From Depoliticisation to Dedemocratisation: Revisiting the Neoliberal Turn in Macroeconomics

References

• Alesina, A., James, M., and Neumann, M.J.M., 1989. Politics and business cycles in industrial democracies. Economic policy, 4 (8), 55–98.
   Google Scholar
• Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M.C., 2004 Neo-liberal economic policy: critical essays. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M., 2008. A critical reconsideration of the foundations of monetary policy in the new consensus macroeconomics framework. Cambridge journal of economics, 32 (5), 761–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhouse, R., 2005. The rise of free market economics: economists and the role of the state since 1970. History of political economy, 37, 355–92.
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, R., 2010. The puzzle of modern economics: science or ideology? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ban, C., 2015. Austerity versus stimulus? Understanding fiscal policy change at the international monetary fund since the great recession. Governance, 28 (2), 167–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, C., 2016. Ruling ideas: how global neoliberalism goes local. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barro, R.J., 1976. Rational expectations and the role of monetary policy. Journal of monetary economics, 2 (1), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, M., 2002. Great transformations: economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, J., 2012. The ethics of voting. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W., 2015. Undoing the demos: neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buller, J. and Flinders, M., 2005. The domestic origins of depoliticisation in the area of British economic policy. The British journal of politics and international relations, 7 (4), 526–43.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, P., 1999. The politics of economic management in the 1990s. New political economy, 4 (1), 37–54.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, P., 2001. New labour and the politics of depoliticisation. The British journal of politics and international relations, 3 (2), 127–49.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, D., 2014. The end of laissez-faire?: on the durability of embedded neoliberalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chernomas, R. and Hudson, I., 2017. The profit doctrine. Chicago: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chwieroth, J.M., 2009. Capital ideas: the IMF and the rise of financial liberalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cockett, R., 1995. Thinking the unthinkable: think-tanks and the economic counter-revolution 1931–1983. London: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C., 2004. Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eatwell, J. and Milgate, M., 2011. The fall and rise of Keynesian economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrant, A., McPhail, E., and Berger, S., 2012. Preventing the “abuses” of democracy: Hayek, the “military usurper” and transitional dictatorship in Chile?. American journal of economics and sociology, 71 (3), 513–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, B. and Milonakis, D., 2009a. From political economy to economics: method, the social and the historical in the evolution of economic theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, B. and Milonakis, D., 2009b. From economics imperialism to freakonomics: the shifting boundaries between economics and other social sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, S., 1996. Robert Lucas’s Nobel memorial prize. The Scandinavian journal of economics, 98 (1), 11–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., 2006. The construction of a global profession: the transnationalization of economics. American journal of sociology, 112 (1), 145–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., Ollion, E., and Algan, Y. 2014. The superiority of economists. MaxPo discussion paper, series 14/3.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M., 1968. The role of monetary policy. The American economic review, LVIII (1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M., 1982. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., 1984. Hayek on liberty. New York: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P.A., ed., 1989. The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P.A., 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative politics, 25 (3), 275–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C., 2001. The ‘crisis’ of Keynesianism and the rise of neoliberalism in Britain: an ideational institutionalist approach. In: J.L. Campbell and O.K. Pedersen, eds. The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Oxford. 193–219.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C., 2004a. Ideas, interests and institutions in the comparative political economy of great transformations. Review of international political economy, 11 (1), 204–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C., 2004b. The normalizing role of rationalist assumptions in the institutional embedding of neoliberalism. Economy and society, 33 (4), 500–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C., 2007. Why we hate politics. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F.A., 1960. The constitution of liberty. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F.A., 2006 [1944]. The road to serfdom. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D., 2006. Models of democracy. Oxford: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J.R., 1937. Mr. Keynes and the ‘classics’; a suggested interpretation. Econometrica: journal of the econometric society, 5, 147–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, H.-H., 2001. Democracy-the god that failed: the economics and politics of monarchy, democracy, and natural order. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kalecki, M., 1943. Political aspects of full employment. The political quarterly, 14 (4), 322–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, S.D., 2003. The revival of laissez-faire in American macroeconomic theory: a case study of the pioneers. New York, NY: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J.M., 2008 [1936]. General theory of employment, interest and money. Hawthorne: BN Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kiely, R., 2017. From authoritarian liberalism to economic technocracy: Neoliberalism, politics and ‘de-democratization’. Critical Sociology, 43 (4-5), 725–745. doi:10.1177/0896920516668386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klamer, A., 1984. Conversation with economists: new classical economists and opponents speak out on the current controversy in macroeconomics. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, D., et al., 2013. Ideological profiles of the economics laureates. Econ journal watch, 10 (3), 255–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kydland, F.E. and Prescott, E.C., 1977. Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of political economy, 85, 473–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C.E., 1982. The market as prison. The journal of politics, 44 (2), 324–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, R.E., 1972. Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of economic theory, 4 (2), 103–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, R.E., 1976. Econometric policy evaluation: a critique. Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy, 1 (0), 19–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, R.E. and Prescott, E.C., 1971. Investment under uncertainty. Econometrica, 39 (5), 659–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, R.E. Jr. and Rapping, L.A., 1969. Real wages, employment, and inflation. Journal of political economy, 77 (5), 721–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, R.E. Jr. and Sargent, T.J., 1979. After Keynesian macroeconomics. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis quarterly review, 321 (Spring Issue), 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Madison, J., Hamilton, A., and Jay, J., 1961. The federalist papers. New York: Signet Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G., 1996. Temporal consistency and policy credibility: why democracies need non-majoritarian institutions. European University Institute working papers, 96/57.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A., 2009. Principles of economics: unabridged eighth edition. New York: Cosimo.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J., 2016. Dark money: the hidden history of the billionaires behind the rise of the radical right. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, K., 2002. Rational fictions: central bank independence and the social logic of delegation. West European politics, 25 (1), 47–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, J.S., 2010 . Considerations on representative government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., 2009. Defining neoliberalism. In: P. Mirowski and D. Plehwe, eds. The road from Mont Pèlerin: the making of the neoliberal thought collective. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 417–456.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., 2013. Never let a serious crisis go to waste: how neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J. and Skaaning, S.-E., 2012. Democracy and democratization in comparative perspective: conceptions, conjunctures, causes and consequences. Vol. 22. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M.S. and Knuuttila, T., 2012. Models and modelling in economics. In: U. Mäki, ed. Philosophy of economics. Handbook of the philosophy of science. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Offer, A. and Söderberg, G., 2016. The Nobel factor: the prize in economics, social democracy, and the market turn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panitch, L. and Gindin, S., 2012. The making of global capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P.A., 1998. How foundations came to be. Journal of economic literature, 36 (3), 1375–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, T.J. and Wallace, N., 1976. Rational expectations and the theory of economic policy. Journal of monetary economics, 2 (2), 169–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sent, E.M., 2006. The evolving rationality of rational expectations: an assessment of Thomas Sargent’s achievements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q., 1969. Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and theory, 8 (1), 3–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q., 2002. Visions of politics. Regarding method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, R.M., 2018. Economic theory, politics and the state in the neoliberal epoch. Dissertation (PhD). University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, R.M., 2019. Economic liberalism and the state: dismantling the myth of naïve laissez-faire. New political economy, 24 (4), 473–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., 2011. The crisis of democratic capitalism. New left review, 71, 5–29.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, J., 1988. Meaning and context: Quentin Skinner and his critics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Pijl, K., 1989. Ruling classes, hegemony, and the state system: theoretical and historical considerations. International journal of political economy, 19 (3), 7–35.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M., 2005. Foundations of international political economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M., 2014. Uneconomic economics and the crisis of the model world. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E.M., 1995. Democracy against capitalism: renewing historical materialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E.M., 2008. Citizens to lords: a social history of western political thought from antiquity to the late middle ages. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E.M., 2012. Liberty and property: a social history of western political thought from the renaissance to enlightenment. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wren-Lewis, S., 2018. Ending the microfoundations hegemony. Oxford review of economic policy, 34 (1-2), 55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar