Developmental State or Economic Statecraft? Where, Why and How the Difference Matters

References

• Amsden, A., 1989. Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, S. with MIT Task Force on Production in the Innovation Economy, 2013. Making in America: from innovation to market. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Block, F., 2008. Swimming against the current: the rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Politics and society, 36 (2), 169–206. doi:10.1177/0032329208318731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, F., 2011. Innovation and the invisible hand of government. In: F. Block and M. Keller, eds. State of innovation: The US government’s role in technology development. Boulder, Colo: Paradigm, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bonvillian, W.B., 2017. Advanced manufacturing: a new policy challenge. Annals of science and technology policy, 1 (1), 1–131.
   Google Scholar
• Bonvillian, W.B., 2018. DARPA and its ARPA-E and IARPA clones: a unique innovation organization model. Industrial and corporate change, 27 (5), 897–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breznitz, Dan and Cowhey, Peter, 2012. America’s two systems of innovation: innovation for production in fostering U.S. growth. Innovations: technology, governance, globalization, 7 (3), 127–54.
   Google Scholar
• Breznitz, D. and Murphree, M., 2013. China's run - economic growth, policy, interdependences, and implications for diverse innovation policies in a world of fragmented production. In: D. Breznitz and J. Zysman, eds. The third globalization. New York: Oxford University Press, 36–51.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, D.O., 2009. Capitalist development in Korea: labour, capital and the myth of the developmental state. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P.B., 1995. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faux, J., 2009. Industrial policy: the road not taken. The American Prospect. December 21. Available from: https://prospect.org/special-report/industrial-policy-road-taken/.
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Policy Research Institute (FPRI). 2019. The rise of South Korea’s defense industry and its impact on South Korean foreign relations. 22 April. https://www.fpri.org/article/2019/04/the-rise-of-south-koreas-defense-industry-and-its-impact-on-south-korean-foreign-relations/.
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, A.L., 2000. In the shadow of the garrison state: America’s anti-statism and its cold war grand strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, E.R.H., and Kirchain, R., 2010. Design for location? The impact of manufacturing offshore on technology competitiveness in the optoelectronics industry. Management science, 56, 2323–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, Otis L. Jr., 1993. Losing time: the industrial policy debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, M., 2010. In-Q-Tel, Google invest in recorded future. Government Computer News. July 29. Available from: https://gcn.com/articles/2010/07/29/inqtel-google-fund-web-analysis-firm.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, T., 2002. Cold war armory: military contracting in Silicon Valley. Enterprise & society, 3 (2), 247–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hockmuth, K., 2018. South Korea’s developmental epoch: a new economic nationalism perspective. Asian international studies review, 19 (2), 33–59.
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Security and Development Policy (ISDP), 2019. Ambition and ambiguity: South Korea’s defense industry reform. 25 July. Available from: https://isdp.eu/ambition-and-ambiguity-south-koreas-defense-industry-reform/.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., 2016. The developmental state in an era of finance-dominated accumulation. In: B. Jessop, ed. The Asian developmental state. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 27–55.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., 1982. MITI and the Japanese miracle. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., 1999. The developmental state: Odyssey of a concept. In: Meredith Woo-Cummings, ed. The developmental state. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 32–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.Y., 2012. Transitioning from fast-follower to innovator: the institutional foundations of the Korean telecommunications sector. Review of international political economy, 19 (1), 140–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.Y., 2019. Hybridized industrial ecosystems and the makings of a new developmental infrastructure in East Asia’s green energy sector. Review of international political economy, 1–25. doi:10.1080/09692290.2018.1554540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.Y. and Thurbon, E., 2015. Developmental environmentalism: explaining the embrace of green growth in Korea. Politics and society, 43 (2), 213–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkmaz, K. and Rydkvist, J., 2012. The Republic of Korea: a defence and security primer. Stockholm: Swedish Defence Research Agency FOI.
   Google Scholar
• Larzelere, I.I., 2007. Delivering insight the history of the accelerated strategic computing initiative. No. UCRL-TR-231286. Livermore, CA (United States): Lawrence Livermore National Lab.(LLNL).
   Google Scholar
• Lazonick, W., 2008. Entrepreneurial ventures and the developmental state: lessons from the advanced economies (No. 2008/01). WIDER Discussion Papers, World Institute for Development Economics (UNU-WIDER).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Keun, 2016. Economic catch-p and technological leapfrogging: the path to development and macroeconomic stability in Korea. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.I. and Lee, K.T., 2015. Economic nationalism and globalization in South Korea: a critical insight. Asian perspective, 39 (1), 125–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, L. and Berry, M., 2016. Understanding the political motivations that shape Rwanda’s emergent developmental state. New political economy, 21 (1), 119–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, J.A and Cho, D.S., 2000. Tiger technology: the creation of a semiconductor industry in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M., 2013. The entrepreneurial state: debunking public vs. private sector myths. Vol. 1. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, W.A., 1982. Technocracy and statecraft in the space age–toward the history of a saltation. The American historical review, 87 (4), 1010–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, S., 2009. The cultural politics of remembering Park Chung Hee. The Asia pacific journal, 19 (May), 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• O’Riain, S., 2004. The politics of high tech growth: developmental network states in the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, W.J., 2003. Technology and national security: risks and responsibilities. In: Conference on risk and responsibility in contemporary engineering and science: French and US perspectives. Stanford, CA: France-Stanford Center for Interdisciplinary Sciences. Vol. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Pirie, I., 2005. The new Korean state. New political economy, 10 (1), 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirie, I., 2007. The Korean developmental state: from dirigisme to neo-liberalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pirie, I., 2018. Korea and Taiwan: the crisis of investment-led growth and the end of the developmental state. Journal of contemporary Asia, 48 (1), 133–58. doi:10.1080/00472336.2017.1375136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisano, G.P., and Shih, W.C., 2009. Restoring American competitiveness. Harvard business review, 87, 114–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAND, 2018. The Korean peninsula: three dangerous scenarios. Perspective. 2018- PE-262-A. Available from: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/perspectives/PE200/PE262/RAND_PE262.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Roh, Moo-hyun, 2003. Presidential inauguration speech. Available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/2797053.stm [Accessed 23 February].
   Google Scholar
• Ruttan, V.W., 2006. Is war necessary for economic growth? Military procurement and technology development. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schrank, A. and Whitford, J., 2009. Industrial policy in the United States: a neo-polanyian interpretation. Politics & society, 37 (4), 521–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H.M., 2016. Wealth and secular stagnation: the role of industrial organizationand intellectual property rights. RSF: The Russell sage foundation journal of the social sciences, 2, 226–49.
   Google Scholar
• Sheen, S.-H., 2009. To be or not to be: South Korea’s East Asia security strategy and the unification quandary. The international spectator, 44 (2), 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, D.T., 2008. Creating the national security state: a history of the law that transformed America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, T.W. and Kwon, I.W., 2002. Globalization and reluctant buyers. International marketing review, 19 (6), 663–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurbon, E., 2016a. Developmental mindset: the revival of financial activism in South Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thurbon, E., 2016b. Trade agreements and the myth of policy constraint in Australia. Australian journal of political science, 51 (4), 636–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurbon, E., 2019. The future of financial activism in Taiwan? The utility of a mindset-centred analysis of developmental states and their evolution. New political economy, 1–17. doi:10.1080/13563467.2018.1562436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurbon, E. and Weiss, L., 2019. Economic statecraft at the frontier: Korea’s quest for intelligent robotics. Review of international political economy. doi:10.1080/09692290.2019.1655084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson, L.D., 1990. Why a national competitiveness policy is needed. International journal of technology management, 5 (3), 245–57.
   Google Scholar
• Van Atta, R. and Slusarczuk, M.M.G., 2012. The tunnel at the end of the light. Science and technology, 28 (3), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R.H., 2017. The American paradox: ideology of free markets and the hidden practice of directional thrust. Cambridge journal of economics, 41 (3), 859–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, R.H., 2018. The developmental state: dead or alive? Development and change, 49 (2), 518–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, L., 1995. Governed interdependence: rethinking the government-business relationship in East Asia. The Pacific review, 8 (4), 589–616.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L., 2014. America Inc? Innovation and enterprise in the national security state. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L., 2019. Re-emergence of great power conflict and us economic statecraft. Paper presented at superpowers workshop, great power competition in the 21st century. Linking Economics and Security. October 24. UC Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. and Hobson, J., 1995. States and economic development: a comparative historical analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. and Thurbon, E., 2018. Power paradox: how the extension of US infrastructural power abroad diminishes state capacity at home. Review of international political economy, 25 (6), 779–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, J.E., 1991. Race to the swift: state and finance in Korean Industrialization. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yannuzzi, R.E., 2000. In-Q-Tel: a new partnership between the CIA and the private sector. Central Intelligence Agency.
   Google Scholar