Self-organized initiatives: a planners’ subversive tool for fragmented urban spaces

References

• Ahmadi, D. 2017. Living With diversity in Jane-Finch. TU Delft, A+BE|Architecture and the Built Environment. No. 12. Retrieved from http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:d1f12d39-a25f-44e3-a2e6-3c8dafbb113a.
   Google Scholar
• Ashby, W. R. 1947. “Principles of the Self-Organizing Dynamic System.” The Journal of General Psychology 37 (2): 125–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1947.9918144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balbo, M. 1993. “Urban Planning and the Fragmented City of Developing Countries.” Third World Planning Review 15: 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Balbo, M., and F. Navez-Bouchanine. 1995. “Urban Fragmentation as a Research Hypothesis: Rabat-Salé Case Study.” Habitat International 19 (4): 571–582.
   Google Scholar
• Bank, W. 2016. GINI Index.
   Google Scholar
• Bayón, M. C., and G. A. Saraví. 2013. “The Cultural Dimensions of Urban Fragmentation: Segregation, Sociability, and Inequality in Mexico City.” Latin American Perspectives 40 (2): 35–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bénit-Gbaffou, C. 2008. “Unbundled Security Services and Urban Fragmentation in Post-Apartheid Johannesburg.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 39 (6): 1933–1950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çakir, G., C. Ün, E. Z. Baskent, S. Köse, F. Sivrikaya, and S. Keleş. 2008. “Evaluating Urbanization, Fragmentation and Land Use/Land Cover Change Pattern in Istanbul City, Turkey from 1971 to 2002.” Land Degradation and Development 19 (6): 663–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2004. The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Cortes, J. M. G. 2008. Politicas Do Espaço: Senac Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva, C. C. R., and R. R. Rojas-Pierola. 2018. “Economic Dynamics of an Urban Space in Dispute. Largo da Batata, São Paulo (Brazil).” Bitacora Urbano Territorial 28 (1): 163–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.15446/bitacora.v28n1.68331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Espriella, C. 2007. “Designing for Equality: Conceptualising a Tool for Strategic Territorial Planning.” Habitat International 31 (3-4): 317–332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eigen, M. 1971. “Molecular Self-Organization and the Early Stages of Evolution.” Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 4 (2&3): 149–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. 2010. The Just City. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., and K. Iveson. 2008. Planning and Diversity in the City: Redistribution, Recognition and Encounter. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, D. 2014. “DIY Urbanism: Implications for Cities.” Journal of Urbanism 7 (4): 381–398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.891149.
   Google Scholar
• Foerster, H., and G. W. Zoepf. 1962. Principles of Self-Organisation. New York: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., and E. Murphy. 2016. “Self-Perceptions of the Role of the Planner.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 43 (1): 74–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515603860.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. 2010. “Place and Place-Making in Cities: A Global Perspective.” Planning Theory & Practice 11 (2): 149–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649351003759573.
   Google Scholar
• Haken, H. 1983. Synergetics: An Introduction: Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and Self-Organization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology. Berlin; New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Heylighen, F. 2008. “Complexity and Self-Organization.” In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, edited by M. J. Bates and M. N. Maack, 250–259. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janoschka, M. 2002. “New Urban Structure Models of Latin American Cities: Fragmentation and Privatization.” EURE - Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Urbano Regionales 28 (85): 11–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., and A. Kraay. 2018. The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) from World Bank. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/wgidataset.xlsx.
   Google Scholar
• Kee, T., and F. Miazzo. 2014. We Own the City: Enabling Community Practice in Architecture and Urban Planning. Amsterdam: TrancityxValiz.
   Google Scholar
• Klaufus, C. 2017. “All-inclusiveness Versus Exclusion: Urban Project Development in Latin America and Africa.” Sustainability 9: 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klink, J., and R. Denaldi. 2012. “Metropolitan Fragmentation and Neo-Localism in the Periphery: Revisiting the Case of Curitiba.” Urban Studies 49 (3): 543–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotus, J., and B. Hławka. 2010. “Urban Neighbourhood Communities Organised on-Line – A New Form of Self-Organisation in the Polish City?” Cities 27 (4): 204–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lydon, M., and A. Garcia. 2015. Tactical Urbanism. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maricato, E. 2011. O Impasse da Política Urbana no Brasil. Petrópolis, RJ - Brazil: Vozes.
   Google Scholar
• Maricato, E., B. G. Lobo, and K. Leitão. 2009. “Fighting for Just Cities in Capitalism's Periphery.” In Searching for the Just City: Debates in Urban Theory and Practice, edited by Peter Marcuse, James Connolly, Johannes Novy, Ingrid Olivo, Cuz Potter, and Justin Steil, 194–213. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Musset, A. 2015. “The Just City's Myth, a Neoliberal Cheatings.” Bitacora Urbano Territorial 25 (1): 11–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.15446/bitacora.v1n25.53216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, L., L. Waldron, A. Dale, and K. Carriere. 2008. “Sustainable Urban Community Development from the Grassroots: Challenges and Opportunities in a Pedestrian Street Initiative.” Local Environment 13 (2): 129–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830701581879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunbogu, A. M., P. I. Korah, P. B. Cobbinah, and M. Poku-Boansi. 2017. “Doing it ‘Ourselves’: Civic Initiative and Self-Governance in Spatial Planning.” Cities, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.022.
   Google Scholar
• Paulo, R. N. S. 2019. Mapa da Desigualdade. São Paulo, Rede Nossa São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Portugali, J. 1999. Self-organization and the City. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rauws, W. 2016. “Civic Initiatives in Urban Development: Self-Governance Versus Self-Organisation in Planning Practice.” Town Planning Review 87 (3): 339–361. doi:https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatini, F., and R. Salcedo. 2007. “Gated Communities and the Poor in Santiago, Chile: Functional and Symbolic Integration in a Context of Aggressive Capitalist Colonization of Lower-Class Areas.” Housing Policy Debate 18 (3): 577–606. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2007.9521612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 2016. “Activist Planning: A Response to the Woes of Neo-Liberalism?” European Planning Studies 24 (7): 1262–1280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1168784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, M. 1990. Metrópole Corporativa Fragmentada: O Caso de São Paulo. São Paulo: Nobel.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Thome, K., S. Wallin, T. Laatikainen, J. Kangasoja, and M. Kyttä. 2014. Exploring the Use of PPGIS in Self-Organizing Urban Development: Case softGIS in Pacific Beach (Vol. 10).
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., and F. Moulaert. 2010. “Can Neighbourhoods Save the City?: Community Development and Social Innovation.” In Regions and Cities, edited by F. Moulaert, 219–234. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taşan-Kok, T., and M. Oranje. 2017. From Student to Urban Planner: Young Practitioners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• van Dam, R., J. Eshuis, and N. Aarts. 2009. “Transition Starts With People: Self-Organising Communities ADM and Golf Residence Dronten.” In Transitions: Towards Sustainable Agriculture and Food Chains in Peri-Urban Areas, edited by K. Poppe, C. Termeer, and M. Slingerland, 81–92. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vilaça, F. 2011. “São Paulo: Segregação Urbana e Desigualdade.” Estudos Avançados 25 (71): 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V. 2014. “Co-production and Collaboration in Planning – The Difference.” Planning Theory and Practice 15 (1): 62–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2013.866266.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V., and G. Siame. 2018. “Alternative Participatory Planning Practices in the Global South: Learning from Co-Production Processes in Informal Communities.” In Public Space Unbound: Urban Emancipation and the Post-Political Condition, edited by Sabine Knierbein and Tihomir Viderman, 143–157. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, T. 2009. “Prolonging the Global Age of Gentrification: Johannesburg's Regeneration Policies.” Planning Theory 8 (4): 362–381. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209102231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunsch, J. S. 2013. “Analyzing Self-Organized Local Governance Initiatives: Are There Insights for Decentralization Reforms?” Public Administration and Development 33 (3): 221–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar