On Analysing Space from a Strategic-Relational Institutionalist Perspective: The Cultural Park for Children in Cairo

References

• Abdelhalim, A. I. 1986. “Rethinking Paradise.” Environmental Design: Journal of the Islamic Environmental Design Research Centre 2: 68–73.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelhalim, A. I. 1988. “A Ceremonial Approach to Community Building.” In Theories and Principles of Design in the Architecture of Islamic Societies, edited by M. Bentley Sevcenko, 139–148. Cambridge, MA: Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelhalim, A. I. 1996. “Culture, Environment, and Sustainability: Theoretical Notes and Reflection on a Community Park Project in Cairo.” In Sustainable Landscape Design in Arid Climates, edited by W. Reilly, 49–61. Geneva: Aga Khan Trust for Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelwahab, M. A. 2009. “Reading Place: The Cultural Park for Children.” Forum 9 (1): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelwahab, M. A. 2010. “Cairo, Khōra and deconstruction: Towards a reflexive reading of place.” Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelwahab, M. forthcoming. A Reflexive Reading of Urban Space. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Aga Khan Award for Architecture. Online Database. Accessed January 29, 2009. http://www.akdn.org/akaa.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Akbar, J. 1992. Cultural Park for Children, Cairo Egypt, The Aga Khan Award for Architecture, AKTC. Accessed January 29, 2009. http://www.akdn.org/aktc.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2001. “In Pursuit of New Approaches to Strategic Spatial Planning. A European Perspective.” International Planning Studies 6 (3): 293–310. doi: 10.1080/13563470120026514
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2003. “Planning and Power: Towards an Emancipatory Planning Approach.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 21 (6): 905–924. doi: 10.1068/c29m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., P. Healey, and K. Kunzmann. 2003. “Strategic Spatial Planning and Regional Governance in Europe.” Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (2): 113–129. doi: 10.1080/01944360308976301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., and S. Mandelbaum. 2005. “A New Context for Planning?” In The Network Society. A New Context for Planning, edited by L. Albrechts and S. Mandelbaum, 1–8. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alden, J., L. Albrechts, and A. da Rosa Pires. 2001. “In Search of New Approaches for Planning.” In The Changing Institutional Landscape of Planning, edited by J. Alden, L. Albrechts and A. da Rosa Pires, 1–7. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. 2004. “Regions Unbound: Towards a New Politics of Place.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 86 (1): 33–44. doi: 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00152.x
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. 2012. Land of Strangers. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A., and N. Thrift. 2005. “What's Left? Just the Future.” Antipode 37 (2): 220–238. doi: 10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00488.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. 1990. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy.” Theory Culture Society 79 (2): 295–310. doi: 10.1177/026327690007002017
   Google Scholar
• Balducci, A. 2010. “Strategic Planning as a Field of Practices.” In Making Strategies in Spatial Planning Knowledge and Values, Urban and Landscape Perspectives, edited by M. Cerreta, G. Concilio and V. Monno, 47–65. Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, I. 1969. “Cairo: A Millennial.” Saudi Aramco World 20 (5): 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984 [1979]. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. R. Nice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. 2006. “Just Planning: The Art of Situated Ethical Judgement.” Journal of Planning Education & Research 26 (1): 92–106. doi: 10.1177/0739456X06288090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Concilio, G. 2010. “Bricolaging Knowledge and Practices in Spatial Strategy-Making.” In Making Strategies in Spatial Planning Knowledge and Values, Urban and Landscape Perspectives, edited by M. Cerreta, G. Concilio, and V. Monno, 281–301. Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. 2004. Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewsbury, J. D. 2000. “Performativity and the Event: Enacting a Philosophy of Difference.” Environment & Planning D, Society & Space 18 (4): 473–496. doi: 10.1068/d200t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doel, M. 1996. “A Hundred Thousand Lines of Flight: A Machinic Introduction to the Nomad Thought and Scrumpled Geography of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari.” Environment and Planning D, Society and Space 14 (4): 421–439. doi: 10.1068/d140421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. 2001. “Competitiveness, Cohesion, and Governance: Their Implications for Social Justice.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25 (4): 884–888. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Rationality & Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, CA: California University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. 2004. “Strategic Spatial Planning and the Longer Range.” Planning Theory and Practice 5 (1): 49–56. doi: 10.1080/1464935042000185062
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. 2001. Architecture from the Outside. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gualini, E. 2001. Planning and the Intelligence of Institutions. Interactive Approaches to Territorial Policy-Making between Institutional Design and Institution-Building. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1984 [1981]. The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, trans. T. McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1987 [1981]. The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, trans. T. McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, F. 1996. The Cultural Garden in Sayyida Zeinab: an expensive toy – interview with Dr Abdelhalim Ibrahim Abdelhalim. Middle East Report, 202: 13. Accessed January 29, 2009 http://www.merip.org/mer.mer202.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1999. “Institutionalist Analysis, Communicative Planning and Shaping Places.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19 (2): 111–121. doi: 10.1177/0739456X9901900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2004. “The Treatment of Space and Place in the New Strategic Spatial Planning in Europe.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 (1): 45–67. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00502.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2005. “On the Project of Institutional Transformation in the Planning Field. Commentary on the Contributions.” Planning Theory 4 (3): 301–310. doi: 10.1177/1473095205058498
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2006. “Relational Complexity and the Imaginative Power of Strategic Spatial Planning.” European Planning Studies 14 (4): 525–546. doi: 10.1080/09654310500421196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2007. Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for our Times. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2008. “Making Choices that Matter: The Practical Art of Situated Strategic Judgment in Spatial Strategy-Making.” In Empowering the Planning Fields: Ethics, Creativity and Action, edited by J. Van den Broeck, F. Moulaert and S. Oosterlynck, 23–41. Leuven: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2010. “Introduction to Part One: Conceptual Challenges from Perspectives on Spatial Planning Practice.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning, edited by J. Hillier and P. Healey, 37–56. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hendler, S. 1995. Planning Ethics. New Brunswick, NJ: Centre for Urban Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2002. Shadows of Power. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2003. “Agonising Over Consensus – Why Habermasian Ideals Cannot be ‘Real’.” Planning Theory 2 (1): 37–59. doi: 10.1177/1473095203002001005
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2007. Stretching beyond the Horizon: A Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning and Governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2011. “Strategic Navigation Across Multiple Planes: Towards a Deleuzean-Inspired Methodology for Strategic Spatial Planning.” Town Planning Review 82 (5): 503–527. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2011.30
   Google Scholar
• Howe, E. 1994. Acting on Ethics in City Planning Ethics. New Brunswick, NJ: Centre for Urban Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J., and D. Booher. 1999. “Consensus-Building as Role-Playing and Bricolage.” Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (1): 9–26. doi: 10.1080/01944369908976031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2001. “Institutional (re)turns and the Strategic-Relational Approach.” Environment and Planning A 33 (7): 1213–1235. doi: 10.1068/a32183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., N. Brenner, and M. Jones. 2008. “Theorizing Sociospatial Relations.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26 (3): 389–401. doi: 10.1068/d9107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. 2009. “Phase Space: Geography, Relational Thinking, and Beyond.” Progress in Human Geography 33 (4): 487–506. doi: 10.1177/0309132508101599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtovuori, P. 2010. Experience and Conflict: The Production of Urban Space. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• MacCann, E., and K. Ward. 2010. “Relationality/Territoriality: Toward a Conceptualization of Cities in the World.” Geoforum 41 (2): 175–184. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F. 2009. “Social Innovation. Institutionally Embedded, Territorially (re)produced.” In Social Innovation and Territorial Development, edited by D. MacCallum, F. Moulaert, J. Hillier, and S. Vicari Haddock, 11–24. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., and A. Mehmood. 2009. “Spatial Planning and Institutional Design: What can they Expect from Transition Cost Economics.” In Urban Policy Handbook, Vol. II, edited by M. Geyer, 199–211. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pløger, J. 2004. “Strife – Urban Planning and Agonism.” Planning Theory 3 (1): 71–92. doi: 10.1177/1473095204042318
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 1998. Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 1991. The Global City. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, L. and P. Van den Broeck. 2012. “The Social Construction of Planning Systems. A Strategic-Relational Institutionalist Approach.” Planning Practice and Research 27 (1): 41–61. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661179
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, P. 2010. De sociale constructie van plannings- en projectinstrumenten. Onderzoek naar de socio-technische dynamiek in het ‘Eerste Kwartier’ in Antwerpen [The Social Construction of Instruments for Planning and Development. Analysis of the Socio-Technical Dynamics in the ‘First Quarter’ in Antwerp], PhD thesis, Leuven, KU Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, P. 2011. “Analysing Social Innovation Through Planning Instruments: A Strategic-Relational Approach.” In Strategic Spatial Projects. Catalysts for Change, edited by S. Oosterlynck, J. Van den Broeck, L. Albrechts, F. Moulaert, and A. Verhetsel, 52–78. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Versteeg, W., and M. Hajer. 2010. “Is This How it is, or is This How it is Here? Making Sense of Politics in Planning.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning, edited by J. Hillier and P. Healey, 159–182. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Vigar, G., S. Graham, and P. Healey. 2005. “In Search of the City in Spatial Strategies: Past Legacies, Future Imaginings.” Urban Studies 42 (8): 1391–1410. doi: 10.1080/00420980500150730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar