601
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Transnational Economists in the Eurozone Crisis: Professional Structures, Networks and Ideas

ORCID Icon

References

  • Ban, C., 2015. Austerity versus stimulus? Explaining change on fiscal policy at the International Monetary Fund since the great recession. Governance, 28 (2), 167–83.
  • Ban, C., 2016. When diffusion fails. The IMF and the ECB in the austerity debate. Paper presented at the Council for European Studies, Philadelphia, p. 2.
  • Ban, C. and Patenaude, B., 2019. The professional politics of the austerity debate: a comparative field analysis of the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund. Public administration, 93 (3), 530–543.
  • Béland, D. and Cox, R.H., eds., 2011. Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Blyth, M., 2013. Paradigms and paradox: the politics of economic ideas in two moments of crisis. Governance, 26 (2), 197–215.
  • Blyth, M. and Matthijs, M., 2017. Black Swans, Lame Ducks, and the mystery of IPE’s missing macroeconomy. Review of international political economy, 24 (2), 203–31.
  • Campbell-Verduyn, M., 2016. Moral economese of scale? Crisis, discursive change and the varying authority of economists. Global society, 30 (4), 507–30.
  • Campbell, J.L. and Pedersen, O.K., 2014. The origins of policy ideas: knowledge regimes in the United States, France, Germany and Denmark. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Carroll, W.K., 2009. Transnationalists and national networkers in the global corporate elite. Global networks, 9, 289–314.
  • Carstensen, M.B. and Schmidt, V.A., 2016. Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European public policy, 23 (3), 318–37.
  • Chwieroth, J.M., 2010. The IMF and the rise of financial liberalisation. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Coman, R., 2019. Why and how do think tanks expand their networks in times of crisis? The case of Bruegel and the centre for European policy studies. Journal of European public policy, 26 (2), 286–301. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1415953.
  • Crespy, A. and Vanheuverzwijn, P., 2017. What ‘Brussels’ means by structural reforms: empty signifier or constructive ambiguity? Comparative European politics, 17 (1), 92–111.
  • Crouch, C., 2011. The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • De Sousa, C. 2014. Economic curriculum reform: why do we need it? http://bruegel.org/2014/09/economic-curriculum-reform-why-do-we-need-it/.
  • Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B., 2002. The internationalization of palace wars. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  • Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B., 2011. Hegemonic battles, professional rivalries, and the international division of labor in the market for the import and export of state-governing expertise. International political sociology, 5, 276–93.
  • Dyson, K.H.F. and Maes, I., 2016. Architects of the Euro. Intellectuals in the making of European Monetary Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dyson, K. and Quaglia, L., 2010. European economic governance and policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Farrell, H. and Quiggin, J., 2012. Consensus, dissensus and economic ideas: the rise and fall of Keynesianism during the economic crisis. https://www.henryfarrell.net/Keynes.pdf.
  • Farrell, H. and Quiggin, J., 2017. Consensus, dissensus, and economic ideas: economic crisis and the rise and fall of Keynesianism. International studies quarterly, 61 (2), 269–83.
  • Fourcade, M., 2006. The construction of a global profession: the transnationalization of economics. American journal of sociology, 112 (1), 145–94.
  • Gamble, A., 2013. Neo-liberalism and fiscal conservatism. In: V.A. Schmidt and M. Thatcher, eds. Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 53–77.
  • Georgakakis, D., 2011. Don’t throw out the “Brussels Bubble” with the bathwater: from EU institutions to the field of Eurocracy. International political sociology, 5, 331–4.
  • Georgakakis, D., ed., 2012. Le champ de l’Eurocratie. Paris: Economica.
  • Georgakakis, M. and Rowell, J., 2013. The field of Eurocracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Green, J. and Hay, C., 2015. Towards a new political economy of the crisis: getting what went wrong right. New political economy, 20 (3), 331–41. doi:10.1080/13563467.2014.951432.
  • Haas, P., 1992. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International organization, 46 (1), 1–35.
  • Haas, P., 2004. When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. Journal of European public policy, 11 (4), 569–92.
  • Hall, P., ed., 1989. The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hay, C., 2016. Good in a crisis: the ontological institutionalism of social constructivism. New political economy, 21 (6), 520–35. doi:10.1080/13563467.2016.1158800.
  • Helgadóttir, O., 2015. The Bocconi boys go to Brussels: Italian economic ideas, professional networks and European austerity. Journal of European public policy, 23 (3), 392–409.
  • Henriksen, L.F. and Seabrooke, L., 2016. Transnational organizing: issue professionals in environmental sustainability networks. Organization, 23 (5), 722–41.
  • Lebaron, F., 2012. Les dirigeants de la BCE, une nouvelle ‘élite’ monétaire européenne. In: D. Georgakakis, ed. Le champ de l’Eurocratie. Paris: Economica, 113–29.
  • Lebaron, F., 2015. Troubles dans l’ordre neoliberal. Savoir/Agir, 32 (2), 5–8.
  • Matthijs, M. and Blyth, M., eds., 2015. The future of the Euro. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Matthijs, M. and McNamara, K.R., 2015. The Euro crisis’ theory effect: Northern saints, Southern sinners, and the demise of the Eurobond. Journal of European integration, 37 (2), 229–45.
  • Momani, B., 2005. Recruiting and diversifying IMF technocrats. Global society, 19 (2), 167–87.
  • Mudge, S. and Vauchez, A., 2015. Fielding supranationalism: the European Central Bank as a field effect. Sociological review, 64 (2), 146–69.
  • Robertson, J., 2014. On the national production of global elites: the rise of a French trained global elite in financial derivatives. International political sociology, 8, 275–92.
  • Salas-Porras, A., 2018. American think tank networks and expert debates around the global financial crisis: Keynesian insurgents against austerity defenders. Policy and society, 37 (2), 243–59. doi:10.1080/14494035.2017.1397393.
  • Schmidt, V.A. and Thatcher, M., eds., 2013. Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Seabrooke, L. and Henriksen, L., eds., 2017. Professional networks in transnational governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Seabrooke, L. and Tsingou, E., 2014. Distinctions, affiliations, and professional knowledge in financial reform expert groups. Journal of European public policy, 21 (3), 389–407.
  • Seabrooke, L. and Tsingou, E., 2018. Europe’s fast- and slow-burning crises. Journal of European public policy. doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1446456.
  • Searbrooke, L., 2014. Identity switching and transnational professionals. International political sociology, 8, 335–7.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.