Differentiation within reciprocity: the European Union approach to preferential trade agreements

References

• Agawal, V. and Fogarty, A.E., 2004. EU trade strategies between regionalism and globalism. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Baccini, L. and Dür, A., 2011. The new regionalism and policy interdependence. British Journal of Political Science, 42 (1), 57–79. doi: 10.1017/S0007123411000238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M.X., Otsuki, T. and Wilson, J.S., 2006. Do standards matter for export success? World Bank Working Paper No. 3809. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• De Ville, F. and Orbie, J., 2014. The European Commission's neoliberal trade discourse since the crisis: legitimising continuity through subtle change. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16 (1), 149–167.
   Google Scholar
• Di Caprio, A. and Trommer, S., 2010. Bilateral graduation: the impact of EPAs on LDC trade space. Journal of Development Studies, 46 (9), 1607–1627. doi: 10.1080/00220381003706502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A., 2007. EU trade policy as protection for exporters: the agreements with Mexico and Chile. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45 (4), 833–855. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00750.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2006. Global Europe: competing in the world. COM (2006), 567, 10 May. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2010. Trade growth and world affairs. COM (2010) 612, 9 November. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2012a. Trade, growth and development. COM (2012) 22, 27 January. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2012b. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on access to third-country goods and services to the Union's internal market in public procurement. COM (2012) 124. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2012. European Union: Free Trade Agreement with Colombia and Peru. Directorate General for External Policies, INTA PE 433.865.
   Google Scholar
• Evenett, S. and Meier, M., 2008. An interim assessment of the us trade policy of ‘competitive liberalization’. The World Economy, 31 (1), 31–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01081.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavas, M. and Koeb, E., 2010. Setting up the European External Action Services: building a comprehensive approach. ODI Background Note, April. London: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gavas, M. and Maxwell, S., 2009. Options for architectural reform in European development cooperation. ODI Background Note, August London: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Heron, T. and Siles-Brügge, G., 2012. Comparative liberalisation and the ‘Global Europe’ services and investment agenda: locating the commercial drivers of the eu-acp economic partnership agreements. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50 (2), 250–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02220.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydon, K. and Woolcock, S., 2013. Comparing trade policies: EU, EFTA, US and Japanese FTAs. European Parliament, Directorate-General for External Policies.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, S. and Nicolaidis, K., 2006. The European Union as a conflicted trade power. Journal of European Public Policy, 13 (6), 905–926. doi: 10.1080/13501760600838623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ODI (2008) Analysis of contents of the CARIFORUM and Pacific ACP Economic Partnership Agreements and challenges ahead. Overseas Development Institute for the Commonwealth Secretariat. Available from: www.thecommonwealth.org/files/185769/FileName/CFTC-EAD-BCWG-208FinalReport.pdf [accessed 10 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, S., 2007. The EU approach to Free Trade Agreements. ECIPE Working Paper 3. Brussels: ECIPE.
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, S., 2012. European Union economic diplomacy: the role of the EU in external economic relations. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organisation (WTO) 2013. The future of trade: the challenges of convergence. Report of the Panel on Defining the Future of Trade convened by WTO Director General Pascal Lamy. Available from: www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/future_of_trade_e.htm [accessed 10 November 2013].
   Google Scholar