2,561
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Planning systems and cultures in global comparison. The case of Brazil and Germany

ORCID Icon &

References

  • ARL (Academy for Spatial Research and Planning). 2011. Strategic Regional Planning (Position Paper No. 84). Hannover: ARL.
  • Binder, G., and J. M. Boldero. 2012. “Planning for Change: The Roles of Habitual Practice and Habitus in Planning Practice.” Urban Policy and Research 30 (2): 175–188. doi:10.1080/08111146.2012.672059.
  • Blotevogel, H. H. 2018. Geschichte der Raumordnung, In Handwörterbuch der Stadt- und Raumentwicklung, edited by ARL, 793–803. Hannover: ARL.
  • Blotevogel, H. H., R. Danielzyk, and A. Münter. 2014. “Spatial Planning in Germany. Institutional Inertia and New Challenges.” In Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes, edited by M. Reimer, P. Getimis, and H. Blotevogel, 83–107. London: Routledge.
  • Bourdieu, P. 2001. Science de la science et reflexivité. Paris: Raisons d´Agir.
  • Bourdieu, P. 2004. Os usos sociais da ciência: por uma sociologia clínica do campo científico. São Paulo: Ed. UNESP.
  • Cabral de Souza, C., J. Klink, and R. Denaldi. 2020. “Planificación reformista-progresista, instrumentos urbanísticos y la (re)producción del espacio en tiempos de neoliberalización. Una exploración a partir del caso de São Bernardo do Campo (São Paulo).” Revista De Estudios Urbano Regionales 46 (137): 199–219.
  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 1997. The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.
  • Collier, D. 1993. “The Comparative Method.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, edited by Ada W. Finifter, 105–119. Washington, DC: APSA.
  • Fernandes, A. 2013. “Tendências e desafios no fomento à pesquisa na área de Planejamento Urbano e Regional: uma análise a partir do CNPq (2000–2012).” Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais 15 (1): 59–76. doi:10.22296/2317-1529.2013v15n1p59.
  • Fligstein, N., and D. McAdam. 2011. “Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields.” Sociological Theory 29 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x.
  • Fürst, D. 2009. “Planning Cultures en Route to a Better Comprehension of ‘Planning Processes’?” In Planning Cultures in Europe. Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, edited by J. Knieling and F. Othengrafen, 23–38. Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Fürst, D. 2010. Raumplanung: Herausforderungen des deutschen Institutionensystems. Detmold: Rohn.
  • Fürst, D., P. Nijkamp, and K. Zimmermann. 1986. Umwelt-Raum-Politik: Ansätze zu einer Integration von Umweltschutz, Raumplanung und regionaler Entwicklungspolitik. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
  • Galland, D., and P. Elinbaum. 2018a. “A “Field” Under Construction: The State of Planning in Latin America and the Southern Turn in Planning.” DISP – The Planning Review 54 (1): 18–24. doi:10.1080/02513625.2018.1454665.
  • Galland, D., and P. Elinbaum. 2018b. “Positioning Latin America Within the Southern Turn in Planning: Perspectives on an “Emerging Field”.” DisP – The Planning Review 54 (1): 48–54. doi:10.1080/02513625.2018.1454696.
  • Hein, C. 2014. “The Exchange of Planning Ideas from Europe to the USA after the Second World War: Introductory Thoughts and a Call for Further Research.” Planning Perspectives 29 (2): 143–151. doi:10.1080/02665433.2014.886522.
  • Janning, F. 1998. Das politische Organisationsfeld. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
  • Keil, R. 2017. Suburban Planet: Making the World Urban from the Outside In. New Jersey: Wiley.
  • Klink, J. J., S. Momm, S. Zioni, A. Favareto, and M. Mencio. 2016. “O Campo e a Práxis Transformadora Do Planejamento: Reflexões Para Uma Agenda Brasileira.” Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais 18 (3): 381. doi:10.22296/2317-1529.2016v18n3p381.
  • Kunzmann, K. R. 2015. Germany. DisP - The Planning Review 51 (1): 38–39. doi:10.1080/02513625.2015.1038055.
  • McFarlane, C., and J. Robinson. 2012. “Introduction—Experiments in Comparative Urbanism.” Urban Geography 33 (6): 765–773.
  • McMichael, P. 1990. “Incorporating Comparison Within a World-Historical Perspective: An Alternative Comparative Method.” American Sociological Review 55 (3): 385–397.
  • Momm-Schult, S. I., J. Piper, R. Denaldi, S. R. Freitas, M. L. P. Fonseca, and V. E. Oliveira. 2013. “Integration of Urban and Environmental Policies in the Metropolitan Area of São Paulo and in Greater London: The Value of Establishing and Protecting Green Open Spaces.” International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development 5: 89–104.
  • Moura, R., D. Follador, and O. L. C. de Freitas-Firkowski. 2018. “Brazil.” DisP – The Planning Review 54 (1): 28–30. doi:10.1080/02513625.2018.1454671.
  • MUNIC. 2019. Perfil dos municípios brasileiros: 2018, Coordenação de População e Indicadores Sociais. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
  • Nadin, V., Fernández Maldonado, A. M., Zonneveld, W., Stead, D., Dąbrowski, M., Piskorek, K., Sarkar, A., Schmitt, P., Smas, L., Cotella, G., Janin Rivolin, U., Solly, A., Berisha, E., Pede, E., Seardo, B. M., Komornicki, T., Goch, K., Bednarek-Szczepańska, M., Degórska, B., … Münter, A. 2018. COMPASS - Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe. Applied Research 2016- 2018: Final Report. ESPON and TU Delft. Luxembourg.
  • Nadin, V., and D. Stead. 2013. “Opening up the Compendium: An Evaluation of International Comparative Planning Research Methodologies.” European Planning Studies 21 (10): 1542–1561. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722958.
  • Othengrafen, F., and D. Galland. 2020. “International Comparative Planning.” In The Routledge Handbook of International Planning Education, edited by Leigh G. Nancey, Steven P. French, S. Guhathakurta, and B. Stiftel, 217–226. London: Routledge.
  • Othengrafen, F., and M. Reimer. 2013. “The Embeddedness of Planning in Cultural Contexts: Theoretical Foundations for the Analysis of Dynamic Planning Cultures.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 45 (6): 1269–1284.
  • Pelling, M., and K. Dill. 2010. “Disaster Politics: Tipping Points for Change in the Adaptation of Sociopolitical Regimes.” Progress in Human Geography 34 (1): 21–37.
  • Peric, A., and C. Hoch. 2017. “Spatial Planning Across European Planning Systems and Social Models: A Look Through the Lens of Planning Cultures of Switzerland, Greece and Serbia.” In E-Proceedings of the AESOP 2017 Conference “Spaces of Dialog for Places of Dignity: Fostering the European Dimension of Planning”, edited by José Antunes Ferreira, et al., 1247–1258. Lisbon: University of Lisbon.
  • Pierre, J. 2005. “Comparative Urban Governance: Uncovering Complex Causalities.” Urban Affairs Review 40 (4): 446–462.
  • Pieterse, J. N. 2010. Development Theory. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Randolph, R. 2007. “Do planejamento colaborativo ao planejamento “subversivo”: reflexões sobre limitações e potencialidades de Planos Diretores no Brasil.” Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales XI (17): 245. http://www.ub.es/geocrit/sn/sn-24517.htm.
  • Reimer, M., P. Getimis, and H. Blotevogel. 2014. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. London: Routledge.
  • Rivolin, U. J. 2008. “Conforming and Performing Planning Systems in Europe: An Unbearable Cohabitation, Planning.” Practice & Research 23 (2): 167–186. doi:10.1080/02697450802327081.
  • Robinson, J. 2011. “Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (1): 1–23.
  • Robinson, J. 2016. “Comparative Urbanism: New Geographies and Cultures of Theorizing the Urban.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40 (1): 187–199.
  • Roodbol-Mekkes, P. H., and A. van den Brink. 2015. “Rescaling Spatial Planning: Spatial Planning Reforms in Denmark, England, and the Netherlands.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33 (1): 184–198. doi:10.1068/c12134.
  • Rubin, M., A. Todes, P. Harrison, and A. Appelbaum, eds. 2020. Densifying the City? Global Cases and Johannesburg. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Sanyal, B. 2016. “Revisiting Comparative Planning Cultures: Is Culture a Reactionary Rhetoric?” Planning Theory & Practice 17 (4): 658–662. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1230363.
  • Schmidt, S., W. Li, J. Carruthers, and S. Siedentop. 2021. “Planning Institutions and Urban Spatial Patterns: Evidence from a Cross-National Analysis.” Journal of Planning Education and Research. doi:10.1177/0739456X211044203.
  • Scott, R. W. 1994. “Conceptualizing Organizational Fields.” In Systemrationalität und Partialinteresse, edited by H. U. Derlien, U. Gerhardt, and F. W. Scharpf, 203–221. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
  • Siedentop, S., S. Fina, and A. Krehl. 2016. “Greenbelts in Germany’s Regional Plans—An Effective Growth Management Policy?” Landscape and Urban Planning 145: 71–82.
  • Smas, L., and P. Schmitt. 2020. “Positioning Regional Planning Across Europe.” Regional Studies. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1782879.
  • Tilly, C. 1984. Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
  • Watson, V. 2016. “Shifting Approaches to Planning Theory: Global North and South.” Urban Planning 1 (4): 32–41. doi:10.17645/up.v1i4.727.
  • Xu, J., and A. G. O. Yeh. 2010. Governance and Planning of Mega-City Regions: An International Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
  • Zimmermann, K., R. Chang, and A. Putlitz. 2017. “Planning Culture: Research Heuristics and Explanatory Value.” In Planning Knowledge and Research, edited by Thomas W. Sanchez, 35–50. London: Routledge.
  • Zioni, S., L. Travassos, S. Momm, and A. Leonel. 2019. “A Macrometrópole Paulista e os desafios para o planejamento e gestão territorial.” In Adaptação às Mudanças Climáticas na Macrometrópole Paulista – diálogos entre a ciência e a política, edited by P. Jacobi, et al., 90–100. São Paulo: Annablume.