Public perceptions of stakeholder influence on Australian metropolitan and local plans

References

• Arnstein, S. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, K., and T. Grossardt. 2010. “Toward Structured Public Involvement: Justice, Geography and Collaborative Geospatial/Geovisual Decision Support Systems.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (1): 57–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, T. 2017. Public Participation as a Tool for Integrating Local Knowledge into Spatial Planning. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brownill, S. 2009. “The Dynamics of Participation: Modes of Governance and Increasing Participation in Planning.” Urban Policy and Research 27 (4): 357–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunker, R. 2014. “How Is the Compact City Faring in Australia?” Planning Practice & Research 29 (5): 449–460.
   Google Scholar
• Byrna, B. 2017. “Greens Aim to Outlaw Political Donations from Property Developers.” The Herald Sun, 14 January. http://www.heraldsun.com.au/leader/news/greens-aim-to-outlaw-political-donations-from-property-developers/news-story/8e2307591412c14b46fef8ee403bfb93.
   Google Scholar
• The Canberra Times. 2016. “Good Move to Ban Political Donations from Property Developers.” The Canberra Times, 25 September. http://www.canberratimes.com.au/comment/ct-editorial/good-move-to-ban-political-donations-from-property-developers-20160924-grnrp0.html.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., and C. Brownill. 2008. “Approaches to Democratic Involvement: Widening Community Engagement in the English Planning System.” Planning Theory and Practice 9 (2): 227–248.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, S. 2010. “Participation in a Hostile State: How do Planners Act to Shape Public Engagement in Politically Difficult Environments?” Planning Practice & Research 25 (3): 333–351.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, T., and N. Gurran. 2015. “Planning Reform, Interest Group Participation and Influence: The Case of New South Wales.” Proceedings of the 2015 state of Australian cities conference, Gold Coast.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. 2001. “Hidden or Hiding? Public Perceptions of Participation in the Planning System.” Town Planning Review 72 (2): 193–216.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. 2015. “Council Amalgamations: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.” Sydney Morning Herald, 27 June. http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/council-amalgamations-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-20150625-ghxz1u.html.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. 2007. Reconsidering Public Attitudes and Public Acceptance of Renewable Energy Technologies: A Critical Review Working Paper 1.4. http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/research/beyond_nimbyism/deliverables/outputs.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. 2009. “Rethinking NIMBYism: The Role of Place Attachment and Place Identity in Explaining Place-Protective Action.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 19 (6): 426–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, J. 2016. “Suburbia in Australian Urban Policy.” Built Environment 42 (1): 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Dodson, J., E. Coiacetto, and C. Ellway. 2006. “Corruption in the Australian Land Development Process: Identifying a Research Agenda.” Proceedings of the 2006 state of Australian cities conference, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. 2000. “New Directions in Planning Theory.” Urban Affairs Review 35 (4): 451–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. 2010. The Just City. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., and E. Murphy. 2014. “Informal Strategies of Power in the Local Planning System.” Planning Theory 13 (3): 244–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., and E. Murphy. 2015. “Self-Perceptions of the Role of the Planner.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 43 (1): 74–92.
   Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., E. Murphy, and B. Grist. 2011. “Legislative Change in Ireland: A Marxist Political Economy Critique of Planning Law.” Town Planning Review 82 (6): 639–668.
   Google Scholar
• Frijters, P., and C. Murray. 2015. “Four Ways We Can Clean Up Corruption in Land Zoning.” The Conversation, 3 June. https://theconversation.com/four-ways-we-can-clean-up-corruption-in-land-rezoning-42557.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B., and N. Low. 2000. “‘Unfinished Business’: Neoliberal Planning Reform in Australia.” Urban Policy and Research 18 (1): 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Gorrey, M. 2018. “Canterbury Council Planning Boss Told to ‘Fix’ Dodgy Proposal: ICAC.” Sydney Morning Herald, 19 June. https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/canterbury-council-planning-boss-told-to-fix-dodgy-proposal-icac-20180619-p4zmb9.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gurran, N., and P. Phibbs. 2016a. “How the Property Council is Shaping the Debate Around Negative Gearing, Taxes.” The Conversation, 17 June. https://theconversation.com/how-the-property-council-is-shaping-the-debate-around-negative-gearing-taxes-61006.
   Google Scholar
• Gurran, N., and P. Phibbs. 2016b. “‘Boulevard of Broken Dreams’: Planning, Housing Supply and Affordability in Urban Australia.” Built Environment 42 (1): 55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Gurran, N., and K. Ruming. 2016. “Less Planning, More Development? Housing and Urban Reform Discourses in Australia.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 19 (3): 262–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M. 2018. “Barangaroo: Machiavellian Megaproject or Erosion of Intent?" In Urban Regeneration and Australian Cities, edited by K. Ruming, 111–134. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1992. “Planning Through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory.” Town Planning Review 63 (2): 143–162.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2006. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2000. “Going Round the Back? Complex Networks and Informal Action in Local Planning Processes.” Environment and Planning A 32 (1): 33–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICAC (Independent Commission Against Corruption). 2008. Report on Investigation into Corruption Allegations Affecting Wollongong City Council. Sydney: ICAC.
   Google Scholar
• ICAC (Independent Commission Against Corruption). 2009. Attempts to Improperly Influence Ku-Ring-gai Council Officer. Sydney: ICAC.
   Google Scholar
• ICAC (Independent Commission Against Corruption). 2012. Auburn City Council – Allegations Concerning Councillor and Developer. Sydney: ICAC.
   Google Scholar
• Inch, A. 2012. “Creating ‘a Generation of NIMBYs’? Interpreting the Role of the State in Managing the Politics of Urban Development.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30 (3): 520–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inch, A. 2015. “Ordinary Citizens and the Political Cultures of Planning: In Search of the Subject of a New Democratic Ethos.” Planning Theory 14 (4): 404–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, M. B. 2005. “Public Participation in Planning: An Intellectual History.” Australian Geographer 36 (3): 283–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legacy, C. 2016a. “Is There a Crisis of Participatory Planning?” Planning Theory, Online First, 16: 425–442. doi: 10.1177/1473095216667433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legacy, C. 2016b. “Transforming Transport Planning in the Postpolitical era.” Urban Studies 53 (14): 3108–3124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legacy, C., A. March, and C. M. Mouat. 2014. “Limits and Potentials to Deliberative Engagement in Highly Regulated Planning Systems: Norm Development Within Fixed Rules.” Planning Theory & Practice 15 (1): 26–40.
   Google Scholar
• Legacy, C., D. Rogers, K. Ruming, and N. Cook. 2016. “‘30-Minute City’? Not in My Backyard! Smart Cities Plan must Let People Have their Say.” The Conversation, 23 May. https://theconversation.com/30-minute-city-not-in-my-backyard-smart-cities-plan-must-let-people-have-their-say-59161.
   Google Scholar
• Liepa-Zemesa, M., and D. Baldwin Hess. 2016. “Effects of Public Perception on Urban Planning: Evolution of an Inclusive Planning System During Crises in Latvia.” Town Planning Review 87 (1): 71–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, C., and R. Willingham. 2015. “Political Donations from Property Developers a Bad Look, Says Ombudsman.” The Age, 25 November. http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/political-donations-from-property-developers-a-bad-look-says-ombudsman-20151125-gl7e1q.html.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, H. 2015. “‘Fantasies of Consensus’: Planning Reform in Sydney, 2005–2013.” Planning Practice and Research 30 (2): 115–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, N., C. Steinmetz, and R. Zehner. 2012. “Community Participation in Planning.” In Planning Australia: An Overview of Urban and Regional Planning, edited by S. Thompson, and P. Maginn, 276–293. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. 1995. “Power and Influence in Urban Planning: Community and Property Interests’ Participation in Dublin’s Planning System.” Irish Geography 28 (1): 64–75.
   Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. 2000. “Power and Policy Networks in Urban Governance: Local Government and Property-led Regeneration in Dublin.” Urban Studies 37 (4): 651–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. 2001. “Situating Communicative Planning Theory: Context, Power, and Knowledge.” Environment and Planning A 33 (2): 195–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. 2005. “Neoliberalist Planning? Re-Thinking and Re-Casting Sydney’s Metropolitan Planning.” Geographical Research 43 (1): 59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P., and G. Thompson. 2017. “Urban Regeneration in Australia.” In Urban Regeneration, edited by P. Robert, H. Sykes, and R. Granger, 288–313. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Government. 2012. A New Planning System for NSW: Green Paper. Sydney: NSW Government.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Government. 2013. White Paper – A New Planning System for NSW. Sydney: NSW Government.
   Google Scholar
• Planning Institute of Australia. 2013. Submission on “A New Planning System for NSW: White Paper. Sydney: PIA NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, B. 2016. “Millennials Pushed Out of Suburbs by NIMBY Baby Boomers who Oppose Development.” Domain, 16 November. https://www.domain.com.au/news/millennials-pushed-out-of-suburbs-by-nimby-baby-boomers-who-oppose-development-20161117-gsr4c5/.
   Google Scholar
• Property Council of Australia. 2014. Submission to the Senate Economics References Committee Inquiry Into Affordable Housing. Sydney: PCA.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. 2009. “Resisting Neoliberalization: Communicative Planning or Counter-Hegemonic Movements?” Planning Theory 8 (2): 140–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quah, E., and K. C. Tan. 2002. Siting Environmentally Unwanted Facilities: Risks, Trade-Offs and Choices. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Raco, M. 2005. “Sustainable Development, Rolled-Out Neoliberalism and Sustainable Communities.” Antipode 37 (2): 324–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, D., C. McAuliffe, A. Piracha, and L. Schatz. 2017. Resident Involvement in Urban Development in Sydney: The New Politics of the City. Sydney: The Henry Halloran Trust, University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Ruming, K. 2009. “Development Configurations and Planning Negotiations: A Case of Fringe Development in Sydney, Australia.” Urban Studies 46 (7): 1461–1483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruming, K. 2010. “Developer Typologies in Urban Renewal in Sydney: Recognising the Role of Informal Associations between Developers and Local Government.” Urban Policy and Research 28 (1): 65–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruming, K. 2012. “Negotiating Within the Context of Planning Reform: Public and Private Reflections from New South Wales, Australia.” International Planning Studies 17 (4): 397–418.
   Google Scholar
• Ruming, K. 2014. “Urban Consolidation, Strategic Planning and Community Opposition in Sydney, Australia: Unpacking Policy Knowledge and Public Perceptions.” Land Use Policy 39: 254–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruming, K. 2017. “Post-Political Planning and Community Opposition: Asserting and Challenging Consensus in Planning Urban Regeneration in Newcastle, New South Wales.” Geographical Research 56: 181–195. doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruming, K., M. Amati, and D. Houston. 2012. “Multiple Suburban Publics: Rethinking Community Opposition to Consolidation in Sydney.” Geographical Research 50 (4): 421–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruming, K., and N. Gurran. 2014. “Planning System Reform in Australia.” Australian Planner 51 (2): 102–107.
   Google Scholar
• Saulwick, J. 2017. “The Auburn Council Inquiry Shows Property Developers Shouldn’t be on Council.” Sydney Morning Herald, 16 March. http://www.smh.com.au/comment/the-auburn-council-inquiry-shows-property-developers-shouldnt-be-on-council-20170315-guykep.html.
   Google Scholar
• Schively, C. 2007. “Understanding the NIMBY and LULU Phenomena: Reassessing our Knowledge Base and Informing Future Research.” Journal of Planning Literature 21 (3): 255–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. 2018. “Murky Waters: The Politics of Melbourne’s Waterfront Regeneration Projects.” In Urban Regeneration and Australian Cities, edited by K. Ruming, 135–158. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sherlock, K., E. Kirk, and A. Reeves. 2004. “Just the Usual Suspects? Partnerships and Environmental Regulation.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 22 (5): 651–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, C., and M. Tait. 2007. “The Crisis of Trust and Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 8 (2): 229–247.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2010. “Impossible Sustainability and the Post-Political Condition.” In Making Strategies in Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Values, edited by M. Cerretam, G. Concilio, and V. Monno, 185–207. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• UDIA (Urban Development Institute of Australia). 2016. Submission on Innovative Funding Modles for Affordable Housing in Response to the Issues Paper Released by the Affordable Housing Working Group of the Council on Federal Financial Relations. Canberra: UDIA.
   Google Scholar
• Whitbourn, M. 2015. “High Court Upholds State-Wide Ban on Political Donations from Property Developers.” Sydney Morning Herald, 7 October. http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/high-court-upholds-statewide-ban-on-political-donations-from-property-developers-20151005-gk21ja.html.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P., and P. Maginn. 2012. “Planning and Governance.” In Planning Australia: An Overview of Urban and Regional Planning, edited by S. Thompson, and P. Maginn, 33–55. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, W., and K. Ruming. 2017. “Urban Consolidation Process and Discourses in Sydney: Unpacking Social Media use in a Community Group’s Media Campaign.” Planning Theory & Practice 18 (3): 428–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. 2006. “Invalid Theory Impedes our Understanding: A Critique on the Persistence of the Language of NIMBY.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 31 (1): 85–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar