Five Little B(R)ICS: Huffing and Puffing, but not Blowing Your House in

References

• Acharya, A. , 2014. Power shift or paradigm shift? China’s rise and Asia’s emerging security order. International studies quarterly , 58 (1), 158–173. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. , 2017. After liberal hegemony: the advent of a multiplex world order. Ethics & international affairs , 31 (3), 271–285. doi: 10.1017/S089267941700020X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrighi, G. , 2007. Adam Smith in Beijing: lineages of the twenty-first century . New York : Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ban, C. , 2013. Brazil’s liberal neo-developmentalism: new paradigm or edited orthodoxy? Review of international political economy , 20 (2), 298–331. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2012.660183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, C. , and Blyth, M. , 2013. The BRICS and the Washington consensus. Review of international political economy , 20 (2), 241–255. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2013.779374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelsmann-Scott, T. , et al. 2016. The new development bank: moving the BRICS from an acronym to an institution. South African institute of international affairs occasional paper 233, June.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, M.L. 2016. Rethinking the political economy of development beyond “the rise of the BRICS”. Sheffield political economy research institute paper no. 30. Available from: http://speri.dept.shef.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Beyond-the-Rise-of-the-BRICS.pdf [Accessed 24 October 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, M.L. , 2018a. Developing democracy, democratizing development: a backlash against hegemonic norms and practice? In: R. Munck and H. Fagan , ed. The handbook of development and social change . Cheltenham : Edward Elgar, 173–189.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, M.L. 2018b. Trade war: what is it good for? Global policy G7 brief, June. Available from: https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/sites/default/files/G7%20%27Trade%20War%27%20Brief%20-%20Matthew%20Louis%20Bishop.pdf [Accessed 14 November 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, M.L. and Zhang, X. , This Issue. Why is China a reluctant leader of the world trade organization? New political economy .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslin, S. , 2011. The ‘China model’ and the global crisis: from friedrich list to a Chinese mode of governance? International affairs , 87 (6), 1323–1343. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01039.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzdugan, S. , and Payne, A. , 2016. The long battle for global governance . London : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-J. , 2002. Kicking away the ladder: development strategy in comparative perspective . London : Anthem.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, G.T. , 2014. The BRICS-led development bank: purpose and politics beyond the G20. Global policy , 5 (3), 366–373. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, G.T. , and Freeman, C. 2016. What is next? … for world order and global governance. Global policy, November. Available from: https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/03/11/2016/what-next-world-order-and-global-governance [Accessed 14 November 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Chodor, T. , 2017. The G20 since the global financial crisis: neither hegemony nor collectivism. Global governance , 23 (2), 205–223. doi: 10.1163/19426720-02302005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. , and Stolte, C. , This Issue. Insider and outsider strategies of influence: the BRICS’ dualistic approach towards informal institutions. New political economy .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drezner, D.W. , 2007. The new new world order. Foreign affairs, March/April.
   Google Scholar
• Ferchen, M. , 2013. Whose China model is it anyway? The contentious search for consensus. Review of international political economy , 20 (2), 390–420. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2012.660184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. , 2013. Part 1 – revealing the Eurocentric foundations of IPE: a critical historiography of the discipline from the classical to the modern era. Review of international political economy , 20 (5), 1024–1054. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2012.704519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. , 2015. Different paths to power: the rise of Brazil, India and China at the world trade organization. Review of international political economy , 22 (2), 311–338. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2014.927387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. , 2016. Breaking the WTO: how emerging powers disrupted the neoliberal project . Stanford : Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G.J. , 2008. The rise of China and the future of the west: can the liberal system survive? Foreign affairs , 87 (1), 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauthammer, C. , 1990. The unipolar moment. Foreign affairs , 70 (1), 23–33. doi: 10.2307/20044692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauthammer, C. , 2002. The unipolar moment revisited. The national interest , 70 (winter), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kupchan, C.A. , 2014. The normative foundations of hegemony and the coming challenge to pax americana. Security studies , 23 (2), 219–257. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2014.874205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne, C. , 1993. The unipolar illusion: why new great powers will rise. International security , 17 (4), 5–51. doi: 10.2307/2539020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesage, D. , Lips, W. , and Vermeiren, M. , This Issue. The BRICs and international tax governance: the case of automatic exchange of information. New political economy .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, S.N. , 2006. The ‘R’ in BRICS: is Russia an emerging power? International affairs , 82 (1), 41–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00514.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, C. , and Nölke, A. 2013. Capitalism in large emerging economies and the new global trade order. 54th Annual convention of the international studies association, San Fransico, 3–6 April.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvad, A. , 2015. Competing hegemonic projects within China’s variegated capitalism: ‘liberal’ guangdong vs. ‘statist’ chongqing. New political economy , 20 (2), 199–227. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2014.914160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray-Evans, P. , 2019. Power in north–south trade negotiations: making the European Union’s economic partnership agreements . London : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murray-Evans, P. , This Issue. Rising powers in complex regimes: South African norm shopping in the governance of cross-border investment. New political economy .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzaka, V. , and Bishop, M.L. , 2015. Doha stalemate: the end of trade multilateralism? Review of international studies , 41 (2), 383–406. doi: 10.1017/S0260210514000266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzaka, V. , and Serrano, O. , This Issue. Teaming-up? intellectual property and the equitable sharing of benefits from genetic resources in China, India and Brazil. New political economy .
   Google Scholar
• Naughton, B. , 2010. China’s distinctive system: can it be a model for others? Journal of contemporary China , 19 (65), 437–460. doi: 10.1080/10670561003666079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nölke, A. , et al., 2015. Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: implications from the rise of large emerging economies. European journal of international relations , 21 (3), 538–567. doi: 10.1177/1354066114553682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachman, G. 2018. America rejects the world it made. Financial times, 29 January.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. , Armijo, L.E. , and Katada, S. , 2017. The BRICS and collective financial statecraft . Oxford : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutland, P. , and Kazantsev, A. , 2016. The limits of Russia’s ‘soft power’. Journal of political power , 9 (3), 395–413. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakwa, R. , 2011. The cricis of Russian democracy: the dual state, factionalism and the medvedev succession . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen, M.D. , 2014. Rising powers, global capitalism and liberal global governance: a historical materialist account of the BRICs challenge. European journal of international relations , 20 (4), 912–938. doi: 10.1177/1354066114523655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steunkel, O. , 2015. The BRICS and the future of global order . Lanham : Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Tansel, B. , This Issue. The shape of “rising powers” to come? The antinomies of growth and neoliberal development in Turkey. New political economy .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. , 1998. The myth of the powerless state . Hong Kong : UP Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. , 2014. America Inc. Innovation and enterprise in the national security state . Ithaca : Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. , and Hobson, J. , 1995. States and economic development: a comparative historical analysis . Cambridge : Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. , 2009. The post-American world: and the rise of the rest . London : Penguin.
   Google Scholar