2,270
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Keep it complex! Prodi’s curse and the EU fiscal governance regime complex

ORCID Icon

References

  • Alter, K.J., and Meunier, S., 2009. The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on politics, 7 (1), 13–24. doi:10.1017/S1537592709090033.
  • Andrle, M., et al. 2015. Reforming fiscal governance in the European Union. IMF Staff Discussion Note, SDN/15/09(May), pp. 1–28.
  • Bauer, M.W., and Becker, S., 2014. The unexpected winner of the crisis: the European Commission’s strengthened role in economic governance. Journal of European integration, 36 (3), 213–29. doi:10.1080/07036337.2014.885750.
  • Breen, M., Hodson, D., and Moschella, M., 2019. Incoherence in regime complexes: a sentiment analysis of EU-IMF surveillance. JCMS: Journal of common market studies, 58 (2), 419–37. doi:10.1111/jcms.12924.
  • Buiter, W.H., 2006. The ‘sense and nonsense of Maastricht’ revisited: what have we learnt about stabilization in EMU? JCMS: Journal of common market studies, 44 (4), 687–710. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00658.x.
  • Buti, M., and Carnot, N., 2012. The EMU debt crisis: early lessons and reforms. JCMS: Journal of common market studies, 50 (6), 899–911.
  • Calmfors, L., 2015. The roles of fiscal rules, fiscal councils, and fiscal union in EU integration. In: H. Badinger, and V. Nitsch, eds. Routledge handbook of the economics of European integration. Abingdon: Routledge, 157–70.
  • Chang, M., 2013. Fiscal policy coordination and the future of the community method. Journal of European integration, 35 (3), 255–69. doi:10.1080/07036337.2013.774776.
  • D'Erman, V., et al., 2019. Measuring economic reform recommendations under the European semester: ‘one size fits all’ or tailoring to member states? Journal of contemporary European research, 15 (2), 194–211. doi:10.30950/jcer.v15i2.999.
  • Deroose, S., et al. 2018. EU fiscal rules: Root causes of its complexity. VoxEU.
  • Eder, F. 2016, July 28. Wolfgang Schäuble bails out Spain, Portugal. Politico.
  • Eichengreen, B., and Wyplosz, C., 2016. Minimal conditions for the survival of the euro. Intereconomics, 51 (1), 24–8. doi:10.1007/s10272-016-0569-z.
  • Eisl, A. 2020. Fiscal policy-making in the time of coronavirus: time to trigger the escape clauses in fiscal frameworks, 20 March. Jacques Delors Institute.
  • European Commission, 2015. Making the best use of the flexibility within the existing rules of the stability and growth pact. Brussels: European Commission.
  • European Commission, 2020. Communication on economic governance review. Brussels: European Commission.
  • European Commission, ed. 2016. Stability and growth pact: council adopts recommendations on Spain and Portugal. Brussels: European Commission.
  • European Fiscal Board. 2018. Annual report. Brussels.
  • European Fiscal Board. 2019. Assessment of EU fiscal rules with a focus on the six and two-pack legislation. Brussels.
  • Fleming, S., and Khan, M. 2019. Brussels eases off on plans to rewrite fiscal rule book. Financial Times, 14 September.
  • Heimberger, P., Huber, J., and Kapeller, J., 2019. The power of economic models: the case of the EU’s fiscal regulation framework. Socio-economic review. doi:10.1093/ser/mwz052.
  • Heipertz, M., and Verdun, A., 2010. Ruling Europe: the politics of the stability and growth pact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Henning, C.R., 2017. Tangled governance: international regime complexity, the Troika, and the Euro crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hodson, D., and Maher, I., 2004. Soft law and sanctions: economic policy co-ordination and reform of the stability and growth pact. Journal of European public policy, 11 (5), 798–813. doi:10.1080/1350176042000273540.
  • IMF, 2020. Fiscal rules, escape clauses, and large shocks. Washington, DC: IMF.
  • Jones, E., 2020. When and how to deactivate the SGP general escape clause? (E. G. S. Unit, ed.). Brussels: European Parliament, 1–24.
  • Kamps, C., and Leiner-Killinger, N. 2019. Taking stock of the functioning of the EU fiscal rules and options for reform. ECB Occasional Paper Series, No 231, pp. 1–40.
  • Keohane, R.O., and Victor, D.G., 2011. The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on politics, 9 (1), 7–23. doi:10.1017/S1537592710004068.
  • Mabbett, D., and Schelkle, W., 2016. Searching under the lamppost: the evolution of fiscal surveillance. In: J. A. Caporaso, and M. Rhodes, eds. The political and economic dynamics of the Eurozone crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 122–44.
  • Matthijs, M., 2016. Powerful rules governing the euro: the perverse logic of German ideas. Journal of European public policy, 23 (3), 375–91. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1115535.
  • McCubbins, M.D., and Schwartz, T., 1984. Congressional oversight overlooked: police patrols versus fire alarms. American journal of political science, 28 (1), 165–79. doi:10.2307/2110792.
  • Mérand, F., 2021. Political work in the stability and growth pact. Journal of European public policy, 1–19. doi:10.1080/13501763.2021.1901961.
  • Moscovici, P. 2019. The European Commission is political — it has no other choice. Financial Times, 22 February.
  • OECD, 2020. Independent fiscal institutions: promoting fiscal transparency and accountability during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Paris: OECD.
  • Raustiala, K., and Victor, D.G., 2004. The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International organization, 58 (2), 277–309.
  • Savage, J.D., 2005. Making the EMU: the politics of budgetary surveillance and the enforcement of Maastricht. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Savage, J.D., and Verdun, A., 2016. Strengthening the European Commission's budgetary and economic surveillance capacity since Greece and the euro area crisis: a study of five Directorates-General. Journal of European public policy, 23 (1), 101–18. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1041417.
  • Schelkle, W., 2007. EU fiscal governance: hard law in the shadow of soft law. Columbia journal of European law, 13 (3), 705–32.
  • Schmidt, V.A., 2016. Reinterpreting the rules ‘by stealth’ in times of crisis: a discursive institutionalist analysis of the European Central Bank and the European Commission. West European politics, 39 (5), 1032–52. doi:10.1080/01402382.2016.1186389.
  • Schön-Quinlivan, E., and Scipioni, M., 2017. The commission as policy entrepreneur in European economic governance: a comparative multiple stream analysis of the 2005 and 2011 reform of the stability and growth pact. Journal of European public policy, 24 (8), 1172–90. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1206140.
  • Seikel, D., 2016. Flexible austerity and supranational autonomy. The reformed excessive deficit procedure and the asymmetry between liberalization and social regulation in the EU. JCMS: Journal of common market studies, 54 (6), 1398–416. doi:10.1111/jcms.12439.
  • Spiegel, P. 2014. Juncker interview: the annotated transcript. Financial Times, 27 November.
  • Streeck, W., and Thelen, K., 2005. Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies. In: W. Streeck, and K. Thelen, eds. Beyond continuity: institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–39.
  • Tesche, T., 2019. ‘The troika is dead, long live the domestic troikas?': the diffusion of National Fiscal Councils in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of common market studies, 57 (6), 1211–27. doi:10.1111/jcms.12880.
  • Verdun, A., 2015. A historical institutionalist explanation of the EU's responses to the euro area financial crisis. Journal of European public policy, 22 (2), 219–37. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.994023.
  • Wieser, T. 2018. Fiscal rules and the role of the Commission. VoxEU.
  • Young, O.R., 1980. International regimes: problems of concept formation. World politics, 32 (3), 331–56. doi:10.2307/2010108.