Sanctions under the EU Generalised System of Preferences and foreign policy: coherence by accident?

References

• Alston, P., 2005. Labour rights as human rights: the not so happy state of the art. In: P. Alston, ed. Labour rights as human rights. Oxford: OUP, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, L., 2007. The WTO legality of the EU's GSP + arrangement. Journal of International Economic Law, 10 (4), 865–886. doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgm035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandtner, B. and Rosas, A., 1998. Human rights and the external relations of the European community: An analysis of the doctrine and practice. European Journal of International Law, 9 (3): 468–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bossuyt, F., Drieghe, L. and Orbie, J., 2013. Living apart together: EU comprehensive security from a trade perspective. European Foreign Affairs Review, 18 (5), 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriche, M., 2008. La cohérence de la politique européenne de coopération au développement. In: M. Dony and L.S. Rossi, eds. Démocratie, cohérence et transparence. Vers une constitutionnalisation de l'Union européenne? Bruxelles: Université de Bruxelles, 249–263.
   Google Scholar
• Bünte, M. and Portela, C., 2012. Myanmar: the beginning of reforms and the end of sanctions. GIGA Focus International, 3, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, M., 2008. Mission impossible: the European Union and policy coherence for development. Journal of European Integration, 30 (3), 323–342. doi: 10.1080/07036330802144992
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, A. and Martignoni, J.B., 2006. Are we there yet? In search of a coherent European Union strategy on labour rights and external trade. In: V.A. Leary and D. Warner, eds. Social issues, globalisation and international institutions: labour rights and the EU, ILO, OECD and WTO. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 233–310.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union, 2004. Basic principles for the use of restrictive measures, Council Doc. 10198/1/04 REV 1 Brussels, 7 June 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cremona, M., 2011. Coherence in foreign policy – the legal dimension. In: P. Koutrakos, ed. European foreign policy: legal and political perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 15–54.
   Google Scholar
• EUobserver, 2006. EU “horse trading” links Belarus and Chinese shoes. 29 September.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2006. Proposal for a council regulation temporarily withdrawing access to the generalised tariff preferences from the Republic of Belarus. COM (2006)0438 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2012a. Trade, growth and development: tailoring trade and investment policy for those countries most in need. SEC (2012)87.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2012b. European Commission proposes to reinstate trade preferences to Myanmar/Burma. Available from: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=831 [accessed 26 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2013. Restrictive measures (sanctions) in force. Available from: http://eeas.europa.eu/cfsp/sanctions/docs/measures_en.pdf [accessed 26 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• European Council, 1999. Presidency conclusions. Helsinki, 10–11 December.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 1997. On the Communication from the Commission on a long term policy for China--Europe relations (COM(95)0279 – C4-0288/95), Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defence Policy, Rapporteur: Mr Edward McMillan-Scott, A4-0198/97.
   Google Scholar
• Fierro, E., 2003. The EU‘s approach to human rights conditionality in practice. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Greven, T., 2005. Social standards in bilateral and regional trade and investment agreements. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Occasional Papers, 16, 1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hampson, F., Sevón, L. and Wieruszewski, R., 2009. The implementation of certain human rights conventions in Sri Lanka. Report for the European Commission, 30 September.
   Google Scholar
• Howse, R. and Genser, J., 2008. Are EU trade sanctions on Burma compatible with WTO law? Michigan Journal of International Law, 29 (165), 165–196.
   Google Scholar
• Krenzler, H.G. and Schneider, H.C., 1997. The question of consistency. In: E. Regelsberger, P. de Schoutheete and W. Wessel, eds. Foreign policy of the European Union: From EPC to CFSP and beyond. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 133–151.
   Google Scholar
• Kryvoi, Y., 2008. Why European Union trade sanctions do not work. Minnesota Journal of International Law, 12 (2), 209–246.
   Google Scholar
• Lerch, M., 2004. Menschenrechte und Europäische Aussenpolitik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelson, P., 2006. Trade policy and decent work intervention. Speech at EU Decent Work Conference, Brussels, 5 December.
   Google Scholar
• Orbie, J. and Tortell, L., 2009. The new GSP + Beneficiaries: ticking the box or truly consistent with ILO findings? European Foreign Affairs Review, 14 (5), 663–681.
   Google Scholar
• Patten, C., 1999. Declaration on Chechnya. Speech at the European Parliament, Strasbourg, 17 November.
   Google Scholar
• Portela, C., 2003. The EU's role in the non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. PRIF Report, 65, 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Portela, C., 2010. European Union sanctions and foreign policy. Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Portela, C. and Raube, K., 2012. The EU polity and foreign policy coherence. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 8 (1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Reuters, 2012. EU says won't be pushed into lifting Myanmar sanctions. Reuters, 30 March.
   Google Scholar
• Siles-Brügge, G. 2014. EU trade and development policy beyond the ACP: subordinating developmental to commercial imperatives in the reform of GSP. Contemporary Politics, 20 (1), 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.E., 2004. Europe's foreign and security policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Elsuwege, P. and Orbie, J., forthcoming. The EU's humanitarian aid policy after Lisbon: implications of a new treaty basis. In: I. Govaere and S. Poli, eds. EU governance of global emergencies. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar