Local planning cultures? What Glasgow, Melbourne and Toronto planners say

References

• Abram, S. 2016a. “. “Culture? And Planning?”.” Planning Theory and Practice 17 (4): 654–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abram, S. 2016b. Culture and Planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. 2001. “The Head and the Heart. National Identity and Urban Planning in a Devolved Scotland.” Interntional Planning Studies 6 (1): 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Local Government Association. 1993. ILAP in Australia – Making the Connections: Towards Integrated Local Area Planning. Canberra: ALGA. www.lga.sa.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/ILAP_Guide___ALGA_1993_pdf1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bains, M. 1979. Board of Review of the Role, Structure and Administration of Local Government in Victoria. Victoria: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., and R. Rhodes. 2012. “Interpretivism and the Analysis of Traditions and Practices.” Critical Policy Studies 6 (2): 2011–2018.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. 2011. “Culture, Planning and Path Dependence: Some Reflections on the Problems of Comparisons.” Town Planning Review 82 (1): 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, M., G. Rice, and C. McWilliamson. 2008. “The Spatialities of Actually Existing Neoliberalism in Glasgow 1977 to Present.” Geografiska Annaler B 90 (4): 313–325.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, A. 1968. Victorian Cities. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, M., T. Budge, and R. Goodman. 2005. “Planning and Deregulation: The Failure of the New Victorian Planning System.” Australian Planner 42 (2): 52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, B. 2016. “Clock-watching and Box-Ticking’: British Local Authority Planners, Professionalism and Performance Targets.” Planning Practice and Research 31 (4): 383–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J., and I. Blanco. 2017. “Austerity Urbanism: Patterns of Neo-Liberalisation and Resistance in Six Cities of Spain and the UK.” Environment and Planning A 49 (7): 1517–1536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Filion, P. 2020. “Creative or Instrumental Planners? Agency and Structure in Their Institutional and Political Economy Context.” Planning Theory, 255–274. doi:10.1177/1473095220980499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filion, P., M. Lee, N. Leanage, and K. Hakull. 2015. “Planners’ Perspectives on Obstacles to Sustainable Development: Implications for Transformative Planning Strategies.” Planning, Practice and Research 30 (2): 202–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. 1987. Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frisken, F. 2007. The Public Metropolis: The Political Dynamics of Urban Expansion in the Toronto Region. Toronto: Neptis Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, J. 2016. “The Managerial Turn and Municipal Land Use Planning in Switzerland – Evidence from Practice.” Planning Theory and Practice 17 (2): 192–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodstadt, V. 2007. “Strategic Planning in the Glasgow Metropolitan Region.” In Strategic Planning for Regional Development: A Review of Principles and Practices, edited by H. Dimitriou, and R. Thompson, 316–337. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J. 2009a. “Experiential Planning: A Practitioner’s Account of Vancouver’s Success.” Journal of the American Planning Association 75 (3): 358–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J. 2009b. “Theory and Practice in the Suburbs: Challenges to Implementing New Urbanism, Smart Growth and Sustainability Principles.” Planning Theory and Practice 10 (1): 11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 1966. The World Cities. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1989. “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Formation of Urban Governance in Late Capitalism.” Geografiska Annaler B 71 (1): 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, H. 2016. “Towards an Ethnographic Sensibility in Urban Research.” Australian Planner 53 (1): 28–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inch, A. 2013. Changing the Culture of Scottish Planning, Report for the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Inch, A., J. Slade, and L. Crookes. 2020. “Exploring Planning as a Technology of Hope.” Journal of Planning Education and Research.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, M. 1991. Comparative Urban Politics: Power and the City in the United States, Canada, Britain and France. Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, R. 2002. “‘Common-Sense’ Neoliberalism: Progressive Conservative Urbanism in Toronto, Canada.” Antipode 34 (3): 578–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneiling, J., and F. Othengrafen. 2015. “Planning Culture – A Concept to Explain the Evolution of Planning Policies and Processes in Europe?” European Planning Studies 23 (11): 2133–2147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefevre, C. 1998. “Metropolitan Government and Governance n Western Countries: A Critical Review.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22 (1): 9–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemon, J. 1996. Liberal Dreaming and Nature’s Limits: Great Cities of North America Since 1600. Toronto: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• March, A. 2012. The Democratic Plan: Analysis and Diagnosis. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, S., J. Grant, and M. Habib. 2020. “Evaluating Strategies for Plan Co-Ordination: A Survey of Canadian Planners.” International Planning Studies 25 (2): 222–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClymont, K. 2014. “Stuck in the Process, Facilitating Nothing? Justice, Capabilities and Planning for Value-led Outcomes.” Planning Practice and Research 29 (4): 187–201.
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, J. B. 1992. Shaping Melbourne’s Future? Town Planning, the State and Civil Society. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neptis Foundation. 2016. Province Must Embrace Its Role as Regional Planner for the Growth Plan to Succeed. Toronto: Neptis Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Office of National Statistics. 2019. Population Estimates. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Purckarthofer, E., A. Hamer, and H. Mattila. 2021. “Subnational and Dynamic Conceptualisations of Planning Culture: The Culture of Regional Planning and Regional Planning Cultures in Finland.” Planning Theory and Practice 22 (2): 244–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reade, E. 1987. British Town and Country Planning. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, M., and H. Blotevogel. 2012. “Comparing Spatial Planning Practice in Europe: A Plea for Cultural Sensitization.” Planning Practice and Research 27 (1): 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, M., P. Getimis, and H. Blotevogel. 2014. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe. A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Change. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, A. 1984. People and the State; An Anthropology of Planned Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 1975. Cities for Sale: Property, Politics and Urban Planning in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 2003. “Out of the Closet: The Importance of Stories and Storytelling in Planning Practice.” Planning Theory and Practice 4 (1): 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal, B. 2005. Comparative Planning Cultures. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sartorio, F., H. Thomas, and N. Harris. 2018. “Interpreting Planners’ Talk About Change: An Exploratory Study.” Planning Theory 17 (4): 605–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. 2018. “Institutions and Urban Space: Land, Infrastructure and Governance in the Production of Urban Property.” Planning Theory and Practice 19 (1): 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D. 2012. “Best Practices and Policy Transfer in Spatial Planning.” Planning Practice and Research 27 (1): 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., J. de Vries, and T. Tasan-Kok. 2015. “Planning Cultures and Histories: Influences on the Evolution of Planning Systems and Spatial Development Patterns.” European Planning Studies 23 (11): 2127–2132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D., J. de Vries, and T. Tasan-Kok. 2017. Planning Cultures and Histories: The Evolution of Planning Systems and Spatial Development Patterns. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., and M. Oranje. 2018. From Student to Urban Planner: Young Practitioners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Z. 2013. “Rethinking Planning Culture: A New Institutional Approach.” Town Planning Review 84 (6): 683–702.
   Google Scholar
• Valler, D., and N. Phelps. 2018. “Framing the Future: On Local Planning Cultures and Legacies.” Planning Theory and Practice 19 (5): 698–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D., and Five Others. 1978. Seeds for Change: Creatively Confronting the Energy Crisis. North Melbourne: Patchwork Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. 2016. Planning Toronto: The Plan, the Planners and Their Legacies 1940-1980. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1961. Culture and Society 1780-1950. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. 1999. “Metropolitan Governance and Strategic Planning: A Review of Experience in Manchester, Melbourne and Toronto.” Progress in Planning 52: 1–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, I., and T. Brooke. 1993. “Urban Planning and the Entrepreneurial State: The View from Victoria, Australia.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 11 (3): 263–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yergin, D., and J. Stanislaw. 1998. The Commanding Heights: The Battle Between Government and the Marketplace That is Remaking the Modern World. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar