. (2008), ‘Setting the Rules: Private Power, Political Underpinnings, and Legitimacy in Global Monetary and Financial Governance’, International Affairs, 84 (3), pp. 535–554. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00723.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigand, J. (2012), Resolution Strategy Overview, Presentation by the Director of the Office of Complex Financial Institutions to Systemic Resolution Advisory Committee, 25 January (Washington, DC: FDIC).
   Google Scholar
• Wigand, J. (2013), Improving Cross-Border Resolution. Testimony Before the Subcommittee on National Security and International Trade and Finance, 15 May (Washington, DC: US Senate).
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, J.T. and Ziegler, J.N. (2012), ‘The Two-Tiered Politics of Financial Reform in the United States’, in R. Mayntz (ed.), Crisis and Control: Institutional Change in Financial Market Regulation (Cologne: Campus Verlag), pp. 29–66.
   Google Scholar
• Young, K.L. (2012), ‘Transnational Regulatory Capture? An Empirical Examination of the Transnational Lobbying of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’, Review of International Political Economy, 19 (4), pp. 663–688. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2011.624976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar