Cross border regional planning: insights from Cascadia

References

• BC Technology. 2019. “Cascadia Innovation Corridor Announces New Steering Committee for Promoting Cross-Border Growth in Cascadia Region.” https://www.bctechnology.com/news/2018/9/18/Cascadia-Innovation-Corridor-Announces-New-Steering-Committee-For-Promoting-Cross-Border-Growth-in-Cascadia-Region.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Border Policy Research Institute. 2018. “Regional Cross-Border Collaboration Between the U.S. & Canada.” Border Policy Research Institute Publications. https://cedar.wwu.edu/bpri_publications/113.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, S. L. 2016. “Making Connections and Building Bridges: Improving the Bi-National Planning Process.” International Planning Studies 21 (1): 64–80. doi:10.1080/13563475.2015.1114450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunerhielm, L., O. E. Alfredsson, and E. Medeiros. 2019. “The Importance of Swedish–Norwegian Border Residents’ Perspectives for Bottom-Up Cross-Border Planning Strategies.” Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography 73 (2): 96–109. doi:10.1080/00291951.2019.1598485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Columbia–Washington MOU. 2016. “ British Columbia–Washington MOU [PDF].” https://news.gov.bc.ca/files/BC_WA_Innovation_MOU.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Caesar, B. 2017. “European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation: A Means to Harden Spatially Dispersed Cooperation?” Regional Studies, Regional Science 4 (1): 247–254. doi:10.1080/21681376.2017.1394216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappellano, F., and T. Makkonen. 2019. “Cross-Border Regional Innovation Ecosystems: The Role of Non-Profit Organizations in Cross-Border Cooperation at the US-Mexico Border.” GeoJournal, 1–15. doi:10.1007/s10708-019-10038-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappellano, F., and T. Makkonen. 2020. “The Proximity Puzzle in Cross-Border Regions.” Planning Practice & Research 35 (3): 283–301. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2020.1743921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappellano, F., and A. Rizzo. 2019. “Economic Drivers in Cross-Border Regional Innovation Systems.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 6 (1): 460–468. doi:10.1080/21681376.2019.1663256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. 2000. “Regional and Transnational Discourse: The Politics of Ideas and Economic Development in Cascadia.” International Journal of Economic Development 2 (3): 360–378. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-39617-4_6.
   Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., and F. Durand. 2017. “Challenges and Obstacles in the Production of Cross-Border Territorial Strategies: The Example of the Greater Region.” Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning 1 (1): 65–78. doi:10.24306/TrAESOP.2017.01.005.
   Google Scholar
• Deppisch, S. 2012. “Governance Processes in Euregios. Evidence From Six Cases Across the Austrian–German Border.” Planning Practice and Research 27 (3): 315–332. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.670937.
   Google Scholar
• Dörry, S., and A. Decoville. 2016. “Governance and Transportation Policy Networks in the Cross-Border Metropolitan Region of Luxembourg: A Social Network Analysis.” European Urban and Regional Studies 23 (1): 69–85. doi:10.1177%2F0969776413490528 doi: 10.1177/0969776413490528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, F. 2014. “Challenges of Cross-Border Spatial Planning in the Metropolitan Regions of Luxembourg and Lille.” Planning Practice and Research 29 (2): 113–132. doi:10.1080/02697459.2014.896148.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F., and A. Decoville. 2018. “Establishing Cross-Border Spatial Planning.” In European Territorial Cooperation, edited by E. Medieros, 229–244. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Falkheimer, J. 2016. “Place Branding in the Øresund Region: From a Transnational Region to a Bi-National City-Region.” Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 12 (2-3): 160–171. doi:10.1057/s41254-016-0012-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke, C. 2015. “Spatial Governance Across Borders Revisited: Organizational Forms and Spatial Planning in Metropolitan Cross-Border Regions.” European Planning Studies 23 (5): 849–870. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.887661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, K., C. Conteh, and C. Phillips. 2019. “Cross-Border Innovation Corridors: How to Support, Strengthen and Sustain Cross-Border Innovation Ecosystems.” Brock University: Niagara Community Observatory Policy Brief (September). https://brocku.ca/niagara-community-observatory/policy/.
   Google Scholar
• Ganster, P., and K. Collins. 2017. “Binational Cooperation and Twinning: A View From the US–Mexican Border, San Diego, California, and Tijuana.” Baja California. Journal of Borderlands Studies 32 (4): 497–511. doi:10.1080/08865655.2016.1198582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, L. A. 2000. “Cross-Border Planning and Cooperation.” In The US-Mexican Border Environment: A Road Map to a Sustainable 2020, edited by P. Ganster, 139–161. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 2016. “Spatial Planning in Cross-Border Regions: A Systems-Theoretical Perspective.” Planning Theory 15 (1): 68–90. doi:10.1177%2F1473095214547149 doi: 10.1177/1473095214547149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knippschild, R. 2011. “Cross-Border Spatial Planning: Understanding, Designing and Managing Cooperation Processes in the German–Polish–Czech Borderland.” European Planning Studies 19 (4): 629–645. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.548464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, V. 2015. “Evolving Canada - United States Cross-Border Mobility in the Cascade Gateway.” Research in Transportation, Business and Management 16: 121–130. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzeretti, L., and F. Capone. 2016. “How Proximity Matters in Innovation Networks Dynamics Along the Cluster Evolution. A Study of the High Technology Applied to Cultural Goods.” Journal of Business Research 69 (12): 5855–5865. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundquist, K. J., and M. Trippl. 2013. “Distance, Proximity and Types of Cross-Border Innovation Systems: A Conceptual Analysis.” Regional Studies 47 (3): 450–460. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.560933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcu, S. 2011. “Opening the Mind, Challenging the Space: Cross-Border Cooperation Between Romania and Moldova.” International Planning Studies 16 (2): 109–130. doi:10.1080/13563475.2011.561056.
   Google Scholar
• Noferini, A., M. Berzi, F. Camonita, and A. Durà. 2019. “Cross-Border Cooperation in the EU: Euroregions Amid Multilevel Governance and Reterritorialization.” European Planning Studies 28 (1): 35–56. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1623973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Governor. 2016. “British Columbia, Washington State to Create Cascadia Innovation Corridor to Promote Regional Economic Opportunities in Tech Industries.” News, September 20. https://www.governor.wa.gov/news-media/british-columbia-washington-state-create-cascadia-innovation-corridor-promote-regional.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, E. 2015. “Constructing Regional Advantage in Branding the Cross-Border Euroregion Galicia–Northern Portugal.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 2 (1): 341–349. doi:10.1080/21681376.2015.1044020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña, S. 2007. “Cross-Border Planning at the U.S.-Mexico Border: An Institutional Approach.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 22 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/08865655.2007.9695666.
   Google Scholar
• Public Safety Canada. 2008. Canada’s First Enhanced Driver’s Licence Launched in BC. News Release. https://archive.news.gov.bc.ca/releases/news_releases_2005-2009/2008OTP0008-000056.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Pupier, P. 2019. “Spatial Evolution of Cross-Border Regions. Contrasted Case Studies in North-West Europe.” European Planning Studies 28 (1): 81–104. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1623975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, K. 2016. “Attracting and Retaining Foreign Highly Skilled Staff in Times of Global Crisis: A Case Study of Vancouver, British Columbia’s Biotechnology Sector.” Population, Space and Place 22 (5): 428–440. doi:10.1002/psp.1912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, K. 2017. Knowledge Borders: Temporary Labor Mobility and the Canada–US Border Region. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. 1999. “European and North American Contexts for Cross-Border Regionalism.” Regional Studies 33 (7): 605–617. doi:10.1080/00343409950078657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparke, M. 2000. “Excavating the Future in Cascadia: Geoeconomics and the Imagined Geographies of a Cross-Border Region.” B.C. Studies: The British Columbian Quarterly 127: 5–44.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, D. 2008. Cascadia the Elusive Utopia: Exploring the Spirit of the Pacific Northwest. Vancouver, BC: Ronsdale Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broek, J., and H. Smulders. 2014. “Institutional Gaps in Cross-Border Regional Innovation Systems: The Horticultural Industry in Venlo–Lower Rhine.” In The Social Dynamics of Innovation Networks, edited by R. Rutten, P. Benneworth, D. Irawati, and F. Boekema, 157–175. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broek, J., and H. Smulders. 2015. “Institutional Hindrances in Cross-Border Regional Innovation Systems.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 2 (1): 116–122. doi:10.1080/21681376.2015.1007158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. 2020. “Governing the Salish Sea.” Hastings Environmental Law Journal 26 (1): 169–162.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerbauer, K. 2018. “Supranational Identities in Planning.” Regional Studies 52 (7): 911–921. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1360481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar