Researching Space, Transgressing Epistemic Boundaries

References

• Abbott, Andrew. 2000. “Reflections on the Future of Sociology.” Contemporary Sociology 29 (2): 296–300. doi: 10.2307/2654383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adorno, Theodor. 1964. The Jargon of Authenticity. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Advisory Committee on Measuring Innovation in the 21st Century Economy. 2008. Innovation Measurement: Tracking the State of Innovation in the American Economy. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce. Accessed October 16, 2009. http://www.innovationmetrics.gov/Innovation%20Measurement%2001-08%20rev%20040908.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Algra, Keimpe. 1995. Concepts of Space in Greek Thought. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1998. The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Audi, Robert, ed. 1995. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, Wendy, Caroline Park, and Erika Goble. 2008. “From Interdisciplinary to Transdisciplinary Research: A Case Study.” Qualitative Health Research 18 (4): 557–564. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beier, Marshall, and Samantha Arnold. 2005. “Becoming Undisciplined: Toward the Supradisciplinary Study of Security.” International Studies Review 7 (1): 41–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-9488.2005.00457.x
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1991. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Blaut, J. 1961. “Space and Process.” The Professional Geographer 13 (4): 1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1961.134_1.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddy, M., and M. Parkinson. 2004. City Matters: Competitiveness, Cohesion and Urban Governance. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• BonJour, Laurence, and Ernest Sosa. 2003. Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs Externalism, Foundations vs Virtues. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Čapek, M., ed. 1976. The Concepts of Space and Time. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chuk, E., R. Hoetzlein, D. Kim, and J. Panko. 2012. “Creating Socially Networked Knowledge Through Interdisciplinary Collaboration.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11 (1–2): 93–108. doi: 10.1177/1474022211426906
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun, Alan. 1989. Modernity and the Classical Tradition: Architectural Essays 1980–1987. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, David, ed. 1999. Epistemology: The Classic Readings. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. 2012. National Planning Policy Framework. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• Derry, Sharon, C. Schunn, and M. A. Gernsbacher, eds. 2005. Interdisciplinary Collaboration: An Emerging Cognitive Science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, René. 1968. Discourse on Method and the Meditations. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1938. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton, T. 1983. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• ECTP-CEU. 2012. “Complete Charter.” European Council of Spatial Planners. Accessed October 12, 2012. http://www.ceu-ectp.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=89&Itemid=14
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. “Consultation on the Future ‘EU 2020’ Strategy.” COM(2009)647 Final, 24.11.2009. Brussels: European Commission. Accessed November 27, 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/eu2020_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faber, Richard. 1983. Foundations of Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometry. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, Susan, and Scott Campbell. 2011. Readings in Urban Theory. 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1983. “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. 2nd ed., edited by Hubert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, 208–226. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1993. “Space, Power and Knowledge.” In The Cultural Studies Reader, edited by Simon During, 161–169. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2002. The Order of Things. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy, and Axel Honneth. 2003. Redistribution or Recognition: A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, Masahisa, Anthony Venables, and Paul Krugman. 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodall, Brian. 1987. The Penguin Dictionary of Human Geography. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. 1989. Ideas of Space: Euclidean, Non-Euclidean and Relativistic. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, Derek, R. J. Johnston, Geraldine Pratt, Michael Watts, and Sarah Whatmore. 2009. The Dictionary of Human Geography. 5th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jurgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollis, Martin. 2002. The Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmwood, John. 2010. “Sociology's Misfortune: Disciplines, Interdisciplinarity and the Impact of Audit Culture.” The British Journal of Sociology 61 (4): 639–658. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01332.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume, David. 1998. “Of the Standard of Taste.” In David Hume: Selected Essays, edited by Stephen Copley and Andrew Edgar, 133–154. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1993. Critique of Pure Reason. London: Everyman, J. M. Dent.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Julie. 2008. “Evaluation of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research: A Literature Review.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35 (2S): S116–S123. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Julie Thompson, Carl Mitcham, and Robert Frodeman. 2010. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Corbusier. 1986. Towards a New Architecture. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, G. 1979. “The Relational Theory of Space and Time.” In Problems of Space and Time, edited by J. J. C. Smart, 89–98. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. 1936. Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, John. 1979. “Place, Extension and Duration.” In Problems of Space and Time, edited by J. J. C. Smart, 99–103. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Low, Setha, and Denise Lawrence-Zúñiga. 2003. The Anthropology of Space and Place. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 2007. Designing the City of Reason: Foundations and Frameworks. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 2011a. “Social Exclusion and Space.” In The City Reader. 5th ed., edited by R. LeGates and F. Stout, 186–194. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 2011b. Knowledge Economy and the City: Spaces of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A., A. Hull, and P. Healey, eds. 2001. The Governance of Place: Space and Planning Processes. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, Doreen. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, S., and A. Penny. 1992. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. R., T. D. Baird, C. M. Littlefield, G. Kofinas, F. Chapin, III, and C. L. Redman. 2008. “Epistemological Pluralism: Reorganizing Interdisciplinary Research.” Ecology and Society 13 (2): 46. Accessed www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, Arthur. 2012. Urban Economics. 8th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. 1998. Partnerships in Urban Governance: European and American Experience. Basingstoke: Macmillan/St Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, Alan, and Rafols, Ismael. 2009. “Is Science Becoming More Interdisciplinary? Measuring and Mapping Six Research Fields over Time.” Scientometrics 81 (3): 719–745. doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, Duncan. 2006. What Is This Thing Called Knowledge? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• RTPI. 2012. “What Planning Does.” Royal Town Planning Institute. Accessed October 12, 2012. http://www.rtpi.org.uk/education-and-careers/learning-about-planning/what-planning-does/
   Google Scholar
• Schacht, Richard. 1996. “Nietzsche's Kind of Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Nietzsche, edited by Bernd Magnus and Kathleen Higgins, 151–179. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph. 2003. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, Alfred. 1970. On Phenomenology and Social Relations, Selected Writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, Alfred, and Thomas Lucknmann. 1974. The Structures of the Life-World. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, Jose Luis. 1944. Can Our Cities Survive? An ABC of Urban Problems, Their Analysis, Their Solution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. 1993. An Inquiry into the Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, Edward. 1989. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A., and J. Okata, eds. 2011. Megacities: Urban form, Governance, and Sustainability. Tokyo: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Steup, Matthias, and Ernest Sosa, eds. 2005. Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stokols, Daniel, J. Fuqua, J. Gress, R. Harvey, K. Phillips, L. Baezconde-Garbanati, J. Unger, et al. 2003. “Evaluating Transdisciplinary Science.” Nicotine & Tobacco Research 5 (Supplement 1) : S21–S39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stokols, D., K. L. Hall, B. K. Taylor, and R. P. Moser. 2008. “The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35 (2S): S77–S89. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, Nigel. 2003. “Space: The Fundamental Stuff of Human Geography.” In Key Concepts in Geography, edited by S. Holloway, S. Rice, and G. Vallentine, 95–107. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tuana, Nancy. 2013. “Embedding Philosophers in the Practices of Science: Bringing Humanities to the Sciences.” Synthese, 190 (11): 1955–1973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2005. “Towards Knowledge Societies.” UNESCO World Report. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Commerce. 2008. Press Release: Gutierrez Calls for Government, Private Sector, and Academic Actions on Innovation Measurement, 18 January. Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary. Accessed October 16, 2009. http://www.innovationmetrics.gov/press_releases/011808PressRelease.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Caroline, J. D. Roessner, K. Bobb, J. Thompson Klein, K. W. Boyack, J. Keyton, I. Rafols, and K. Börner. 2011. “Approaches to Understanding and Measuring Interdisciplinary Scientific Research (IDR): A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Informetrics 5 (1): 14–26. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar