Minor Cities in a Metropolitan World: Challenges for Development and Governance in Three Hungarian Urban Agglomerations

References

• Ache, P. 2000. “Cities in Old Industrial Regions between Local Innovative Milieu and Urban Governance: Reflections on City Region Governance.” European Planning Studies 8 (6): 693–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B. 1998. “Agglomeration and the Location of Innovative Activity.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14 (2): 18–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajmócy, Z. 2006. “Egyetemi üzleti inkubáció lehetőségei elmaradott térségekben [University business incubation: Opportunities in less favoured regions].” Tér és Társadalom 20 (3): 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Barta, Gy., Z. Csizmadia, Cs. Deák, T. Dőry, A. Kiss, and B. Lengyel. 2011. “R&D Cooperation between Universities and Enterprises.” Discussion Papers No. 84. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Basten, L. 2011. “Stuttgart: A Metropolitan City-region in the Making?” International Planning Studies 16 (3): 273–287.
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., and D. Charles. 2005. “University Spin-off Policies and Economic Development in Less Successful Regions: Learning from Two Decades of Policy Practice.” European Planning Studies 13 (4): 537–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg, L., E. Braun, and W. van Winden. 2001. “Growth Clusters in European Cities: An Integral Approach.” Urban Studies 38 (1): 185–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, P. 2000. “Urban Governance and Economic Development: A Critique of Merseyside and Objective 1 Status.” European Urban and Regional Studies 7 (3): 211–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., and J. Lambooy. 1999. “The Prospects of an Adjustment Policy based on Collective Learning in Old Industrial Regions.” GeoJournal 49 (4): 391–399.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, E., H. Budil-Nadvornikova, and A. Kleinknecht. 1999. “Are Urban Agglomerations a Better Breeding Place for Product Innovation? An Analysis of New Product Announcements.” Regional Studies 33 (6): 541–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csizmadia, Z., and A. Grosz. 2011. “Innovation and Cooperation Networks in Hungary.” Discussion Papers No. 85. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin, M., and S. Allwinkle. 2007. “Urban Regeneration and Sustainable Communities: The Role of Networks, Innovation, and Creativity in Building Successful Partnerships.” Journal of Urban Technology 14 (1): 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dell'Agnese, E., and V. Anzoise. 2011. “Milan, the Unthinking Metropolis.” International Planning Studies 16 (3): 217–235.
   Google Scholar
• Derudder, B., P. J. Taylor, F. Witlox, and G. Catalano. 2003. “Hierarchical Tendencies and Regional Patterns in the World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis of 234 Cities.” Urban Studies 37 (9): 875–886.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L. 2013. “Why Investing More in the Capital can Lead to Less Growth.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 6 (2): 251–268.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., E. Garcilazo, and P. McCann. 2013. “The Economic Performance of European Cities and City Regions: Myths and Realities.” European Planning Studies 21 (3): 334–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdős, K. 2011. “Motivational and Institutional Factors Influencing Academic Spin-offs: Theoretical Framework and Preliminary Results from the Hungarian Biotechnology Sector.” Research in Social Change 3 (1): 75–94.
   Google Scholar
• Erdősi, F. 2003. “Globalizáció és a világvárosok által uralt tér [Globalisation and the world city-dominated space].” Tér és Társadalom 17 (3): 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, D., and M. Jones. 2009. “City-regions: New Geographies of Uneven Development and Inequality.” Regional Studies 43 (2): 247–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faragó, L. 2006. “A városokra alapozott területpolitika koncepcionális megalapozása [Conceptional establishment of city based regional policy].” Tér és Társadalom 20 (2): 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Faragó, L. 2010. “Területi koncentráció és a jelentőségüket vesztő perifériák [Territorial Concentration and the Diminishing Peripheries].” In A Területi Kutatások Csomópontjai, edited by Gy. Barta, P. Beluszky, Zs. Földi and K. Kovács, 432–453. Pécs: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Regionális Kutatások Központja.
   Google Scholar
• Faragó, L. 2012. “Urban Regeneration in a “City of Culture”: The case of Pécs, Hungary.” European Spatial Research and Policy 19 (2): 103–120.
   Google Scholar
• First ESPON. 2013. Synthesis Report (2010). Luxembourg: ESPON Coordination Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Frigant, V., and J. -B. Layan. 2009. “Modular Production and the New Division of Labour within Europe. The Perspective of French Automotive Parts Suppliers.” European Urban and Regional Studies 16 (1): 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, M., and J. -F. Thisse. 1996. “Economics of Agglomeration.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 10 (4): 339–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gál, Z. 2010. Pénzügyi piacok a globális térben: A válság szabdalta pénzügyi tér [Financial Markets in Global Space: The Crisis-Segmented Financial Space]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Ganser, R., and R. Piro, eds. 2012. Parallel Patterns of Shrinking Cities and Urban Growth: Spatial Planning for Sustainable Development of City Regions and Rural Areas. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, I. R., and P. McCann. 2000. “Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks?” Urban Studies 37 (3): 513–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. 1993. “The Weakness of Strong Ties. The Lock-in of Regional Development in the Ruhr Area.” In The Embedded Firm. On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks, edited by G. Grabher, 255–277. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, A. 2012. “Az autóipar klaszteresedése Magyarországon [Clusterisation of Automotive Sector in Hungary].” In A járműipari beszállítói hálózat Kelet-Közép-Európában és Magyarországon, edited by J. Rechnitzer and M. Smahó, 216–243. Győr: Széchenyi University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajdú, Z., and Sz. Rácz. 2011. “Urbanisation, State Formation Processes and New Capital Cities in the Western Balkans.” Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis — Geographica 42 (2): 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hardi, T. 2012. “Győr, Miskolc és Pécs agglomerációja a vidéki szuburbanizációban [The agglomerations of Győr, Miskolc and Pécs in the context of provincial suburbanisation].” In Az agglomerációk intézményesítésének sajátos kérdései: Három Magyar nagyvárosi térség az átalakuló térben, edited by E. Somlyódyné Pfeil, 15–41. Pécs: Publikon Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, A. 1997. “Urban Regimes in a Europe of the Cities?” European Urban and Regional Studies 4 (4): 291–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, A. 1999. “North American Urban Political Economy, Urban Theory, and British Research.” British Journal of Political Science 29 (4): 673–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. 2007. “From Competitive Regions to Competitive City-regions: A New Orthodoxy, but Some Old Mistakes.” Journal of Economic Geography 7 (3): 311–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. 2012. “Life After Regions? The Evolution of City-Regionalism in England.” Regional Studies 46 (9): 1243–1259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horváth, Gy. 2009. “Cohesion Deficiencies in Eastern and Central Europe: Inequalities of Regional Research Area.” Discussion Papers No. 72. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Horváth, Gy. 2010. “Szubszidiaritás és területfejlesztés [Subsidiarity and regional development].” In Szubszidiaritás és regionalitás az egyház- és államszervezetben, edited by Z. Hajdú, 87–100. Pécs: MTA Regionális Kutatások Központja.
   Google Scholar
• Horváth, Gy. 2012. “Regionalization in Eastern and Central Europe: Obstacles and Perspectives.” Geography, Environment, Sustainability 5 (2): 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. L. 1998. “Reformulating Urban Regime Theory: The Division of Labor between State and Market Reconsidered.” Journal of Urban Affairs 20 (3): 233–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. L. 2003. “Overcoming the Neglect of Economics in Urban Regime Theory.” Journal of Urban Affairs 25 (3): 271–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen-Jansen, L. B., and T. A. Hutton. 2011. “Rethinking Metropolis: Reconfiguring the Governance Structures of the Twenty-First-Century City-Region.” International Planning Studies 16 (3): 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Kasabov, E. 2011. “Towards a Theory of Peripheral, Early-Stage Clusters.” Regional Studies 45 (6): 827–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, M. 2001. “Governing Cities and Regions: Territorial Restructuring in a Global Age.” In Global City Regions, edited by A. J. Scott, 371–390. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kilburn, H. W. 2004. “Explaining U.S. Urban Regimes: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Urban Affairs Review 39 (5): 633–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokx, A., and R. van Kempen. 2010. “Dutch Urban Governance: Multi-level or Multi-Scalar?” European Urban and Regional Studies 17 (4): 355–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koós, B. 2010. “A gazdasági tevékenységek agglomerálódása egy vállalatdemográfiai modell tükrében [The spatial agglomeration of economic activities from the perspective of corporation demographics].” Tér és Társadalom 24 (1): 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Lengyel, I., and F. Mozsár. 2002. “A külső gazdasági hatások (externáliák) térbelisége [The spatiality of external economies (externalities)].” Tér és Társadalom 16 (2): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lengyel, B., and B. Ságvári. 2011. “Creative Occupations and Regional Development in Hungary: Mobility of Talent in a one-centred Transition Economy.” European Planning Studies 19 (12): 2073–2093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengyel, B., and M. Szanyi. 2011. “Agglomerációs előnyök és regionális növekedés felzárkózó régiókban: A magyar átmenet esete [Agglomeration economies and regional growth in catching-up regions: The case of Hungarian transition].” Közgazdasági Szemle 58 (10): 858–876.
   Google Scholar
• Lovering, J. 1999. “Theory Led by Policy: The Inadequacies of the ‘new regionalism’ (illustrated from the case of Wales).” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23 (2): 379–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lux, G. 2005. “A magyar fejlesztéspolitika térszemlélete és a második generációs programozás területi vetületei [Views on Space in Hungarian Development Policy and the Spatial Aspects of Second Generational Programming].” Tér és Társadalom 19 (3–4): 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Lux, G. 2010a. “From Industrial Periphery to Cultural Capital? Restructuring and Institution-Building in Pécs.” In: Developments in Minor Cities: Institutions Matter, edited by J. Sucháček and J. Juul Petersen, 103–126. Ostrava: VŠB — Technical University of Ostrava.
   Google Scholar
• Lux, G. 2010b. “Location Differences of Services and Industry: A Central European Dichotomy.” Prace Komisji Geografii Przemysłu Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego 16 (1): 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Maenning, W., and M. Ölschläger. 2011. “Innovative Milieu and Regional Competitiveness: The Role of Associations and Chambers of Commerce and Industry in Germany.” Regional Studies 45 (4): 441–452.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez Fernandez, C., N. Kubo, A. Noya, and T. Weyman, eds. 2012. Demographic Change and Local Development: Shrinkage, Regenerations and Social Dynamics. OECD/LEED.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., and J. Z. Acs. 2011. “Globalization: Countries, Cities and Multinationals.” Regional Studies 45 (1): 17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezei, C. 2006. “Helyi gazdaságfejlesztés Közép-Kelet-Európában [Local economic development in Central and Eastern European countries].” Tér és Társadalom 20 (3): 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., and G. Stoker. 2001. “The Evolution of Urban Regime Theory: The Challenge of Conceptualization.” Urban Affairs Review 36 (6): 810–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., F. Martinelli, S. González, and E. Swyngedouw. 2007. “Introduction: Social Innovation and Governance in European Cities: Urban Development between Path Dependency and Radical Innovation.” European Urban and Regional Studies 14 (3): 195–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, E. 2012. “Verseny vagy kiegyenlítés? Az európai várospolitika neoliberális fordulata és a helyi tervezési-fejlesztési gyakorlatok ‘projektesítése’ [Competition or Cohesion? The Neo-Liberal Turn of European Urban Policy and the ‘Projectification’ of Local Planning and Development Practice].” In A társadalomföldrajz lokális és globális kérdései, edited by V. Pál, 54–67. Szeged: SZTE TTIK Gazdaság- és Társadalomföldrajz Tanszék.
   Google Scholar
• Nuur, C., and S. Laestadius. 2010. “Development in Peripheral Regions: Case Studies in Sweden.” European Urban and Regional Studies 17 (3): 293–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paci, R., and S. Usai. 1999. “Externalities, Knowledge Spillovers and the Spatial Distribution of Innovation.” GeoJournal 49 (4): 381–390.
   Google Scholar
• Pallagst, K., J. Aber, I. Audirac, E. Cunningham-Sabot, S. Fol, C. Martinez-Fernandez, S. Moraes, et al. eds. 2009. The Future of Shrinking Cities: Problems, Patterns and Strategies of Urban Transformation in a Global Context. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Pálné Kovács, I. 2010. “Városi terek kormányzása és a városi rezsimek: Egy induló kutatás margójára [Governance of urban spaces and urban regimes. On the margin of a starting research project].” Tér és Társadalom 24 (4): 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Pálné Kovács, I. 2011. “Local Governance in Hungary: The Balance of the Last 20 Years.” Discussion Papers No. 83. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• van der Panne, G. 2004. “Agglomeration Externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14 (5): 593–604.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, M., R. Meegan, J. Karecha, R. Evans, G. Jones, M. Sotarauta, O. Ruokolainen et al. 2012. Second-tier Cities and Territorial Development in Europe: Performance, Policies and Prospects. Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, J. B. 2005. “Perspectives of the City-Region.” Regional Studies 39 (5): 555–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlínek, P., B. Domański, and R. Guzik. 2009. “Industrial Upgrading through Foreign Direct Investment in Central European Automotive Manufacturing.” European Urban and Regional Studies 16 (1): 43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Póla, P. 2007. “The Economic Chambers and the Enforcement of Local Economic Interests.” Discussion Papers No. 60. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Rechnitzer, J., and M. Smahó. 2012. “A jármű- és autóipar hatása a kelet-közép-európai térség versenyképességére. A kutatási eredmények összefoglalása [Effects of vehicle and automotive industry on the competitiveness of Central and Eastern European regions: Summary of research results].” In Járműipar és regionális versenyképesség. Nyugat- és Közép-Dunántúl a kelet-közép-európai térségben, edited by J. Rechnitzer and M. Smahó, 5–24. Győr: Széchenyi University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, M. T. W., and C. Hornych. 2010. “Could Cities in De-industrialized Regions Become Hot Spots for Attracting Cultural Businesses? The Case of Media Industry in Halle an der Saale (Germany).” European Planning Studies 18 (3): 371–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 1991. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 2006. Cities in a World Economy. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. 1996. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Socio, M. 2007. “Business Community Structures and Urban Regimes: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Urban Affairs 29 (4): 339–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Socio, M. 2010. “Marginalization of Sunset Firms in Regime Coalitions: A Social Network Analysis.” Regional Studies 44 (2): 167–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solé-Ollé, A., and E. Viladecans-Marsal. 2004. “Central Cities as Engines of Metropolitan Areas of Growth.” Journal of Regional Science 44 (2): 321–350.
   Google Scholar
• Somlyódyné Pfeil, E. 2008. “A városi térségek a közigazgatási struktúra és a ‘governance’ keresztmetszetében [Urban areas in the focus of administrational structure and urban governance].” Tér és Társadalom 22 (1): 27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Somlyódyné Pfeil, E. 2011. “Az agglomerációk jelentőségének változása az államszervezés és a városi kormányzás szempontjából [The changing significance of agglomerations in light of state spatial organisation and regional governance].” Tér és Társadalom 25 (3): 27–59.
   Google Scholar
• Spiekermann, K., and M. Wegener. 2008. “The Shrinking Continent: Accessibility, Competitiveness, and Cohesion.” In European Spatial Research and Planning, edited by A. Faludi, 115–140. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, M. 1985. “Old Industrial Areas: A Theoretical Approach.” Urban Studies 22 (5): 387–398.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. N. 1993. “Urban Regimes and the Capacity to Govern: A Political Economy Approach.” Journal of Urban Affairs 15 (1): 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C. N. 2005. “Looking Forward to Look Back: Reflections on Urban Regime Analysis.” Urban Affairs Review 40 (1): 309–341.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M. 1992. “The Limits to Globalization: Technology Districts and International Trade.” Economic Geography 68 (1): 60–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sucháček, J. 2010. “On the Emergence of Minor Cities.” In Development in Minor Cities: Institutions Matter, edited by J. Sucháček and J. J. Petersen, 13–16. Ostrava: VŠB — Technical University of Ostrava.
   Google Scholar
• Sucháček, J., and J. J. Petersen, eds. 2010. Development in Minor Cities: Institutions Matter. VŠB — Technical University of Ostrava.
   Google Scholar
• Suvák, A. 2010. “Integrated Urban Development Strategies: Comparison of European and Hungarian Approaches.” Journal of Landscape Studies 3 (3): 139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Suvák, A. 2011. “Környezeti fenntarthatóság mint az életminőségi stratégia része Európa középvárosaiban [Environmental Sustainability as a Quality of Life Factor for European Medium-Sized Cities].” In Évkönyv 2011, edited by B. Páger, 233–244. Pécs: Pécsi Tudományegyetem Közgazdaság-Tudományi Kara, Regionális Politika és Gazdaságtan Doktori Iskola.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J. 1997. “Hierarchical Tendencies amongst World Cities: A Global Research Proposal.” Cities 14 (6): 323–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J., and D. R. F. Walker. 2001. “World Cities: A First Multivariate Analysis of their Service Complexes.” Urban Studies 38 (1): 23–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnock, D. 2001. “Location Trends for Foreign Direct Investment in East Central Europe.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19 (6): 849–880.
   Google Scholar
• Viladecans-Marsal, E. 2002. The Growth of Cities: Does Agglomeration Matter? Barcelona: Institut d'Economia de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Voith, R. 1998. “Do Suburbs Need Cities?” Journal of Regional Science 38 (3): 445–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar