Ideology in practice: the career of sustainability as an ideological concept in strategic urban planning

References

• Allmendinger, P., and G. Haughton. 2012. “Post-Political Spatial Planning in England: a Crisis of Consensus?” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37 (1): 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and K. Sköldberg. 2018. Reflexive Methodology: new Vistas for Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boddy, M., and H. Hickman. 2016. “The ‘Cambridge Phenomenon’ and the Challenge of Planning Reform.” Town Planning Review 87 (1): 31–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandtner, C., M. A. Höllerer, R. E. Meyer, and M. Kornberger. 2017. “Enacting Governance Through Strategy: A Comparative Study of Governance Configurations in Sydney and Vienna.” Urban Studies 54 (5): 1075–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. 2016. “Sustainability as Empty Signifier: Its Rise, Fall, and Radical Potential.” Antipode 48 (1): 115–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 2014. Social Science Research: From Field to Desk. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 2020. “Will Sustainability be Replaced by Resilience, and if so, why?” In Dilemmas of Sustainable Urban Development: a View from Practice, edited by J. Metzger and J. Lindblad, 231–234. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, M. 2010. “Sustainability as Ideological Praxis: The Acting out of Planning’s Master-Signifier.” City 14 (4): 390–405.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, M. 2012. “Sustainable City as Fantasy.” Human Geography 5 (2): 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. 2014. “Climate Change, Securitisation of Nature, and Resilient Urbanism.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32 (2): 360–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., D. Galland, and D. Stead. 2019. “Reinventing Planning and Planners: Ideological Decontestations and Rhetorical Appeals.” Planning Theory. doi:10.1177/1473095219869386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, D. 1960. “British Town Planning: One Ideology or Three?” The British Journal of Sociology 11 (3): 211–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: a Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. 2003. Ideology: a Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1964. “Ideology as a Cultural System.” The Interpretation of Cultures, Reproduced In C. Geertz (1973), 192–233. New York: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Grange, K. 2014. “In Search of Radical Democracy: the Ideological Character of Current Political Advocacies for Culture Change in Planning.” Environment and Planning A 46 (11): 2670–2685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gressgård, R. 2015. “The Power of (re) Attachment in Urban Strategy: Interrogating the Framing of Social Sustainability in Malmö.” Environment and Planning A 47 (1): 108–120.
   Google Scholar
• Gunder, M. 2006. “Sustainability: Planning’s saving grace or road to perdition?” Journal of Planning Education and Research 26: 208–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunder, M. 2010. “Planning as the Ideology of (Neoliberal) Space.” Planning Theory 9 (4): 298–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunder, M., and J. Hillier. 2009. Planning in ten Words or Less: a Lacanian Entanglement with Spatial Planning. Farnham. Surrey, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2007. Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for our Times. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Inch, A., and E. Shepherd. 2019. “Thinking Conjuncturally About Ideology, Housing and English Planning.” Planning Theory. doi:10.1177/1473095219887771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberger, M., and S. Clegg. 2011. “Strategy as Performative Practice: The Case of Sydney 2030.” Strategic Organization 9 (2): 136–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberger, M., R. Meyer, and M. Höllerer. 2018. Impact beyond implementation: Exploring the long-term effect of strategy. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 2002. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1983. “The Impossibility of Society.” CTheory 7 (1-2): 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1990. New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1996a. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1996b. “The Death and Resurrection of the Theory of Ideology.” Journal of Political Ideologies 1 (3): 201–220.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2006. “Ideology and Post-Marxism.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (2): 103–114.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony & Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2003. “What if we Talked Politics a Little?” Contemporary Political Theory 2 (2): 143–164.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: an Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lauria, M., and M. Long. 2017. “Planning Experience and Planners’ Ethics.” Journal of the American Planning Association 83 (2): 202–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchart, O. 2007. Post-foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. 2018. “Postpolitics and Planning.” In The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory, edited by M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, and V. Watson, 180–193. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., P. Allmendinger, and S. Oosterlynck, eds. 2014. Planning Against the Political: Democratic Deficits in European Territorial Governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Norval, A. J. 2000. “The Things we do with Words–Contemporary Approaches to the Analysis of Ideology.” British Journal of Political Science 30 (2): 313–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, S. E., and R. Cowell. 2002. Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the Planning Process. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock, S., and P. Allmendinger. 2020. “Delivering Sustainable Development: Landownership and Accountability in Cambridge City.” In Dilemmas of Sustainable Urban Development: a View From Practice, edited by J. Metzger and J. Lindblad, 175–193. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, Å, N. Weitz, and M. Nilsson. 2016. “Follow-up and Review of the Sustainable Development Goals: Alignment vs. Internalization.” Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 25 (1): 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salet, W. 2018. Public Norms and Aspirations: The Turn to Institutions in Action. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W. 2019. “The Making of the Public.” Planning Theory 18 (2): 260–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2007. “Impossible “Sustainability” and the Postpolitical Condition.” In The Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban Political Economy in the United States and Europe, edited by R. Krueger and D. Gibbs, 13–40. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitz, N., Å Persson, M. Nilsson, and S. Tenggren. 2015. Sustainable Development Goals for Sweden: Insights on Setting a National Agenda. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Zanotto, J. M. 2020. “The Role of Discourses in Enacting Neoliberal Urbanism: Understanding the Relationship Between Ideology and Discourse in Planning.” Planning Theory. doi:10.1177/1473095219898876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S., ed. 1994. Mapping Ideology. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1997. The Plague of Fantasies. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar