Neoliberalism and urban planning in Toronto: how seasoned planners adjust to their changing circumstances

References

• Allen, R., and P. Campsie. 2013. Implementing the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe: Has the Strategic Regional Vision been Compromised? Toronto: Neptis Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Alpert, D. 2013. The Age of Oversupply: Overcoming the Greatest Challenge to the Global Economy. New York: Portfolio.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, L. 2001. “Designing a Metropolitan Region: the Lessons and Lost Opportunities of the Toronto Experience.” In The Challenge of Urban Government, edited by M. Freire and R. Stren, 27–46. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2002. “Cities and the Geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism’.” Antipode 34 (3): 349–379. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchfield, M., and A. Kramer. 2015. Growing Pains: Understanding the New Reality of Population and Dwelling Patterns in the Toronto and Vancouver Regions. Toronto: Neptis Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, M., R. Goodman, and T. Budge. 2005. “Planning and Deregulation: The Failure of the new Victorian Planning System.” Australian Planner 42 (2): 52–58. doi: 10.1080/07293682.2005.9982418
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. 2008. “Living with/in and Without neo-Liberalism.” Focaal, 2008 (51): 135–147.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, B. 2016. “Clock-watching and Box-ticking’: British Local Authority Planners, Professionalism and Performance Targets.” Planning Practice and Research 31 (4): 383–401. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2016.1178038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, T. 1980. Big Daddy: Frederick G. Gardiner and the Building of Metropolitan Toronto. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, C. 2007. A Practical Guide to Research Methods: A User-friendly Manual for Mastering Research Techniques and Projects. 3rd ed. Oxford: How to Books.
   Google Scholar
• Eidelman, G. 2010. “Managing Urban Sprawl in Ontario: Good Policy or Good Politics?” Politics and Policy 38 (6): 1211–1236. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00275.x
   Google Scholar
• Ekers, M., P. Hamel, and R. Keil. 2015. “Governing Suburbia: Modalities and Mechanisms of Suburban Governance.” In Suburban Governance: A Global View, edited by P. Hamel and R. Keil, 19–48. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Filion, P. 2001. “The Urban Policy-making and Development Dimension of Fordism and Post-Fordism: A Toronto Case Study.” Space and Policy 5 (2): 85–111. doi: 10.1080/13562570120104427
   Google Scholar
• Filion, P., M. Lee, N. Leanage, and K. Hakull. 2015. “Planners’ Perspectives on Obstacles to Sustainable Urban Development: Implications for Transformative Planning Strategies.” Planning Practice and Research 30 (2): 202–221. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1023079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 2015. What kind of research might help us become better planners? Planning Theory and Practice 16(2): 145–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frisken, F. 1999. Toronto at the Crossroads, and How It Got There. Toronto: World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1998. The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 2000. The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J. 2002. “Mixed Use in Theory and Practice: Canadian Experience with Implementing a Planning Principle.” Journal of the American Planning Association 68 (1): 71–84. doi: 10.1080/01944360208977192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J. 2009a. “Theory and Practice in the Suburbs: Challenges to Implementing New Urbanism, Smart Growth, and Sustainability Principles.” Planning Theory and Practice 10 (1): 11–33. doi: 10.1080/14649350802661683
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J. 2009b. “Experiential Planning: a Practitioner’s Account of Vancouver’s Success.” Journal of the American Planning Association 75 (3): 358–370. doi: 10.1080/01944360902965875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J. 2011. “Story Telling, Group Dynamics, and Professional Culture: Lessons from a Focus Group Discussion.” Planning Theory and Practice 12 (3): 407–425. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2011.617497
   Google Scholar
• Harris, N. 2000. “Practice Through a Lens: A Metaphor for Planning Theory.” Journal of Planning Theory and Research 19: 309–315. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0001900310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1989. “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Formation of Urban Governance in Late Capitalism.” Geografiska Annaler B 17 (1): 3–17. doi: 10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
   Google Scholar
• Hattersley, R. 2009. In Search of England. London: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, D. 1997. “The Privatised City: Urban Infrastructure, Planning and Service Provision in the Era of Privatisation.” Urban Policy and Research 15 (1): 55–64. doi: 10.1080/08111149708551640
   Google Scholar
• Hess, P., and A. Sorensen. 2015. “Compact, Concurrent and Contiguous: Smart Growth and 50 Years of Residential Planning in the Toronto Region.” Urban Geography 36 (1): 127–151. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2014.947859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoggart, R. 1957. The Uses of Literacy: Aspects of Working-class Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horak, M. 2013. “State Scaling in Practice: Urban Governance Reform in Toronto.” Urban Research and Practice 6 (3): 311–328. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2013.846005
   Google Scholar
• Inch, A. 2017. “‘Open for Business’? Neoliberalism and the Cultural Politics of Modernising Planning in Scotland.” Urban Studies, 1–17. doi:10.1177/0042098016684731.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. 2009. “Neo-liberal or Third Way? What Planners From Glasgow, Melbourne and Toronto Say.” Urban Policy and Research 27 (4): 397–417. doi: 10.1080/08111140903318437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, R. 2002. “Common-Sense Neoliberalism: Progressive Conservative Urbanism in Toronto, Canada.” In Spaces of Neoliberalism, edited by N. Brenner and N. Theodore, 230–253. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, R., P. Hamel, E. Chou, and K. Williams. 2015. “Modalities of Suburban Governance in Canada.” In Suburban Governance: a Global View, edited by P. Hamel and R. Keil, 80–109. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, U., R. Keil, and S. Kipfer. 2010. “Reurbanization in Toronto: Condominium Boom and Social Housing Revitalization.” disP – The Planning Review 46: 180. 81–90. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2010.10557065
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, U., and J. Laidley. 2008. “Old Mega Projects Newly Packaged? Waterfront Redevelopment in Toronto.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (4): 786–803. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00830.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemon, J. 1996. Liberal Dreaming and Nature’s Limits: Great Cities of North America Since 1600. Toronto: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Infrastructure. 2006. Places to grow. Better choices. Brighter future: Growth plan for the greater Golden Horseshoe. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Neptis Foundation. 2016. Province Must Embrace Its Role as Regional Planner for the Growth Plan to Succeed. Toronto: Neptis Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Oberlander, H., and A. Fallick, eds. 1988. The Ministry of State for Urban Affairs: A Courageous Experiment in Urban Affairs. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Centre for Human Settlements.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, R. 1975. Whose City? Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and A. Tickell. 2002. “Neoliberalizing Space.” In Spaces of Neo-liberalism; Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, edited by N. Brenner and N. Theodore, 33–57. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Raco, M. 2013. “The New Contractualism, the Privatization of the Welfare State, and the Barriers to Open Source Planning.” Planning Practice & Research 28 (1): 45–64. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.694306
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., and M. Webber. 1984. “Planning Problems are Wicked Problems.” In Developments in Design Methodology, edited by N. Cross, 135–144. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 2015. “Ideological Traces in Plans for Compact Cities: Is Neo-liberalism Hegemonic?” Planning Theory 14 (3): 268–295. doi: 10.1177/1473095214527279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, J. 1993. The Shaping of the City: Toronto Struggles with Modern Planning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Social Planning Council of Metro Toronto. 1979. Metro’s Suburbs in Transition. Toronto: Social Planning Council of Metro Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. 2010. “Toronto MegaCity: Growth, Planning, Institutions, Sustainability.” In MegaCities: Urban Form, Governance and Sustainability, edited by A. Sorensen and J. Okata, 245–271. Tokyo: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T. 2012. “Introduction: Contradictions of Neoliberal Urban Planning.” In Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning, edited by T. Tasan-Kok and G. Baeten, 1–19. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., and M. Orange 2017. From Planning Student to Urban Planner: Young Practitioners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Toronto, City of. 2002. Toronto Official Plan. Toronto: Toronto Urban Development Services.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S. 2007. “The International Diffusion of Planning: A Review and a Canadian Case Study.” International Planning Studies 4 (1): 53–77. doi: 10.1080/13563479908721726
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1973. The Countryside and the City. London: Chatto and Windus.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2011. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar