647
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Rising Powers in Complex Regimes: South African Norm Shopping in the Governance of Cross-Border Investment

References

  • Aggarwal, V.K. , 2005. Reconciling institutions: nested, horizontal, overlapping, and independent institutions. Working Paper, February. University of California at Berkely.
  • Aggarwal, V.K. , and Evenett, S.J. , 2013. A fragmenting global economy: a weakened WTO, mega FTAs, and murky protectionism. Swiss political science review , 19 (4), 550–557.
  • Alden, C. , and Le Pere, G. , (2009). South Africa in Africa: bound to lead. Politikon: South African journal of political studies , 36 (1), 145–169.
  • Allix, M. , 2015. Investors mull leaving. Business Day, 16 September.
  • Alter, K. , and Meunier, S. , 2006. Nested and overlapping regimes in the Transatlantic Banana Trade Dispute. Journal of European public policy , 13 (3), 362–382.
  • Alter, K. , and Meunier, S. , 2009. The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on politics , 7 (1), 13–24.
  • Arrighi, G. , 2007. Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-first century . New York : Verso.
  • Ashton, C. , 2009. Letter to colleagues: petition TRAIDCRAFT [online]. Available from: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/january/tradoc_142184.pdf [Accessed 17 December 2015].
  • Barnett, M. , and Finnemore, M. , 2004. Rules for the World: international organizations in global politics . Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
  • Benvenisti, E. , and Downs, G.W. , 2007. The Empire's new clothes: political economy and the fragmentation of international law. Stanford law review , 60 (2), 595–631.
  • Bergsten, C.F. , 1996. Competitive liberalization and global free trade: a vision for the 21st century. Working Paper 96/12. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
  • Bhagwati, J. , 1993. Regionalism and multilateralism: an overview. In: K. Anderson , and R. Blackhurst , ed. Regionalism and the global trading system . London : Harvester-Wheatsheaf, 22–51.
  • Bischoff, P.-H. , 2003. External and domestic sources of foreign policy ambiguity: South African foreign policy and the projection of pluralist middle power. Politikon: South African journal of political studies , 30 (2), 183–201.
  • Bishop, M.L. , 2016. Rethinking the political economy of development beyond ‘the rise of the BRICS’. SPERI paper no. 30 . Sheffield : Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute.
  • Bishop, M.L. , Heron, T. , and Payne, A. , 2013. Caribbean development alternatives and the CARIFORUM-European Union Economic Partnership Agreement. Journal of international relations and development , 16 (1), 82–110.
  • Bloomfield, A. , 2016. Norm antipreneurs and theorising resistance to normative change. Review of international studies , 42 (2), 310–333.
  • Bonnitcha, J. , Poulsen, L.N.S. , and Waibel, M. , 2017. The political economy of the investment treaty regime . Oxford : Oxford University Press.
  • Capling, A. , and Higgott, R. , 2009. The future of the multilateral trade system - what role for the World Trade Organization? Global governance , 15 (3), 313–326.
  • Carim, X. , 2009. The Interim Economic Partnership Agreement (IEPA): view from the South African government. In: E. Jones , and D.F. Martí , ed. Updating economic partnership agreements to today's global challenges: Essays on the future of economic partnership agreements . Washington, DC : German Marshall Fund of the United States.
  • Carim, X. , 2015. International investment agreements and Africa's structural transformation: a perspective from South Africa. South Centre Investment Policy Brief No. 4 . Geneva : South Centre.
  • CEO [Corporate Europe Observatory] , 2013a. A Transatlantic Corporate Bill of Rights [online]. Available from: https://corporateeurope.org/trade/2013/06/transatlantic-corporate-bill-rights [Accessed 16 March 2014].
  • CEO [Corporate Europe Observatory] , 2013b. Unravelling the spin: a guide to corporate rights in the EU-US trade deal [online]. Available from: https://corporateeurope.org/trade/2013/07/unravelling-spin-guide-corporate-rights-eu-us-trade-deal [Accessed 16 March 2017].
  • CEO [Corporate Europe Observatory] , 2014. TTIP debunking the business propaganda over investor rights [online]. Available from: https://corporateeurope.org/international-trade/2014/07/ttip-debunking-business-propaganda-over-investor-rights [Accessed 16 March 2017].
  • Davies, R. , 2008. Bridging the divide: the SADC EPA. Trade negotiations insights , 7 (4), 1–2.
  • Davies, R. , 2012a. Speaking notes for Minister at the discussion of UNCTAD's investment policy framework for sustainable development (IPFSD) . Geneva , 24 September.
  • Davies, R. , 2012b. UNCTAD provides the policy know-how for moving from a traditional investment model to a new sustainable model. Speech delivered by the Minister of Trade and Industry at the South African launch of the United Nations Trade and Development (UNCTAD) Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development. 26 July. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
  • Davies, R. , 2016. South Africa's country statement delivered by the Minister of Trade and Industry, Dr Rob Davies. In: UNCTAD XIV ministerial conference, 20 July Nairobi.
  • Del Felice, C. , 2012. Power in discursive practices: the case of the STOP EPAs campaign. The European journal of international relations , 20 (1), 145–167.
  • Department of Trade and Industry , 2008. SADC EPA group – EC negotiations: assessing the emerging outcome . Pretoria .
  • Department of Trade and Industry , 2009. Bilateral investment treaty policy framework review: government position Paper . Pretoria .
  • Department of Trade and Industry and Department of Mineral Resources , 2010. Briefing on arbitration cases against South Africa under various bilateral investment treaties . Pretoria .
  • De Ville, F. , and Siles-Brügge, G. , 2015. TTIP: the truth about the transatlantic trade and investment partnership . Cambridge : Polity.
  • Drezner, D.W. , 2007. The New New World order. Foreign affairs , 86, 34–46.
  • Drezner, D.W. , 2009. The power and peril of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on politics , 7 (1), 65–70.
  • Drezner, D.W. , 2010. Mercantilist and realist perspecitves on the global political economy. In: R. Marlin-Bennett , ed. Oxford research encyclopedia of international studies . Oxford : Oxford University Press.
  • Drezner, D.W. , 2013. The tragedy of the global institutional commons. In: M. Finnemore , and J. Goldstein , ed. Back to basics: state power in a contemporary world . Oxford : Oxford University Press, 280–312.
  • Efstathopoulos, C. , 2015. Middle powers in World Trade Diplomacy: India, South Africa and the Doha Development Agenda . Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Elkins, Z. , Guzman, A. , and Simmons, B. , 2006. Competing for capital: the diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960–2000. International organization , 60 (4), 811–146.
  • Emmott, B. , 2008. Rivals: How the power struggle between China, India and Japan will shape our next decade . New York : Harcourt.
  • Epstein, C. , 2012a. Stop telling us how to behave: socialization or infantilization? International studies perspectives , 13 (2), 135–145.
  • Epstein, C. , 2012b. Symposium: interrogating the use of norms in international relations: an introduction. International studies perspectives , 13 (2), 121–122.
  • Finnemore, M. , 2003. The purpose of intervention: changing beliefs about the use of force . Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
  • Finnemore, M. , and Sikkink, K. , 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. International organization , 52 (4), 887–917.
  • Gamble, A. , et al. , 2015. Multipolarity and the transatlantic trade and investment partnership. In: T. Novotná , ed. The politics of transatlantic trade negotiations: TTIP in a globalized world . Farnham : Ashgate, 9–16.
  • Gehring, T. , and Faude, B. , 2013. The dynamics of regime complexes: microfoundations and systemic effects. Global governance , 19 (1), 119–130.
  • Gehring, T. , and Faude, B. , 2014. A theory of emerging order within institutional complexes: How competition among regulatory international institutions leads to institutional adaptation and division of labour. Review of International Organizations , 9 (4), 471–498.
  • Gilpin, R. , 1972. The politics of transnational relations. In: R.O. Keohane , and J.S. Nye , ed. Transnational relations and world politics . Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
  • Girvan, N. , 2012. Social movements confront neoliberalism: reflections on a Caribbean experience. Globalizations , 9 (6), 753–766.
  • Goldstein, J. , et al. , 2001. Legalization and World politics . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
  • Gómez-Mera, L. , 2015. International regime complexity and regional governance: evidence from the Americas. Global governance , 21 (1), 19–42.
  • Hall, R.B. , 2003. The discursive demolition of the Asian development model. International studies quarterly , 47 (1), 71–99.
  • Hamill, J. , and Lee, D. , 2001. A middle power paradox? South African diplomacy in the post-apartheid era. International relations , 15 (4), 33–59.
  • Heron, T. , 2011. Asymmetric bargaining and development trade-offs in the CARIFORUM-European Union economic partnership agreement. Review of international political economy , 18 (3), 328–357.
  • Heron, T. , and Murray-Evans, P. , 2017. Limits to market power: strategic discourse and institutional path dependence in the EU-ACP economic partnership agreements. European journal of international relations , 23 (2), 341–364.
  • Heron, T. , and Siles-Brügge, G. , 2012. Competitive liberalisation and the ‘Global Europe’ services and investment agenda: locating the commercial drivers of the EU-ACP economic partnership agreements. Journal of common market studies , 50 (2), 250–266.
  • Hobson, J.M. , and Seabrooke, L. , 2007. Everyday IPE: revealing everyday forms of change in the World economy. In: J.M. Hobson , and L. Seabrooke , ed. Everyday politics of the World economy . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1–23.
  • Hopewell, K. , 2015. Different paths to power: The rise of Brazil, India and China at the WTO. Review of international political economy , 22 (2), 311–338.
  • Hopewell, K. , 2016. Breaking the WTO: How emerging powers disrupted the neoliberal project . Stanford : Stanford University Press.
  • Ikenberry, G.J. , 2008. The rise of China and the future of the West. Foreign affairs , 87 (1), 23–37.
  • Kanth, D.R. , 2017a. India, South Africa, US oppose G20 draft on investment facilitation [online]. Available from: http://www.livemint.com/Politics/ZcaJq4oeGLusd2Cuigk0iM/India-South-Africa-US-oppose-G20-draft-on-investment-facil.html [Accessed 9 June 2017].
  • Kanth, D.R. , 2017b. India blocks discussion on global investment facilitation at WTO [online]. Available from: http://www.livemint.com/Politics/z7ZcaQc8rzCTcpt2qYdfaM/India-blocks-discussion-on-global-investment-facilitation-at.html [Accessed 19 October 2017].
  • Keck, M. , and Sikkink, K. , 1998. Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics . Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
  • Keet, D. , 2005. South Africa's official position and role in promoting the World Trade Organisation and a new round of multilateral trade negotiations [online]. Available from: https://www.tni.org/es/node/7573 [Accessed 25 January 2017].
  • Keohane, R.O. , 1980. The theory of hegemonic stability and changes in international economic regimes, 1967–1977. In: O. Holsti , R. Siverson , and A.L. George , ed. Change in the international system . Boulder : Westview, 131–162.
  • Keohane, R.O. , 1984. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the World political economy . Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
  • van Kersbergen, K. , and Verbeek, B. , 2007. The politics of international norms: subsidiarity and the imperfect competence regime of the European Union. European journal of international relations , 13 (2), 217–238.
  • Kindleberger, C.P. , 1973. The world depression: 1929–1939 . Berkeley, CA : University of California Press.
  • Krasner, S.D. , 1976. State power and the structure of international trade. World politics , 28 (3), 317–347.
  • Krasner, S.D. , 1983. Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. In: S.D Krasner , ed. International regimes . Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press, 1–22.
  • Krebs, R.R. , and Jackson, P.T. , 2007. Twisting tongues and twisting arms: the power of political rhetoric. European journal of international relations , 13 (1), 35–66.
  • Krugman, P. , 1993. Regionalism versus multilateralism: analytic notes. In: J. De Melo , and A. Panagariya , ed. New dimensions in regional integration . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 58–79.
  • Laïdi, Z. , 2014. Towards a post-hegemonic World: the multipolar threat to the multilateral order. International politics , 51 (3), 350–365.
  • Langalanga, A. , 2015. Imagining South Africa's foreign investment regulatory regime in a global context. SAIIA Occasional Paper 214. Johannesburg: South African Institute of International Affairs.
  • Langalanga, A. , 2017. Regulations for Foreign Investor Act weighted towards dispute settlement [online]. Available from: http://www.saiia.org.za/opinion-analysis/regulations-for-foreign-investor-act-weighted-towards-dispute-settlement [Accessed 9 June 2017].
  • Mattoo, A. , and Subramanian, A. , 2009. From Doha to the next Bretton Woods: a new multilateral trade agenda. Foreign affairs , 88 (1), 15–26.
  • Mossallam, M. , 2015. Process matters: South Africa's experience of exiting its BITs. GEG Working Paper 2015/97. University of Oxford, Blavatnik School of Government.
  • Murray-Evans, P. , 2019. Power in North-South trade negotiations: making the European Union's economic partnership agreements . London : Routledge.
  • Muzaka, V. , and Bishop, M.L. , 2015. The Doha stalemate: the end of multilateralism? Review of international studies , 41 (2), 383–406.
  • Niemann, H. , and Schillinger, H. , 2016. Contestation ‘all the way down’? The grammar of contestation in norm research. Review of international studies , 43 (1), 29–49.
  • OECD , 2012. Roundtable on freedom of investment 17: Summary of roundtable discussions by the OECD Secretariat . Paris .
  • Orsini, A. , Morin, J.-F. , and Young, O. , 2013. Regime complexes: a buzz, a boom or a boost for global governance. Global governance , 19 (1), 27–39.
  • Panagariya, A. , 1998. ‘APEC and the United States’. In: A. Woodland , and J. Piggott , ed. International trade policy and the Pacific Rim . London : Macmillan, 302–318.
  • Poulsen, L.N.S. , 2014. Bounded rationality and the diffusion of modern investment treaties. International studies quarterly , 58 (1), 1–14.
  • Poulsen, L.N.S. , 2015. Bounded rationality and economic diplomacy: the politics of investment treaties in developing countries . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • Raustiala, K. , and Victor, D. , 2004. The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International organization , 58 (2), 277–309.
  • Reiter, J. , 2006. International investment rules. In: S. Woolcock , ed. Trade and investment rule-making: the role of regional and bilateral agreements . Tokyo : United Nations University Press, 208–240.
  • SADC , 2006. A strategic framework for the SADC EPA Member States in the EPA negotiations as adopted by the SADC Ministers of Trade on 12 February 2006. SADC/EPA-MIN/7/2006/3, Luanda.
  • Santander , 2017. South Africa: foreign investment [online]. Available from: https://en.portal.santandertrade.com/establish-overseas/south-africa/foreign-investment [Accessed 7 June 2017].
  • Schimmelfennig, F. , 2001. The community trap: liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the Eastern enlargement of the European Union. International Organization , 55 (1), 47–80.
  • Schott, J. , 1989. More free trade areas. In: J. Schott , ed. Free trade areas and US Trade Policy . Washington, DC : Institute for International Economics.
  • Seabrooke, L. , 2006. The social forces of financial power: domestic legitimacy and international financial orders . Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
  • Serrão, O. , and Bischoff, P.-H. , 2009. Foriegn policy ambiguity on the part of an emerging middle power: South African foreign policy through other lenses. Politikon: South African journal of political studies , 36 (3), 363–380.
  • Sharman, J.C. , 2007. The agency of peripheral actors: small state tax havens and international regimes as weapons of the weak. In: J. Hobson , and L. Seabrooke , ed. Everyday politics of the World economy . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 45–62.
  • Siles-Brügge, G. , 2014. Constructing European Union Trade Policy . London : Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Singh, K. , 2017. Do we need a multilateral instrument on investment facilitation. Madhyam Briefing Paper No. 19, New Delhi.
  • Taylor, I. , and Williams, P.D. , 2006. Understanding South Africa's multilateralism. In: D. Lee , I. Taylor , and P.D. Williams , ed. The new multilateralism in South African diplomacy . Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 1–25.
  • Trade and Industry Committee , 2015. SA foreign direct investment obligations & promotion and protection of investment bill [B18-2015]. Seminar. Pretoria.
  • UNCTAD , 2004. International investment agreements: key issues, volume 1. Document UNCTAD/IIE/IIT/2004/10, 10 December, Geneva.
  • UNCTAD , 2012. Investment policy framework for sustainable development . Geneva .
  • UNCTAD , 2016. UNCTAD facilitates G20 consensus on guiding principles for global investment policymaking [online]. Available from: http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/News/Hub/Archive/508 [Accessed 9 June 2017].
  • Vandevelde, K.J. , 2005. A brief history of international investment agreements. Journal of international law and policy , 12 (1), 157–194.
  • Van Harten, G. , 2008. Investment provisions in economic partnership agreements. Working Paper. York University, Toronto: Osgoode Hall Law School.
  • Wade, R. , 2011. Emerging World order? from multipolarity to multilateralism in the G20, the World Bank, and the IMF. Politics & society , 39 (3), 347–378.
  • Wiener, A. , 2004. Contested compliance: interventions on the normative structure of world politics. European journal of international relations , 10 (2), 189–234.
  • Wiener, A. , 2007. The dual quality of norms and governance beyond the state: sociological and normatice approaches to ‘interaction’. Critical review of international social and political philosophy , 10 (1), 47–69.
  • Wiener, A. , 2017. Agency of the governed in global international relations: access to norm validation. Third World thematics , 2 (5), 709–725.
  • Woolcock, S. , 2011. Multi-Level economic Diplomacy: The case of investment. In: N. Bayne , and S. Woolcock , ed. The new economic diplomacy: decision-making and negotiation in international economic relations, 3rd ed . Farnham : Ashgate, 131–149.
  • Woolcock, S. , 2015. The impact of mega regional agreements on international investment rules and norms. European policy analysis , 13, 1–12.
  • Woolfrey, S. , 2013. South Africa's promotion and protection of investment bill [online]. Available from: https://www.tralac.org/discussions/article/5345-south-africa-s-promotion-and-protection-of-investment-bill.html [Accessed 16 February 2017].
  • World Trade Organization , 2003. Minutes of meeting held in the Centre William Rappard on 4 April 2003. TN/C/M/8 .
  • World Trade Organization , 2004. Minutes of meeting held in the Centre William Rappard on 14–15 July 2003. TN/C/M/11 .
  • Zakaria, F. , 2011. The post-American World and the rise of the rest . New York : Penguin.
  • Zhan, J. , 2016. G20 guiding principles for global investment policymaking: a facilitator's perspective. E15 investment theme think piece .
  • Zimmerman, L. , Deitelhoff, N. , and Lesch, M. , 2017. Unlocking the agency of the governed: contestation and norm dynamics. Third World thematics , 2 (5), 691–708.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.