Continuity Under a Different Name: The Outcome of Privatisation in Serbia

References

• Anderson, G. and Boettke, P. (1997), ‘Soviety Venality: A Rent-seeking Model of the Communist State’, Public Choice, 93 (1–2), pp. 37–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anti-Corruption Agency (2015), Report on the Implementation of Privatisations against the Law (Government of Republic of Serbia – Anti-Corruption Council), NR72.
   Google Scholar
• Birdsall, N. and Nellis, J. (2003), ‘Winners and Losers: Assessing the Distributional Impact of Privatization’, World Development, 31 (10), pp. 1617–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettke, P. (1993), Why Perestroika Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Boettke, P. (2001), Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Boettke, P., Coyne, C. and Leeson, P. (2008), ‘Institutional Stickiness and the New Development Economics’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67 (2), pp. 331–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolcic, S. (2003), ‘Blocked Transition and Post-Socialist Transformation: Serbia in the Nineties’, Review of Sociology, 9 (2), pp. 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bošković, O. and Ognjanov, G. (2006), ‘Privatisation and Unemployment: Who are the Redundant Workers in Privatised Enterprises’, in B. Cerović (ed), Privatisation in Serbia: Evidence and Analysis (Faculty of Economics Belgrade: Belgrad), pp. 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Boycko, M., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1996), ‘A Theory of privatisation’, The Economic Journal, 106 (435), pp. 309–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boycko, M., et al. (1993), ‘Privatizing Russia’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1993 (2), pp. 139–92.
   Google Scholar
• Breslow, N. (1970), ‘A Generalized Kruskal-Wallis Test for Comparing K Samples Subject to Unequal Patterns of Censorship’, Biometrika, 57 (3), pp. 579–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, N. P. and Giovannoni, F. (2006), ‘The Determinants of Asset Stripping: Theory and Evidence from the Transition Economies’, Journal of Law and Economics, 49 (2), pp. 681–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cefalu, M. (2011), ‘Pointwise Confidence Intervals for the Covariate-Adjusted Survivor Function in the Cox Model’, Stata Journal, 11 (1), pp. 64–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerović, B. and Mitrović, R. D. (2007), ‘Privatisation Effects: Some Evidence From Serbia’, Transition Studies Review, 14 (3), pp. 469–87.
   Google Scholar
• Cvetkovic, M., Pankov, A. and Popovic, A. (2007), ‘Balkan Latecomer: The Case of Serbian Privatization’, in I. W. Lieberman and D. J. Kopf (eds), Privatization in Transition Economies: The Ongoing Story (London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited), pp. 221–260.
   Google Scholar
• Denisova, I., et al. (2009), ‘Who Wants to Revise Privatization? The Complementarity of Market Skills and Institutions’, American Political Science Review, 103 (2), pp. 284–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denisova, I., et al. (2012), ‘Everyone Hates Privatization, but why? Survey Evidence from 28 Post-Communist Countries’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 40 (1), pp. 44–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. (1986), ‘Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy’, Statistical Science, 1 (1), pp. 54–75.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. (1994), An Introduction to the Bootstrap (London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics & Applied Probability/Taylor & Francis).
   Google Scholar
• EU. (2015), Business Economy – Size Class Analysis (EU: EU Background Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Fagerland, M.W., Hosmer, D.W. and Bofin, A.M. (2008), ‘Multinomial Goodness-of-fit Tests for Logistic Regression Models’, Statistics in Medicine, 27 (21), pp. 4238–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehan, A. (1965), ‘A Generalized Wilcoxon Test for Comparing Arbitrarily Singly-censored Samples’, Biometrika, 52 (1/2), pp. 203–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gelb A., Hillman A.L., and Ursprung H.W. (1998), ‘Rents as Distractions: Why the Exit from Transition is Prolonged’, in N.C. Baltas, G. Demopoulos, J. Hassid (eds), Economic Interdependence and Cooperation in Europe, Studies in International Economics and Institutions (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer), pp. 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Gorodnichenko, Y. and Grygorenko, Y. (2008), ‘Are Oligarchs Productive? Theory and Evidence’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 36 (1), pp. 17–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregorič, A. (2002), ‘Growth in Transition Economies: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina’, Economic and Business Review, 4 (3–4), pp. 279–308.
   Google Scholar
• Gregurek, M. (2001), ‘The Volume and the Results of Privatisation in Croatia’, Economic Outlook, 4, pp. 155–88.
   Google Scholar
• Guriev, S. and Rachinsky, A. (2005), ‘The Role of Oligarchs in Russian capitalism’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (1), pp. 131–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm, P., King, P. and Stuckler, D. (2012), ‘Mass Privatization, State Capacity, and Economic Growth in Post-Communist countries’, American Sociological Review, 77 (2), pp. 295–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman, J. S. (1998), ‘Winners Take All: the Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist transitions’, World Politics, 50 (2), pp. 203–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman, J. S., Jones, G. and Kaufmann, D. (2003), ‘Seize the State, Seize the day: State Capture and Influence in Transition Economies’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 31 (4), pp. 751–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. (1998), ‘Trade, Growth and Economic Policy in Open Economies: Essays in Honour of Hans-Jürgen Vosgerau’, in K-J Koch and K. Jaeger (eds), Western Economic Theory and The Transition: The Public Choice Perspective (London: Springer), pp. 351–367.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff, K. and Stiglitz, E. (2004), ‘After the big Bang? Obstacles to the Emergence of the Rule of law in Post-Communist Societies’, American Economic Review, 94 (3), pp. 753–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. and Lemeshow, S. (2000), Applied Logistic Regression (Hoboken: Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• IMF. (2000), Offshore Financial Centers (Washington, DC: IMF) , IMF Background Paper .
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E. and Meier, P. (1958), ‘Nonparametric Estimation From Incomplete observations’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53 (282), pp. 457–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikeri, S. and Nellis, J. (2004), ‘Privatization in Competitive Sectors: The Record So Far’, The World Bank Research Observer, 19 (1), pp. 87–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koman, M. and Vasileva-Markovska, V.H. (2007), ‘Transition firms in Illyria: Do Workers Still Manage? Evidence from Macedonian firms’, Economic and Business Review, 9 (1), pp. 23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Koman, M., et al. (2011), ‘Effects of Ownership and Management Changes on Productivity in Privatized Montenegrin Firms’, Eastern European Economics, 49 (3), pp. 5–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koman, M., et al. (2015), ‘Asset Stripping and firm Survival in Mass Privatization: Testing the Hoff-Stiglitz and Campos-Giovannoni Models in Montenegro’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 43 (2), pp. 274–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotakorpi, K. and Poutvaara, P. (2011), ‘Pay for Politicians and Candidate Selection: An Empirical Analysis’, Journal of Public Economics, 95 (7–8), pp. 877–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, A. (1974), ‘The Political Economy of the Rent-seeking society’, American Economic Review, 64 (3), pp. 291–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazic, M. and Sekelj, L. (1997), ‘Privatisation in Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)’, Europe-Asia Studies, 49 (6), pp. 1057–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megginson, L. and Netter, J. (2001), ‘From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization’, Journal of Economic Literature, 39 (2), pp. 321–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, D. (2003), Pubic Choice III (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Nellis, J.R. (1999), Time to Rethink Privatization in Transition Economies? Vol. 38 (Washington, DC: World Bank Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. (1971), Bureaucracy and Representative Government (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Official Gazette. (1989), Federal Parliament of Former Yugoslavia, Law, N 84/89.
   Google Scholar
• Official Gazette. (1990), Federal Parliament of Former Yugoslavia, Law, N 46/90.
   Google Scholar
• Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia. (2001a), National Assembly of Serbia, Law, N 36.
   Google Scholar
• Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia. (2001b), National Assembly of Serbia, Law, N 45.
   Google Scholar
• Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia. (2005), National Assembly of Serbia, Law, N 79.
   Google Scholar
• Ogaki, M. and Atkeson, A. (1997), ‘Rate of Time Preference, Intertemporal Elasticity of Substitution, and Level of Wealth’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 79 (4), pp. 564–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1982), The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities, 1st ed. (New Haven: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Peltzman, S., Levine, M. E. and Noll, R. G. (1989), ‘The Economic Theory of Regulation After a Decade of Deregulation’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, 1989, pp. 1–59.
   Google Scholar
• Peto, R. and Peto, J. (1972), ‘Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test procedures’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 135 (2), pp. 185–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrović, P., Bogetić, Ž. and Vujošević, Z. (1999), ‘The Yugoslav Hyperinflation of 1992–1994: Causes, Dynamics, and Money Supply process’. Journal of Comparative Economics, 27 (2), pp. 335–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polishchuk, L. (1999), Distribution of Assets and Credibility of Property Rights (Moscow: University of Maryland and New Economic School).
   Google Scholar
• Prasnikar, J. and Svejnar, J. (1991), ‘Workers’ Participation in Management vs. Social Ownership and Government Policies: Yugoslav Lessons for Transforming Socialist Economies’, Comparative Economic Studies, 33 (4), pp. 27–45.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, L. (1978), ‘Linear Rank Tests with Right Censored Data’, Biometrika, 65 (1), pp. 167–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quarterly National Accounts Division. (2011), Statistical Release: Quarterly Gross Domestic Product in the Republic of Serbia. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, NR40(083).
   Google Scholar
• Quarterly National Accounts Division. (2013), Statistical Release: Quarterly Gross Domestic Product in the Republic of Serbia. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, NR40(267).
   Google Scholar
• Roland, G. (2001), ‘Ten Years After … Transition and Economics’, IMF Economic Review, 48 (1), pp. 29–52.
   Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman, S. (2003), ‘Corruption’, in C. Rowley and F. Schneider (eds), The Encyclopedia of Public Choice (New York: Springer), pp. 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Schamis, H. (2002), Re-forming the State: The Politics of Privatization in Latin America and Europe (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A. (1998), ‘State Versus Private ownership’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12 (4), pp. 133–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A. and Treisman, D. (2000), Without a Map: Political Tactics and Economic Reform in Russia (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A. and Vishny, W. (1994), ‘Politicians and Firms’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109 (4), pp. 995–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonin, K. (1999), Inequality, Property Rights Protection, and Economic Growth in Transition Economies: Theory and Russian Evidence. CEPR Discussion Papers No. 2300.
   Google Scholar
• Sprenger, C. (2014), ‘Privatization and Survival – Evidence from a Russian Firm Survey’, Economic Annals, 59 (200), pp. 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Stringham, E, Boettke, P. and Clark, J. (2008), ‘Are Regulations the Answer for Emerging Stock Markets? Evidence From the Czech Republic and Poland’, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48 (3), pp. 541–66.
   Google Scholar
• Tarone, R. and Ware, J. (1977), ‘On Distribution-free Tests for Equality of Survival Distributions’, Biometrika, 64 (1), pp. 156–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullock, G. (1967), ‘The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft’, Economic Inquiry, 5 (3), pp. 224–32.
   Google Scholar
• Tullock, G. (2002), ‘People are people: The elements of public choice’, in G. Tullock, G.L. Brady and A. Seldon (eds), Government Failure: A Primer in Public Choice (Washington, DC: Cato Institute), pp. 3–82.
   Google Scholar
• Vujačić, I. and Petrović-Vujačić, J. (2011), ‘Privatization in Serbia: Results and Institutional Failures’, Economic Annals, 56 (191), pp. 89–105.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2002), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Xu, K., Tihanyi, L. and Hitt, M. (2014), ‘Firm Resources, Governmental Power, and Privatization’, Journal of Management, 20 (10), pp. 1–27.
   Google Scholar