Replicated or homegrown planning model? The mutual constitution of ideas, interests and institutions in the delivery of a megaproject in Rio de Janeiro

References

• Béland, D. 2009. “Ideas, Institutions, and Policy Change.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (5): 701–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D., and R. H. Cox. 2011. Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, S. 2001. “Ideas, Norms, and Culture in Political Analysis.” Comparative Politics 33 (2): 231–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, S. 2013. “Ideational Theorizing in the Social Sciences Since “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State”.” Governance 26 (2): 217–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, P., J. Bronte, and J. Muir. 2017. “On the Waterfront: Neoliberal Urbanism and the Politics of Public Benefit.” Cities 61: 117–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borén, T., P. Grzyś, and C. Young. 2020. “Intra-urban Connectedness, Policy Mobilities and Creative City-Making: National Conservatism vs. Urban (neo) Liberalism.” European Urban and Regional Studies 27 (3): 246–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brill, F. 2020. “Complexity and Coordination in London’s Silvertown Quays: How Real Estate Developers (re) Centred Themselves in the Planning Process.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 52 (2): 362–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brill, F. N., and E. Robin. 2020. “The Risky Business of Real Estate Developers: Network Building and Risk Mitigation in London and Johannesburg.” Urban Geography 41 (1): 36–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownill, S. 2013. “Just add Water: Waterfront Regeneration as a Global Phenomenon.” In The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration, edited by M. E. Leary, and J. McCarthy, 45–55. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, T., R. Padawangi, and E. C. Thompson. 2018. “The Politics of Learning from a Small City: Solo as Translocal Model and Political Launch pad.” Regional Studies 52 (8): 1065–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, P. H. P. 2014. Estranhas Catedrais: As Empreiteiras Brasileiras e a Ditadura Civil-Militar, 1964-1988. Niterói: Eduff.
   Google Scholar
• Carazzai, E. H., and M. C. Carvalho. 2014. Empreiteiro Relata Lobby para Fazer Obra no Porto do Rio. Folha de São Paulo, December 7. http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/2014/12/1558759-empreiteiro-relata-lobby-para-fazer-obra-no-porto-do-rio.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• CDURP. 2010. Apresentação do Projeto Porto Maravilha para a Ademi. http://www.ademi.org.br/IMG/pdf/doc-873.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CDURP. 2020. Relatório trimestral de atividades. Período julho, agosto e setembro de 2020. https://portomaravilha.com.br/conteudo/relatorios/2020/_RELATORIO_JUL_AGO_SET%202020_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ceperj. 2014. Produto Interno Bruto do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. http://www.ceperj.rj.gov.br/ceep/pib/pib.html.
   Google Scholar
• Colliers International. 2009. The Knowledge Report – Offices, Second Semester. Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, I. R., and K. Ward. 2012. “Relational Comparisons: The Assembling of Cleveland's Waterfront Plan.” Urban Geography 33 (6): 774–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutinho, F. 2015. “Eduardo Cunha Cobrou R$ 52 mi em Propina para Liberar Dinheiro do FI-FGTS, diz PGR”. Época, December 16. http://epoca.globo.com/tempo/noticia/2015/12/exclusivo-eduardo-cunha-cobrou-r-52-mi-em-propina-para-liberar-dinheiro-do-fi-fgts-diz-pgr.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cuenya, B., P. de Novais, and C. B. Vainer. 2012. Grandes Proyectos Urbanos: miradas críticas sobre la experiencia argentina y brasileña. Buenos Aires: Editorial Café de las Ciudades.
   Google Scholar
• del Cerro Santamaría, G. 2013. Urban Megaprojects: A Worldwide View. Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, S. 2010. “Rio de Janeiro e o Porto Maravilha.” In Porto Maravilha + 6 Casos de Sucesso de Revitalização Portuária, edited by V. Andreatta, 208–231. Rio de Janeiro: Casa da Palavra.
   Google Scholar
• Dilworth, R., and T. P. Weaver. 2020. “Ideas, Interests, Institutions, and Urban Political Development.” In How Ideas Shape Urban Political Development, edited by R. Dilworth, and T. P. Weaver, 1–18. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gofas, A., and C. Hay. 2010. The Role of Ideas in Political Analysis: A Portrait of Contemporary Debates. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• González, S. 2011. “Bilbao and Barcelona ‘in Motion’. How Urban Regeneration ‘Models’ Travel and Mutate in the Global Flows of Policy Tourism.” Urban Studies 48 (7): 1397–1418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandin, J., and H. Haarstad. 2021. “Transformation as Relational Mobilisation: The Networked Geography of Addis Ababa’s Sustainable Transport Interventions.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 39 (2): 289–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimwood, R., T. Baker, L. Humpage, and J. Broom. 2021. “Policy, Fast and Slow: Social Impact Bonds and the Differential Temporalities of Mobile Policy.” Global Social Policy. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018121997809.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2011. “Ideas and the Construction of Interests.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, edited by D. Béland, and R. H. Cox, 65–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, J., and M. Howlett eds. 2015. Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice: Discourses, Ideas and Anomalies in Public Policy Dynamics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. 2013. World Energy Outlook 2013. https://www.iea.org/Textbase/npsum/WEO2013SUM.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jajamovich, G. 2019. Puerto Madero en movimiento. Un abordaje a partir de la circulación de la Corporación Antiguo Puerto Madero (1989-2017). Buenos Aires: Teseo.
   Google Scholar
• John, P. 2012. Analysing Public Policy. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klink, J., and L. E. M. Stroher. 2017. “The Making of Urban Financialization? An Exploration of Brazilian Urban Partnership Operations with Building Certificates.” Land Use Policy 69: 519–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, U., and J. Laidley. 2008. “Old Mega-Projects Newly Packaged? Waterfront Redevelopment in Toronto.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (4): 786–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. J. 2011. “Urban Policy Mobilities and Global Circuits of Knowledge: Toward a Research Agenda.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (1): 107–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., and K. Ward. 2011. Mobile Urbanism: Cities and Policymaking in the Global Age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministério Público Federal. 2018. Operação Sépsis. http://www.mpf.mp.br/df/sala-de-imprensa/docs/alegacoes-finais-sepsis.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., A. Rodríguez, and E. Swyngedouw. 2003. The Globalized City: Economic Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Mouton, M., and G. Shatkin. 2020. “Strategizing the for-Profit City: The State, Developers, and Urban Production in Mega Manila.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 52 (2): 403–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, P. 2000. “L'Analyse Cognitive des Politiques Publiques: Vers une Sociologie Politique de l'Action Publique.” Revue Française de Science Politique 50 (2): 189–208.
   Google Scholar
• Nogueira, I. 2020. Caixa diz que Porto Maravilha do Rio era inviável desde o início. Folha de São Paulo, June 4. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/mercado/2020/06/apos-prejuizo-bilionario-ao-fgts-caixa-diz-que-revitalizacao-do-porto-do-rio-e-inviavel.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, S. 2011. “Re-imagining City Waterfronts: A Comparative Analysis of Governing Renewal in Adelaide, Darwin and Melbourne.” Urban Policy and Research 29 (3): 221–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orueta, F. D., and S. S. Fainstein. 2008. “The New Mega-Projects: Genesis and Impacts.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (4): 759–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palier, B., and Y. Surel. 2005. “Les « Trois I » et l'Analyse de l'État en Action.” Revue Française de Science Politique 55 (1): 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and N. Theodore. 2015. Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., N. Theodore, and N. Brenner. 2009. “Neoliberal Urbanism: Models, Moments, Mutations.” SAIS Review of International Affairs 29 (1): 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Ponzini, D. 2020. Transnational Architecture and Urbanism: Rethinking how Cities Plan, Transform, and Learn. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, R. 2017. “Local or Global Policy? Thinking About Policy Mobility with Assemblage and Topology.” Area 49 (3): 335–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. 1995. “The Role of Knowledge in the Policy Process.” Journal of European Public Policy 2 (2): 159–183.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, E. 2015. “Globalising Sustainable Urbanism: The Role of International Masterplanners.” Area 47 (2): 110–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rio Mar e Vila. 2007. Projeto Rio Mar e Vila. Vol. I. Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 2013. “‘Arriving at’ Urban Policies/the Urban: Traces of Elsewhere in Making City Futures.” In Critical Mobilities, edited by O. Söderström, S. Randeria, D. Ruedin, G. D'Amato, and F. Panese, 23–51. Lausanne: EPFL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Royer, L., and V. Oliveira. 2021. “O fundo público na era da dominância da valorização financeira. O caso do FGTS.” In Habitação e o direito à cidade – desafios paras as metrópoles em tempos de crise, edited by A. L. Cardoso, and C. D’Ottaviano, 211–233. Rio de Janeiro: Letra Capital.
   Google Scholar
• Sarue, B. 2016. “Os Capitais Urbanos do Porto Maravilha.” Novos Estudos CEBRAP 35 (2): 78–97.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestre, G., and G. Jajamovich. 2021. “The Role of Mobile Policies in Coalition Building: The Barcelona Model as Coalition Magnet in Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro (1989–1996).” Urban Studies 58 (11): 2310–2328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklair, L. 2017. The Icon Project: Architecture, Cities, and Capitalist Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroher, L. E. M., and N. R. Dias. 2019. “Operações Urbanas Consorciadas 2.0: origem e performatividade de um modelo em constante adaptação”. Proceedings XVIII ENANPUR 2019. anpur.org.br/xviiienanpur/anais.
   Google Scholar
• Surel, Yves. 2018. “La mécanique de l’action publique.” Revue Française de Science Politique 68 (6): 991–1014.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., F. Moulaert, and A. Rodriguez. 2002. “Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large–Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy.” Antipode 34 (3): 542–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarazona Vento, A. 2017. “Mega-project Meltdown: Post-politics, Neoliberal Urban Regeneration and Valencia’s Fiscal Crisis.” Urban Studies 54 (1): 68–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temenos, C., and T. Baker. 2015. “Enriching Urban Policy Mobilities Research.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (4): 841–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temenos, C., T. Baker, and I. R. Cook. 2019. “Inside Mobile Urbanism: Cities and Policy Mobilities.” In Handbook of Urban Geography, edited by T. Schwanen, and R. van Kempen, 103–118. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Varró, K., and D. J. Bunders. 2020. “Bringing Back the National to the Study of Globally Circulating Policy Ideas: ‘Actually Existing Smart Urbanism’ in Hungary and the Netherlands.” European Urban and Regional Studies 27 (3): 209–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, S. V. 2006. “Cities are Fun: Inventing and Spreading the Baltimore Model of Cultural Urbanism.” In Culture, Urbanism and Planning, edited by J. Monclús, and M. Guàrdia, 271–285. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K. 2018. “Urban Redevelopment Policies on the Move: Rethinking the Geographies of Comparison, Exchange and Learning.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 42 (4): 666–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A. 2015. “Multiple Temporalities of Policy Circulation: Gradual, Repetitive and Delayed Processes of BRT Adoption in South African Cities.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (3): 568–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2020. Case Studies on Urban Regeneration. World Bank Open Learning Campus. https://olc.worldbank.org/content/case-studies-urban-regeneration.
   Google Scholar