Understanding context and its influence on collaborative planning processes: a contribution to communicative planning theory

References

• Alexander, Ernest R. 2005. “Institutional Transformation and Planning: From Institutionalization Theory to Institutional Design.” Planning Theory 4 (3): 209–223.
   Google Scholar
• Bjarnadóttí, Hólmfríður. 2008. SEA in the Context of Land-Use Planning: The Application of the EU Directive 2001/42/EC to Sweden, Iceland and England. Karlskrona: Blekinge Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Blicharska, Malgorzata, Karolina Isaksson, Tim Richardson, and Chia Jung Wu. 2011. “Context Dependency and Stakeholder Involvement in EIA: The Decisive Role of Practitioners.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54 (3): 337–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderon, C. 2013. “Politicising Participation: Towards a New Theoretical Approach to Participation in the Planning and Design of Public Space.” Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Carrim, Yunus. 2011. “Participatory Planning in Local Government in South Africa: Policy, Legislation and Practice.” International Conference on Emerging Experiences in Decentralised Planning, Anand.
   Google Scholar
• Coaffee, Jon, and Patsy Healey. 2003. “‘My Voice: My Place’: Tracking Transformations in Urban Governance.” Urban Studies 40 (10): 1979–1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, Steve. 2010. “Participation in a Hostile State: How Do Planners Act to Shape Public Engagement in Politically Difficult Environments?” Planning Practice & Research 25 (3): 333–351.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, Bill, and Uma Kothari. 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny?. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, Paul J, and Walter W Powell. 1991. “Introduction.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Paul J. DiMaggio and Walter W. Powell, 1–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, Bent, and Tim Richardson. 2002. “Planning and Foucault: In Search of the Dark Side of Planning Theory.” In Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, edited by Philip Allmendinger and Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 44–62. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, John. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner. Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, John. 2009. Dealing with Differences – Dramas of Mediating Public Disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, John. 2016. “Daunting or Inviting: ‘Context’ as Your Working Theory of Practice.” Planning Theory & Practice 17 (2): 169–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, Sara, and Patsy Healey. 2005. “A Sociological Institutionalist Approach to the Study of Innovation in Governance Capacity.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 2055–2069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, Colin. 2002. Political Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, Patsy. 1997. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, Patsy. 2003. “Collaborative Planning in Perspective.” Planning Theory 2 (2): 101–123.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, Patsy. 2004. “Creativity and Urban Governance.” Policy Studies 25 (2): 87–102.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, Patsy. 2007a. “The New Institutionalism and the Transformative Goals of Planning.” In Institutions and Planning, edited by Niraj Verma, 61–87. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, Patsy. 2007b. Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for our Times. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, Patrick. 2012. “Democracy, Participatory Politics and Development: Some Comparative Lessons from Brazil, India and South Africa.” Polity 44 (4): 643–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, Margo, and Oren Yiftachel. 2000. “New Paradigm or Old Myopia? Unsettling the Communicative Turn in Planning Theory.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19 (4): 333–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, Judith, and David Booher. 2003. “Collaborative Policymaking: Governance Through Dialogue.” In Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society, edited by M. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, 33–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, Bob. 2001. “Institutional Re(Turns) and the Strategic – relational Approach.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 33 (7): 1213–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, Bob. 2007. State Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, Vijay, and R. K. Pandit. 2013. “Indian Urban Development Planning Approach: Quench For New Paradigm.” International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology (IJESIT) 2 (2): 497–501.
   Google Scholar
• Laws, David, and John Forester. 2015. Conflict, Improvisation, Governance: Street Level Practices for Urban Democracy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, Vivien. 2002. “Institutionalism.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, edited by David Marsh and Gerry Stoker, 90–108. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. M. 2001. “Situating Communicative Planning Theory: Context, Power, and Knowledge.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 33 (2): 195–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, Frank, Bob Jessop, and Abid Mehmood. 2016. “Agency, Structure, Institutions, Discourse (ASID) in Urban and Regional Development.” International Journal of Urban Sciences 20 (2): 167–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, Douglas. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2006. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raitio, Kaisa. 2008. ‘You Can’t Please Everyone’: Conflict Management Practices, Frames and Institutions in Finnish State Forests. Joensuu: Joensuu University.
   Google Scholar
• Raitio, Kaisa. 2012. “New Institutional Approach to Collaborative Forest Planning on Public Land: Methods for Analysis and Lessons for Policy.” Land Use Policy 29 (2): 309–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahni, Satinder. 2003. “Engaging with Participatory Local Governance in India.” UN/DESA Interregional WorkshopQ12 on Engaged Governance Fro Pro-Poor Policies, Colombo. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan013176.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, Loris Antonio, and Pieter Van Den Broeck. 2012. “The Social Construction of Planning Systems: A Strategic-Relational Institutionalist Approach.” Planning Practice & Research 27 (1): 41–61.
   Google Scholar
• Siddle, Andrew McCalman. 2011. Decentralisation in South African Local Government: A Critical Evaluation. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• SWEDESD. 2014a. The Inquiry Based Approach (IBA): A Facilitator’s Handbook. Visby: iVisby Tryckeri AB.
   Google Scholar
• SWEDESD. 2014b. “Wikispace Supporting Urban Sustainability Programme.” Accessed June. http://susprogramme.wikispaces.com/Welcome+to+the+Supporting+Urban+Sustainability+Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M., and P. Allmendinger. 1998. “Deconstructing Communicative Rationality: A Critique of Habermasian Collaborative Planning.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 30: 1975–1989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, Niraj. 2007. “Institutions and Planning: An Analogical Inquiry.” In Institutions and Planning, edited by Niraj Verma, 1–16. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Vanessa. 2003. “Conflicting Rationalities: Implications for Planning Theory and Ethics.” Planning Theory and Practice 4 (2): 395–407.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Vanessa. 2008. “Down to Earth: Linking Planning Theory and Practice in the ‘Metropole’ and Beyond.” International Planning Studies 13 (3): 223–237.
   Google Scholar
• Westin, M., A. Hellquist, D. O. Kronlid, and J. Colvin. 2013. “Towards Urban Sustainability: Learning From the Design of a Programme for Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration.” Southern African Journal of Environmental Education 29 (1): 39–57.
   Google Scholar