Imaginary failure: RegTech in finance

References

• Ahdieh, R., 2011. Beyond individualism in law and economics. Boston University Law Review, 91, 43–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arachnys, 2020. AML alternative data. Detecting emerging risk. London: Arachnys.
   Google Scholar
• Arner, D.W., Barberis, J., and Buckley, R.P., 2017. FinTech, RegTech and the reconceptualization of financial regulation. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 37 (3), 371–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayache, E., 2010. The blank swan: the end of probability. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• BaFin. 2018. Big Data Meets Artificial Intelligence. Challenges and Implications for the Supervision and Regulation of Financial Services.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A., 2013. The new political economy of the macroprudential ideational shift. New Political Economy, 18 (1), 112–139. doi:10.1080/13563467.2012.662952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, A., 2014. Transnational technocracy and the macroprudential paradox. In: T. Porter, ed. Transnational financial regulation after the crisis. London: Routledge, 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A., 2018. Macroprudential regimes and the politics of social purpose. Review of International Political Economy, 25 (3), 293–316. doi:10.1080/09692290.2018.1459780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernards, N., 2019. ‘Fintech’ and financial inclusion. In: T. M. Shaw, L. C. Mahrenbach, R. Modi, and X. Yi-Chong, eds. The Palgrave handbook of contemporary international political economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 317–329.
   Google Scholar
• Best, J., 2021. Varieties of ignorance in neoliberal policy: or the possibilities and perils of wishful economic thinking. Review of International Political Economy, 29 (4), 1159–1182. doi:10.1080/09692290.2021.1888144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BFA Global, 2018. Financial authorities in the era of data abundance RegTech for regulators and SupTech solutions. Boston: BFA Global.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K., and Muniesa, F., 2020. Introduction: assetization and technoscientific capitalism. In: K. Birch, and F. Muniesa, eds. Assetization: turning things into assets in technoscientific capitalism. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• BIS, 2018. Innovative technology in financial supervision (suptech) – The experience of early users. Basel: BIS.
   Google Scholar
• BIS, 2019. The suptech generations. Basel: BIS.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B., 2021. Asset manager capitalism as a corporate governance regime. In: J.S. Hacker, etal, ed. The American political economy: politics, markets, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 270–294.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E., and Piroska, D., 2021. Governing fintech and fintech as governance: the regulatory sandbox, riskwashing, and disruptive social classification. New Political Economy, 27 (1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/13563467.2021.1910645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, T., and O’Brien, L., 2019. Understanding RegTech for digital regulatory compliance. In: T. Lynn, J. G. Mooney, P. Rosati, and M. Cummins, eds. Disrupting finance: FinTech and strategy in the 21st century. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• CGAP. 2016. Risk-based supervision in the digital financial inclusion era [online]. Available from: https://www.cgap.org/blog/risk-based-supervision-digital-financial-inclusion-era.
   Google Scholar
• Compliance.ai. 2020. The imperative to automate regulatory change management for compliance in financial services [online]. Available from: https://fintech.global/globalregtechsummit/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Compliance-Imperative-to-Automate.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, W.L., Gozman, D.P., and Seddon, J.J.M., 2017. Dialectic tensions in the financial markets: a longitudinal study of pre- and post-crisis regulatory technology. Journal of Information Technology, 33 (4), 304–325. doi:10.1057/s41265-017-0047-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Goede, M., 2005. Virtue, fortune, and faith: a genealogy of finance. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Koker, L., 2009. Identifying and managing low money laundering risk: perspectives on FATF’s risk-based guidance. Journal of Financial Crime, 16 (4), 334–352. doi:10.1108/13590790910993717
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte, 2017. The evolving fintech regulatory environment. preparing for the inevitable. New York: Deloitte.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte, 2020. Regtech universe 2020. New York: Deloitte.
   Google Scholar
• ESRB. 2020. Systemic cyber risk [online]. Available from https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/reports/esrb.report200219_systemiccyberrisk~101a09685e.en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V., 2017. Automating inequality: how high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• FCA, 2015. Supporting the development and adoption of RegTech. London: FCA.
   Google Scholar
• Froud, J., et al., 2010. Escaping the tyranny of earned income? The failure of finance as social innovation. New Political Economy, 15 (1), 147–164. doi:10.1080/13563460903553723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FSB, 2020. The Use of supervisory and regulatory technology by authorities and regulated institutions. Market developments and financial stability implications. FSB: Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Gabor, D., 2021. The wall street consensus. Development and Change, 52 (3), 429–459. doi:10.1111/dech.12645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germain, R., 2010. Global politics and financial governance. Basingstoke: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Germain, R., and Schwartz, H., 2014. The political economy of failure: the euro as an international currency. Review of International Political Economy, 21 (5), 1095–1122. doi:10.1080/09692290.2014.891242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruin, J., 2021. The epistemic evolution of market authority: Big data, blockchain and China’s neostatist challenge to neoliberalism. Competition & Change, 25 (5), 580–604. doi:10.1177/1024529420965524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haiven, M., 2010. The financial crisis as a crisis of imagination. Cultural Logic: A Journal of Marxist Theory & Practice, 17, 1–23. doi:10.14288/clogic.v17i0.191526
   Google Scholar
• Haldane, A.G. 2012. Towards a common financial language. Speech given at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association ‘Building a Global Legal Entity Identifier Framework’ Symposium, New York. Available from: http://www.bis.org/review/r120315g.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Haldane, A.G., and May, R.M., 2011. Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature, 469, 351–355. doi:10.1038/nature09659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardie, I., and Howarth, D., 2013. Market-based banking and the international financial crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatherly, D., Leung, D., and MacKenzie, D., 2008. The finitist accountant. In: T. Pinch, and R. Swedberg, eds. Living in a material world. economic sociology meets science and technology studies. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 131–160.
   Google Scholar
• IIF, 2016. Regtech in financial services: technology solutions for compliance and reporting. Washington: IIF.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, S., and Gabor, D., 2020. The rise of digital financialisation: the case of India. New Political Economy, 25 (5), 813–828. doi:10.1080/13563467.2019.1708879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., 2015. Future imperfect: science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In: S. Jasanoff, and S. H. Kim, eds. Dreamscapes of modernity: sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and Kim, S.H., 2009. Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear regulation in the U.S. and South Korea. Minerva, 47 (2), 119–146. doi:10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komporozos-Athanasiou, A., and Fotaki, M., 2020. The imaginary constitution of financial crises. The Sociological Review, 68 (5), 932–947. doi:10.1177/0038026119899350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KPMG, 2017. The transformative power of RegTech. KPMG frontiers in finance. For decision-makers in financial services, 57, 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kranke, M., and Yarrow, D., 2019. The global governance of systemic risk: how measurement practices tame macroprudential politics. New Political Economy, 24 (6), 816–832. doi:10.1080/13563467.2018.1545754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, P., and Leyshon, A., 2021. The platform political economy of fintech: reintermediation, consolidation and capitalisation. New Political Economy, 26 (3), 376–388. doi:10.1080/13563467.2020.1766432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenglet, M., 2021. Algorithmic finance, its regulation, and Deleuzean jurisprudence: a few remarks on a necessary paradigm shift. Topoi, 40 (4), 811–819. doi:10.1007/s11245-019-09653-6
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, E., 2015. Predicting the unpredictable: value-at-risk, performativity, and the politics of financial uncertainty. Review of International Political Economy, 22 (4), 719–756. doi:10.1080/09692290.2014.957233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macartney, H., Wood, J., and Dubrova, K., 2022. Collaboration, adaptation, or disruption? Wall Street, fintech and corporate bond trading. New Political Economy, 27 (2), 257–276. doi:10.1080/13563467.2021.1952556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., et al., 2021. Why hasn’t high-frequency trading swept the board? Shares, sovereign bonds and the politics of market structure. Review of International Political Economy, 28 (5), 1385–1409. doi:10.1080/09692290.2020.1743340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., and Pardo-Guerra, J.P., 2014. Insurgent capitalism: island, bricolage and the re-making of finance. Economy and Society, 43 (2), 153–182. doi:10.1080/03085147.2014.881597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M., et al., 2017. Conceptualizing imaginaries of science, technology, and society. In: U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. Miller, and L. Smith-Doerr, eds. The handbook of science and technology studies. Harvard: MIT Press, 435–464.
   Google Scholar
• Merz, S., and Williams, R., 2018. ‘We all have a responsibility to each other’: valuing racialised bodies in the neoliberal bioeconomy. New Political Economy, 23 (5), 560–573. doi:10.1080/13563467.2017.1417368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., 2007. Markets come to bits: evolution, computation and markomata in economic science. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63 (2), 209–242. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, E., 2013. To save everything, click here. The folly of technological solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Nesvetailova, A., and Palan, R., 2010. The end of liberal finance? The changing paradigm of global financial governance. Millennium, 38 (3), 797–825. doi:10.1177/0305829810364275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omarova, S.T., 2020. Technology v. technocracy: fintech as a regulatory challenge. Journal of Financial Regulation, 6 (1), 75–124. doi:10.1093/jfr/fjaa004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz, H., 2021. A political anthropology of finance: studying the distribution of money in the financial industry as a political process. Anthropological Theory, 21 (1), 3–27. doi:10.1177/1463499620951374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piroska, D., Gorelkina, Y., and Johnson, J., 2021. Macroprudential policy on an uneven playing field: supranational regulation and domestic politics in the EU’s dependent market economies. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59 (3), 497–517. doi:10.1111/jcms.13097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2004. The risk management of everything. rethinking the politics of uncertainty. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Riles, A., 2004. Real time: unwinding technocratic and anthropological knowledge. American Ethnologist, 31 (3), 392–405. doi:10.1525/ae.2004.31.3.392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J., 2019. When data is capital: datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society, 6 (1), 2053951718820549. doi:10.1177/2053951718820549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samman, A., 2014. Making financial history: the crisis of 2008 and the return of the past. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 42 (2), 309–330. doi:10.1177/0305829813511866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samman, A., 2016. Conjuring the spirit of multilateralism: histories of crisis management during the ‘Great Credit Crash’. Review of International Studies, 42 (2), 227–246. doi:10.1017/S0260210515000133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler, S., Alami, I., and Jepson, N., 2022. Goodbye Washington confusion, hello wall street consensus: contemporary state capitalism and the spatialisation of industrial strategy. New Political Economy, 1–18. doi:10.1080/13563467.2022.2091534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibata, S., 2021. Digitalization or flexibilization? The changing role of technology in the political economy of Japan. Review of International Political Economy, 29 (5), 1549–1576. doi:10.1080/09692290.2021.1935294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, T.J., 2000. Reinventing authority: embedded knowledge networks and the new global finance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18 (4), 487–502. doi:10.1068/c10c
   Google Scholar
• Swartz, L., 2017. Blockchain dreams: imagining techno-economic alternatives after bitcoin. In: M. Castells, ed. Another economy is possible: culture and economy in a time of crisis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 82–105.
   Google Scholar
• Tett, G., 2009. Fool’s gold: how unrestrained greed corrupted a dream, shattered global markets and unleashed a catastrophe. London: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., 2011. Sources of financial sociability. networks, ecological systems or diligent risk preparedness? Journal of Cultural Economy, 4 (4), 405–421. doi:10.1080/17530350.2011.609699
   Google Scholar
• Tooze, A., 2018. Crashed: how a decade of financial crises changed the world. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Underhill, G., and Blom, J., 2013. Global financial integration, twin crises, and the enduring search for financial stability. London: CEPR.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J.W., 2013. Regulatory technologies, risky subjects, and financial boundaries: governing ‘fraud’ in the financial markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38 (6-7), 544–558. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar