Perilous presidentialism in Southeast Asia?

References

• Aspinall, E., Mietzner, M., & Tomsa, D. (2015). The Yudhoyono preisdency. Indonesia’s decade of stability and stagnation. Singapore: ISEAS.
   Google Scholar
• Bagehot, W. ([1867] 2009). The English constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bünte, M., & Dressel, B. (2017). Politics and constitutions in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Case, W. (2011). Executive accountability in Southeast Asia: The role of legislatures in New democracies and under electoral authoritarianism ( Policy Studies, No. 57). Honolulu: East-West Center.
   Google Scholar
• Chaisty, P., Cheesman, N., & Power, T. (2014). Rethinking the ‘presidentialism debate’: Conceptualizing coalitional politics in cross-regional perspective. Democratization, 21(1), 72–94. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2012.710604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheibub, J. A. (2014). The constitutional foundations of democratic consolidation. APSA Comparative Democratization, 12(2), 1 and 7.
   Google Scholar
• Dressel, B., & Bünte, M. (2014). Constitutional Politics in Southeast Asia: From contestation to constitutionalism. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 36(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1355/cs36-1a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgie, R. (2005). From Linz to Tsebelis: Three waves of presidential/parliamentary studies?’ Democratization, 12, 106–122. doi: 10.1080/1351034042000317989
   Google Scholar
• Elgie, R. (2011). Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-types and democratic performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, F. (2015). The political development of modern Thailand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F., Dressel, B., & Chang, B.-S. (2005). Challenge and change in East Asia: Facing the perils of presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 16(2), 102–116. doi: 10.1353/jod.2005.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewison, K. (2017). Reluctant populists: Learning populism in Thailand. International Political Science Review, 38, 426–440. doi: 10.1177/0192512117692801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicken, A. (forthcoming). Party and party system institutionalization in the Philippines. In E. V. C. Batalla, & M. R. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of the contemporary Philippines. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. (1990). Comparing democratic systems. Journal of Democracy, 1(4), 73–79. doi: 10.1353/jod.1990.0056
   Google Scholar
• Kasuya, Y. (Ed.). (2013). Presidents, assemblies and policy-making in Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Laski, H. J. (1944). The parliamentary and presidential systems. Public Administration Review, 4(4), 347–359. doi: 10.2307/972898
   Google Scholar
• Linz, J. J. (1990a). The perils of presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 1, 51–69. doi: 10.1353/jod.1990.0059
   Google Scholar
• Linz, J. J. (1990b). The virtues of parliamentarism. Journal of Democracy, 1, 84–91. doi: 10.1353/jod.1990.0059
   Google Scholar
• Linz, J. (1994). Presidential or parliamentary democracy: Does it make a difference? In J. Linz & A. Valenzuela (Eds.), The failure of presidential democracy (pp. 3–90). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S. (1993). Presidentialism, multipartism and democracy: The difficult combination’. Comparative Political Studies, 26(2), 198–228. doi: 10.1177/0010414093026002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S., & Shugart, M. S. (1997). Juan Linz, presidentialism, and democracy: A critical appraisal. Comparative Politics, 29, 449–471. doi: 10.2307/422014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manasca, R. C., & Tan, A. (2005). Manufacturing parties: Re-examining the transient nature of Philippine political parties’. Party Politics, 11(6), 748–765. doi: 10.1177/1354068805057608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mietzner, M. (2016). Coercing loyalty: Coalitional presidentialism and party politics in Jokowi’s Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 38(2), 209–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G. (1994). Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy, 5(1), 55–69. doi: 10.1353/jod.1994.0010
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G. (1998). Horizontal accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy, 9(3), 112–126. doi: 10.1353/jod.1998.0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, D. K. (1943). The parliamentary and presidential systems. Public Administration Review, 3(4), 317–334. doi: 10.2307/972312
   Google Scholar
• Quimpo, N. G. (2008). The Philippines: Political parties and corruption. In D. Singh, & L. C. Salazar (Eds.), Southeast Asian affairs (pp. 277–294). Singapore: ISEAS.
   Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman, S., & Desierto, D. A. (2011). Hyper-presidentialism: Separation of powers without checks and balances in Argentina and Philippines. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 29, 246–333.
   Google Scholar
• Rüland, J., Jürgenmeyer, C., Nelson, M. L., & Ziegenhain, P. (2005). Parliaments and political change in Asia: A comparative study of Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea and Thailand. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, D. J., & Shugart, M. S. (2010). Presidents, parties and prime ministers: How separation of powers affects party organization and behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. (Ed.). (2006). Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Sedelius, T., & Linde, J. (2018). Unravelling semi-presidentialism: Democracy and government performance in four distinct regime-types. Democratization, 25(1), 136–157. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2017.1334643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, M. S., & Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and assemblies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D. (2004). Indonesia’s accountability trap: Party cartels and presidential power after democratic transition. Indonesia, 78, 61–92.
   Google Scholar
• Stepan, A., & Skach, C. (1993). Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus presidentialism. World Politics, 46, 1–22. doi: 10.2307/2950664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiebault, J. L. (2017). Chapter 2: Presidential leadership in Latin America. In M. Alcantara, J. Blondel, & J. L. Theibault (Eds.), Presidents and democracy in Latin America. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2016). Populism and the moral economy of electoralism in the Philippines and Thailand. Journal of Developing Societies, 32, 246–269. doi: 10.1177/0169796X16652028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2017, August 7). Duterte’s illiberal democracy. East Asia Forum. Retrieved from http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/08/07/80706/
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. (1884). Committee or cabinet government? Overlands Monthly, 2, 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. (1997). The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76, 22–42. doi: 10.2307/20048274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar