Politics and planning: land take between the EU soil strategy and local policymaking in Lombardy

References

• Allmendinger, Ph, and G. Haughton. 2010. “Spatial Planning, Devolution, and New Planning Spaces.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28 (5): 803–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banfield, E. C. 1959. “Ends and Means in Planning.” International Social Science Journal 11 (3): 361–368.
   Google Scholar
• Blowers, A. 1980. The Limits of Power. The Politics of Local Planning Policy. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonora, P. 2015. Fermiamo il consumo di suolo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, I., and H. Keman. 1993. Parties and Democracy: Coalition Formation and Government Functioning in Twenty States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campos Venuti, G. 2012. Amministrare l’urbanistica oggi. Rome: INU Edizioni.
   Google Scholar
• Cash, C. 2016. “Good Governance and Strong Political Will: Are They Enough for Transformation?” Land Use Policy 50: 301–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2010. “Press Release”. 3002nd Council meeting, Brussels, 15 March 2010, 7522/10.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R., D. M. Farrell, and I. McAllister. 2013. Political Parties & Democratic Linkage. How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dear, M. J. 2001. The Postmodern Urban Condition. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Debry, J.-L. 2012. Le cauchemar pavillonnaire. Montreuil: L’Échappée.
   Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., and M. Schneider. 2016. “Can the 2050 Zero Land Take Objective of the EU Be Reliably Monitored? A Comparative Study.” Journal of Land Use Science 11 (3): 331–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djellouli, Y., C. Emelianoff, A. Bennasr, J. Chevalier, et al. 2010. “Introduction.” In L’Étalement Urbain – Un processus incontrôlable?, edited by Y. Djellouli, 9–18. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. W. 1963. “The Measure of Association in a 2×2 Table.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society [Series A] 126: 108–114.
   Google Scholar
• EEA – European Environment Agency. 2019. Land and Soil in Europe. Why We Need to Use These Vital and Finite Resources Sustainably. Copenhagen: EEA.
   Google Scholar
• Elkin, S. L. 1974. Politics and Land Use Planning. The London Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. “Communication from the Commission”. Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe. COM(2011) 571 final, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016. “Future Brief: No Net Land Take by 2050?” Science for Environment Policy 14.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021a. “Communication from the Commission”. EU Soil Strategy for 2030. Reaping the benefits of healthy soils for people, food, nature and climate. COM(2021) 699 final. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021b. “Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the Communication from the Commission”. EU Soil Strategy for 2030. SWD(2021) 323 final. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2018. “People in the EU - Statistics on Housing Conditions”. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. W. 2003. “Shouting Very Loudly: Economics, Planning and Politics.” Town Planning Review 74 (2): 195–212.
   Google Scholar
• González, A., G. Daly, and J. Gleeson. 2016. “Congested Spaces, Contested Scales – A Review of Spatial Planning for Wind Energy in Ireland.” Landscape and Urban Planning 145: 12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granata, E. 2015. “Ridurre il consumo di suolo, idea civile che riguarda tutti.” Vita & Pensiero 98 (4): 71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, A., and A. Siiba. 2020. “Spatial Planning Through the Political Landscape of Ghana: Examining the Nexus Between Election Manifestos and Planning.” Territory, Politics, Governance 8 (3): 407–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inch, A., and E. Shepherd. 2020. “Thinking Conjuncturally About Ideology, Housing and English Planning.” Planning Theory 19 (1): 59–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISPRA. 2016. “Consumo di suolo, dinamiche territoriali e servizi ecosistemici”. N.248/2016. ISPRA, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan, M. J. 1983. “Ideology, Politics, and Planning: Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Urban Planning.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 10 (1): 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, H. D., R. Hofferbert, and I. Budge, eds. 1994. Parties, Policies, and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krumholz, N. 2001. “Planners and Politicians: A Commentary Based on Experience from the United States.” Planning Theory & Practice 2 (1): 96–100.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, S., and G. Lombardini. 2016. “Regional Drivers of Land Take: A Comparative Analysis in Two Italian Regions.” Land Use Policy 56: 262–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansergh, L., and R. Thomson. 2007. “Election Pledges, Party Competition, and Policymaking.” Comparative Politics 39 (3): 311–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerson, M., and E. C. Banfield. 1955. Politics, Planning, and the Public Interest. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munafò, M. (ed.). 2021. Consumo di suolo, dinamiche territoriali e servizi ecosistemici. Report SNPA 22/21, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J., and S. Abram. 2017. Rationalities of Planning: Development Versus Environment in Planning for Housing. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Plieninger, T., et al. 2016. “The Driving Forces of Landscape Change in Europe: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.” Land Use Policy 57: 204–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, E. 2020. “Liberty, Property and the State: The Ideology of the Institution of English Town and Country Planning.” Progress in Planning 135: 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, E., A. Inch, and T. Marshall. 2020. “Narratives of Power: Bringing Ideology to the Fore of Planning Analysis.” Planning Theory 19 (1): 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P., et al. 2016. “Global Change Pressures on Soils from Land Use and Management.” Global Change Biology 22 (3): 1008–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2009. “The Antinomies of the Postpolitical City: In Search of a Democratic Politics of Environmental Production.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33 (3): 601–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, N. 1980. “Planning Theory and the Philosophy of Planning.” Urban Studies 17: 159–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M. 2002. The Planning Polity. Planning, Government and the Policy Process. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Éupolis Lombardia. 2015. “Missione valutativa ‘Il consumo di suolo nella pianificazione comunale’”. Rapporto finale esteso. Éupolis Lombardia, Milan.
   Google Scholar
• van Vliet, J., H. L. F. de Groot, P. Rietveld, and P. H. Verburg. 2015. “Manifestations and Underlying Drivers of Agricultural Land Use Change in Europe.” Landscape and Urban Planning 133: 24–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O. 1989. “Towards a new Typology of Urban Planning Theories.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 16: 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanotto, J. 2020. “The Role of Discourses in Enacting Neoliberal Urbanism: Understanding the Relationship Between Ideology and Discourse in Planning.” Planning Theory 19 (1): 104–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1999. The Ticklish Subject — The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar