Trade Paradiplomacy and the Politics of International Economic Law: The Inclusion of Quebec and the Exclusion of Wallonia in the CETA Negotiations

References

• Alen, A. and Ergec, A., 1998. La Belgique fédérale après la quatrième réforme de l’État de 1993. 2d ed. Bruxelles: Ministère des Affaires étrangères de Belgique.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, L., 2018. Le processus de conclusion de traités au Canada. Ottawa: Bibliothèque du Parlement.
   Google Scholar
• Bollem, Y., de Ville, F., and Gheyle, N., 2020. From Nada to Namur: sub-federal parliaments’ involvement in European Union trade politics, and the case of Belgium. In: J. Broschek and P. Goff, eds. The multilevel politics of trade. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 256–280.
   Google Scholar
• Bouvier-Auclair, R., 2016. L’accord de libre-échange Canada-Eu est signé [online]. Radio-Canada, 30 octobre. Available from: https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/811713/canada-ue-libre-echange [Accessed 16 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Broschek, J. and Goff, P., 2020. The multilevel politics of trade. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bursen, P., 2016. Belgian Federalism and CETA. Center on Constitutional Change [online]. 29 Octobre 2016. Available from: https://www.centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk/opinions/belgian-federalism-and-ceta [Accessed 16 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Criekemans, D., 2010. Regional sub-state diplomacy today. Leyden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Cyr, H. and de Mestral, A., 2017. International treaty-making and the treaty implementation. In: P. Oliver, P. Macklem, and N. Des Rosiers, eds. The Oxford handbook of the Canadian constitution. New York: Oxford University Press, 595–621.
   Google Scholar
• de Mestral, A., 2005. The provinces and international relations in Canada. In: J.-F. Gaudreau-Desbiens and F. Gélinas, eds. The states and moods of federalism: governance, identity and methodology. Cowansville: Éditions Yvon Blais, 319–322.
   Google Scholar
• de Mestral, A. and Fox-Decent, V., 2008. Rethinking the relationship between international and domestic law. Mcgill Law journal, 53 (4), 573–648.
   Google Scholar
• Ducourtieux, C. and Stroobants, J.-P., 2016. Le rejet wallon du traité commercial CETA avec le Canada plonge l’UE dans le désarroi [online]. Le Monde, 20 octobre. Available from: https://www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2016/10/20/la-wallonie-maintient-son-opposition-au-traite-commercial-ceta-avec-le-canada_5017686_3214.html [Accessed 16 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Egan, M. and Guimarães, M.H., 2020. The dynamics of federalism, subnational markets and trade policy-making in Canada and the US. Regional & federal studies, 29 (4), 459–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Court of Justice, 2017. Opinion 2/15 of the Court [online]. 17 May. Available from: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=190727&doclang=en [Accessed 16 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Justice, 2019. Opinion 1/17 of the Court [online]. 30 April. Available from: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=213502&mode=req&pageIndex=1&dir=&occ=first&part=1&text=&doclang=EN&cid=929830 [Accessed 16 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• European Union, 2018. Negotiation EU trade agreements. Who does what and how we reach a final deal [online]. Trade. Available from: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2012/june/tradoc_149616.pdf [Accessed 16 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Freudlsperger, C., 2020. Trade policy in multilevel government, organizing openness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, J., 2005. Redressing the democratic deficit in treaty law making: (re-) establishing a role for parliament. Mcgill Law journal, 46 (5), 467–508.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G., and Schakel, A.H., 2010. The rise of regional authority. A comparative study of 42 democracies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P.M., Muzzi, P., and Bastien, V., 2015. Le Québec et l’AECG. In: C. Deblock, J. Lebulanger, and S. Paquin, eds. Un nouveau pont sur l’Atlantique: l’Accord économique et commercial global entre l’Union européenne et le Canada. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec, 24-39.
   Google Scholar
• Kukucha, C., 2008. The provinces and Canadian foreign trade policy. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kukucha, C., 2013. Canadian sub-federal governments and CETA: overarching themes and future trends. International journal, 68 (4), 528–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukucha, C., 2016. Provincial/Territorial Governments and the Negotiations of International Trade Agreements. IRPP Insight, October, no 10: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kukucha, C., 2017. Federalism and liberalization: evaluating the impact of governments on negotiation of international trade agreements. International negotiation, 22 (1), 259–284.
   Google Scholar
• LeDuc, F., 2009. Guide de la pratique des relations internationales du Québec. Québec: Les publications du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Lequesne, C. and Paquin, S., 2017. Federalism, paradiplomacy and foreign policy: a case of mutual neglect. International negotiation, 22 (1), 183–204.
   Google Scholar
• Magnette, P., 2016. Wallonia blocked a harmful EU trade deal-but we don’t share Trump’s dreams [online]. The Guardian, November 14. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/14/wallonia-ceta-ttip-eu-trade-belgium [Accessed 16 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Magnette, P., 2017. CETA – Quand l’Europe déraille. Waterloo: Éditions Luc Pire. édition Kindle.
   Google Scholar
• Michelmann, H., 2009. Foreign relations in federal countries. Montreal-Kingston, McGill-Queen’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panetta, A., 2013. The inside story of Canada’s trade deal with the European Union. Jean Charest reveals how courtship began with a bluff [online]. Maclean’s, 18 October Available from: https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/the-inside-story-of-canadas-trade-deal-with-the-european-union/ [Accessed 16 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, S., 2010. Federalism and compliance with international agreements: Belgium and Canada compared. The Hague journal of diplomacy, 5 (1-2), 173–197.
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, S., 2013. Federalism and the governance of international trade negotiations in Canada: comparing CUSFTA with CETA. International journal, 68 (4), 545–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquin, S., 2014. Le fédéralisme d’ouverture et la place du Québec (et des autres provinces) dans les négociations internationales: rupture dans la continuité? Canadian foreign policy journal, 20 (1), 28–37.
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, S., 2016. Theories of international political economy. Don Mill: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, S., 2019. Paradiplomacy. In: T. Balzacq, F. Charillon, and F. Ramel, eds. Global diplomacy. An introduction to theory and practice. London: Palgrave, 49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, S., 2020. Federalism and trade negotiations in Canada: CUSFTA, CETA and TPP compared. In: J. Broschek and P Goff, eds. The multilevel politics of trade: configurations, patterns and dynamics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 35–56.
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, S., Reuchamps, M., and Kravagna, M., 2015. International relations of minority nations: Quebec and Wallonia compared. In: M. Reuchamps, ed. Minority nations in multinational federations: a comparative study of Quebec and Wallonia. London: Routledge, 160–180.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J., 1990. Turbulence in world politics: a theory of change and continuity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• RTBF, 2017. Paul Magnette à la télévision canadienne: ‘On pourrait ne pas ratifier CETA’ [online]. 2 June. Available from: https://www.rtbf.be/info/monde/detail_paul-magnette-a-la-television-canadienne-on-pourrait-ne-pas-ratifier-le-ceta?id=9623300 [Accessed 16 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Tatham, M., 2018. Shaping but also Blocking — The rise of regional influence in the EU, from soft policy lobbying to Hard Vetoing. Journal of common market studies, 56 (3), 672–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Loo, G., 2016. CETA’s signature: 38 statements, a joint interpretative instrument and an uncertain future. In: CEPS Commentary, 31 October, p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• VanDuzer, A., 2013. Could an intergovernmental agreement make Canadian treaty commitments in areas within provincial jurisdiction more credible? International journal, 68 (4), 536–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallonie-Bruxelles International, 2018. Rapport annuel de gestion 2018. Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar